Follow us on social

51146039085_8d052817c9_o

Biden's new North Korea strategy is promising, but questions remain

For the administration's strategy to work, they will need bold moves to get North Korea back to the negotiating table.

Asia-Pacific

The news that the Biden administration will pursue a “calibrated, practical approach to diplomacy with the North with the goal of eliminating the threat to the United States” is welcome. The question is how much risk the White House and Congress are willing to take in order to break the deadlock and bring North Korea back to the negotiating table. 

President Donald Trump, to his credit, opened the possibility for a new kind of bilateral relationship with North Korea by engaging in direct talks with Kim Jong Un. The Biden administration should take full advantage of this opening by taking another unprecedented step in declaring the 70-year Korean War over and calling for a formal peace treaty. Such bold preemptive moves are urgently needed to end the original “forever war” and build trust between both countries.

Another open question is how the Biden administration will work with Congress on the North Korea issue. It is possible — even likely — that hawks in Congress will place unrealistic demands or create barriers to poison the atmosphere for negotiations. For example, some members of Congress may demand that the Biden administration appoint a hardliner for the role of Special Envoy for North Korea Human Rights, rather than someone who will pursue a more holistic approach for tackling both human rights and humanitarian issues facing North Koreans. 

Ultimately, any U.S. policy toward North Korea should advance American interests, even if that involves taking a certain amount of risk.


President Joe Biden salutes as he walks along the Colonnade of the White House on Friday, March 12, 2021, en route to the Oval Office. (Official White House Photo by Adam Schultz)
Asia-Pacific
American Special Operations
Top image credit: (shutterstock/FabrikaSimf)

American cult: Why our special ops need a reset

Military Industrial Complex

This article is the latest installment in our Quincy Institute/Responsible Statecraft project series highlighting the writing and reporting of U.S. military veterans. Click here for more information.

America’s post-9/11 conflicts have left indelible imprints on our society and our military. In some cases, these changes were so gradual that few noticed the change, except as snapshots in time.

keep readingShow less
Recep Tayyip Erdogan Benjamin Netanyahu
Top photo credit: President of Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdogan (Shutterstock/ Mustafa Kirazli) and Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu (Salty View/Shutterstock)
Is Turkey's big break with Israel for real?

Why Israel is now turning its sights on Turkey

Middle East

As the distribution of power shifts in the region, with Iran losing relative power and Israel and Turkey emerging on top, an intensified rivalry between Tel Aviv and Ankara is not a question of if, but how. It is not a question of whether they choose the rivalry, but how they choose to react to it: through confrontation or peaceful management.

As I describe in Treacherous Alliance, a similar situation emerged after the end of the Cold War: The collapse of the Soviet Union dramatically changed the global distribution of power, and the defeat of Saddam's Iraq in the Persian Gulf War reshuffled the regional geopolitical deck. A nascent bipolar regional structure took shape with Iran and Israel emerging as the two main powers with no effective buffer between them (since Iraq had been defeated). The Israelis acted on this first, inverting the strategy that had guided them for the previous decades: The Doctrine of the Periphery. According to this doctrine, Israel would build alliances with the non-Arab states in its periphery (Iran, Turkey, and Ethiopia) to balance the Arab powers in its vicinity (Iraq, Syria, and Egypt, respectively).

keep readingShow less
Havana, Cuba
Top Image Credit: Havana, Cuba, 2019. (CLWphoto/Shutterstock)

Trump lifted sanctions on Syria. Now do Cuba.

North America

President Trump’s new National Security Presidential Memorandum (NSPM) on Cuba, announced on June 30, reaffirms the policy of sanctions and hostility he articulated at the start of his first term in office. In fact, the new NSPM is almost identical to the old one.

The policy’s stated purpose is to “improve human rights, encourage the rule of law, foster free markets and free enterprise, and promote democracy” by restricting financial flows to the Cuban government. It reaffirms Trump’s support for the 1996 Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity Act, which explicitly requires regime change — that Cuba become a multiparty democracy with a free market economy (among other conditions) before the U.S. embargo will be lifted.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.