Follow us on social

Gaza war

$21.7 billion in US military aid has fueled Israel's war on Gaza

A new report shows how American support has been essential to what many experts are now calling a genocide

Reporting | QiOSK

A report released today by the Quincy Institute and the Costs of War Project at Brown University found that the U.S. has supplied $21.7 billion in military aid to Israel since the war in Gaza was triggered by Hamas’October 7, 2023 attack that killed 1,200 people in Israel, mostly civilians. The Israeli response, which has killed tens of thousands of Palestinians, has been described as a genocide by a series of independent experts.

But whether one calls Israel’s actions a genocide, or a series of egregious violations of the laws of war, or merely surveys the human toll, one thing has remained consistent: U.S. military and financial support for the Israeli war effort. The $21.7 billion in U.S.military aid supplied to Israel in the past few years is nearly three times the amount that nation would have received during an average year, based on a 10-year $38 billion commitment negotiated by the Obama administration.

Israel could not have wreaked the level of destruction it has inflicted on Gaza without U.S. weapons and financing, and its ability to widen the war to the broader region would be severely undermined. While some of the weapons slated to be paid for with U.S. aid may not arrive for months or years, over $4 billion worth of weapons transferred from U.S. stocks arrived in short order.

Israel would also have been hard pressed to conduct the war at the pace it did without U.S. assistance with maintenance and spare parts. That’s because Israel’s entire inventory of combat aircraft is composed of U.S.-supplied F-15s, F-16s, and F-35s, as are most of its attack helicopters.

In short, the United States could substantially undermine Israel’s ability to wage war if it cut off weapons, financing and spare parts. But neither the Biden nor Trump administrations have chosen to do so.

And, as another new Costs of War paper by Harvard University economist Linda Bilmes demonstrates, military aid is far from the only economic cost of U.S. support for Israel’s war in Gaza. U.S. military operations in the region — including doing battle with Houthi forces in Yemen and bombing Iran — have cost somewhere between $9.6 billion and $12.7 billion since the start of the Gaza war.

All of this U.S. support has enabled Israel to engage in mass slaughter, with devastating human consequences. Another new Costs of War paper, by Neta Crawford at the University of Oxford and the project’s co-founder, estimates that over 236,000 Gaza residents have been killed or injured during the war, an astounding 10 percent of the territory’s population. And in the fourth paper in the newly published Costs of War series, anthropologist David Vine found that since October 7, 2023, over 5 million people had been displaced by the war in Gaza and the fighting in the wider region.

The humanitarian costs of the Gaza war are unconscionable, but unfortunately they are not the end of the story. Continuing to support Israel’s war efforts in Gaza and beyond could draw the United States into a direct, prolonged conflict in the region, as almost happened when the Trump administration ordered air strikes on Iran in June of this year. Meanwhile, America’s unwavering support for Israel’s brutal war will make it considerably harder for U.S. diplomats to press other nations on human rights issues or speak credibly about a “rules-based international order.”

There are no upsides to supporting Israel’s war on Gaza or its escalation of the conflict to the broader region. When will a U.S. president have the courage to abandon the policy of “Israel right or wrong” and use America’s leverage to stop the killing?


Top image credit: Anas-Mohammed / Shutterstock.com
Reporting | QiOSK
Trump ASEAN
Top photo credit: U.S. President Donald Trump looks at Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., next to Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim when posing for a family photo with leaders at the ASEAN Summit in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, October 26, 2025. Vincent Thian/Pool via REUTERS

‘America First’ meets ‘ASEAN Way’ in Kuala Lumpur

Asia-Pacific

The 2025 ASEAN and East Asia Summits in Kuala Lumpur beginning today are set to be consequential multilateral gatherings — defining not only ASEAN’s internal cohesion but also the shape of U.S.–China relations in the Indo-Pacific.

President Donald Trump’s participation will be the first by a U.S. president in an ASEAN-led summit since 2022. President Biden skipped the last two such summits in 2023 and 2024, sending then-Vice President Harris instead.

keep readingShow less
iran, china, russia
Top photo credit: Top image credit: Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov and and Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi shake hands as Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Ma Zhaoxu looks on during their meet with reporters after their meeting at Diaoyutai State Guest House on March 14, 2025 in Beijing, China. Lintao Zhang/Pool via REUTERS

'Annulled'! Russia won't abide snapback sanctions on Iran

Middle East

“A raider attack on the U.N. Security Council.” This was the explosive accusation leveled by Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov this week. His target was the U.N. Secretariat and Western powers, whom he blamed for what Russia sees as an illegitimate attempt to restore the nuclear-related international sanctions on Iran.

Beyond the fiery rhetoric, Ryabkov’s statement contained a message: Russia, he said, now considers all pre-2015 U.N. sanctions on Iran, snapped back by the European signatories of the 2015 nuclear deal (JCPOA) — the United Kingdom, France, Germany — “annulled.” Moscow will deepen its military-technical cooperation with Tehran accordingly, according to Ryabkov.

This is more than a diplomatic spat; it is the formal announcement of a split in international legal reality. The world’s major powers are now operating under two irreconcilable interpretations of international law. On one side, the United States, the United Kingdom, France, and Germany assert that the sanctions snapback mechanism of the JCPOA was legitimately triggered for Iran’s alleged violations. On the other, Iran, Russia, and China reject this as an illegitimate procedural act.

This schism was not inevitable, and its origin reveals a profound incongruence. The Western powers that most frequently appeal to the sanctity of the "rules-based international order" and international law have, in this instance, taken an action whose effects fundamentally undermine it. By pushing through a legal maneuver that a significant part of the Security Council considers illegitimate, they have ushered the world into a new and more dangerous state. The predictable, if imperfect, framework of universally recognized Security Council decisions is being replaced by a system where legal facts are determined by political interests espoused by competing power blocs.

This rupture followed a deliberate Western choice to reject compromises in a stand-off with Iran. While Iran was in a technical violation of the provisions of the JCPOA — by, notably, amassing a stockpile of highly enriched uranium (up to 60% as opposed to the 3.67% for a civilian use permissible under the JCPOA), there was a chance to avert the crisis. In the critical weeks leading to the snapback, Iran had signaled concessions in talks with the International Atomic Energy Agency in Cairo, in terms of renewing cooperation with the U.N. nuclear watchdog’s inspectors.

keep readingShow less
On Ukraine and Venezuela, Trump needs to dump the sycophants
Top Photo Credit: (Official White House Photo by Molly Riley)

On Ukraine and Venezuela, Trump needs to dump the sycophants

Europe

While diplomats labored to produce the Dayton Accords in 1995, then-Secretary of Defense Bill Perry advised, “No agreement is better than a bad agreement.” Given that Washington’s allies in London, Paris, Berlin and Warsaw are opposed to any outcome that might end the war in Ukraine, no agreement may be preferable. But for President Trump, there is no point in equating the illusion of peace in Ukraine with a meaningless ceasefire that settles nothing.

Today, Ukraine is mired in corruption, starting at the very highest levels of the administration in Kyiv. Sending $175 billion of borrowed money there "for however long it takes" has turned out to be worse than reckless. The U.S. national sovereign debt is surging to nearly $38 trillion and rising by $425 billion with each passing month. President Trump needs to turn his attention away from funding Joe Biden’s wars and instead focus on the faltering American economy.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.