Follow us on social

Steve Witkoff envoy

Trump envoy Witkoff: Gaza uninhabitable for at least 15 years

Says Hamas must physically leave the strip; acknowledges that Palestinians may return

Analysis | QiOSK

Steve Witkoff, President Trump’s Special Envoy to the Middle East said on CBS’ “Face the Nation” Sunday that “people don’t belong living” in the besieged Gaza Strip for “at least 15 years.”

Addressing reporter Margaret Brennan’s questions about Palestinians’ right to return to Gaza, Witkoff emphasized that the Strip was uninhabitable.

“Level setting the facts suggest that nobody can really live [in Gaza] in a safe environment for probably at least 15 years,” Witkoff said. “And so there's a lot of work that has to be done there. There's tons of demolition, there's artillery shells all over the place that could explode at any moment. This is a much longer project, and people don't belong living there right now.”

"[Trump's] come up with a new notion. And the new notion is, let's create a better opportunity for these, for people who have lived in Gaza to have a better life for themselves, better upside, better aspirations for what can happen for their children and so forth,” Witkoff told Brennan.

Witkoff also stressed that Hamas must be barred from power — and from Gaza. “Hamas cannot be allowed to come back into the government,” Witkoff explained. “They've got to leave, and we're going to — the negotiation will be around that.”

“I would say [Hamas needs to leave] physically,” Witkoff explained. He said that the Trump administration had ideas about where Hamas could go, but could not yet publicly comment on them.

Hamas’ recent shows of strength, brandishing new weapons, uniforms, trucks, and equipment in recent hostage release videos indicate their abject lack of interest in leaving Gaza “physically” anytime soon.

Altogether, Witkoff’s comments parrot Trump’s previously floated Gaza comments from February 4, where he said the U.S. would “take over the Gaza Strip.” The proposal would force the displacement of Palestinians into various Arab nations that since repeatedly rejected the notion. Forced displacement is illegal under international law.

Witkoff did leave the door open for Palestinians’ right to return to Gaza on “Face the Nation,” clarifying, "I'm not sure that anyone has a problem with people — with people returning.” But Trump previously argued in a February 10 Fox News interview that they wouldn’t have the right under his plan.

"No, [Palestinians] wouldn't [have a right of return] because they're going to have much better housing…I'm talking about building a permanent place for them [elsewhere]” Trump had said.

Facing international backlash over what many would consider ethnic cleansing, the Trump administration has publicly walked back parts of the president’s initial Gaza proposal. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt, for example, clarified on February 5 that Trump’s plans for Palestinians were for temporary accommodation, rather than permanent relocation. Trump himself said he was “not forcing” his Gaza proposal in a Fox News radio interview Friday.

Witkoff’s “Face the Nation” comments yesterday, however, signal the Trump administration’s commitment to some kind of U.S. Gaza takeover plan, even if some details remain unclear.


Top image credit: Gov. Kathy Hochul, U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff, more - "Face the Nation" Full Broadcast, Feb. 23, 2025 (You Tube/Screenshot)
Analysis | QiOSK
Fort Bragg horrors expose dark underbelly of post-9/11 warfare
Top photo credit: Seth Harp book jacket (Viking press) US special operators/deviant art/creative commons

Fort Bragg horrors expose dark underbelly of post-9/11 warfare

Media

In 2020 and 2021, 109 U.S. soldiers died at Fort Bragg, the largest military base in the country and the central location for the key Special Operations Units in the American military.

Only four of them were on overseas deployments. The others died stateside, mostly of drug overdoses, violence, or suicide. The situation has hardly improved. It was recently revealed that another 51 soldiers died at Fort Bragg in 2023. According to U.S. government data, these represent more military fatalities than have occurred at the hands of enemy forces in any year since 2013.

keep readingShow less
Trump Netanyahu
Top image credit: President Donald Trump hosts a bilateral dinner for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Monday, July 7, 2025, in the Blue Room. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

The case for US Middle East retrenchment has never been clearer

Middle East

Is Israel becoming the new hegemon of the Middle East? The answer to this question is an important one.

Preventing the rise of a rival regional hegemon — a state with a preponderance of military and economic power — in Eurasia has long been a core goal of U.S. foreign policy. During the Cold War, Washington feared Soviet dominion over Europe. Today, U.S. policymakers worry that China’s increasingly capable military will crowd the United States out of Asia’s lucrative economic markets. The United States has also acted repeatedly to prevent close allies in Europe and Asia from becoming military competitors, using promises of U.S. military protection to keep them weak and dependent.

keep readingShow less
United Nations
Top image credit: lev radin / Shutterstock.com

Do we need a treaty on neutrality?

Global Crises

In an era of widespread use of economic sanctions, dual-use technology exports, and hybrid warfare, the boundary between peacetime and wartime has become increasingly blurry. Yet understandings of neutrality remain stuck in the time of trench warfare. An updated conception of neutrality, codified through an international treaty, is necessary for global security.

Neutrality in the 21st century is often whatever a country wants it to be. For some, such as the European neutrals like Switzerland and Ireland, it is compatible with non-U.N. sanctions (such as by the European Union) while for others it is not. Countries in the Global South are also more likely to take a case-by-case approach, such as choosing to not take a stance on a specific conflict and instead call for a peaceful resolution while others believe a moral position does not undermine neutrality.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.