Follow us on social

Shutterstock_29776705-scaled

Biden cannot ignore Uyghur 'genocide' in Xinjiang

Trump's policy on the systematic oppression of China's Muslim minority was far too muddy.

Analysis | Asia-Pacific

Beginning in 2017, up to 1.8 million Turkic Muslims, many of whom are Uyghur and Kazakh, have been interned in re-education camps in Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. While imprisoned, they suffer bullying, brainwashing, and beatings simply for practicing Islam, mild acts of dissent, and contact with Uyghurs living abroad. 

In an interview with National Public Radio, researcher Adrian Zenz said this qualifies as a genocide, as the Chinese party-state is engaging in “suppression of birth,” a key criterion of the United Nations Convention for the Punishment and Prevention of the Crime of Genocide. In addition, the Australian Security Policy Institute has uncovered the presence of more than 380 of these facilities in Xinjiang, suggesting a widespread network of camps across the region with no end to the internment in sight.

The Trump administration’s response to this human rights crisis has been inconsistent. Earlier this year, Trump delayed censuring China on the mass internment of Uyghurs, citing his concern regarding trade talks with Beijing. On June 17, 2020, however, Trump signed the Uyghur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 into law. This act condemns Chinese party-state actions in Xinjiang, requires continued monitoring for the potential use of sanctions, and discusses harassment of Uyghurs currently living in the United States. 

While the Trump administration has not labeled the atrocities in Xinjiang as a genocide, National Security Council Spokesman John Ullyot condemned Beijing’s actions, citing “horrific acts against women, including forced abortion, forced sterilization and other coercive birth control methods,’” among other human rights violations.

Now that a new administration is set to enter the White House in January of 2021, the question turns to how Mr. Biden should approach what appears to be a worsening situation. His administration should take the following three steps:

Engage in multilateral efforts to publicly censure China: The best way forward is for the Biden administration to work with allies that also have large Uyghur exile populations. In particular, the new administration should support Germany in taking greater action. While German politicians have spoken out earlier on this matter, Angela Merkel has avoided the issue, ostensibly to prioritize economic issues. These are not mutually exclusive, and the U.S. and its Western allies should both condemn the violence in Xinjiang and work to foster constructive economic relations with China. 

In addition, the United States and its allies should use their influence at the World Bank to ensure that China does not receive funding that would support the internment camps or the persecution of Uyghurs in any way. Finally, while it may seem as though working with Muslim majority states would be an appropriate strategy, this avenue is not expected to be fruitful. These states demonstrate less solidarity with the Uyghurs, as they continue to welcome Chinese investment

A consistent human rights stance: Aside from China, Mr. Biden should also challenge other countries that commit human rights atrocities. Doing so would present a contrast with the Trump administration, which ignored rights violations in Saudi Arabia, a United States ally. Trump also ceased to criticize North Korea after beginning discussions on a nuclear deal. Also, in the interest of a commitment to justice on United States soil, the new administration should protect overseas Uyghurs from harassment. Finally, the Biden administration should open the borders to Uyghurs who want to immigrate to the United States and grant them asylum. In addition to being a model of freedom at home, allowing Uyghurs to establish themselves permanently in the United States will serve as a way of protecting Uyghur culture outside of China.

Responsible technological cooperation: The United States can continue to work with China on technology, but it should make sure that it is not contributing to surveillance in Xinjiang. The Biden administration can commit to cooperating with China on green technology so that it may continue to make strides in reducing emissions. Even so, the new administration should ensure that American companies do not sell technology that would aid in the continued surveillance of the Uyghur population in Xinjiang.

The incoming administration has an opportunity to constructively engage with China without ignoring the human rights atrocities in Xinjiang. Articulating a firm stance without alienating Beijing is the best way for the United States to have a meaningful impact with regard to this issue.


Muslim worshipers kneel on prayer carpets outside of Id Kah Mosque at the end of Ramadan back in 2008 in Kashgar, Xinjiang province western China. (Pete Niesen/Shutterstock)
Analysis | Asia-Pacific
Nato Summit Trump
Top photo credit: NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, President Donald Trump, at the 2025 NATO Summit in The Hague (NATO/Flickr)

Did Trump just dump the Ukraine War into the Europeans' lap?

Europe

The aerial war between Israel and Iran over the past two weeks sucked most of the world’s attention away from the war in Ukraine.

The Hague NATO Summit confirms that President Donald Trump now sees paying for the war as Europe’s problem. It’s less clear that he will have the patience to keep pushing for peace.

keep readingShow less
Antonio Guterres and Ursula von der Leyen
Top image credit: Alexandros Michailidis / Shutterstock.com

UN Charter turns 80: Why do Europeans mock it so?

Europe

Eighty years ago, on June 26, 1945, the United Nations Charter was signed in San Francisco. But you wouldn’t know it if you listened to European governments today.

After two devastating global military conflicts, the Charter explicitly aimed to “save succeeding generations from the scourge of war.” And it did so by famously outlawing the use of force in Article 2(4). The only exceptions were to be actions taken in self-defense against an actual or imminent attack and missions authorized by the U.N. Security Council to restore collective security.

keep readingShow less
IRGC
Top image credit: Tehran Iran - November 4, 2022, a line of Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps troops crossing the street (saeediex / Shutterstock.com)

If Iranian regime collapses or is toppled, 'what's next?'

Middle East

In a startling turn of events in the Israel-Iran war, six hours after Iran attacked the Al Udeid Air Base— the largest U.S. combat airfield outside of the U.S., and home of the CENTCOM Forward Headquarters — President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire in the 12-day war, quickly taking effect over the subsequent 18 hours. Defying predictions that the Iranian response to the U.S. attack on three nuclear facilities could start an escalatory cycle, the ceasefire appears to be holding. For now.

While the bombing may have ceased, calls for regime change have not. President Trump has backtracked on his comments, but other influential voices have not. John Bolton, Trump’s former national security adviser, said Tuesday that regime change must still happen, “…because this is about the regime itself… Until the regime itself is gone, there is no foundation for peace and security in the Middle East.” These sentiments are echoed by many others to include, as expected, Reza Pahlavi, exiled son of the deposed shah.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.