Follow us on social

google cta
Constitution

Today I am thankful for the surviving Constitution

George Washington was right about the US role in the world — and he also had a thing or two to say about our founding principles.

Analysis | North America
google cta
google cta

When you survey the antics playing out daily on our national political scene, it's tough to find much to be thankful for on this Thanksgiving Day. That said, I find myself this year particularly grateful that the constitutional order established in 1787 still survives — severely tested, yes, but as yet intact. 

With others, I have in recent years developed a lively appreciation for the wrongs woven into the U.S. Constitution as originally drafted and ratified. Even as amended, defects remain. (Down with the Electoral College, I say!) That said, the document’s value as the basis of American order and the principal guarantor of our liberty can hardly be overestimated. It forms a precious part of our collective inheritance as citizens. It binds us together as a nation. Without it, we are nothing. 

Today, to an extent that I would once have considered unimaginable, the Constitution itself is at risk. So I find myself also thankful for the guidance that President Washington offered us in his Farewell Address of 1796. I have often quoted the Farewell Address for the wisdom it contains regarding America's proper role in the world. That wisdom has lost none of its salience with the passage of time — would that our present-day foreign policy establishment would ruminate on its passages and take Washington's counsel to heart. 

Yet George Washington also used the occasion of his departure from public life to reflect on the importance of the Constitution. "To the efficacy and permanency of your Union," he wrote, "a government for the whole is indispensable." The Constitution, then less than a decade old, provided the essential foundation for that Union. The outgoing president urged his fellow citizens to think deeply about the imperative of honoring and protecting it.  

"Respect for its authority, compliance with its laws, acquiescence in its measures," he wrote, “are duties enjoined by the fundamental maxims of true liberty."

The basis of our political systems is the right of the people to make and to alter their constitutions of government. But the Constitution which at any time exists, till changed by an explicit and authentic act of the whole people, is sacredly obligatory upon all. The very idea of the power and the right of the people to establish government  presupposes the duty of every individual to obey the established government.

That the preservation of individual liberty should entail duties! That adherence to the Constitution should confer sacred obligations! How far we have come since 1796 — recently at least in the wrong direction.

That Washington and the rest of the Founding Fathers were mere mortals is certainly the case. We should lament their frailties and condemn their sins (while being mindful of our own). But when it comes to appreciating the Constitution, mark me down as siding with the man from Mount Vernon.


(Steve Cukrov/Shutterstock)
google cta
Analysis | North America
Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi
Top photo credit: Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi 首相官邸 (Cabinet Public Affairs Office)

Takaichi 101: How to torpedo relations with China in a month

Asia-Pacific

On November 7, Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi stated that a Chinese attack on Taiwan could undoubtedly be “a situation that threatens Japan’s survival,” thereby implying that Tokyo could respond by dispatching Self-Defense Forces.

This statement triggered the worst crisis in Sino-Japanese relations in over a decade because it reflected a transformation in Japan’s security policy discourse, defense posture, and U.S.-Japan defense cooperation in recent years. Understanding this transformation requires dissecting the context as well as content of Takaichi’s parliamentary remarks.

keep readingShow less
Starmer, Macron, Merz G7
Top photo credit: Prime Minister Keir Starmer meets Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and António Costa, President of the European Council at the G7 world leaders summit in Kananaskis, June 15, 2025. Picture by Simon Dawson / No 10 Downing Street

The Europeans pushing the NATO poison pill

Europe

The recent flurry of diplomatic activity surrounding Ukraine has revealed a stark transatlantic divide. While high level American and Ukrainian officials have been negotiating the U.S. peace plan in Geneva, European powers have been scrambling to influence a process from which they risk being sidelined.

While Europe has to be eventually involved in a settlement of the biggest war on its territory after World War II, so far it’s been acting more like a spoiler than a constructive player.

keep readingShow less
Sudan
Top image credit: A Sudanese army soldier stands next to a destroyed combat vehicle as Sudan's army retakes ground and some displaced residents return to ravaged capital in the state of Khartoum Sudan March 26, 2025. REUTERS/El Tayeb Siddig
Will Sudan attack the UAE?

Saudi leans in hard to get UAE out of Sudan civil war

Middle East

As Saudi Arabia’s powerful crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman (MBS), swept through Washington last week, the agenda was predictably packed with deals: a trillion-dollar investment pledge, access to advanced F-35 fighter jets, and coveted American AI technology dominated the headlines. Yet tucked within these transactions was a significant development for the civil war in Sudan.

Speaking at the U.S.-Saudi Investment Forum President Donald Trump said that Sudan “was not on my charts,” viewing the conflict as “just something that was crazy and out of control” until the Saudi leader pressed the issue. “His majesty would like me to do something very powerful having to do with Sudan,” Trump recounted, adding that MBS framed it as an opportunity for greatness.

The crown prince’s intervention highlights a crucial new reality that the path to peace, or continued war, in Sudan now runs even more directly through the escalating rivalry between Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The fate of Sudan is being forged in the Gulf, and its future will be decided by which side has more sway in Trump’s White House.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.