Follow us on social

Tom Cotton

Tom Cotton signals big shift on Iran talks

The GOP senator may now be open to accepting a civilian nuclear program

Reporting | QiOSK

A prominent Republican Iran hawk suggested this week that he may be willing to accept a deal with the United States in which Iran maintains its civilian nuclear program, a sign that hardline opposition to President Trump’s negotiations with Tehran may be softening.

“A good deal is a deal that cuts off all of Iran’s paths to a nuclear bomb, that includes all of their highly enriched uranium and their advanced centrifuges,” Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) said during an interview with conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt. “They don’t need those centrifuges or highly enriched uranium for civilian nuclear power. There are a couple dozen countries around the world that have civilian nuclear power that don’t enrich their own uranium.”

Focusing solely on “highly enriched uranium” — which is needed for building nuclear weapons — and not “low enriched uranium,” which is for civilian nuclear power, is a significant shift for the Arkansas Republican and a slight move away from many Iran hawks who say Trump should not accept an agreement that allows Iran to have a civilian nuclear program at all.

Cotton has made a career out of promoting maximalist demands on Iran, opposing negotiations and calling for war. In fact, just two weeks ago, Cotton said “the only solution is Iran completely dismantling its program, or we should do it for them.”

Indeed, pushing for Trump to only accept a deal that completely dismantles Iran’s nuclear program has been the top talking point among Iran hawks since negotiations began just weeks ago.

“Dismantle all the infrastructure of Iran’s nuclear program,” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said recently. “That is a deal we can live with.”

The Foundation for the Defense of Democracies — a Washington think tank that advocates for Israel, pushes war with Iran and was instrumental in Trump’s withdrawal from Obama’s Iran nuclear deal in 2018 — has been peddling this line as well.

“With Tehran at its weakest point in decades,” an FDD “policy alert” stated earlier this month, “the administration must avoid past mistakes and insist that no deal be made unless Iran completely and verifiably dismantles its nuclear program.”

Experts more supportive of Trump's outreach to Iran say Cotton's recent comments have potential to help the president get a good deal.

"Senator Tom Cotton’s recent remarks on Iran represent a notable shift in the debate that maintains a hardline stance while introducing a more strategic path forward," said Center for International Policy senior fellow Sina Toossi. "Cotton has always been one of the toughest voices on Iran, and he’s making it clear that Iran must never be allowed to have highly enriched uranium or advanced centrifuges. He’s right. These aren’t needed for a peaceful, civilian nuclear program. Drawing that line is common sense, rooted in U.S. security interests."

Toossi added that Trump is in a unique position to settle the nuclear dispute with Iran and avoid dragging the U.S. into another Middle East war. "Cotton appears to be moving away from that maximalist position, which could signal weakening domestic opposition to any deal Trump makes with Iran," he said.

A spokesperson for Cotton said the senator "has been very clear that the terrorist regime of Iran must dismantle its entire nuclear program."


Top image credit: Maxim Elramsisy / Shutterstock.com
Reporting | QiOSK
Russia train derailment
Top photo credit: Specialists of emergency services work at the scene, after a road bridge collapsed onto railway tracks due to an explosion in the Bryansk region, Russia, June 1, 2025. REUTERS/Stringer

What the giddy reaction to Ukraine's surprise attacks says about us

Europe

A little over forty years ago, while preparing for a weekly radio address, President Ronald Reagan famously cracked wise about the possibility of attacking the Soviet Union. “I have signed legislation that outlaws Russia forever,” he said. “We begin bombing in five minutes.”

Reagan had not realized that the studio microphone was recording his joke and that technical personnel preparing for the broadcast in stations across the country were already listening. His facetious remarks were leaked. The public reaction was immediate, strong, and negative. Democratic candidate Walter Mondale admonished his election opponent for ill-considered humor, and Reagan’s polling numbers took a temporary hit.

keep readingShow less
Is Trump's ambassador to Israel going off-script?
Top photo credit: U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee visits the Western Wall, Judaism's holiest prayer site, in Jerusalem's Old City, April 18, 2025. REUTERS/Ronen Zvulun

Is Trump's ambassador to Israel going off-script?

Washington Politics

As the Trump administration continues to try to broker a nuclear deal with Iran, Israel’s president Benjamin Netanyahu has not been a willing partner in those efforts.

The two spoke Monday evening, but Israel’s government has threatened strikes on Iran that could upend a deal. When Trump bypassed Israel on his Middle East trip last month, many saw it as a snub to Netanyahu.

keep readingShow less
Boeing
Top image credit: EVERETT (WA), USA – JANUARY 30 2015: Unidentified Boeing employees continue work building its latest Boeing 777 jets at its Everett factory (First Class Photography / Shutterstock.com)

A nuclear deal with Iran could generate billions for US economy

Middle East

As the U.S. and Iran engage in fraught rounds of nuclear talks, deep distrust, past failures, and mounting pressure from opponents continue to hinder progress. Washington has reverted to its old zero-enrichment stance, a policy that, in 2010, led Iran to increase uranium enrichment from under 5% to 20%. Tehran remains equally entrenched, insisting, “No enrichment, no deal, No nuclear weapons, we have a deal.”

In Washington, the instinct is to tighten the screws on Tehran, make military threats credible, and explore strike options to force capitulation. Yet history shows that these coercive tactics often fail. Sanctions have not secured compliance and have proven costly to U.S. interests. Military strikes are unlikely to dismantle Iran’s nuclear capabilities; instead, they risk convincing Tehran to pursue the development of nuclear weapons.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.