Follow us on social

google cta
2020-08-14t000000z_1638899827_mt1abcpr738913003_rtrmadp_3_abaca-press-scaled

France and Turkey: When NATO allies collide

Paris has sided with a coalition of states against fellow U.S. ally in Istanbul, showing how fragile these security agreements really are.

Analysis | Middle East
google cta
google cta

It is now clear that France is seeking to fill the void created by the gradual demise of America’s influence in the Middle East and North Africa.

With Emmanuel Macron at the helm, French foreign policy is becoming increasingly at odds with certain fellow NATO allies, especially Turkey. Libya is also proving to be a salient example, as France has dangerously deferred to the United Arab Emirates (UAE) on numerous foreign policy issues, catalyzing the current crisis in French-Turkish relations.

Meanwhile, Paris and Abu Dhabi’s anti-Turkish postures in the Middle East are drawing the two powers together. On June 3, France and UAE held the 12th iteration of their bilateral Strategic Dialogue. During the meeting, high-ranking officials from Abu Dhabi and Paris expressed their desire to further strengthen bilateral relations, endorsing a 10-year roadmap intending to deepen their strategic partnership. 

France sees the UAE as an important source of investment, trade, and energy. Abu Dhabi hosts France’s first permanent military base in the Gulf, allowing the French defense sector to reap massive benefits from Paris’s relationship with the Emirates. In the wake of the 2011 Arab Spring, France’s ties with UAE gained momentum as Abu Dhabi and Paris share an affinity for autocratic, strong man Middle Eastern regimes that can repress the rise of radical Islamism. Here, Macron considers Abu Dhabi and Riyadh important partners in the struggle against extremism. 

However, relations between the France-UAE duet and Turkey seem to have reached rock-bottom. Primarily, Paris and Abu Dhabi have supported Greece in its standoff with Ankara over the convoluted maritime demarcation of exclusive economic zones, and the duet’s sponsorship of General Khalifa Haftar in Libya and the Peoples’ Protect Units (YPG) in Syria has threatened Turkish interests across the region. Macron’s recent controversial speech on Islam is set to further plague relations between Paris and Ankara, especially after he expressed solidarity with Armenia and blamed Azerbaijan and Turkey for the recent outbreak of the conflict with Yerevan.

The idea of an authoritarian strongman ruling Libya resonated well in Paris and Abu Dhabi, which both began supporting Haftar as early as 2014. In April 2019, Paris surreptitiously backed Haftar’s “Operation to Liberate Tripoli” campaign, which aimed to overthrow the North African country’s UN-recognized Government of National Accord (GNA). While the UAE bought Haftar an army of mercenaries, provided him with military equipment, armored vehicles, defense systems, assault drones, and air support, France contributed intelligence, special forces, and some sophisticated weapons.  At the end of 2019, Haftar praised the French support publicly. However, backing the Libyan warlord resulted in fueling the war, war crimes against civilians, and Turkish intervention on behalf of the GNA.

Eastern Mediterranean energy politics drives Turkish involvement in Libya. Turkey’s leadership is concerned about missing opportunities to exploit the Eastern Mediterranean’s gas wealth. Notably, the proposed East Med pipeline project (a 2015 natural gas agreement between Israel, Greece, Cyprus, and Italy) would circumvent Turkey and jockey it out of the Eastern Mediterranean energy market. Coupled with Egypt’s recent discoveries of natural gas and plans to turn itself into a regional energy hub, Turkey’s neighbors have blunted its aspirations to become a Mediterranean energy power. 

In April 2019, Cyprus, Egypt, Greece, Israel, Italy, Jordan, and Palestine agreed to establish the EastMed Gas Forum, headquartered in Cairo and deliberately excluding Turkey. Seven months later, the UAE held its first trilateral meeting with Greece and Cyprus and, soon after, France requested to join the forum as a permanent observer. Each action appears to balance Turkish activities and aspirations in the Eastern Mediterranean energy. 

Reacting to this emerging anti-Turkey coalition in the East Mediterranean and its efforts to isolate Turkey in a thin coastal strip, Ankara signed a maritime demarcation deal with the U.N.-recognized Government of National Accord (GNA) in Libya in November 2019 that would necessitate Turkish involvement in the EastMed project. In return, Turkey committed resolutely to support the GNA in its battle against Haftar.  

Turkish support has decisively tipped the civil war in the GNA’s favor, invalidating years of French and Emirati investment in Haftar and prompting Abu Dhabi and Paris to augment their anti-Turkish efforts in the Eastern Mediterranean. Under its state-owned enterprise DP World, the UAE has placed a bid to operate Israel’s Haifa port, potentially opening up an energy avenue that could circumvent the Strait of Hormuz.  Using this new energy outlet, Abu Dhabi could finance the very expensive EastMed gas pipeline, also exporting Emirati gas, that would further inhibit Turkish energy ambitions. 

While the UAE focuses on infrastructure, France has rallied the European Union (EU) around increased naval vigilance towards Turkey under the banner of defending their ally, Greece. However, concealed in this rally cry for European solidarity is a choking off of Turkish support to the GNA and a tacit endorsement of the UAE. Increased naval monitoring of Turkey would sever Turkish naval supply lines for the GNA while allowing the UAE to continue its airlifts, reifying the balance of power towards Haftar in Libya. Although France has largely ceased its direct support for Haftar, Macron could be using the EU and the UAE as vessels to surreptitiously advance French foreign policy goals.  

While the Libyan conflict persists, Russia has also found a client in Haftar, using him to further the doctrine of establishing Mediterranean ports to deter potential Western advances into the Bosphorus straits.Already realizing this goal at the Syrian port of Tartus, Russian President Vladimir Putin is now inching down the Mediterranean, using the private military company, Wagner group, to further Russian influence in a power vacuum and explore the feasibility of a port at Benghazi. The UAE and France’s anti-Turkey effort has granted Russia a foothold in Libya, seen by many in the West as a long-run security threat to Europe. 

Although the France-UAE duet has not yet hindered Turkish action, it has helped further destabilize the region, fueling the Libyan conflict, and increasing the risks of confrontation. With both Turkey and its neighbors striving to relegate the other’s position in Mediterranean energy politics, and the U.S. remaining largely quiet concerning the tension, whether the duet’s regional policies will dampen Turkey’s posture in the region remains to be seen.  


Dear RS readers: It has been an extraordinary year and our editing team has been working overtime to make sure that we are covering the current conflicts with quality, fresh analysis that doesn’t cleave to the mainstream orthodoxy or take official Washington and the commentariat at face value. Our staff reporters, experts, and outside writers offer top-notch, independent work, daily. Please consider making a tax-exempt, year-end contribution to Responsible Statecraftso that we can continue this quality coverage — which you will find nowhere else — into 2026. Happy Holidays!

File photo dated June 28, 2019 of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan meets with France's President Emmanuel Macron during a bilateral meeting on the sidelines of the G20 Summit in Osaka, Japan. Photo by Eliot Blondet/ABACAPRESS.COM
google cta
Analysis | Middle East
USS Defiant trump class
Top photo credit: Design image of future USS Defiant (Naval Sea Systems Command/US military)

Trump's big, bad battleship will fail

Military Industrial Complex

President Trump announced on December 22 that the Navy would build a new Trump-class of “battleships.” The new ships will dwarf existing surface combatant ships. The first of these planned ships, the expected USS Defiant, would be more than three times the size of an existing Arleigh Burke-class destroyer.

Predictably, a major selling point for the new ships is that they will be packed full of all the latest technology. These massive new battleships will be armed with the most sophisticated guns and missiles, to include hypersonics and eventually nuclear-tipped cruise missiles. The ships will also be festooned with lasers and will incorporate the latest AI technology.

keep readingShow less
Does Israel really still need a 'qualitative military edge' ?
An Israeli Air Force F-35I Lightning II “Adir” approaches a U.S. Air Force 908th Expeditionary Refueling Squadron KC-10 Extender to refuel during “Enduring Lightning II” exercise over southern Israel Aug. 2, 2020. While forging a resolute partnership, the allies train to maintain a ready posture to deter against regional aggressors. (U.S. Air Force photo by Master Sgt. Patrick OReilly)

Does Israel really still need a 'qualitative military edge' ?

Middle East

On November 17, 2025, President Donald Trump announced that he would approve the sale to Saudi Arabia of the most advanced US manned strike fighter aircraft, the F-35. The news came one day before the visit to the White House of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, who has sought to purchase 48 such aircraft in a multibillion-dollar deal that has the potential to shift the military status quo in the Middle East. Currently, Israel is the only other state in the region to possess the F-35.

During the White House meeting, Trump suggested that Saudi Arabia’s F-35s should be equipped with the same technology as those procured by Israel. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu quickly sought assurances from US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who sought to walk back Trump’s comment and reiterated a “commitment that the United States will continue to preserve Israel’s qualitative military edge in everything related to supplying weapons and military systems to countries in the Middle East.”

keep readingShow less
Think a $35B gas deal will thaw Egypt toward Israel? Not so fast.
Top image credit: Miss.Cabul via shutterstock.com

Think a $35B gas deal will thaw Egypt toward Israel? Not so fast.

Middle East

The Trump administration’s hopes of convening a summit between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi either in Cairo or Washington as early as the end of this month or early next are unlikely to materialize.

The centerpiece of the proposed summit is the lucrative expansion of natural gas exports worth an estimated $35 billion. This mega-deal will pump an additional 4 billion cubic meters annually into Egypt through 2040.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.