Follow us on social

google cta
Gaza war

$21.7 billion in US military aid has fueled Israel's war on Gaza

A new report shows how American support has been essential to what many experts are now calling a genocide

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

A report released today by the Quincy Institute and the Costs of War Project at Brown University found that the U.S. has supplied $21.7 billion in military aid to Israel since the war in Gaza was triggered by Hamas’October 7, 2023 attack that killed 1,200 people in Israel, mostly civilians. The Israeli response, which has killed tens of thousands of Palestinians, has been described as a genocide by a series of independent experts.

But whether one calls Israel’s actions a genocide, or a series of egregious violations of the laws of war, or merely surveys the human toll, one thing has remained consistent: U.S. military and financial support for the Israeli war effort. The $21.7 billion in U.S.military aid supplied to Israel in the past few years is nearly three times the amount that nation would have received during an average year, based on a 10-year $38 billion commitment negotiated by the Obama administration.

Israel could not have wreaked the level of destruction it has inflicted on Gaza without U.S. weapons and financing, and its ability to widen the war to the broader region would be severely undermined. While some of the weapons slated to be paid for with U.S. aid may not arrive for months or years, over $4 billion worth of weapons transferred from U.S. stocks arrived in short order.

Israel would also have been hard pressed to conduct the war at the pace it did without U.S. assistance with maintenance and spare parts. That’s because Israel’s entire inventory of combat aircraft is composed of U.S.-supplied F-15s, F-16s, and F-35s, as are most of its attack helicopters.

In short, the United States could substantially undermine Israel’s ability to wage war if it cut off weapons, financing and spare parts. But neither the Biden nor Trump administrations have chosen to do so.

And, as another new Costs of War paper by Harvard University economist Linda Bilmes demonstrates, military aid is far from the only economic cost of U.S. support for Israel’s war in Gaza. U.S. military operations in the region — including doing battle with Houthi forces in Yemen and bombing Iran — have cost somewhere between $9.6 billion and $12.7 billion since the start of the Gaza war.

All of this U.S. support has enabled Israel to engage in mass slaughter, with devastating human consequences. Another new Costs of War paper, by Neta Crawford at the University of Oxford and the project’s co-founder, estimates that over 236,000 Gaza residents have been killed or injured during the war, an astounding 10 percent of the territory’s population. And in the fourth paper in the newly published Costs of War series, anthropologist David Vine found that since October 7, 2023, over 5 million people had been displaced by the war in Gaza and the fighting in the wider region.

The humanitarian costs of the Gaza war are unconscionable, but unfortunately they are not the end of the story. Continuing to support Israel’s war efforts in Gaza and beyond could draw the United States into a direct, prolonged conflict in the region, as almost happened when the Trump administration ordered air strikes on Iran in June of this year. Meanwhile, America’s unwavering support for Israel’s brutal war will make it considerably harder for U.S. diplomats to press other nations on human rights issues or speak credibly about a “rules-based international order.”

There are no upsides to supporting Israel’s war on Gaza or its escalation of the conflict to the broader region. When will a U.S. president have the courage to abandon the policy of “Israel right or wrong” and use America’s leverage to stop the killing?


Dear RS readers: It has been an extraordinary year and our editing team has been working overtime to make sure that we are covering the current conflicts with quality, fresh analysis that doesn’t cleave to the mainstream orthodoxy or take official Washington and the commentariat at face value. Our staff reporters, experts, and outside writers offer top-notch, independent work, daily. Please consider making a tax-exempt, year-end contribution to Responsible Statecraftso that we can continue this quality coverage — which you will find nowhere else — into 2026. Happy Holidays!

Top image credit: Anas-Mohammed / Shutterstock.com
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
Does Israel really still need a 'qualitative military edge' ?
An Israeli Air Force F-35I Lightning II “Adir” approaches a U.S. Air Force 908th Expeditionary Refueling Squadron KC-10 Extender to refuel during “Enduring Lightning II” exercise over southern Israel Aug. 2, 2020. While forging a resolute partnership, the allies train to maintain a ready posture to deter against regional aggressors. (U.S. Air Force photo by Master Sgt. Patrick OReilly)

Does Israel really still need a 'qualitative military edge' ?

Middle East

On November 17, 2025, President Donald Trump announced that he would approve the sale to Saudi Arabia of the most advanced US manned strike fighter aircraft, the F-35. The news came one day before the visit to the White House of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, who has sought to purchase 48 such aircraft in a multibillion-dollar deal that has the potential to shift the military status quo in the Middle East. Currently, Israel is the only other state in the region to possess the F-35.

During the White House meeting, Trump suggested that Saudi Arabia’s F-35s should be equipped with the same technology as those procured by Israel. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu quickly sought assurances from US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who sought to walk back Trump’s comment and reiterated a “commitment that the United States will continue to preserve Israel’s qualitative military edge in everything related to supplying weapons and military systems to countries in the Middle East.”

keep readingShow less
Think a $35B gas deal will thaw Egypt toward Israel? Not so fast.
Top image credit: Miss.Cabul via shutterstock.com

Think a $35B gas deal will thaw Egypt toward Israel? Not so fast.

Middle East

The Trump administration’s hopes of convening a summit between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi either in Cairo or Washington as early as the end of this month or early next are unlikely to materialize.

The centerpiece of the proposed summit is the lucrative expansion of natural gas exports worth an estimated $35 billion. This mega-deal will pump an additional 4 billion cubic meters annually into Egypt through 2040.

keep readingShow less
Trump
Top image credit: President Donald Trump addresses the nation, Wednesday, December 17, 2025, from the Diplomatic Reception Room of the White House. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

Trump national security logic: rare earths and fossil fuels

Washington Politics

The new National Security Strategy of the United States seeks “strategic stability” with Russia. It declares that China is merely a competitor, that the Middle East is not central to American security, that Latin America is “our hemisphere,” and that Europe faces “civilizational erasure.”

India, the world's largest country by population, barely rates a mention — one might say, as Neville Chamberlain did of Czechoslovakia in 1938, it’s “a faraway country... of which we know nothing.” Well, so much the better for India, which can take care of itself.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.