Follow us on social

google cta
Diplomacy Watch Donald Trump Putin Zelensky

Will Trump step away from the Ukraine-Russia peace process?

‘This is a European situation. It should have remained a European situation’

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

President Trump has again signaled that the United States may retreat from Russia-Ukraine peace negotiations. After a two-hour-long phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Trump called the war a “European situation,” and told reporters, “This isn’t my war, we got ourselves entangled in something we shouldn’t have been involved in.”

He ended on an optimistic note, saying “negotiations between Russia and Ukraine will begin immediately,” but indicated that the Vatican would be open to mediating negotiations, rather than the United States. The president also suggested that the United States was not yet withdrawing from negotiations, but was only considering doing so: “I think something’s going to happen, and if it doesn’t, I just back away and they’re going to have to keep going.”

“The conditions for that will be negotiated between the two parties, as it can only be, because they know details of a negotiation that nobody else would be aware of,” the president said regarding a ceasefire, adding that the tone of the conversation was “excellent.”

Despite Trump’s optimistic comments, it’s reported that his call with Putin did not include demands for Russia to make concessions, and Vice President JD Vance told reporters on Monday that the U.S. is “more than open to walking away.” Additionally, during a call with European leaders that took place after his call with Putin, witnesses claim Trump conceded that Putin was not willing to pursue peace negotiations because Russia was winning the war.

Some European leaders are frustrated that Trump did not seem to push against the Russian-made demands during last week’s talks in Istanbul, or threaten Putin with additional sanctions.

Even with these threats to possibly walk away, the Trump administration seems committed to sending aid to Ukraine and still maintains a host of sanctions on Russia.

For his part, Putin said, “I would like to note that, on the whole, Russia’s position is clear. The main thing for us is to eliminate the root causes of this crisis; we just need to determine the most effective ways to move towards peace.”

Kremlin Spokesperson, Dmitry Peskov, added that “there are no deadlines, and there cannot be any. It is clear that everyone wants to do this as quickly as possible, but of course, the devil is in the details.”

In other Ukraine War news this week

The New York Times reports that Russia is expanding its military presence along the Finnish border. Satellite images confirmed that additional tents and buildings meant to store military equipment have been popping up along the border, despite Russia’s current low troop count there.

Also reported by The New York Times, Ukraine fired hundreds of drones into Russia on Thursday morning, one of its largest attacks during the war. According to the Kremlin, 485 drones were shot down while targeting 10 regions in Russia. It is unclear how much damage the drones caused, but multiple airports in Moscow were shut down temporarily. This comes after Russia launched 128 drones into Ukraine.

The United Kingdom and European Union are introducing fresh sanctions on the Kremlin. According to Reuters, the day after President Trump spoke with Putin, EU leaders approved a package of sanctions targeting oil exports. German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephu commented, “we have repeatedly made it clear that we expect one thing from Russia—an immediate ceasefire without preconditions.”



There were no State Department press briefings this week.


Dear RS readers: It has been an extraordinary year and our editing team has been working overtime to make sure that we are covering the current conflicts with quality, fresh analysis that doesn’t cleave to the mainstream orthodoxy or take official Washington and the commentariat at face value. Our staff reporters, experts, and outside writers offer top-notch, independent work, daily. Please consider making a tax-exempt, year-end contribution to Responsible Statecraftso that we can continue this quality coverage — which you will find nowhere else — into 2026. Happy Holidays!

Top Photo Credit: Diplomacy Watch (Khody Akhavi)
Diplomacy Watch: Minerals deal to occur next week
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
Does Israel really still need a 'qualitative military edge' ?
An Israeli Air Force F-35I Lightning II “Adir” approaches a U.S. Air Force 908th Expeditionary Refueling Squadron KC-10 Extender to refuel during “Enduring Lightning II” exercise over southern Israel Aug. 2, 2020. While forging a resolute partnership, the allies train to maintain a ready posture to deter against regional aggressors. (U.S. Air Force photo by Master Sgt. Patrick OReilly)

Does Israel really still need a 'qualitative military edge' ?

Middle East

On November 17, 2025, President Donald Trump announced that he would approve the sale to Saudi Arabia of the most advanced US manned strike fighter aircraft, the F-35. The news came one day before the visit to the White House of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, who has sought to purchase 48 such aircraft in a multibillion-dollar deal that has the potential to shift the military status quo in the Middle East. Currently, Israel is the only other state in the region to possess the F-35.

During the White House meeting, Trump suggested that Saudi Arabia’s F-35s should be equipped with the same technology as those procured by Israel. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu quickly sought assurances from US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who sought to walk back Trump’s comment and reiterated a “commitment that the United States will continue to preserve Israel’s qualitative military edge in everything related to supplying weapons and military systems to countries in the Middle East.”

keep readingShow less
Think a $35B gas deal will thaw Egypt toward Israel? Not so fast.
Top image credit: Miss.Cabul via shutterstock.com

Think a $35B gas deal will thaw Egypt toward Israel? Not so fast.

Middle East

The Trump administration’s hopes of convening a summit between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi either in Cairo or Washington as early as the end of this month or early next are unlikely to materialize.

The centerpiece of the proposed summit is the lucrative expansion of natural gas exports worth an estimated $35 billion. This mega-deal will pump an additional 4 billion cubic meters annually into Egypt through 2040.

keep readingShow less
Trump
Top image credit: President Donald Trump addresses the nation, Wednesday, December 17, 2025, from the Diplomatic Reception Room of the White House. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

Trump national security logic: rare earths and fossil fuels

Washington Politics

The new National Security Strategy of the United States seeks “strategic stability” with Russia. It declares that China is merely a competitor, that the Middle East is not central to American security, that Latin America is “our hemisphere,” and that Europe faces “civilizational erasure.”

India, the world's largest country by population, barely rates a mention — one might say, as Neville Chamberlain did of Czechoslovakia in 1938, it’s “a faraway country... of which we know nothing.” Well, so much the better for India, which can take care of itself.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.