Follow us on social

Tom Cotton

Tom Cotton signals big shift on Iran talks

The GOP senator may now be open to accepting a civilian nuclear program

Reporting | QiOSK

A prominent Republican Iran hawk suggested this week that he may be willing to accept a deal with the United States in which Iran maintains its civilian nuclear program, a sign that hardline opposition to President Trump’s negotiations with Tehran may be softening.

“A good deal is a deal that cuts off all of Iran’s paths to a nuclear bomb, that includes all of their highly enriched uranium and their advanced centrifuges,” Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) said during an interview with conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt. “They don’t need those centrifuges or highly enriched uranium for civilian nuclear power. There are a couple dozen countries around the world that have civilian nuclear power that don’t enrich their own uranium.”

Focusing solely on “highly enriched uranium” — which is needed for building nuclear weapons — and not “low enriched uranium,” which is for civilian nuclear power, is a significant shift for the Arkansas Republican and a slight move away from many Iran hawks who say Trump should not accept an agreement that allows Iran to have a civilian nuclear program at all.

Cotton has made a career out of promoting maximalist demands on Iran, opposing negotiations and calling for war. In fact, just two weeks ago, Cotton said “the only solution is Iran completely dismantling its program, or we should do it for them.”

Indeed, pushing for Trump to only accept a deal that completely dismantles Iran’s nuclear program has been the top talking point among Iran hawks since negotiations began just weeks ago.

“Dismantle all the infrastructure of Iran’s nuclear program,” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said recently. “That is a deal we can live with.”

The Foundation for the Defense of Democracies — a Washington think tank that advocates for Israel, pushes war with Iran and was instrumental in Trump’s withdrawal from Obama’s Iran nuclear deal in 2018 — has been peddling this line as well.

“With Tehran at its weakest point in decades,” an FDD “policy alert” stated earlier this month, “the administration must avoid past mistakes and insist that no deal be made unless Iran completely and verifiably dismantles its nuclear program.”

Experts more supportive of Trump's outreach to Iran say Cotton's recent comments have potential to help the president get a good deal.

"Senator Tom Cotton’s recent remarks on Iran represent a notable shift in the debate that maintains a hardline stance while introducing a more strategic path forward," said Center for International Policy senior fellow Sina Toossi. "Cotton has always been one of the toughest voices on Iran, and he’s making it clear that Iran must never be allowed to have highly enriched uranium or advanced centrifuges. He’s right. These aren’t needed for a peaceful, civilian nuclear program. Drawing that line is common sense, rooted in U.S. security interests."

Toossi added that Trump is in a unique position to settle the nuclear dispute with Iran and avoid dragging the U.S. into another Middle East war. "Cotton appears to be moving away from that maximalist position, which could signal weakening domestic opposition to any deal Trump makes with Iran," he said.

A spokesperson for Cotton said the senator "has been very clear that the terrorist regime of Iran must dismantle its entire nuclear program."


Top image credit: Maxim Elramsisy / Shutterstock.com
Reporting | QiOSK
Trump Netanyahu
Top image credit: White House April 7, 2025

Polls: Americans don't support Trump's war on Iran

Military Industrial Complex

While there are serious doubts about the accuracy of President Donald Trump’s claims about the effectiveness of his attacks on Iranian nuclear sites, the U.S./Israeli war on Iran has provided fresh and abundant evidence of widespread opposition to war in the United States.

With a tenuous ceasefire currently holding, several nationwide surveys suggest Trump’s attack, which plunged the country into yet another offensive war in the Middle East, has been broadly unpopular across the country.

keep readingShow less
Could Trump's Congo-Rwanda mineral deals actually save lives?
Top photo credit: Foreign Minister of the Democratic Republic of the Congo Thérèse Kayikwamba Wagner, left, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, center, and Foreign Minister of Rwanda Olivier Nduhungirehe, right, during ceremony to sign a Declaration of Principles between the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda, at the State Department, in Washington, D.C., on Friday, April 25, 2025. (Graeme Sloan/Sipa USA)

Could Trump's Congo-Rwanda mineral deals actually save lives?

Africa

There may be a light at the end of the tunnel as representatives from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Rwanda are hoping to end the violence between them by signing a peace deal in a joint signing ceremony in Washington today.

This comes after the United States and Qatar have been working for months to mediate an end to the conflict roiling the eastern DRC for years.

keep readingShow less
Trump steve Bannon
Top photo credit: President Donald Trump (White House/Flickr) and Steve Bannon (Gage Skidmore/Flickr)

Don't read the funeral rites for MAGA restraint yet

Washington Politics

On the same night President Donald Trump ordered U.S. airstrikes against Iran, POLITICO reported, “MAGA largely falls in line on Trump’s Iran strikes.”

The report cited “Charlie Kirk, a conservative activist and critic of GOP war hawks,” who posted on X, “Iran gave President Trump no choice.” It noted that former Republican Congressman Matt Gaetz, a longtime Trump supporter, “said on X that the president’s strike didn’t necessarily portend a larger conflict.” Gaetz said. “Trump the Peacemaker!”

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.