Follow us on social

google cta
Gaza war

$21.7 billion in US military aid has fueled Israel's war on Gaza

A new report shows how American support has been essential to what many experts are now calling a genocide

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

A report released today by the Quincy Institute and the Costs of War Project at Brown University found that the U.S. has supplied $21.7 billion in military aid to Israel since the war in Gaza was triggered by Hamas’October 7, 2023 attack that killed 1,200 people in Israel, mostly civilians. The Israeli response, which has killed tens of thousands of Palestinians, has been described as a genocide by a series of independent experts.

But whether one calls Israel’s actions a genocide, or a series of egregious violations of the laws of war, or merely surveys the human toll, one thing has remained consistent: U.S. military and financial support for the Israeli war effort. The $21.7 billion in U.S.military aid supplied to Israel in the past few years is nearly three times the amount that nation would have received during an average year, based on a 10-year $38 billion commitment negotiated by the Obama administration.

Israel could not have wreaked the level of destruction it has inflicted on Gaza without U.S. weapons and financing, and its ability to widen the war to the broader region would be severely undermined. While some of the weapons slated to be paid for with U.S. aid may not arrive for months or years, over $4 billion worth of weapons transferred from U.S. stocks arrived in short order.

Israel would also have been hard pressed to conduct the war at the pace it did without U.S. assistance with maintenance and spare parts. That’s because Israel’s entire inventory of combat aircraft is composed of U.S.-supplied F-15s, F-16s, and F-35s, as are most of its attack helicopters.

In short, the United States could substantially undermine Israel’s ability to wage war if it cut off weapons, financing and spare parts. But neither the Biden nor Trump administrations have chosen to do so.

And, as another new Costs of War paper by Harvard University economist Linda Bilmes demonstrates, military aid is far from the only economic cost of U.S. support for Israel’s war in Gaza. U.S. military operations in the region — including doing battle with Houthi forces in Yemen and bombing Iran — have cost somewhere between $9.6 billion and $12.7 billion since the start of the Gaza war.

All of this U.S. support has enabled Israel to engage in mass slaughter, with devastating human consequences. Another new Costs of War paper, by Neta Crawford at the University of Oxford and the project’s co-founder, estimates that over 236,000 Gaza residents have been killed or injured during the war, an astounding 10 percent of the territory’s population. And in the fourth paper in the newly published Costs of War series, anthropologist David Vine found that since October 7, 2023, over 5 million people had been displaced by the war in Gaza and the fighting in the wider region.

The humanitarian costs of the Gaza war are unconscionable, but unfortunately they are not the end of the story. Continuing to support Israel’s war efforts in Gaza and beyond could draw the United States into a direct, prolonged conflict in the region, as almost happened when the Trump administration ordered air strikes on Iran in June of this year. Meanwhile, America’s unwavering support for Israel’s brutal war will make it considerably harder for U.S. diplomats to press other nations on human rights issues or speak credibly about a “rules-based international order.”

There are no upsides to supporting Israel’s war on Gaza or its escalation of the conflict to the broader region. When will a U.S. president have the courage to abandon the policy of “Israel right or wrong” and use America’s leverage to stop the killing?


Top image credit: Anas-Mohammed / Shutterstock.com
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
Africa construction development
Top photo credit: Construction site in Johannesburg, South Africa, 2024. (Shutterstock/ Wirestock Creators)

US capital investments for something other than beating China

Africa

Among the many elements of the draft National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) currently being debated in Congress is an amendment that would reauthorize the Development Finance Corporation (DFC). What it might look like coming out of the Republican-dominated Congress should be of interest for anyone watching the current direction of foreign policy under the Trump Administration.

In contrast with America’s other major development agencies like the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), which the administration has largely dismantled, President Donald Trump has expressed support for a reauthorized DFC but wants to broaden the agency’s mandate so that it focuses less on investing in traditional development projects and more on linking investment to national security priorities.

keep readingShow less
USS Lafayette (FFG 65) Constellation-class
Top image credit: Graphic rendering of the future USS Lafayette (FFG 65), the fourth of the new Constellation-class frigates, scheduled to commission in 2029. The Constellation-class guided-missile frigate represents the Navy’s next generation small surface combatant. VIA US NAVY

The US Navy just lit another $9 billion on fire

Military Industrial Complex

The United States Navy has a storied combat record at sea, but the service hasn’t had a successful shipbuilding program in decades. John Phelan, the secretary of the Navy, announced the latest shipbuilding failure by canceling the Constellation-class program on a November 25.

The Constellation program was supposed to produce 20 frigates to serve as small surface combatant ships to support the rest of the fleet and be able to conduct independent patrols. In an effort to reduce development risks and avoid fielding delays that often accompany entirely new designs, Navy officials decided to use an already proven parent design they could modify to meet the Navy’s needs. They selected the European multi-purpose frigate design employed by the French and Italian navies.

keep readingShow less
Who's behind push to designate Muslim Brotherhood a terror group?

Who's behind push to designate Muslim Brotherhood a terror group?

Washington Politics

It all happened in a flash.

Two weeks ago, Texas announced that it was designating the Muslim Brotherhood and a prominent American Muslim group as foreign terror organizations. President Donald Trump followed suit last week, ordering his administration to consider sanctioning Muslim Brotherhood chapters in Egypt, Jordan, and Lebanon.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.