Follow us on social

Senator Chris Murphy on Senate floor

UAE support to Sudan's RSF on Senate chopping block

The Democratic senators' resolutions would cut off the sale of weapons often provided to the paramilitary group

Reporting | QiOSK

UPDATE: S.J. Resolution 54 did not pass a vote in the Senate Wednesday, with 39 voting Yea and 56 voting Nay.

Democratic senators are targeting the United Arab Emirates’ (UAE) controversial support of the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in Sudan’s civil war, through myriad resolutions also aiming to undermine what they call Trump’s use of “foreign policy [as] a machine to enrich himself.”

Senators Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), Tim Kaine, (D-Va.), Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Bernie Sanders (D.-Vt.) and Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) aim to block weapons sales to the UAE with Joint Resolutions of Disapproval (JRD) S.J.Res.51, S.J.Res.52, and S.J.Res.54. The senators have forced a vote on Resolution 54, expected to take place as soon as later today.

Sen. Murphy has said the resolutions are an effort to block arms deals to countries he alleges “take part in Trump's corruption,” citing the UAE’s $2 billion investment in a Trump family crypto project. Another resolution introduced in tandem would block arms sales to Qatar, he said, over its recent move to give the U.S. a luxury jet, intended for use as Trump’s Air Force One.

But JRDs 51, 52, and 54 would also seek to undermine the UAE’s support of the RSF, a paramilitary group at the heart of Sudan’s raging civil war that began in 2023, which the Biden administration State Department asserted was committing genocide in January. Specifically, the resolutions would cut off sales of weapons to the UAE that could subsequently be provided to the group. To date, the war has killed over 150,000 people and left over 30 million in need of humanitarian aid.

“The UAE is the main supplier of weapons to the worst of the two parties that are involved in the brutal, catastrophic, deadly civil war in Sudan,” Murphy explained on the Senate floor on Monday. "They want the United States to keep giving them weapons, most recently asking for a resupply of Chinook helicopters, even as they use their military prowess to destroy Sudan."

The UAE insists on its neutrality in the war. But many investigations, including a U.N. panel linking the UAE to weapons found in Darfur, suggest the UAE’s supported RSF with weapons and other material support. Citing such support, 30+ humanitarian organizations voiced support for the JRD in a joint letter published Monday.

“Independent investigations by human rights organizations, journalists, and a UN panel have concluded that the United Arab Emirates has provided weapons and other support to the RSF…Much of that support violates the United Nations Security Council’s Darfur arms embargo in place since 2005,” the letter read. “Investigations by leading human rights organizations have additionally concluded that the RSF has engaged in widespread war crimes and other atrocities, including extensive sexual violence.”.

The letter continued, “Civilians in Sudan have endured unimaginable suffering in a war marked by extensive abuses, which have been fueled by flows of weapons into the country.”

“Congress has paid too little attention to the role of outside actors in fueling atrocities committed by the Rapid Support Forces,” John Ramming Chappell, advocacy and legal adviser at Center for Civilians in Conflict (CIVIC), told Responsible Statecraft. “Senators should take the chance to vote for this resolution and send a clear message to the Emirati government: stop arming the RSF, or face consequences for the US-UAE relationship.”

The resolutions are unlikely to pass.

Editor's note: The reporting has been clarified to reflect that JRDs 51 and 52 have yet to be brought to be voted upon.


Top Image credit: Murphy: Trump's Corruption Has No Precedent in American History -- Senator Chris Murphy [YouTube/Screenshot]
Reporting | QiOSK
Ratcliffe Gabbard
Top image credit: Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and CIA director John Ratcliffe join a meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump and his intelligence team in the Situation Room at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S. June 21, 2025. The White House/Handout via REUTERS

Trump's use and misuse of Iran intel

Middle East

President Donald Trump has twice, within the space of a week, been at odds with U.S. intelligence agencies on issues involving Iran’s nuclear program. In each instance, Trump was pushing his preferred narrative, but the substantive differences in the two cases were in opposite directions.

Before the United States joined Israel’s attack on Iran, Trump dismissed earlier testimony by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, in which she presented the intelligence community’s judgment that “Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader Khamanei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program he suspended in 2003.” Questioned about this testimony, Trump said, “she’s wrong.”

keep readingShow less
Mohammad Bin Salman Trump Ayatollah Khomenei
Top photo credit: Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad Bin Salman (President of the Russian Federation/Wikimedia Commons); U.S. President Donald Trump (Gage Skidmore/Flickr) and Iran’s Ayatollah Khamenei (Wikimedia Commons)

Let's make a deal: Enrichment path that both Iran, US can agree on

Middle East

The recent conflict, a direct confrontation that pitted Iran against Israel and drew in U.S. B-2 bombers, has likely rendered the previous diplomatic playbook for Tehran's nuclear program obsolete.

The zero-sum debates concerning uranium enrichment that once defined that framework now represent an increasingly unworkable approach.

Although a regional nuclear consortium had been previously advanced as a theoretical alternative, the collapse of talks as a result of military action against Iran now positions it as the most compelling path forward for all parties.

Before the war, Iran was already suggesting a joint uranium enrichment facility with Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) on Iranian soil. For Iran, this framework could achieve its primary goal: the preservation of a domestic nuclear program and, crucially, its demand to maintain some enrichment on its own territory. The added benefit is that it embeds Iran within a regional security architecture that provides a buffer against unilateral attack.

For Gulf actors, it offers unprecedented transparency and a degree of control over their rival-turned-friend’s nuclear activities, a far better outcome than a possible covert Iranian breakout. For a Trump administration focused on deals, it offers a tangible, multilateral framework that can be sold as a blueprint for regional stability.

keep readingShow less
Trump Netanyahu
Top image credit: White House April 7, 2025

Polls: Americans don't support Trump's war on Iran

Military Industrial Complex

While there are serious doubts about the accuracy of President Donald Trump’s claims about the effectiveness of his attacks on Iranian nuclear sites, the U.S./Israeli war on Iran has provided fresh and abundant evidence of widespread opposition to war in the United States.

With a tenuous ceasefire currently holding, several nationwide surveys suggest Trump’s attack, which plunged the country into yet another offensive war in the Middle East, has been broadly unpopular across the country.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.