Follow us on social


On Inauguration Day, a good time to curb our presidentialism

We've poured too much authority and faith into one man and that has proven dangerous, at home and abroad.

Analysis | North America

As a self-professed conservative with no party affiliation, I join with my progressive friends in viewing the approaching end of the Trump presidency as cause for celebration. To quote a notable piece of presidential oratory, “This American carnage stops right here and stops right now.” Let us hope so.

I do not wish to offer my own entry into the ongoing competition to describe just how execrable Trump has been. My thesaurus (Roget’sInternational, 5th edition) contains literally dozens of synonyms for bad, ranging from "nasty”and “malodorous,”to "dangerous”and “evil.” In one way or another, almost all of them apply to President Trump and his administration.  

That said, perhaps unlike some of my progressive friends, my expectations of the incoming Biden administration presiding over a Great American Restoration are muted.  

As Joe Biden prepares to take the Oath of Office as our 46th President, I wish him well. I am confident that his intentions are honorable. Unlike his predecessor, he takes office having already acquired considerable experience in governing. Unlike his predecessor who seemingly viewed the presidency less as a job than as a performance venue, Biden will tend seriously to his duties. He will apply himself. He will work hard.

But let’s face it: At 78, he is an old man. With advancing age comes a loss of energy, memory, and intellectual acuity. To defend myself against charges of ageism, let me just say that I speak from personal experience.  

There is also the fact that as a career politician, Biden never figured as a candidate for inclusion in a revised and expanded edition of Profiles in Courage. Most writers are hacks. Most ballplayers are journeymen. Most art is forgettable and most artists quickly forgotten. Few politicians ever leave a legacy worth remembering. Over the course of several decades serving in the U.S. Senate, Biden has never numbered among those few.  

In 1957, a Senate committee chaired by John F. Kennedy recommended Henry Clay (Ky.)John C. Calhoun (S.C.)Daniel Webster (Mass.)Robert Taft (Ohio), and Robert La Follette, Sr. (Wis.) for inclusion in a senatorial “hall of fame.” Were such a committee to convene today, it would not add Joe Biden to the ranks of senatorial demigods.  

No doubt our 46th president will represent a distinct improvement over our 45th. But it does not fall within his capability to expiate the sins besetting our nation. To my knowledge, no one has improved on Martin Luther King’s description of those sins:  the “giant triplets” of racism, materialism, and militarism.

Among the many baffling aspects of political tradition, surely the strangest must be the widely held conviction that the occupant of the Oval Office determines the fate of the country and of the planet. Call it presidentialism.

Presidentialism is the Big Lie of American politics. It is a far bigger lie than all the middling lies that Donald Trump told over the course of his four years in the White House.

Every time I hear a U.S. president referred to as “the most powerful man in the world,” I am reminded of that lie. After Biden is inaugurated today, let’s ask Mitch McConnell if our new president is the most powerful man in the world. Or we might pose the same question to Xi Jinping or Jeff Bezos or — heck, why not — Pope Francis.  

The last days of the Trump presidency should suffice to refute the Big Lie. The supposedly most powerful man in the world attempted to overturn the results of the November 2020 election and failed. In a despicable act, hooligans trashed the Capitol. They never came close to overturning the Constitutional order.

Presidentialism is American Exceptionalism transferred to the arena of politics. It is a vast and dangerous delusion. The sooner we wake up to that fact the better for our democracy.  

Although 2020 was a rotten year, our Republic has survived worse. Trump’s departure from office is cause for celebration. But Dr. King’s “giant triplets” remain, posing a greater threat to our democracy than Trump ever did even at his most devious. Should we be serious about addressing that threat, we must look not to the White House but to ourselves.

U.S. President-elect Joe Biden gestures during an event in New Castle, Delaware, January 19, 2021. REUTERS/Tom Brenner
Analysis | North America
How the 'war on terror' made the US Institute for Peace a sideshow

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken speaks at the launch of the U.S.-Afghan Consultative Mechanism with Special Envoy for Afghan Women, Girls, and Human Rights Rina Amiri, at the U.S. Institute of Peace, in Washington, U.S., July 28, 2022. Andrew Harnik/Pool via REUTERS

How the 'war on terror' made the US Institute for Peace a sideshow

Global Crises

This year the United States Institute of Peace is 40 years old, and most Americans and U.S. government officials have little to no awareness that Congress funds an institute of peace or understand what it does.

This lack of awareness about USIP and its anniversary this year reflects a larger problem in U.S. foreign policy: the U.S. government’s strained relationship with peacemaking.

keep readingShow less
L-R: U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu shake hands after their meeting at the Prime Minister's Office in Jerusalem, on Monday, January 30, 2023. DEBBIE HILL/Pool via REUTERS
L-R: U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu shake hands after their meeting at the Prime Minister's Office in Jerusalem, on Monday, January 30, 2023. DEBBIE HILL/Pool via REUTERS

Don't be fooled, push for normalization is about US dominance

Middle East

While Israel continues its military siege of Gaza, the United States is trying to exploit the situation with the goal of strengthening U.S. power in the Middle East.

Rather than seeking a long-term solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict, the United States is prioritizing its longstanding goal of normalizing relations between Israel and Saudi Arabia. With such a deal, which would require calm in Gaza to bring Saudi Arabia on board, the United States would further marginalize the Palestinians while more tightly integrating Israel into its regional network of alliances and partnerships.

keep readingShow less
Yes, we can reconcile absurd Russian & Ukrainian peace plans

Review News and Aynur Mammadov via

Yes, we can reconcile absurd Russian & Ukrainian peace plans


The international community has before it two official proposals — Ukrainian and Russian — for a peace settlement to end the war in Ukraine. Both as they stand, and in present circumstances, are absurd. Diplomats and analysts should however give thought to whether they could nonetheless in the future provide the starting point for negotiations leading to an eventual compromise.

The Ukrainian government’s Ten-Point “peace plan” demands complete withdrawal of Russian forces from all the Ukrainian territory that Russia has occupied since 2014 as a precondition for holding talks at all. Presumably those talks would then deal with other Ukrainian points, including war crimes trials for the Russian leadership, and Russian compensation for the damage caused by the Russian invasion.

keep readingShow less

Israel-Gaza Crisis