Follow us on social

google cta
Steve Witkoff envoy

Trump envoy Witkoff: Gaza uninhabitable for at least 15 years

Says Hamas must physically leave the strip; acknowledges that Palestinians may return

Analysis | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

Steve Witkoff, President Trump’s Special Envoy to the Middle East said on CBS’ “Face the Nation” Sunday that “people don’t belong living” in the besieged Gaza Strip for “at least 15 years.”

Addressing reporter Margaret Brennan’s questions about Palestinians’ right to return to Gaza, Witkoff emphasized that the Strip was uninhabitable.

“Level setting the facts suggest that nobody can really live [in Gaza] in a safe environment for probably at least 15 years,” Witkoff said. “And so there's a lot of work that has to be done there. There's tons of demolition, there's artillery shells all over the place that could explode at any moment. This is a much longer project, and people don't belong living there right now.”

"[Trump's] come up with a new notion. And the new notion is, let's create a better opportunity for these, for people who have lived in Gaza to have a better life for themselves, better upside, better aspirations for what can happen for their children and so forth,” Witkoff told Brennan.

Witkoff also stressed that Hamas must be barred from power — and from Gaza. “Hamas cannot be allowed to come back into the government,” Witkoff explained. “They've got to leave, and we're going to — the negotiation will be around that.”

“I would say [Hamas needs to leave] physically,” Witkoff explained. He said that the Trump administration had ideas about where Hamas could go, but could not yet publicly comment on them.

Hamas’ recent shows of strength, brandishing new weapons, uniforms, trucks, and equipment in recent hostage release videos indicate their abject lack of interest in leaving Gaza “physically” anytime soon.

Altogether, Witkoff’s comments parrot Trump’s previously floated Gaza comments from February 4, where he said the U.S. would “take over the Gaza Strip.” The proposal would force the displacement of Palestinians into various Arab nations that since repeatedly rejected the notion. Forced displacement is illegal under international law.

Witkoff did leave the door open for Palestinians’ right to return to Gaza on “Face the Nation,” clarifying, "I'm not sure that anyone has a problem with people — with people returning.” But Trump previously argued in a February 10 Fox News interview that they wouldn’t have the right under his plan.

"No, [Palestinians] wouldn't [have a right of return] because they're going to have much better housing…I'm talking about building a permanent place for them [elsewhere]” Trump had said.

Facing international backlash over what many would consider ethnic cleansing, the Trump administration has publicly walked back parts of the president’s initial Gaza proposal. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt, for example, clarified on February 5 that Trump’s plans for Palestinians were for temporary accommodation, rather than permanent relocation. Trump himself said he was “not forcing” his Gaza proposal in a Fox News radio interview Friday.

Witkoff’s “Face the Nation” comments yesterday, however, signal the Trump administration’s commitment to some kind of U.S. Gaza takeover plan, even if some details remain unclear.


Top image credit: Gov. Kathy Hochul, U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff, more - "Face the Nation" Full Broadcast, Feb. 23, 2025 (You Tube/Screenshot)
google cta
Analysis | QiOSK
Iran nuclear
Top image credit: An Iranian cleric and a young girl stand next to scale models of Iran-made ballistic missiles and centrifuges after participating in an anti-U.S. and anti-Israeli rally marking the anniversary of the U.S. embassy occupation in downtown Tehran, Iran, on November 4, 2025.(Photo by Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto via REUTERS CONNECT)

Want Iran to get the bomb? Try regime change

Middle East

Washington is once again flirting with a familiar temptation: the belief that enough pressure, and if necessary, military force, can bend Iran to its will. The Trump administration appears ready to move beyond containment toward forcing collapse. Before treating Iran as the next candidate for forced transformation, policymakers should ask a question they have consistently failed to answer in the Middle East: “what follows regime change?”

The record is sobering. In the past two decades, regime change in the region has yielded state fragmentation, authoritarian restoration, or prolonged conflict. Iraq remains fractured despite two decades of U.S. investment. Egypt’s democratic opening collapsed within a year. Libya, Syria, and Yemen spiraled into civil wars whose spillover persists. In each case, removing a regime proved far easier than constructing a viable successor. Iran would not be the exception. It would be the rule — at a scale that dwarfs anything the region has experienced.

keep readingShow less
Much ado about a Chinese 'mega-embassy' in London
Top image credit: London, UK - 3rd May 2025: Protestors gather outside the Royal Mint to demonstrate against plans to relocate China's embassy to the site. (Monkey Butler Images/Shutterstock)

Much ado about a Chinese 'mega-embassy' in London

Europe

A group of Russian nuns were recently sighted selling holy trinkets in Swedish churches. Soon, Swedish newspapers were awash with headlines about pro-Putin spies engaged in “funding the Putin war machine.” Russian Orthodox priests had also allegedly infiltrated Swedish churches located suspiciously close to military bases and airports.

Michael Ojermo, the rector of Täby, a suburb of Stockholm, tried to quell the alarm. There is no evidence of ecclesiastical espionage, he said, and “a few trinkets cannot fund a war.”

keep readingShow less
world powers
Top photo credit: (Ben_Je/Shutterstock)

US-China symposium: Spheres of influence for me, not for thee?

Asia-Pacific

In the new National Security Strategy and National Defense Strategy, the Trump team charges that the Monroe Doctrine has been "ignored" by previous administrations and that the primary goal now is to reassert control over its economic and security interests in the Western Hemisphere.

"We will guarantee U.S. military and commercial access to key terrain, especially the Panama Canal, Gulf of America, and Greenland," states the NDS. The U.S. will work with neighbors to protect "our shared interests," but "where they do not, we will stand ready to take focused, decisive action that concretely advances U.S. interests."

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.