Follow us on social

google cta
Shutterstock_1847575060-scaled-e1608298016973

Q&A: Ilhan Omar looks forward to a more productive US foreign policy

The Minnesota Democrat slams ‘maximum pressure’ and reflects on her own experience seeking refuge in the United States.

Analysis | Reporting | Washington Politics
google cta
google cta

Congresswoman Ilhan Omar calls President Trump’s policy towards Iran a “spectacular failure” which did not bring Iran to the negotiating table, and instead has resulted in an expansion of Iran’s nuclear program, empowered Iranian hardliners, and made future diplomacy more difficult.

In an exclusive interview with Responsible Statecraft, the Democratic lawmaker from Minnesota urged a reassessment of America's priorities in the Middle East and explained that the United States’ presence in the region has been “counterproductive.” She urged President-elect Biden to live up to American ideals and call out human rights violations, whether by close partners like Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, or by Iran and Syria. 

Rep. Omar made history in November 2018 when she was elected as one of the first two Muslim women to the United States Congress, and the first Somali-American lawmaker. She soon became a rising star in the Democratic Party, sitting on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, and a lightning rod for Republicans and President Trump himself.

Rep. Omar has since been a vocal critic of the Trump administration’s foreign policy, especially towards the Middle East, pushing for fundamental shifts in the United States’ presence in the region. Here is our full interview:

NEGAR MORTAZAVI: Congresswoman Omar thank you for taking the time for this interview. Let's start with this election as the entire world has been watching the process very closely. How do you think Donald Trump's false allegations of fraud have affected America's image and the credibility of its democratic process around the world, especially when the U.S. government weighs in on election fraud in other countries?

REP. ILHAN OMAR (D-MINN.): It is deeply damaging, not just to our own democracy but to the cause of democracy around the world. Our elections should be the gold standard of elections around the world. When the President of the United States seeks to undermine the credibility of the electoral process, it undermines the trust and community that is the lifeblood of democracy.

Just as we’ve seen despots in places like Brazil and the Philippines copy Trump’s far-right faux populism, I worry that politicians will imitate his efforts to undermine democracy. The good news is that he is failing. We had record turnout this election, despite a pandemic. Election officials in his own party are finally standing up for our democracy and against Donald Trump. No matter what he says, Joe Biden is the incoming President of the United States.

NM: Now I want to ask you to assess U.S. foreign policy in the past four years. What is your take on America's standing in the world and the direction of its foreign policy towards friends and foes?  

REP. OMAR: As I recently wrote, the past four years have been disastrous for the U.S. standing in the world and foreign policy as a whole. Donald Trump backed out of major diplomatic achievements like the Paris agreement and the Iran nuclear deal in favor of unilateralism and bluster. He torpedoed our alliances, alienating partnerships that were forged over decades. He propped up dictators around the world and tapped into a network of right-wing authoritarians from Saudi Arabia to Hungary to India. As a result, despots around the world feel more emboldened than ever. He put us on the brink of war — assassinating an Iranian official. Meanwhile, Pentagon budgets and our military presence around the world continued to grow.

NM: One of the cornerstones of the Trump administration has been its maximum pressure policy on Iran that is a combination of crippling sanctions and intense political and at times military pressure. What do you think about this policy as a strategy, as well as its impact on the people of Iran?

REP. OMAR: As a strategy, it has been a spectacular failure. It has done nothing to bring Iran to the negotiating table. In fact, Iran now has 12 times more uranium than the nuclear deal limited. It has only empowered the most hardline factions in Iran and increased animosity towards the United States, making it more difficult to strike another deal. As a moral matter, it is quite literally killing innocent people. The Iranian people — particular poor women and children — are suffering. During the pandemic, they have faced a staggering shortage of medicine and don’t have their basic needs met.

NM: The Biden administration will start its work in less than two months and his team has promised to re-engage with Iran. What do you think U.S. policy should be towards Iran? How should the United States engage Iran and Iranians?

REP. OMAR: We must do everything in our power to bring Iran back to the table and strike a deal. That would not only mean relief for the Iranian people, but also preventing a nuclear arms race in the Middle East that would threaten the United States and the whole world. I’m encouraged that President-elect Biden and Javad Zarif, the chief Iranian negotiator of the JCPOA, have shown a willingness to engage on this.

Moreover, we must assure the Iranian people that we stand in solidarity with their hopes, dreams and aspirations — that we want them to flourish and have basic human rights and self-determination, just as we do for people yearning for a better life around the world. And we very simply cannot support Iranian human rights by force, nor by “maximum pressure” against the government that violates those rights. We’ve tried that since 1979, and it has never worked.

NM: I also want to look at U.S. foreign policy towards the Middle East as a region and how years of wars and military presence has impacted the region, from the invasion of Iraq to the wars in Syria and Yemen. What is your vision for a U.S. foreign policy and military presence towards the region?

REP. OMAR: Our presence in the region has, to say the least, often been counterproductive. Many times, our ideals of human rights and justice have been ignored in favor of unilateralism, wars of aggression and material interests. For many people around the world, especially in the Middle East, the United States is seen as an outside occupying force that does not truly practice in the ideals we claim to stand for. I still believe in those ideals, and I believe President-elect Biden has an opportunity to live up to them. That means prioritizing human rights above short-term military alliances. It means calling out human rights violations wherever they are committed — whether it is by supposed allies like Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates or by regimes like Iran or Syria. It will take decades to rebuild trust, but it’s very possible. 

NM: The Trump administration has spent a lot of political capital on the Israel-Palestine issue and we have seen agreements between some Arab states in the Persian Gulf with Israel, but not with Palestinians themselves. What do you think of these agreements? And how do you think the United States can help the Israel-Palestine peace process effectively?

REP. OMAR: I wrote about this in my op-ed. I still believe, deeply, that peace is possible and that we must do everything in our power to bring about peace and self-determination for the Palestinian people, along with security for Israelis. I think it will require a sustained investment in dialogue between Israelis and Palestinians. It will also mean imposing consequences when Israel violates Palestinian human rights, including conditioning U.S. military aid.

NM: Let's talk about the Muslim Ban which Donald Trump imposed on his first days in office and Joe Biden has vowed to rescind on his first day as president. You yourself are a Muslim and you have been a refugee in this country, fleeing wars and violence. What do you think about the implications of this ban in the past four years? What message did it send to the world about America?

REP. OMAR: It is painful. It sends a message to people around the world that we are not valuable simply because of our country of origin or the religion we practice. My life was changed forever because I was able to come to the United States as a refugee and I will forever be grateful for that. But the ban, along with the drastic cuts in refugee resettlement, makes it harder for the little Ilhans around the world to flee war and oppression. It is a stain on American history — a direct violation of our most fundamental values. And I can’t wait for Joe Biden to place it in the dustbin of history where it belongs on day one of his presidency.

NM: And finally, I want to talk about yourself. Your story is a unique example of the American Dream. A young Muslim African girl who fled wars and settled in the US as a refugee became one of the first two Muslim women elected to Congress. Tell me about your journey looking back at your own life from where you are standing right now.

REP. OMAR: My story is a uniquely American story. I came to this country as a refugee, when the only two English words I knew were “hello” and “shut up.” I worked multiple jobs to pay my way through college while raising young kids, and eventually was able to represent my community in the United States House of Representatives. As a first, I know there a people around the country whose hopes and dreams I embody. But I also know that it is not enough to simply get to Congress. I owe it to my district and the people whose aspirations I represent to leave the world a better place than I found it. I owe it to them to fight for an America where everyone has the opportunity to achieve their full potential and will be treated equally under the law. That’s why I continue to serve.


Photo: Alex Gakos via shutterstock.com
google cta
Analysis | Reporting | Washington Politics
Did the US only attack Iran because of Israel?
Top image credit: President Donald J. Trump holds a joint news conference at the White House with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Feb. 4, 2025. (Shutterstock/ Joshua Sukoff)

Did the US only attack Iran because of Israel?

QiOSK

In the months that led up to the Iraq War, the Bush administration went to extraordinary lengths to convince the world of the need to oust Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. Leading officials laid out their case in public, sharing what they claimed was evidence that Iraq was moving rapidly toward the deployment of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. When U.S. tanks rolled across the border, everyone knew the justification: the U.S. was determined to thwart Iraq’s development of weapons of mass destruction, however fictitious that threat would later prove to be.

In the months that led up to the Iran War, the Trump administration took a different tack. President Trump spoke only occasionally of Iran, offering a smattering of justifications for growing U.S. tensions with the country. He claimed without evidence that Iran was rebuilding its nuclear program after the U.S.-Israeli attack last June and even developing missiles that could strike the United States. But he insisted that Tehran could make a deal with seven magic words: “we will never have a nuclear weapon.”

keep readingShow less
Iran says ‘no ship is allowed to pass’ Strait of Hormuz: Reports
Top image credit: A large oil tanker transits the Strait of Hormuz. (Shutterstock/ Clare Louise Jackson)

Iran says ‘no ship is allowed to pass’ Strait of Hormuz: Reports

QiOSK

Hours after the U.S. and Israel launched a campaign of airstrikes across Iran, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps is warning vessels in the Persian Gulf via radio that “no ship is allowed to pass the Strait of Hormuz,” according to a report from Reuters.

The news suggests that Iran is ready to pull out all the stops in its response to the U.S.-Israeli barrage, which President Donald Trump says is aimed at toppling the Iranian regime. A full shutdown of the Strait of Hormuz would cause an international crisis given that 20% of the world’s oil passes through the narrow channel. Financial analysts estimate that even one day of a full blockade could cause global oil prices to double from $66 per barrel to more than $120.

keep readingShow less
What Pakistan's 'open war' on Taliban in Afghanistan really means
Top image credit: FILE PHOTO: Afghan Taliban fighters patrol near the Afghanistan-Pakistan border in Spin Boldak, Kandahar Province, following exchanges of fire between Pakistani and Afghan forces in Afghanistan, October 15, 2025. REUTERS/Stringer

What Pakistan's 'open war' on Taliban in Afghanistan really means

QiOSK

Pakistan’s airstrikes on Kabul and Kandahar over the last 24 hours are nothing new. Islamabad has carried out strikes inside Afghanistan several times since the Taliban’s return to power. Pakistan claimed that the Afghan Taliban used drones to conduct strikes in Pakistan.

What distinguishes this latest episode is the rhetorical escalation, with Pakistani officials openly referring to the action as “open war.” While the language grabbed international headlines, it is best understood as part of a managed escalation designed to signal resolve without crossing red lines that would make de-escalation impossible.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.