Follow us on social

google cta
Screen-shot-2021-04-07-at-5.15.52-pm

Why Biden must reverse Trump policy on landmines now

These destructive weapons continue to kill decades after formal cessations of hostilities.

Analysis | Global Crises
google cta
google cta

It’s been 30 years and I can still hear my father’s voice.

“This is the path that you take to school. Only walk along this road. If you veer off, the nagas, tigers, and ghosts will come get you!” My father told my brother and me as we ran ahead of him, screaming happily as he pretended to struggle to catch up to us.

He caught up, took my hand, and stared down at me. I saw the worry in his eyes.

The consequences of war are immeasurable. They span generations and go beyond physical destruction, acting as powerful forces that loom over our lives — whether we invite them to or not.

Survivors know that war is not over when the superpowers say it is. Instead, it is often the beginning of more suffering and a long, nonlinear path to healing and closure from trauma.

Today, I am fearful and disappointed to learn that President Biden has not yet reversed the destructive Trump policy on landmines reopening the door for their use, which set our country backwards when we should be looking forward and valuing lives, even if they are not American. Have we not learned from our mistakes? 

From 1964 to 1973, the United States dropped over 2.1 million tons of ordnance over Laos during 580,000 bombing missions — equal to a planeload of bombs every 8 minutes, 24 hours a day for 9 straight years.

This earned Laos the unwanted title of being the most bombed country per capita in history. It wasn’t even a country that was at war with America.

An estimated one-third of the bombs dropped did not explode, leaving Laos contaminated with vast quantities of unexploded ordnance. To date, less than one percent has been cleared and over 25,000 people have been killed or injured since the bombing ceased. Other gifts left behind during this period include landmines and Agent Orange. Each is designed to do one thing: Kill now or kill later.

I didn’t realize there were so many dangers lurking around me as a 6-year-old walking to school in Laos. My parents didn’t tell me that every day, it was a risk allowing their children to leave the house because of the millions of bombs potentially buried just inches beneath our feet.

They tried to shield us until they could no longer do so. In 1990, they made the decision to uproot us and start a new life in the very country that nearly destroyed Laos: The United States.

My siblings and I were all born decades after the so-called Secret War, yet it is still impacting our lives today. Although we left, we cannot escape the legacies of war, only mitigate their impact. Adding more landmines or any weapons to the world is not the answer.

In the wake of the U.S. bombings, 25 percent of the population of Laos became refugees. Countless historical and religious sites were destroyed, and innocent civilian blood was spilled on the soil of Laos. Families like mine were displaced, separated, and forced to start a new life in a new culture, land, and language. My parents often worked two to three jobs in order to make ends meet. This was not the worst of it.

Those who escape war have to deal with the emotional trauma and guilt of leaving their countrymen behind, knowing that there’s still a threat from unexploded ordnance and landmines. This reality was brought home on February 4, 2021, when five children were walking home from school near the Lao capital of Vientiane, just blocks away from where I grew up. These five boys, all under the age of 10, spotted what looked like a ball and started playing with it. The “ball” exploded and immediately killed two of the boys and left the remaining children severely injured.

We must renounce these indiscriminate weapons that will continue to kill decades after they were placed.

President Biden needs to show American leadership by boldly accelerating a plan within the next two months to join the 164 other countries who have made the humane decision to sign the international Mine Ban Treaty and the 123 countries who have pledged their support to the Convention on Cluster Munitions.

As a swift first step, the president should immediately prohibit the U.S. military from acquiring and using landmines and destroying all stockpiles of these weapons.

As someone who has seen firsthand what it is like to have to live in a bomb-littered land, I am proud to lead Legacies of War's efforts to support bomb clearance and survivor assistance. It is also an honor to represent my team and serve on the Steering Committee of the U.S. Campaign to Ban Landmine and Cluster Munition Coalition.

Let’s stop these deadly policies and usher in an era where we value the lives of children and their families no matter where they live.


A sign warns of mines in an open field. About one-third of the land in Laos is contaminated with unexploded ordnance. Photo by Legacies of War.
google cta
Analysis | Global Crises
Is America still considered part of the 'Americas'?
Top image credit: bluestork/shutterstock.com

Is America still considered part of the 'Americas'?

Latin America

On January 7, the White House announced its plans to withdraw from 66 international bodies whose work it had deemed inconsistent with U.S. national interests.

While many of these organizations were international in nature, three of them were specific to the Americas — the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research, the Pan American Institute of Geography and History, and the U.N.’s Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. The decision came on the heels of the Dominican Republic postponing the X Summit of the Americas last year following disagreements over who would be invited and ensuing boycotts.

keep readingShow less
After shuttering USAID, Trump launches new foreign aid strategy
Top photo credit: Abuja, Nigeria, March 06, 2021: African Medical Doctor giving consultation and treatment in a rural clinic. (Shutterstock/Oni Abimbola)

After shuttering USAID, Trump launches new foreign aid strategy

Washington Politics

Almost exactly one year ago, the swift dismantling of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) got underway with a public statement issued by the State Department.

At the start of July 2025, the State Department officially absorbed what was left of the storied agency. A few short months later, to fill the USAID-shaped hole in America’s soft-power projection abroad, the Trump administration launched an $11 billion plan to provide foreign health assistance.

keep readingShow less
What happens when we give Europe first dibs on US missiles for war
Top photo credit: Volodymyr Selenskyj (l), President of Ukraine, and Boris Pistorius (SPD), Federal Minister of Defense, answer media questions after a visit to the training of soldiers on the "Patriot" air defence missile system at a military training area. The international reconstruction conference for Ukraine takes place on June 11 and 12. (Jens Büttner/dpa via Reuters Connect)

What happens when we give Europe first dibs on US missiles for war

Military Industrial Complex

For weeks the question animating the Washington D.C. commentariat has been this: When will President Donald Trump make good on his threat and launch a second round of airstrikes on Iran? So far at least, the answer is “not yet.”

Many explanations for Trump’s surprising (but very welcome) restraint have emerged. Among the most troubling, however, is that it is a lack of the necessary munitions, and in particular air defense interceptors, that is giving Trump second thoughts. “The missile defense cupboard is bare,” one report concludes based on interviews with current and former U.S. defense officials.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.