Follow us on social

Tom Cotton

Tom Cotton signals big shift on Iran talks

The GOP senator may now be open to accepting a civilian nuclear program

Reporting | QiOSK

A prominent Republican Iran hawk suggested this week that he may be willing to accept a deal with the United States in which Iran maintains its civilian nuclear program, a sign that hardline opposition to President Trump’s negotiations with Tehran may be softening.

“A good deal is a deal that cuts off all of Iran’s paths to a nuclear bomb, that includes all of their highly enriched uranium and their advanced centrifuges,” Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) said during an interview with conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt. “They don’t need those centrifuges or highly enriched uranium for civilian nuclear power. There are a couple dozen countries around the world that have civilian nuclear power that don’t enrich their own uranium.”

Focusing solely on “highly enriched uranium” — which is needed for building nuclear weapons — and not “low enriched uranium,” which is for civilian nuclear power, is a significant shift for the Arkansas Republican and a slight move away from many Iran hawks who say Trump should not accept an agreement that allows Iran to have a civilian nuclear program at all.

Cotton has made a career out of promoting maximalist demands on Iran, opposing negotiations and calling for war. In fact, just two weeks ago, Cotton said “the only solution is Iran completely dismantling its program, or we should do it for them.”

Indeed, pushing for Trump to only accept a deal that completely dismantles Iran’s nuclear program has been the top talking point among Iran hawks since negotiations began just weeks ago.

“Dismantle all the infrastructure of Iran’s nuclear program,” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said recently. “That is a deal we can live with.”

The Foundation for the Defense of Democracies — a Washington think tank that advocates for Israel, pushes war with Iran and was instrumental in Trump’s withdrawal from Obama’s Iran nuclear deal in 2018 — has been peddling this line as well.

“With Tehran at its weakest point in decades,” an FDD “policy alert” stated earlier this month, “the administration must avoid past mistakes and insist that no deal be made unless Iran completely and verifiably dismantles its nuclear program.”

Experts more supportive of Trump's outreach to Iran say Cotton's recent comments have potential to help the president get a good deal.

"Senator Tom Cotton’s recent remarks on Iran represent a notable shift in the debate that maintains a hardline stance while introducing a more strategic path forward," said Center for International Policy senior fellow Sina Toossi. "Cotton has always been one of the toughest voices on Iran, and he’s making it clear that Iran must never be allowed to have highly enriched uranium or advanced centrifuges. He’s right. These aren’t needed for a peaceful, civilian nuclear program. Drawing that line is common sense, rooted in U.S. security interests."

Toossi added that Trump is in a unique position to settle the nuclear dispute with Iran and avoid dragging the U.S. into another Middle East war. "Cotton appears to be moving away from that maximalist position, which could signal weakening domestic opposition to any deal Trump makes with Iran," he said.

A spokesperson for Cotton said the senator "has been very clear that the terrorist regime of Iran must dismantle its entire nuclear program."


Top image credit: Maxim Elramsisy / Shutterstock.com
Reporting | QiOSK
Salva Kiir
Top image credit: Sudan's Sovereign Council Chief General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, is received by South Sudanese President Salva Kiir upon arriving at the Juba International Airport, in Juba, South Sudan September 16, 2024. REUTERS/Jok Solomun

South Sudan teetering on the edge of civil war

Africa

The people of South Sudan are once again forced to flee their homes and endure severe hunger as the country is on the brink of civil war. The escalating violence and skyrocketing tensions between leaders in South Sudan threaten the country's stability and regional security and risk worsening the humanitarian crisis.

President Salva Kiir’s recent detention of the country’s main opposition leader, Vice President Riek Machar, and his aides is raising fears of military clashes and violence across the country between the national force (SSPDF) and the military wing of Machar's party (SPLM/A-IO).

keep readingShow less
Fall of saigon vietnam
South Vietnamese refugees walk across a U.S. Navy vessel. Operation Frequent Wind, the final operation in Saigon, began April 29, 1975. (U.S. Marine Corps in Japan, official photo)

Trump can boycott, but the failure and end of Vietnam War is a fact

Asia-Pacific

The Trump administration has ordered U.S. diplomats in Vietnam not to attend ceremonies marking the 50th anniversary of the Vietnam War on Wednesday, according to a report in the New York Times.

Although mere ceremonies that look backward in history may seem unimportant compared to the current problems that diplomats must address, this decision to shun official representation at events that the Vietnamese government is organizing is regrettable. It represents a failure to recognize one of the greatest transitions in U.S. foreign policy from a destructive to a constructive path.

keep readingShow less
Pezeshkian Witkoff
Top photo credit: Iranian president Masoud Pezeshkian ( Tasnim News Agency/Wikimedia) and US special envoy Steve Witkoff (Office of President of Russian Federation/Wikimedia)

Enrichment is the sticking point as US-Iran talks cautiously 'hopeful'

Middle East

Alarmed by reports of dissension in the White House on U.S. Iran policy, the director of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies recently warned that Iran will “exploit these different negotiating positions…as soon as the regime smells desperation.”

This alert was probably prompted by the White House’s chief negotiating envoy, Steven Witkoff, who stated on Monday, April 14, that “Iran does not need to enrich [uranium] past 3.67 percent,” only to declare on Tuesday that “Iran must…eliminate its nuclear enrichment and weaponization program.” In one day, he went from a position that could offer the basis for a negotiated deal to echoing administration hawks, such as national security adviser Mike Waltz, who insists that the total dismantling of Iran’s nuclear program is the only acceptable goal.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.