Follow us on social

Shutterstock_1623221884-scaled

Don’t let the Saudis use coronavirus concerns to hide their crimes

Saudi Arabia is already fomenting one of the world's worst humanitarian crises — why are we asking them to help solve another?

Analysis | Middle East

Saudi Arabia has just offered to host a “Virtual” G20 summit, bringing the world’s leaders together to address the coronavirus pandemic. While the world absolutely needs much better international coordination in response to this catastrophic pandemic, Saudi Arabia's ruling family is one of the last governments we should want convening a conversation on solving any humanitarian crisis, let alone a crisis of this magnitude.

Saudi Arabia's ruling family has repeatedly demonstrated its opposition to the very principles that enable a successful response to a global pandemic. To successfully address a public health crisis, governments must embrace information transparency and a willingness to listen to independent voices who might challenge their preconceived notions. The Saudi dictatorship has consistently done the opposite, deploying brutal campaigns of internal repression and censorship to silence dissent.

But that's not the only problem. To make matters worse, Saudi Arabia's ruling family has actually increased the risk that the coronavirus will spread across the Middle East through its devastating blockades and bombardment of Yemeni society.

First, there is the question of access to information. Addressing a public health crisis effectively requires information transparency and a posture of receptivity to dissent. Saudi Arabia's dictatorship often does the opposite, violently suppressing any dissenting voices.

The assassination of Jamal Khashoggi was one horrifying example of this. Another is the ongoing persecution of Loujain al-Hathloul, a leading voice in the Saudi women’s freedom to drive campaign. Right now, the Saudi monarchy is prosecuting al-Hathloul in a sham trial after already torturing her during some two years of imprisonment.

Against this backdrop of repression, some Saudi voices turned to Twitter as a platform for anonymous free speech. In response, the Saudi monarchy paid spies inside Twitter to find and share information on thousands of users of the social media platform. Human rights advocates outside Saudi Arabia have since received reports of the jailing and brutal torture of those who the Saudi dictatorship believed were using Twitter to criticize the government.

Allowing the Saudi monarchy to convene a conversation of world leaders on the coronavirus pandemic would provide a false sheen of legitimacy for a government that is actively fostering a climate of repression and censorship both inside and outside its borders.

But the problem isn't just Saudi repression and censorship, it’s that the Saudi monarchy has actually pursued strategies that now risk an expansion of the coronavirus pandemic in the Middle East.

In its war with Houthi rebels, Saudi Arabia has repeatedly bombed and blockaded Yemeni civilians and civilian infrastructure, creating a humanitarian and public health crisis. In the words of the International Committee of the Red Cross, Yemen's health care systems have been "decimated."

One result: According to the World Health Organization, there have been over 1.3 million suspected cases of cholera in the country, leading to what became the world's largest cholera outbreak in 2017.

As the coronavirus pandemic moves across the globe, Yemenis lack the basic public health defenses necessary to manage the threat. And as we now know all too well, this pandemic respects no borders. Wherever it can be incubated is a potential jumping off point for the next round of global infections. By creating a humanitarian crisis in Yemen, the Saudi monarchy has made all of us less safe.

Given this track-record, why is Saudi Arabia even being allowed to pitch itself as a convener for the international response to a public health crisis? The answer is, in short, the Saudi lobby.

Through the lobbying and public relations firms on their payroll, the Saudis have done an extraordinary job of white-washing their record of human rights atrocities. Their foreign agents have repeatedly touted Saudi efforts to reduce civilian casualties in Yemen, only to have their talking points tragically belied by horrendous attacks on funerals and markets just days later. Within days of Khashoggi’s murder they were spending millions on public relations and lobbying firms to thwart reprisals for the heinous murder of a Washington Post journalist on foreign soil. Just this month, their foreign agents distributed propaganda touting “representation and engagement of women” at the G20, conveniently ignoring that female activists pushing for women’s rights in Saudi Arabia, like Loujain al-Hathloul, are still imprisoned there.

Today, the Saudi’s are once again trying to get Americans and the world to turn a blind-eye to their ongoing transgressions. But, the stakes are far too high to let an instigator of humanitarian crises lead the charge against the greatest crisis of the 21st century so far. While it’s clear that the world needs much greater international coordination to address the coronavirus pandemic, it’s just as clear Saudi Arabia’s dictatorship should not be allowed to use this moment as a propaganda victory to obscure their many crimes.


Saudi Arabia's war on Yemen is fomenting a humanitarian crisis there, including water shortages throughout the country (Photo credit: akramalrasny / Shutterstock.com)
Analysis | Middle East
Why new CENTCOM chief Brad Cooper is as wrong as the old one
Top photo credit: U.S. Navy Vice Admiral Brad Cooper speaks to guests at the IISS Manama Dialogue in Manama, Bahrain, November 17, 2023. REUTERS/Hamad I Mohammed

Why new CENTCOM chief Brad Cooper is as wrong as the old one

Middle East

If accounts of President Donald Trump’s decision to strike Iranian nuclear facilities this past month are to be believed, the president’s initial impulse to stay out of the Israel-Iran conflict failed to survive the prodding of hawkish advisers, chiefly U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) chief Michael Kurilla.

With Kurilla, an Iran hawk and staunch ally of both the Israeli government and erstwhile national security adviser Mike Waltz, set to leave office this summer, advocates of a more restrained foreign policy may understandably feel like they are out of the woods.

keep readingShow less
Putin Trump
Top photo credit: Vladimir Putin (Office of the President of the Russian Federation) and Donald Trump (US Southern Command photo)

How Trump's 50-day deadline threat against Putin will backfire

Europe

In the first six months of his second term, President Donald Trump has demonstrated his love for three things: deals, tariffs, and ultimatums.

He got to combine these passions during his Oval Office meeting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte on Monday. Only moments after the two leaders announced a new plan to get military aid to Ukraine, Trump issued an ominous 50-day deadline for Russian President Vladimir Putin to agree to a ceasefire. “We're going to be doing secondary tariffs if we don't have a deal within 50 days,” Trump told the assembled reporters.

keep readingShow less
Trump White House reporters
U.S. President Donald Trump responds to questions from reporters on the South Lawn on July 11, 2025. (Photo by Samuel Corum/Sipa USA)

Russia sanctions & new weapons, is Trump stuck in Groundhog Day?

Europe

President Trump finds himself in a rerun of his first term on Ukraine policy. Declawed by lawmakers in D.C. and forced to push policies that worsen the U.S. relationship with Russia.

He is expected today to announce that the U.S. will be sending more advanced patriot missile batteries to Ukraine — via NATO member countries, which will be paying for it.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.