Follow us on social

google cta
Code-pink-2

'Angry' protesters show up at Sen. Bob Menendez's house

Code Pink says the chair of the foreign relations committee is hindering, not helping get the U.S. back into Iran nuclear deal.

Analysis | Middle East
google cta
google cta

Antiwar protesters demonstrated Saturday outside the suburban New Jersey home of Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman Bob Menendez (D–N.J.) over his opposition to diplomacy with Iran.

The protest was led by Codepink and Peace Action NJ. About two dozen people marched to the house in the upscale suburb of Englewood Cliffs where Menendez’s third wife lives and the senator spends much of the year.

The demonstrators also set up a haft sin — a table spread Iranians traditionally put out for the beginning of spring — outside the house and left a letter at the front door.

“We’re actually hopeful right now that there can be a deal made, because of the meeting that’s happening on Tuesday in Vienna,” Codepink co-founder Medea Benjamin told Responsible Statecraft. “But so much of it depends on Menendez and his cadre to not muck it up. And he’s done so much already to stop the United States from rejoining the deal, and it’s made us very angry.” 

Iran and the United States have agreed to begin indirect talks in Austria over rejoining the 2015 nuclear deal, a stated goal of the Biden administration. The deal, which the Trump administration had broken from in 2018, placed strict restrictions on Iran’s nuclear program in exchange for six world powers ending their economic embargo on Iran.

Menendez had opposed the deal when it was first negotiated, and recently led a petition alongside Sen. Lindsey Graham (R–S.C.) pushing the Biden administration to take a tough line on Iran. The petition, backed by the hawkish American Israel Public Affairs Committee, was seen by pro-diplomacy advocates as an effort to derail a return to the deal.

Menendez and Graham’s letter stated that its signatories have “differing views on the [2015 deal] and the overall approach of the Trump Administration’s maximum pressure campaign,” and calls on the administration to “use the full force of our diplomatic and economic tools” to pressure Iran on its regional policies and conventional missile program.

“They pretend that they’re in line with the Biden administration, but they’re not in line with the Biden administration,” said Benjamin, who called on Menendez to publicly commit to supporting the talks with Iran.

Iranian-American human rights activist Manijeh Saba said she joined the protest because Menendez “has supported every war” and “the Iranian people are suffering so much” under U.S. economic sanctions.

“I’m not doing this because I support the Iranian government,” she added. “I’ve never supported the Iranian government. They actually threw me in jail, took my passport away for six years.”

Twenty-year Air Force veteran Ed Dugan, who has had numerous members of his family serve in the U.S. military, also spoke about the American people’s interest in diplomacy with Iran. 

“My biggest reason — I brought with me — is my eleven year old son,” he said in a speech. “I don’t want to still be at war when he gets old enough for military service.”


Code Pink outside the home of Senator Bob Menendez in suburban New Jersey Saturday April 2. (Matthew Petti)
google cta
Analysis | Middle East
Did the US only attack Iran because of Israel?
Top image credit: President Donald J. Trump holds a joint news conference at the White House with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Feb. 4, 2025. (Shutterstock/ Joshua Sukoff)

Did the US only attack Iran because of Israel?

QiOSK

In the months that led up to the Iraq War, the Bush administration went to extraordinary lengths to convince the world of the need to oust Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. Leading officials laid out their case in public, sharing what they claimed was evidence that Iraq was moving rapidly toward the deployment of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. When U.S. tanks rolled across the border, everyone knew the justification: the U.S. was determined to thwart Iraq’s development of weapons of mass destruction, however fictitious that threat would later prove to be.

In the months that led up to the Iran War, the Trump administration took a different tack. President Trump spoke only occasionally of Iran, offering a smattering of justifications for growing U.S. tensions with the country. He claimed without evidence that Iran was rebuilding its nuclear program after the U.S.-Israeli attack last June and even developing missiles that could strike the United States. But he insisted that Tehran could make a deal with seven magic words: “we will never have a nuclear weapon.”

keep readingShow less
Iran says ‘no ship is allowed to pass’ Strait of Hormuz: Reports
Top image credit: A large oil tanker transits the Strait of Hormuz. (Shutterstock/ Clare Louise Jackson)

Iran says ‘no ship is allowed to pass’ Strait of Hormuz: Reports

QiOSK

Hours after the U.S. and Israel launched a campaign of airstrikes across Iran, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps is warning vessels in the Persian Gulf via radio that “no ship is allowed to pass the Strait of Hormuz,” according to a report from Reuters.

The news suggests that Iran is ready to pull out all the stops in its response to the U.S.-Israeli barrage, which President Donald Trump says is aimed at toppling the Iranian regime. A full shutdown of the Strait of Hormuz would cause an international crisis given that 20% of the world’s oil passes through the narrow channel. Financial analysts estimate that even one day of a full blockade could cause global oil prices to double from $66 per barrel to more than $120.

keep readingShow less
What Pakistan's 'open war' on Taliban in Afghanistan really means
Top image credit: FILE PHOTO: Afghan Taliban fighters patrol near the Afghanistan-Pakistan border in Spin Boldak, Kandahar Province, following exchanges of fire between Pakistani and Afghan forces in Afghanistan, October 15, 2025. REUTERS/Stringer

What Pakistan's 'open war' on Taliban in Afghanistan really means

QiOSK

Pakistan’s airstrikes on Kabul and Kandahar over the last 24 hours are nothing new. Islamabad has carried out strikes inside Afghanistan several times since the Taliban’s return to power. Pakistan claimed that the Afghan Taliban used drones to conduct strikes in Pakistan.

What distinguishes this latest episode is the rhetorical escalation, with Pakistani officials openly referring to the action as “open war.” While the language grabbed international headlines, it is best understood as part of a managed escalation designed to signal resolve without crossing red lines that would make de-escalation impossible.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.