Follow us on social

Shutterstock_471111341-scaled

How the Qataris conquered DC while you were sleeping

Qatar's charm offensive is part of a multi-faceted and strategic influence operation designed to further entangle the U.S. with this autocratic power.

Analysis | Reporting | Washington Politics

The coronavirus has brought most industries in our nation’s capital to a screeching halt. DC’s celebrated restaurant scene is largely shuttered. The World Series champion Washington Nationals aren’t defending their title. Even the Beltway’s notorious traffic has disappeared.

But, one industry in DC is thriving: lobbying. As Politico explained, “the coronavirus pandemic has fueled a boom in business on K street.” Much of this surge in the influence industry has been driven by large businesses and associations vying to secure more than their fair share of the coronavirus stimulus packages. And, lobbyists for some foreign governments are taking full advantage of the pandemic too. But, they’re not looking to score government stimulus money; they’re looking to score goodwill during these bad times.

Lobbyists working for Qatar have, arguably, been at the forefront of this coronavirus charitable crusade. They’ve blasted out press releases about Qatar hosting a conference with high-level World Health Organization (WHO) officials in response to the pandemic. They alerted congressional staffers when Secretary of State Mike Pompeo sent a letter to Qatar’s Minister of Foreign Affairs thanking Qatar Airways for helping tens of thousands of Americans return home during the coronavirus pandemic.

Qatar has also been spreading money all over America for coronavirus relief. As COVID-19 cases continued to mount in April, Qatar made a $5 million donation to help families in Los Angeles. In a tweet in early May, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo thanked, “the government and people of Qatar…for your assistance in helping send critical supplies and for the donation of aid.” Even smaller cities, like Charleston, South Carolina, are receiving coronavirus relief money from the government of Qatar.

On its face, this might simply be seen as a friendly country helping out the U.S. in a time of need. That might certainly be true, and American communities are desperately in need of help, but this is only a portion of the story. This charm offensive is part of a multi-faceted and strategic Qatari influence operation designed to further entangle the U.S. with this autocratic power.

Qatar’s coronavirus campaign is the latest installment in a resurgent Qatari influence operation that began almost three years ago thanks, perhaps ironically, to the immense influence of another Middle East power — Saudi Arabia.

When Donald Trump won the 2016 presidential election the Saudis began courting Trump and were successful beyond their wildest dreams. This love affair between Trump and the Saudi regime culminated with Trump’s first trip abroad as president to Riyadh in May 2017. Just weeks later Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and a host of other countries launched a blockade of Qatar and had the full backing of the American president. As is the president’s way when expressing his views on all delicate foreign policy matters, Trump took to Twitter to declare his support for the Saudi faction. With the president’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, also allegedly “in the pocket” of future Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the Qataris found themselves completely outmatched in the influence game in DC. So, they did what many countries now do when faced with an international crisis involving the U.S. — they hired an army of lobbyists.

As documented in a recently released report that I authored, “The Qatar Lobby in Washington,” after the blockade began in 2017, the Qatari government vastly expanded the number of Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) registered firms working for them. They started just days after the blockade began by bringing on the law firm of former Attorney General John Ashcroft, with a whopping $2.5 million contract for just the first ninety days of work. Later in 2017 they added more Republican fire-power via Stonington Strategies, headed by Nick Muzin, who previously worked on Trump’s presidential campaign. Muzin’s strategy for getting the president off the Saudi’s side was simple: influence those who influence him, most notably Fox News. Muzin and Stonington ultimately targeted around 250 Trump influencers on behalf of Qatar, even paying for them to go on all-expenses-paid trips to Doha. Fox News commentator and former Governor Mike Huckabee, who went on one such trip tweeted, “Just back from a few days in surprisingly beautiful, modern, and hospitable Doha, Qatar.”

Needless to say, the lobbying blitz worked. On April 10, 2018, less than a year after the blockade began and Trump accused the Qatari government of financing terrorism, Trump met with the Emir of Qatar in the Oval office and described him as a “great gentleman.” The Emir, in an Orwellian historical rewrite, thanked the president for, “supporting us during this blockade.”

And, the Qatar lobby was far from done. By the end of 2018, Qatar had more than two dozen FARA registered firms on their payroll, according to our analysis of all the FARA filings made by firms working on behalf of Qatar. They had also contacted nearly two-thirds of all members of Congress and made campaign contributions to 59 of those members, sometimes on the exact same day they met with them.

Even this extraordinary influence operation is just the tip of the iceberg of Qatar’s influence in America. The Qataris are one of the top donors to DC think tanks — the Brookings Institution alone receives more than $2 million annually from Qatar. And, never mind what you’ve heard about Chinese influence on campus, Qatar is, by far, the leading foreign donor to American Universities, outspending China more than two-to-one.

The Qataris are also major investors in DC real estate. Qatar invested more than $600 million to become the primary owner of the gleaming City Center in the heart of DC and has since purchased other prominent real estate around town. Most recently, in April, the Embassy of the State of Qatar bought the historic Hollerith House in Georgetown for $17.75 million, the most expensive home purchased in the nation’s capital since Amazon founder Jeff Bezos dropped $22 million on a DC home in 2017. And, the recent coronavirus donations follow a long-track record of Qatar making charitable donations in the U.S., like providing $30 million in grants to help Texas recover from the devastation of Hurricane Harvey.

Perhaps most importantly, Qatar has amassed this extraordinary influence operation extremely quietly. While the Saudi lobby has garnered all the wrong headlines — particularly given the murder of Jamal Khashoggi and their devastating war in Yemen — Qatar has flown under the radar, while dramatically increasing its ties to the U.S. For example, the Al-Udeid military base — that is already home to more U.S. troops than and base in the Middle East — is expanding and trade between the U.S. and Qatar grew by a remarkable 35 percent in 2019.

But, is this good for U.S. foreign policy? Qatar certainly appears less volatile than their mercurial Saudi and Emirati neighbors who seem intent on continuing their disastrous war in Yemen and doing all they can to drag the U.S. into what would be an even more disastrous war with Iran. But, make no mistake, Qatar is still an authoritarian regime with a terrible human rights record.

Most importantly, the resurgence in U.S. ties with Qatar didn’t happen because it was good foreign policy, it happened because U.S. foreign policy is for sale. And, so long as U.S. Middle East policy continues to be determined by the highest bidder, we should continue to expect U.S. foreign policy to be of little benefit to the U.S.


Photo credit: bakdc / Shutterstock.com
Analysis | Reporting | Washington Politics
Recep Tayyip Erdogan Benjamin Netanyahu
Top photo credit: President of Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdogan (Shutterstock/ Mustafa Kirazli) and Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu (Salty View/Shutterstock)
Is Turkey's big break with Israel for real?

Why Israel is now turning its sights on Turkey

Middle East

As the distribution of power shifts in the region, with Iran losing relative power and Israel and Turkey emerging on top, an intensified rivalry between Tel Aviv and Ankara is not a question of if, but how. It is not a question of whether they choose the rivalry, but how they choose to react to it: through confrontation or peaceful management.

As I describe in Treacherous Alliance, a similar situation emerged after the end of the Cold War: The collapse of the Soviet Union dramatically changed the global distribution of power, and the defeat of Saddam's Iraq in the Persian Gulf War reshuffled the regional geopolitical deck. A nascent bipolar regional structure took shape with Iran and Israel emerging as the two main powers with no effective buffer between them (since Iraq had been defeated). The Israelis acted on this first, inverting the strategy that had guided them for the previous decades: The Doctrine of the Periphery. According to this doctrine, Israel would build alliances with the non-Arab states in its periphery (Iran, Turkey, and Ethiopia) to balance the Arab powers in its vicinity (Iraq, Syria, and Egypt, respectively).

keep readingShow less
Havana, Cuba
Top Image Credit: Havana, Cuba, 2019. (CLWphoto/Shutterstock)

Trump lifted sanctions on Syria. Now do Cuba.

North America

President Trump’s new National Security Presidential Memorandum (NSPM) on Cuba, announced on June 30, reaffirms the policy of sanctions and hostility he articulated at the start of his first term in office. In fact, the new NSPM is almost identical to the old one.

The policy’s stated purpose is to “improve human rights, encourage the rule of law, foster free markets and free enterprise, and promote democracy” by restricting financial flows to the Cuban government. It reaffirms Trump’s support for the 1996 Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity Act, which explicitly requires regime change — that Cuba become a multiparty democracy with a free market economy (among other conditions) before the U.S. embargo will be lifted.

keep readingShow less
SPD Germany Ukraine
Top Photo: Lars Klingbeil (l-r, SPD), Federal Minister of Finance, Vice-Chancellor and SPD Federal Chairman, and Bärbel Bas (SPD), Federal Minister of Labor and Social Affairs and SPD Party Chairwoman, bid farewell to the members of the previous Federal Cabinet Olaf Scholz (SPD), former Federal Chancellor, Nancy Faeser, Saskia Esken, SPD Federal Chairwoman, Karl Lauterbach, Svenja Schulze and Hubertus Heil at the SPD Federal Party Conference. At the party conference, the SPD intends to elect a new executive committee and initiate a program process. Kay Nietfeld/dpa via Reuters Connect

Does Germany’s ruling coalition have a peace problem?

Europe

Surfacing a long-dormant intra-party conflict, the Friedenskreise (peace circles) within the Social Democratic Party of Germany has published a “Manifesto on Securing Peace in Europe” in a stark challenge to the rearmament line taken by the SPD leaders governing in coalition with the conservative CDU-CSU under Chancellor Friedrich Merz.

Although the Manifesto clearly does not have broad support in the SPD, the party’s leader, Deputy Chancellor and Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil, won only 64% support from the June 28-29 party conference for his performance so far, a much weaker endorsement than anticipated. The views of the party’s peace camp may be part of the explanation.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.