Follow us on social

google cta
J.D. Vance

J.D. Vance is tie-breaker killing War Powers vote

Republicans stopped the process before colleagues could even weigh in on further military force in Venezuela

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

Republican senators used a procedural measure to kill a resolution today that would have halted unauthorized hostilities against Venezuela.

Before a vote could take place for S.J. Res. 98, sponsored by Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.), Sen. Jim Risch (R-Id.) challenged the resolution’s privileged status in a point of order along the lines that there were no ongoing hostilities with Venezuela.

That point of order prompted a vote, which tied 50-50. Vice President J.D. Vance broke that tie and voted for the point of order, thus removing the resolution from immediate consideration on the Senate Floor.

Sens. Todd Young (R-In.) and Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), who voted to advance the resolution last week, also voted for the point of order.

On the Senate floor the day of the vote, Republican leadership asserted that war powers are unnecessary, because there are no ongoing hostilities between the U.S. and Venezuela.

“We have no troops on the ground in Venezuela. We’re not currently conducting military operations there,” Sen. John Thune (R- S.D.) said before the vote.

“The objective of this resolution is to stop something that is not happening,” Sen. Jim Risch (R- Id.) said.

Angered by the procedural move to quash the vote, resolution supporters contended that hostilities with Venezuela have already begun, and that Congress must assert its power to block further unauthorized action.

“Certainly [the senators moving to block the resolution] must think that invasion of a capital is a war, that removing a president is war, or a blockade of a country. So even though the first incursion, the first invasion, may well be over — is the blockade of a country not a war?,” Sen. Rand Paul asked. “Are we not at war when we have a military blockade of a country?’

“An argument that the Venezuela campaign is not imminent hostilities, within the meaning of the War Powers Resolution, is a violation of every reasonable meaning of that term,” Sen. Kaine charged. “To pretend otherwise would weaken the respect that this institution should aspire to.”

The Trump administration previously said it was “not afraid” to put “boots on the ground” in Venezuela if needed. It also said it would have to “run” the country until a transition of power can occur.

Before today’s failed attempt to assert its war powers there were a string of other unsuccessful efforts, which aimed to either stop hostilities against Iran, Venezuela, or attacks on the so-called “narcoterrorist” boats in the Caribbean.

The Senate last passed a War Powers Resolution back in 2020, to bar unauthorized hostilities against Iran; Trump vetoed that resolution.


Top image credit: senate.gov [screenshot]
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
Why SCOTUS won’t deter Trump’s desire to weaponize trade
Top image credit: U.S. President Donald Trump talks to Chief Justice of the Supreme Court John Roberts on the day of his speech to a joint session of Congress, in the House Chamber of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., March 4, 2025. (REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque)

Why SCOTUS won’t deter Trump’s desire to weaponize trade

QiOSK

In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court today ruled against the White House on a key economic initiative of the Trump administration, concluding that the International Economic Emergency Powers Act (IEEPA) does not give the president the right to impose tariffs.

The ruling was not really a surprise; the tone of the questioning by several justices in early November was overwhelmingly skeptical of the administration’s argument, as prediction markets rightly concluded. Given the likelihood of this result, it should also come as no surprise that the Trump administration has already been plotting ways to work around the decision.

keep readingShow less
Board of Peace
Top image credit: U.S. President Donald Trump listens, as his son-in-law Jared Kushner speaks, during the inaugural Board of Peace meeting at the U.S. Institute of Peace in Washington, D.C., U.S., February 19, 2026. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

​Board of Peace will be a bonanza for wealthy board members

QiOSK

On Thursday, President Trump hosted the inaugural meeting of the Board of Peace, a body created by Trump to oversee the security and redevelopment of Gaza. His son-in-law Jared Kushner, who is on the founding Executive Board overseeing the Board of Peace, played down any notion that the people in the room would be profiting off Gaza’s redevelopment.

“I really want to thank the entire team that’s worked so hard at this. A lot of these people are volunteers, they’re doing this not for any personal gain. People are not personally profiting from this,” he said.

keep readingShow less
Trump Iran
Top image credit: Lucas Parker and FotoField via shutterstock.com

No, even a 'small attack' on Iran will lead to war

QiOSK

The Wall Street Journal reports that President Donald Trump is considering a small attack to force Iran to agree to his nuclear deal, and if Tehran refuses, escalate the attacks until Iran either agrees or the regime falls.

Here’s why this won’t work.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.