Follow us on social

google cta
Constitution

Today I am thankful for the surviving Constitution

George Washington was right about the US role in the world — and he also had a thing or two to say about our founding principles.

Analysis | North America
google cta
google cta

When you survey the antics playing out daily on our national political scene, it's tough to find much to be thankful for on this Thanksgiving Day. That said, I find myself this year particularly grateful that the constitutional order established in 1787 still survives — severely tested, yes, but as yet intact. 

With others, I have in recent years developed a lively appreciation for the wrongs woven into the U.S. Constitution as originally drafted and ratified. Even as amended, defects remain. (Down with the Electoral College, I say!) That said, the document’s value as the basis of American order and the principal guarantor of our liberty can hardly be overestimated. It forms a precious part of our collective inheritance as citizens. It binds us together as a nation. Without it, we are nothing. 

Today, to an extent that I would once have considered unimaginable, the Constitution itself is at risk. So I find myself also thankful for the guidance that President Washington offered us in his Farewell Address of 1796. I have often quoted the Farewell Address for the wisdom it contains regarding America's proper role in the world. That wisdom has lost none of its salience with the passage of time — would that our present-day foreign policy establishment would ruminate on its passages and take Washington's counsel to heart. 

Yet George Washington also used the occasion of his departure from public life to reflect on the importance of the Constitution. "To the efficacy and permanency of your Union," he wrote, "a government for the whole is indispensable." The Constitution, then less than a decade old, provided the essential foundation for that Union. The outgoing president urged his fellow citizens to think deeply about the imperative of honoring and protecting it.  

"Respect for its authority, compliance with its laws, acquiescence in its measures," he wrote, “are duties enjoined by the fundamental maxims of true liberty."

The basis of our political systems is the right of the people to make and to alter their constitutions of government. But the Constitution which at any time exists, till changed by an explicit and authentic act of the whole people, is sacredly obligatory upon all. The very idea of the power and the right of the people to establish government  presupposes the duty of every individual to obey the established government.

That the preservation of individual liberty should entail duties! That adherence to the Constitution should confer sacred obligations! How far we have come since 1796 — recently at least in the wrong direction.

That Washington and the rest of the Founding Fathers were mere mortals is certainly the case. We should lament their frailties and condemn their sins (while being mindful of our own). But when it comes to appreciating the Constitution, mark me down as siding with the man from Mount Vernon.


(Steve Cukrov/Shutterstock)
google cta
Analysis | North America
United Nations
Monitors at the United Nations General Assembly hall display the results of a vote on a resolution condemning the annexation of parts of Ukraine by Russia, amid Russia's invasion of Ukraine, at the United Nations Headquarters in New York City, New York, U.S., October 12, 2022. REUTERS/David 'Dee' Delgado||

We're burying the rules based order. But what's next?

Global Crises

In a Davos speech widely praised for its intellectual rigor and willingness to confront established truths, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney finally laid the fiction of the “rules-based international order” to rest.

The “rules-based order” — or RBIO — was never a neutral description of the post-World War II system of international law and multilateral institutions. Rather, it was a discourse born out of insecurity over the West’s decline and unwillingness to share power. Aimed at preserving the power structures of the past by shaping the norms and standards of the future, the RBIO was invariably something that needed to be “defended” against those who were accused of opposing it, rather than an inclusive system that governed relations between all states.

keep readingShow less
china trump
President Donald Trump announces the creation of a critical minerals reserve during an event in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, DC on Monday, February 2, 2026. Trump announced the creation of “Project Vault,” a rare earth stockpile to lower reliance on China for rare earths and other resources. Photo by Bonnie Cash/Pool/Sipa USA

Trump vs. his China hawks

Asia-Pacific

In the year since President Donald Trump returned to the White House, China hawks have started to panic. Leading lights on U.S. policy toward Beijing now warn that Trump is “barreling toward a bad bargain” with the Chinese Communist Party. Matthew Pottinger, a key architect of Trump’s China policy in his first term, argues that the president has put Beijing in a “sweet spot” through his “baffling” policy decisions.

Even some congressional Republicans have criticized Trump’s approach, particularly following his decision in December to allow the sale of powerful Nvidia AI chips to China. “The CCP will use these highly advanced chips to strengthen its military capabilities and totalitarian surveillance,” argued Rep. John Moolenaar (R-Mich.), who chairs the influential Select Committee on Competition with China.

keep readingShow less
Is America still considered part of the 'Americas'?
Top image credit: bluestork/shutterstock.com

Is America still considered part of the 'Americas'?

Latin America

On January 7, the White House announced its plans to withdraw from 66 international bodies whose work it had deemed inconsistent with U.S. national interests.

While many of these organizations were international in nature, three of them were specific to the Americas — the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research, the Pan American Institute of Geography and History, and the U.N.’s Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. The decision came on the heels of the Dominican Republic postponing the X Summit of the Americas last year following disagreements over who would be invited and ensuing boycotts.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.