Follow us on social

google cta
49517942356_438c0185f1_k

Israel and Iran attack Rep. Omar for the same comments

Maybe the congresswoman is the key to bringing peace between Iran and Israel. She’s bringing them together in ways no one has before.

Asia-Pacific
google cta
google cta

Iranian state media and the Israeli ambassador have criticized Rep. Ilhan Omar (D–Minn.) for her comments supporting the International Criminal Court.

Omar had said that the Hague-based court was important for prosecuting crimes committed by both sides in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and Afghan war.

“I would emphasize that in Israel and Palestine, this includes crimes committed by both the Israeli security forces and Hamas,” Omar during a Monday meeting of the House Foreign Affairs Committee. “In Afghanistan, it includes crimes committed by the Afghan national government and the Taliban.”

“If domestic courts can't or won't provide justice, and we oppose the ICC, where do we think victims are supposed to go for justice?” she asked Secretary of State Antony Blinken.

Omar followed up her comments with a Twitter post about the “unthinkable atrocities committed by the U.S., Hamas, Israel, Afghanistan, and the Taliban.”

Gilad Erdan, Israel’s ambassador to the United States, took offense to Omar’s comments. He asked on Twitter how Omar could compare “two vibrant democracies with robust legal systems” to “jihadi terrorists who purposely murder civilians.”

Several of Omar’s fellow Democrats agreed, signing onto a statement written by Rep. Brad Schneider (D–Ill.) on Thursday. The statement claimed that Omar’s “false equivalencies give cover to terrorist groups,” and “at worst reflects deep-seated prejudice.”

“It’s shameful for colleagues who call me when they need my support to now put out a statement asking for ‘clarification’ and not just call,” Omar responded in another Twitter post. “The Islamophobic tropes in this statement are offensive. The constant harassment & silencing from the signers of this letter is unbearable.”

The Israeli ambassador and pro-Israel lawmakers were joined by an unlikely ally: the Iranian government’s English-language news channel.

“Ilhan Omar has been accused of pandering to Zionists after she compared the Palestinian resistance groups' defensive acts with atrocities committed by the US, the Taliban and Israeli occupation forces,” PressTV wrote in a Tuesday article.

The Iranian propaganda channel cited unnamed Palestinian activists, who apparently agreed with the Israeli ambassador that there is no appropriate comparison between Hamas and the Israeli military.

The Trump administration had previously imposed sanctions on The Hague for opening investigations into U.S. and Israeli forces. The Biden administration lifted those sanctions, but continues to oppose the investigations.

Blinken told Omar on Monday that the United States and Israel “both have the mechanisms to make there is accountability in any situation where there are concerns about the use of force and human rights.”


Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) (Flicker/Creative Commons/Gage Skidmore)
google cta
Asia-Pacific
Mbs-mbz-scaled
UAE President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan receives Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman at the Presidential Airport in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates November 27, 2019. WAM/Handout via REUTERS

Is the US goading Arab states to join war against Iran?

QiOSK

On Sunday, U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Mike Waltz told ABC News that Arab Gulf states may soon step up their involvement in the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran. “I expect that you'll see additional diplomatic and possibly military action from them in the coming days and weeks,” Waltz said.

Then, on Monday morning, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) slammed Saudi Arabia for staying out of the war even as “Americans are dying and the U.S. is spending billions” of dollars to conduct regime change in Iran. “If you are not willing to use your military now, when are you willing to use it?” Graham asked. “Hopefully this changes soon. If not, consequences will follow.”

keep readingShow less
Why Tehran may have time on its side
Top image credit: Iranian army military personnel stand at attention under a banner featuring an image of an Iranian-made unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) during a military parade commemorating the anniversary of Army Day outside the Shrine of Iran's late leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in the south of Tehran, Iran, on April 18, 2025. (Photo by Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto)

Why Tehran may have time on its side

QiOSK

A provocative calculus by Anusar Farrouqui (“policytensor”) has been circulating on X and in more exhaustive form on the author’s Substack. It purports to demonstrate a sobering reality: in a high-intensity U.S.-Iran conflict, the United States may be unable to suppress Iranian drone production quickly enough to prevent a strategically consequential period of regional devastation.

The argument is framed through a quantitative lens, carrying the seductive appeal of mathematical precision. It arranges variables—such as U.S. sortie rates and degradation efficiency against Iranian repair cycles and rebuild speeds—to suggest a "sustainable firing rate." The implication is that Iran could maintain a persistent strike capability long enough to exhaust American political patience, forcing Washington toward a premature declaration of success or an unfavorable ceasefire.

keep readingShow less
Despite ban, pernicious military 'earmarks' are back in the billions
Top image credit: Roman Samborski via shutterstock.com
Popular YouTuber discovers how corrupt the Pentagon budget is

Despite ban, pernicious military 'earmarks' are back in the billions

Military Industrial Complex

A new report finds that lawmakers added nearly $34 billion to the Pentagon’s procurement and research accounts for FY2026, through 1,090 individual program increases, many of which the Defense Department did not even request funds for.

Although individual program increases are not earmarks, they serve a similar function. Formal earmarks themselves were temporarily banned in 2011 to curb lawmaker-driven runaway spending, then reintroduced in 2021 by Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) and Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) as “Community Project Funding,” and “Congressionally Directed Spending (CDS)” in the House and Senate respectively — and subject to transparency requirements, where lawmakers must associate themselves with the earmarks they propose.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.