Follow us on social

google cta
Diplomacy Watch Putin Trump Zelenskyy Ukraine

Diplomacy Watch: Is Europe out of bargaining chips?

Offered a stiff deal by Trump, the EU’s Ukraine-sparked security fears won out

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

After licking its wounds after what many call an “unbalanced” trade deal with the U.S., the EU is mulling over its security needs and future altogether as war continues to rage nearby.

For some Europeans, one way forward means buying more weapons for themselves — and for Ukraine.

To that end, many European leaders plan to apply for Security Action For Europe (SAFE) loans, a $150 billion defense-lending scheme agreed upon by European ambassadors back in late May.

EU Defense and Economy Commissioners Andrius Kubilius and Valdis Dombrovskis hope some of the funds the SAFE loans provide to Europe will go toward purchasing weapons from Ukraine: for Europeans, but also for Ukraine, so that Kyiv can continue fighting. They suggest this additional weapons procurement will bolster Europe’s “collective security.”

"We strongly invite you to consider how to involve Ukraine in your plans,” they wrote earlier this month in a letter to EU member states. “Procurement for Ukraine, with Ukraine, in Ukraine, can make a difference for our collective security.”

But for others, the disappointment of the 15% tariff deal means challenging EU leadership outright, on the deal and in general.

"The EU has agreed to a deal that abandons fundamental principles of rules-based global trade. Instead of long-term stability, the agreement creates uncertainty," German Greens politician Sandra Detzer lamented at the Bundestag this week.

Although German Chancellor Friedrich Merz initially hailed the U.S.-EU tariff deal, saying it will help the EU steer clear of larger trade war with its ally, its unpopularity among German politicians, among politicians like Detzer, has led even Merz to instead contend the tariffs are a “considerable burden.”

Ultimately, security needs and concerns, especially those related to Ukraine, played a role in Europe’s agreeing to a deal many call unideal or burdensome. As Maha Rafi Atal, a lecturer at the University of Glasgow’s School of Social and Political Sciences writes in the Conversation: “the urgency of Europe’s security concerns in Ukraine made [recent tariff talks] different from trade negotiations in the first Trump administration, when Europe could afford to be more aggressive.”

“It’s not only about the trade. It’s about security. It’s about Ukraine. It’s about current geopolitical volatility,” EU Trade Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič stressed on Monday along these lines, telling reporters “I cannot go into all the details.”

“The EU is in a difficult situation because we’re very dependent on the U.S. for security,” Niclas Poitiers, research fellow at the Bruegel research institution told AP. “Ukraine is a very big part of that.”

In other Ukraine war news this week

A Ukrainian drone attack on the Russian city of Salsk killed three people and caused damage to over 50 apartment units there on Wednesday, according to Al Jazeera.

CNN reported yesterday that Russia claims it has captured the long-sought after Ukrainian town of Chasiv Yar. If true, Russia controlling the town would give it a high ground in the Donetsk region, near Ukraine’s “fortress belt” of cities it still holds there. The Ukrainian military has denied Russia captured the town.

On Monday, Trump shortened his 50-day deadline for Russia to reach peace with Ukraine or face tariffs to ten days, according to Reuters.

"I don't know if it's going to affect Russia, because [Russian President Vladimir Putin] wants to, obviously, probably keep the war going," Trump explained his new deadline. "But we're going to put on tariffs."

Following a wave of major protests against his government, The Guardian reported that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky signed anti-corruption legislation into law Thursday. The new law effectively backtracks previous legislation, which had moved to give the Ukrainian government more control of anti-corruption bodies National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office (SAPO), thus compromising these bodies’ independence from it.

“This guarantees the normal, independent work of anti-corruption bodies and all law enforcement agencies in our country. It is the right decision,” Zelensky said Thursday, stressing that Ukraine remains a democracy. “It is very important that the state listens to public opinion,” he said in acknowledgment of the protests.

From State Department 

On Tuesday, spokesperson Tammy Bruce said during the State Department press briefing that the shortened 10-day deadline Trump set on Russia for a deal for peace in Ukraine, was generous considering Trump knows “what the situation [is].”

“Oh, you might not even have 10 days. I would just suggest, even when he set that 50-day timeline for Russia, I think one of the things I’ve said is that – who knows when that could happen,” Bruce said. “He has had timelines before in which he acted very quickly. So I – with the President, he also noted that he was going to – he shortened that timeline because he pretty much knew what the situation was.”


Top Photo: Trump, Zelenskyy, and Putin with Ukraine graphic. Credit, Khody Akhavi
Diplomacy Watch: Are Kyiv protests pent-up anger against Zelensky?
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
Did the US only attack Iran because of Israel?
Top image credit: President Donald J. Trump holds a joint news conference at the White House with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Feb. 4, 2025. (Shutterstock/ Joshua Sukoff)

Did the US only attack Iran because of Israel?

QiOSK

In the months that led up to the Iraq War, the Bush administration went to extraordinary lengths to convince the world of the need to oust Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. Leading officials laid out their case in public, sharing what they claimed was evidence that Iraq was moving rapidly toward the deployment of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. When U.S. tanks rolled across the border, everyone knew the justification: the U.S. was determined to thwart Iraq’s development of weapons of mass destruction, however fictitious that threat would later prove to be.

In the months that led up to the Iran War, the Trump administration took a different tack. President Trump spoke only occasionally of Iran, offering a smattering of justifications for growing U.S. tensions with the country. He claimed without evidence that Iran was rebuilding its nuclear program after the U.S.-Israeli attack last June and even developing missiles that could strike the United States. But he insisted that Tehran could make a deal with seven magic words: “we will never have a nuclear weapon.”

keep readingShow less
Iran says ‘no ship is allowed to pass’ Strait of Hormuz: Reports
Top image credit: A large oil tanker transits the Strait of Hormuz. (Shutterstock/ Clare Louise Jackson)

Iran says ‘no ship is allowed to pass’ Strait of Hormuz: Reports

QiOSK

Hours after the U.S. and Israel launched a campaign of airstrikes across Iran, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps is warning vessels in the Persian Gulf via radio that “no ship is allowed to pass the Strait of Hormuz,” according to a report from Reuters.

The news suggests that Iran is ready to pull out all the stops in its response to the U.S.-Israeli barrage, which President Donald Trump says is aimed at toppling the Iranian regime. A full shutdown of the Strait of Hormuz would cause an international crisis given that 20% of the world’s oil passes through the narrow channel. Financial analysts estimate that even one day of a full blockade could cause global oil prices to double from $66 per barrel to more than $120.

keep readingShow less
Ro Khanna Jon Fetterman
Top photo credit: Ro Khanna (creative commons/WebSummitt ) and Jon Fetterman (shutterstock/EB Photos)

Fury and fanboys: US, world leaders react to US-Israeli war on Iran

QiOSK

The reactions are already coming in following the early morning attacks on Iran by U.S. and Israeli forces in what is being called "Operation Epic Fury." The reports are fluid, but as President Trump announced on his Truth Social, the U.S. is taking aim at Iran's military and senior leadership and hopes to raze both so that the Iranian people can take over. "When we are finished the government is yours to take. Your hour of freedom is at hand."

For some, like U.S. Senator Jon Fetterman, a Democrat who represents the people of Pennsylvania, this is the greatest thing to happen since the last time the U.S. and Israel attacked Iran in June. "President Trump has been willing to do what’s right and necessary to produce real peace in the region. God bless the United States, our great military, and Israel."

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.