Follow us on social

google cta
J.D. Vance

J.D. Vance is tie-breaker killing War Powers vote

Republicans stopped the process before colleagues could even weigh in on further military force in Venezuela

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

Republican senators used a procedural measure to kill a resolution today that would have halted unauthorized hostilities against Venezuela.

Before a vote could take place for S.J. Res. 98, sponsored by Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.), Sen. Jim Risch (R-Id.) challenged the resolution’s privileged status in a point of order along the lines that there were no ongoing hostilities with Venezuela.

That point of order prompted a vote, which tied 50-50. Vice President J.D. Vance broke that tie and voted for the point of order, thus removing the resolution from immediate consideration on the Senate Floor.

Sens. Todd Young (R-In.) and Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), who voted to advance the resolution last week, also voted for the point of order.

On the Senate floor the day of the vote, Republican leadership asserted that war powers are unnecessary, because there are no ongoing hostilities between the U.S. and Venezuela.

“We have no troops on the ground in Venezuela. We’re not currently conducting military operations there,” Sen. John Thune (R- S.D.) said before the vote.

“The objective of this resolution is to stop something that is not happening,” Sen. Jim Risch (R- Id.) said.

Angered by the procedural move to quash the vote, resolution supporters contended that hostilities with Venezuela have already begun, and that Congress must assert its power to block further unauthorized action.

“Certainly [the senators moving to block the resolution] must think that invasion of a capital is a war, that removing a president is war, or a blockade of a country. So even though the first incursion, the first invasion, may well be over — is the blockade of a country not a war?,” Sen. Rand Paul asked. “Are we not at war when we have a military blockade of a country?’

“An argument that the Venezuela campaign is not imminent hostilities, within the meaning of the War Powers Resolution, is a violation of every reasonable meaning of that term,” Sen. Kaine charged. “To pretend otherwise would weaken the respect that this institution should aspire to.”

The Trump administration previously said it was “not afraid” to put “boots on the ground” in Venezuela if needed. It also said it would have to “run” the country until a transition of power can occur.

Before today’s failed attempt to assert its war powers there were a string of other unsuccessful efforts, which aimed to either stop hostilities against Iran, Venezuela, or attacks on the so-called “narcoterrorist” boats in the Caribbean.

The Senate last passed a War Powers Resolution back in 2020, to bar unauthorized hostilities against Iran; Trump vetoed that resolution.


Top image credit: senate.gov [screenshot]
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
Trump's war is a gift to Iran’s hardliners
REUTERS/Imran Ali

Shi'ite Muslims hold posters of Iran's new supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, alongside late Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, as they take part in the religious procession marking the death anniversary of Imam Ali, son-in-law of Prophet Muhammad, during the fasting month of Ramadan, in Karachi, Pakistan, March 11, 2026.

Trump's war is a gift to Iran’s hardliners

Middle East

When the United States and Israel launched strikes on Iran on February 28 — an escalation that has already brought new suffering and uncertainty to millions of ordinary Iranians — the central debate quickly turned to whether the Islamic Republic might collapse. Some analysts argued that decapitating Iran’s leadership could produce rapid regime change, perhaps resembling the leadership removal in Venezuela earlier this year. Others warned that Iran’s political system was far more resilient.

Yet the more important point may lie elsewhere. Given the Islamic Republic’s internal dynamics, war could produce the opposite of what many expect. Rather than weakening the regime, the war may strengthen its most committed supporters — the ideological networks often labeled “hardliners” in Western media — while marginalizing the broader political middle, inside and outside the system, that favors non-violent and gradual change.

keep readingShow less
As Iran war rages, Washington opens a new front in Ecuador
Top image credit: Ecuadoran security forces patrol the streets of Manta, Ecuador. (IMAGO/Agencia Prensa-Independiente via Reuters Connect)

As Iran war rages, Washington opens a new front in Ecuador

Latin America

As the world’s attention is focused on the U.S. and Israeli war on Iran, the United States has, with little fanfare, opened another front in its expanding campaign against so-called “narco-terrorism” in the Western Hemisphere.

Since this new "war on drugs" began last year, U.S. military strikes on alleged drug-smuggling boats, as well as a direct military intervention in Venezuela, have claimed the lives of more than 250 people. Now, Ecuador, a country on the northwestern edge of South America, has become the latest site of Washington’s reinvigorated “war on drugs.” This escalation risks making the United States complicit in the human rights abuses of a government that is steadily dismantling its own country’s democracy, including by suspending the nation’s largest opposition party.

keep readingShow less
Israel’s push for Somaliland base raises fears of wider war
Top image credit: Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar and Somaliland President Abdirahman Mohamed Abdullahi participate in a joint press conference during Saar's visit to Somaliland on January 6, 2026. (Screengrab via X)

Israel’s push for Somaliland base raises fears of wider war

QiOSK

Bloomberg reported Wednesday that Israel is in talks with Somaliland officials to form a strategic security partnership, which might include granting Israel access to a military base or other security installation along the Somaliland coast from which it can launch attacks against Yemen’s Houthi rebels.

With war raging in the Middle East, the Horn of Africa is a particularly important geoeconomic and geopolitical puzzle piece. Its location near the Bab el-Mandeb strait, which connects ships traveling through the Red Sea with the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean, makes it a strategic location from the perspective of global shipping, 10% to 12% of which travels through the strait annually.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.