Follow us on social

google cta
2020-02-23t104036z_829837423_rc2a6f94lbrh_rtrmadp_3_china-health-north-korea-scaled

The case for U.S.-North Korea diplomacy to combat the coronavirus

U.S. and international sanctions have crushed North Korea's health care system, making it harder to deal with the coronavirus.

Analysis | Asia-Pacific
google cta
google cta

The coronavirus, or COVID-19, has become a massive threat to the United States. The Dow Jones Industrial Average plunged for the second consecutive day on Tuesday, as the news about American susceptibility to the coronavirus made national headlines. This may be the beginning of an economic downturn, rather than a blip, given the size of the economies that are grappling with the virus, such as China, Japan, South Korea, and Italy. And now the virus has reached American troops. A 23-year-old American soldier stationed in South Korea recently tested positive for COVID-19 — the first U.S. service member to contract the virus.

Indeed, the coronavirus constitutes both a security and economic threat to the United States. It lies in the interest of the United States to eliminate the virus, even in countries with which it has hostile relations. North Korea is a case in point.

Some American policymakers view North Korea as a distant problem. But infectious diseases know no borders, as the current situation shows. North Korea’s close proximity to China, the decrepit state of its healthcare sector, and the high rate of malnutrition among its people all make North Korea extraordinarily susceptible to the coronavirus. Its impact could also spill over into East Asia, including to South Korea where 28,500 U.S. service members are stationed. 

Unfortunately, the international community has no idea if the coronavirus is spreading inside North Korea. As of yesterday, there were 80,994 confirmed cases and 2,760 deaths from the COVID-19 outbreak, according to the Coronavirus COVID-19 Global Cases by Johns Hopkins CSSE, mostly concentrated in East Asia, Italy, and Iran. There are currently no known cases of COVID-19 from North Korea, which shares 900 miles of border with China, home of the largest confirmed cases of coronavirus in the world. The fact that we know nothing about the level of infection or deaths within North Korea is extremely problematic and, left unchanged, could have serious public health implications. According to Choi Jung-hoon, a North Korean neurologist who defected to South Korea in 2012, "Past epidemics that originated in China have always spread to North Korea, and vice versa." During previous outbreaks, such as SARS, he says, cases in North Korea often went unreported. 

Responding to this threat to the U.S. national security is complicated by Washington’s sanctions-centric North Korea policy and its inability to look beyond the nuclear issue. For example, at yesterday’s Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on East Asia, the Pacific, and International Cybersecurity Policy hearing on North Korea, only about five minutes were devoted to COVID-19. Of the three representatives who testified, two were from the same think tank (Center for Strategic and International Studies), and two had formerly worked at the Central Intelligence Agency. There was hardly any debate on the impact of international sanctions on North Korea’s healthcare infrastructure or its ability to address pandemics. What’s more, the current U.S. policy has contributed to the weak healthcare system in North Korea. As Ambassador Bob King stated at the hearing, the global sanctions regime against North Korea have made it difficult to deliver life-saving aid to the North Korean people, whether they are test kits, masks, or sending trained personnel to conduct tests in-country for maximum accuracy. 

Dr. Kee Park, a lecturer on Global Health and Social Medicine at Harvard Medical School with firsthand knowledge of the North Korean health system described to me, “When faced with an international public health emergency, the idea that permission should be obtained by highly-regarded international organizations such as the World Health Organization and UNICEF prior to delivering urgent protective and diagnostic supplies is unethical and morally objectionable.” U.S.-led economic sanctions against North Korea have contributed to a weakened healthcare system inside the country, which now threatens U.S. troops and U.S. national security interests in the Asia-Pacific region.

The United States and North Korea must look beyond the nuclear issue and recognize that there’s a common threat. Diplomacy is essential for addressing this and other transnational threats that require coordination, communication, and problem-solving. Both countries must address the coronavirus without delay. Specifically, Pyongyang should be more open and transparent about the impact of the coronavirus on its people and be willing to accept aid. Washington needs to be more creative and ensure that sanctions and North Korea's isolation does not prevent it from receiving medical aid or hamper its ability to respond to that pandemic. After this ordeal has ended, a public debate on the impact of U.S. and U.N. sanctions on the North Korean healthcare system is in order, as the status quo clearly is not serving U.S. national security interests.  


A trolley bus is disinfected amid fears over the spread of the novel coronavirus in Pyongyang, North Korea, in this photo taken on February 22, 2020 and released by Kyodo February 23, 2020. Picture taken February 22, 2020. Mandatory credit Kyodo/via REUTERS ATTENTION EDITORS - THIS IMAGE WAS PROVIDED BY A THIRD PARTY. MANDATORY CREDIT. JAPAN OUT. NO COMMERCIAL OR EDITORIAL SALES IN JAPAN.
google cta
Analysis | Asia-Pacific
Iran nuclear
Top image credit: An Iranian cleric and a young girl stand next to scale models of Iran-made ballistic missiles and centrifuges after participating in an anti-U.S. and anti-Israeli rally marking the anniversary of the U.S. embassy occupation in downtown Tehran, Iran, on November 4, 2025.(Photo by Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto via REUTERS CONNECT)

Want Iran to get the bomb? Try regime change

Middle East

Washington is once again flirting with a familiar temptation: the belief that enough pressure, and if necessary, military force, can bend Iran to its will. The Trump administration appears ready to move beyond containment toward forcing collapse. Before treating Iran as the next candidate for forced transformation, policymakers should ask a question they have consistently failed to answer in the Middle East: “what follows regime change?”

The record is sobering. In the past two decades, regime change in the region has yielded state fragmentation, authoritarian restoration, or prolonged conflict. Iraq remains fractured despite two decades of U.S. investment. Egypt’s democratic opening collapsed within a year. Libya, Syria, and Yemen spiraled into civil wars whose spillover persists. In each case, removing a regime proved far easier than constructing a viable successor. Iran would not be the exception. It would be the rule — at a scale that dwarfs anything the region has experienced.

keep readingShow less
Much ado about a Chinese 'mega-embassy' in London
Top image credit: London, UK - 3rd May 2025: Protestors gather outside the Royal Mint to demonstrate against plans to relocate China's embassy to the site. (Monkey Butler Images/Shutterstock)

Much ado about a Chinese 'mega-embassy' in London

Europe

A group of Russian nuns were recently sighted selling holy trinkets in Swedish churches. Soon, Swedish newspapers were awash with headlines about pro-Putin spies engaged in “funding the Putin war machine.” Russian Orthodox priests had also allegedly infiltrated Swedish churches located suspiciously close to military bases and airports.

Michael Ojermo, the rector of Täby, a suburb of Stockholm, tried to quell the alarm. There is no evidence of ecclesiastical espionage, he said, and “a few trinkets cannot fund a war.”

keep readingShow less
world powers
Top photo credit: (Ben_Je/Shutterstock)

US-China symposium: Spheres of influence for me, not for thee?

Asia-Pacific

In the new National Security Strategy and National Defense Strategy, the Trump team charges that the Monroe Doctrine has been "ignored" by previous administrations and that the primary goal now is to reassert control over its economic and security interests in the Western Hemisphere.

"We will guarantee U.S. military and commercial access to key terrain, especially the Panama Canal, Gulf of America, and Greenland," states the NDS. The U.S. will work with neighbors to protect "our shared interests," but "where they do not, we will stand ready to take focused, decisive action that concretely advances U.S. interests."

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.