Follow us on social

google cta
49517942356_438c0185f1_k

Israel and Iran attack Rep. Omar for the same comments

Maybe the congresswoman is the key to bringing peace between Iran and Israel. She’s bringing them together in ways no one has before.

Asia-Pacific
google cta
google cta

Iranian state media and the Israeli ambassador have criticized Rep. Ilhan Omar (D–Minn.) for her comments supporting the International Criminal Court.

Omar had said that the Hague-based court was important for prosecuting crimes committed by both sides in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and Afghan war.

“I would emphasize that in Israel and Palestine, this includes crimes committed by both the Israeli security forces and Hamas,” Omar during a Monday meeting of the House Foreign Affairs Committee. “In Afghanistan, it includes crimes committed by the Afghan national government and the Taliban.”

“If domestic courts can't or won't provide justice, and we oppose the ICC, where do we think victims are supposed to go for justice?” she asked Secretary of State Antony Blinken.

Omar followed up her comments with a Twitter post about the “unthinkable atrocities committed by the U.S., Hamas, Israel, Afghanistan, and the Taliban.”

Gilad Erdan, Israel’s ambassador to the United States, took offense to Omar’s comments. He asked on Twitter how Omar could compare “two vibrant democracies with robust legal systems” to “jihadi terrorists who purposely murder civilians.”

Several of Omar’s fellow Democrats agreed, signing onto a statement written by Rep. Brad Schneider (D–Ill.) on Thursday. The statement claimed that Omar’s “false equivalencies give cover to terrorist groups,” and “at worst reflects deep-seated prejudice.”

“It’s shameful for colleagues who call me when they need my support to now put out a statement asking for ‘clarification’ and not just call,” Omar responded in another Twitter post. “The Islamophobic tropes in this statement are offensive. The constant harassment & silencing from the signers of this letter is unbearable.”

The Israeli ambassador and pro-Israel lawmakers were joined by an unlikely ally: the Iranian government’s English-language news channel.

“Ilhan Omar has been accused of pandering to Zionists after she compared the Palestinian resistance groups' defensive acts with atrocities committed by the US, the Taliban and Israeli occupation forces,” PressTV wrote in a Tuesday article.

The Iranian propaganda channel cited unnamed Palestinian activists, who apparently agreed with the Israeli ambassador that there is no appropriate comparison between Hamas and the Israeli military.

The Trump administration had previously imposed sanctions on The Hague for opening investigations into U.S. and Israeli forces. The Biden administration lifted those sanctions, but continues to oppose the investigations.

Blinken told Omar on Monday that the United States and Israel “both have the mechanisms to make there is accountability in any situation where there are concerns about the use of force and human rights.”


Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) (Flicker/Creative Commons/Gage Skidmore)
google cta
Asia-Pacific
Dan Caine
Top photo credit: Secretary of War Pete Hegseth and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff U.S. Air Force Gen. Dan Caine conduct a press briefing on Operation Epic Fury at the Pentagon, Washington, D.C., March 4, 2026. (DoW photo by U.S. Navy Petty Officer 1st Class Alexander Kubitza)

Did Caine just announce the Morgenthau option for Iran?

QiOSK

Gen. Dan Caine’s formulation of American war aims in Iran is remarkable not because it is bellicose, but because it is strategically incoherent.

In a press conference Tuesday morning, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff did not describe a limited campaign to suppress missile fire, blunt Iran’s naval threat, or even impose a severe but bounded setback on Tehran’s coercive instruments. He described a campaign against Iran’s “military and industrial base” designed to prevent the regime from attacking Americans, U.S. interests, and regional partners “for years to come.” In an earlier briefing he put the objective similarly: to prevent Iran from projecting power outside its borders. Rather than the language of a discrete coercive operation, this describes a war against a state’s capacity to regenerate power.

keep readingShow less
Ilham Aliyev azerbaijan iran
Top photo credit: Azerbaijan president Ilham Aliyev visited Embassy of Islamic Republic of Iran, offered condolences over death of former President Ayatollah Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, in 2017. (Office of the President of Azerbaijan/public domain)

Neocons wanted an Azeri uprising against Iran. They didn't get it.

Middle East

With Iran resisting the U.S./Israeli onslaught for the second week, what was supposed to be a quick transition to a pro-U.S. regime following the decapitation strike that killed Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is fast turning into a quagmire. While the U.S. and Israel continue to sow mayhem on Tehran from the skies, the previously unthinkable option of sending ground troops to Iran is gaining ground.

First, an apparent plan was being hatched to employ Kurdish fighters to take on Tehran. Then, when drones, allegedly flying from Iran although Tehran denied it, struck the Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic of Azerbaijan — hitting an airport terminal and a village school, and wounding four civilians — the stage appeared set for the opening of a northern front against Iran. Here was an alleged act of aggression from Iranian territory against Israel's closest partner in the South Caucasus. It offered the pretext to goad Azerbaijan into joining the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran.

keep readingShow less
Trump miami press conference iran
Top photo credit: Trump press conference on Iran, Miami, 3/9/26 (PBS screengrab)

Trump press conference reveals a man who wants out of war

QiOSK

Trump’s “all over the place” press conference at his Miami resort on Monday appears to have had two key objectives: a) Calm the markets by signalling the conflict may soon be over because it has been so "successful,” and b) Prepare the ground for Trump ending the war through a unilateral declaration of victory.

Though ending a war that never should have been started in the first place — rather than fighting it endlessly in the pursuit of an illusory victory as the U.S. did in Afghanistan — is the right move, it won’t be as easy as Trump appears to think.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.