Follow us on social

2020-01-09t000000z_642566432_mt1abcpr715274017_rtrmadp_3_abaca-press-scaled

The who's who of Iranian players behind the new president

Everyone seems to know Ebrahim Raisi is the Supreme Leader's man. But how did he get into that tight inner circle?

Analysis | Middle East

Iran’s June 18 presidential election was unlike any other election in the history of the Islamic Republic. It was appropriately referred to by Mostafa Tajzadeh, a leading opposition figure as entesabat-e mohandesi shodeh, or “engineered appointments.” 

The reason was that the Guardian Council, the Constitutional body that vets candidates for national elections, rejected 14 candidates put up by the Reformist opposition, including Tajzadeh, and allowed only seven candidates to run, five of whom were hardliners. The other two candidates did not belong to the Reformist camp, but held relatively moderate views. 

More than 51 percent of the eligible voters stayed home, which was also totally unprecedented. Of the 49 percent of the voters who actually cast ballots, eight percent were deemed invalid, implying that only 41 percent of the people actually voted for a candidate. Ebrahim Raisi, the hardline Judiciary chief, and a protégé of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his son Mojtaba Khamenei, “won” the election.

Raisi’s track record of violating human rights of the Iranian people is well documented. He played a leading role in the execution of nearly 4,000 political prisoners during the summer of 1988. As Tehran Prosecutor from 1989 to 1994, he prosecuted the leading nationalist-religious figures who had played important roles in the 1979 Revolution. During the Green Movement protests of 2009-2010, when he served as the principal deputy of the chief of the judiciary, he declared that the demonstrators should be executed and played a key role in the crackdown that followed. As Prosecutor of the “Special Court for the Clergy” — an unconstitutional and extra-judicial court — from 2012 forward, he has prosecuted dissident clerics opposed to Khamenei’s rule.

This was Raisi’s third important national position in less than four years. How did he rise to power so rapidly? What is not well understood is the role of what is called “beyt-e rahbari” in Iran — the Abode of the Supreme Leader, or the Leader’s “office” — in shaping the hardliners’ view of the world. The close ties between Raeisi and the Abode help explain the role of the latter in the rise of the former. The Abode is run by people with intelligence and security backgrounds. The chief of staff is cleric Mohammad (Gholam-Hossein) Mohammadi Golpayegani, who, from 1979 to 1989, served as Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini’s representative in Iran’s Air Force. He is also the father-in-law of Khamenei’s daughter, Boshra. 

Khamenei’s chief of security is cleric Asghar (Sadegh) Mir Hejazi, a principal figure in founding the Ministry of Intelligence in the 1980s, who coordinates everything with the Islamic Revolution Guard Corps, or IRGC, and the nation’s intelligence services. Khamenei’s chief personal aide and deputy chief of staff is Vahid Haghanian, known in Iran as AghaVahid, who is an IRGC officer in the Sarallah Base, the IRGC’s large military base that is responsible for Tehran’s security. He played a leading role in suppressing the Green Movement, as well as in the house arrest (for more than a decade) of its leaders, former Prime Minister Mir Hossein Mousavi, his wife Dr. Zahra Rahnavard, and the former Speaker of the Majlis, Iran’s parliament, Mehdi Karroubi

Typical of Iranian politics, however, the Abode is not unified. There are fissures within it — except when they stand together against the opposition — with at least two main factions. One is led by Khamenei’s senior foreign policy adviser and former foreign minister Ali Akbar Velayati, a traditional conservative who has been very close to Khamenei for three decades. Velayati supported President Hassan Rouhani in negotiating and approving the JCPOA, the nuclear agreement between Iran and P5+1.

The second faction is led by Khamenei’s ultra-conservative son, Mojtaba. Over the years, Mojtaba Khamenei, who took part in Iran-Iraq war, has established close relations with the aforementioned trio of hardline security men that run the Abode, as well as a faction of the IRGC high command, including former IRGC chief Major General Mohammad Ali Jafari; his successor, Major General Hossein Salami; Major General Yahya Rahim Safavi, Khamenei’s senior military adviser; Brigadier General Masoud Jazayeri, who was former the deputy chief of staff of the armed forces for cultural and propaganda; and Brigadier General Mohammad Reza Naghdi, deputy IRGC commander for coordination. This faction opposes any deviations from hardline policies, both domestic and in the international arena. It also opposes any rapprochement with the West. Raisi has close links with this faction and its military and intelligence figures and is also close to Mojtaba Khamenei who has played the key role in his rise to prominence.

The younger Khamenei has always wanted his own man as Iran’s president. The first time Iranians heard about him was in 2005, when, with his support and that of the IRGC, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was elected to the presidency. Karroubi wrote a public letter to Ayatollah Khamenei at the time in which he strongly condemned Mojtaba Khamenei’s intervention in politics. Since the younger Khamenei’s support for Ahmadinejad’s reelection was well known, one of the most popular slogans during the Green Movement’s protests that followed the 2009 election was “Mojtaba bemire, rahbari ro nabini” (Mojtaba, you will die and will never be the Leader.) In the 2013 presidential election he favored former nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili, who lost badly to Rouhani.

It was with Mojtaba Khamenei’s support that the elder Khamenei appointed Raisi in 2016 to the highly important post of Chairman of Astan Quds Razavi in Mashhad, the shrine of Imam Reza, Shiite’s 8th Imam — a foundation with assets estimated at tens of billions of dollars. Immediately after his appointment, senior IRGC officers, including those mentioned above, visited Raisi in Mashhad, paying him the courtesies due a future national leader. That was the first sign that Raisi was a favorite among the hardliners. It was with Mojtaba Khamenei’s support that Raisi ran in the 2017 presidential elections in which, however, he lost to Rouhani in a landslide. And it was with the younger Khamenei’s support that the Guardian Council rejected all the Reformist candidates, including Tajzadeh and the current First Vice President, Eshagh Jahangiri, to set the stage for Raeisi’s election “victory” on June 18.

Raisi’s views reflect those of Mojtaba Khamenei: uncompromising with a black-and-white view of the world. His father-in-law, cleric Ahmad Alamolhoda, who is the Friday prayer Imam of Mashhad, is a close friend of the Supreme Leader. The four men form Iran’s “gang of four,” which, similar to the original Chinese “Gang of Four” who followed Mao Zedong after his death in 1976, rejects the West, particularly the United States. In his first press conference as President-elect, Raisi flatly rejected the possibility of his meeting with President Joe Biden and insisted his government will not negotiate limits to Iran’s ballistic missile program or its support for its allies throughout the Middle East, although he did say that he supported the JCPOA.

Some believe that Raisi is on his way to become the next Supreme Leader. That is highly unlikely. Ayatollah Khamenei and his son support Raeisi because the former may pass from the scene in the near future and wants his son to succeed him. In their view, a Raisi presidency can facilitate a transition to Mojtaba’s rise to the Supreme Leadership. 

That remains to be seen, because, if last week’s elections indicated anything, it was that a solid majority of the Iranian people’s reject the hardliners, a rejection that appears to have become stronger and will likely continue to do so unless by some miracle Raisi succeeds in substantially improving the country’s economy in a relatively short period of time. Even in that event, however, the hardliners will have great difficulty running Iran because once the middle class, the engine for positive change in Iran, feels secure economically, it will demand its fundamental human and civil rights, including a democratic republic, as it has for more than a century.

Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei (R) greeting newly-appointed commander of the Quds Force of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Esmail Qaani (L), Iranian Armed Forces Chief of Staff Major General Mohammad Bagheri (C), and Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Chief Commander Hossein Salami, during a mourning ceremony in Tehran for slain top general Qasem Soleimani,Tehran, Iran on January 9, 2020. Handout Photo via SalamPix/ABACAPRESS.COM
Analysis | Middle East
Why American war and election news coverage is so rotten
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. | Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. speaking wit… | Flickr

Why American war and election news coverage is so rotten

Media


Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed: everything else is public relations.”

keep readingShow less
Peter Thiel: 'I defer to Israel'

Peter Thiel attends the annual Allen and Co. Sun Valley Media Conference in Sun Valley, Idaho, U.S., July 6, 2022. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid

Peter Thiel: 'I defer to Israel'

QiOSK

The trouble with doing business with Israel — or any foreign government — is you can't really say anything when they do terrible things with technology that you may or may not have sold to them, or hope to sell to them, or hope to sell in your own country.

Such was the case with Peter Thiel, co-founder of Palantir Technologies, in this recently surfaced video, talking to the Cambridge Union back in May. See him stumble and stutter and buy time when asked what he thought about the use of Artificial Intelligence by the Israeli military in a targeting program called "Lavender" — which we now know has been responsible for the deaths of an untold number of innocent Palestinians since Oct 7. (See investigation here).

keep readingShow less
Are budget boosters actually breaking the military?

Committee chairman Jack Reed (D-RI), left, looks on as co-chair Roger Wicker (R-MS) shakes hands with U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin before a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on President Biden's proposed budget request for the Department of Defense on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., April 9, 2024. REUTERS/Amanda Andrade-Rhoades

Are budget boosters actually breaking the military?

Military Industrial Complex

Now that both political parties have seemingly settled upon their respective candidates for the 2024 presidential election, we have an opportune moment to ask a rather fundamental question about our nation’s defense spending: how much is enough?

Back in May, Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, penned an op-ed in the New York Times insisting the answer was not enough at all. Wicker claimed that the nation wasn’t prepared for war — or peace, for that matter — that our ships and fighter-jet fleets were “dangerously small” and our military infrastructure “outdated.” So weak our defense establishment and so dangerous the world right now, Wicker pressed, the nation ought to “spend an additional $55 billion on the military in the 2025 fiscal year.”

keep readingShow less

Israel-Gaza Crisis

Latest

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.