Follow us on social

google cta
Tom Cotton

Tom Cotton signals big shift on Iran talks

The GOP senator may now be open to accepting a civilian nuclear program

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

A prominent Republican Iran hawk suggested this week that he may be willing to accept a deal with the United States in which Iran maintains its civilian nuclear program, a sign that hardline opposition to President Trump’s negotiations with Tehran may be softening.

“A good deal is a deal that cuts off all of Iran’s paths to a nuclear bomb, that includes all of their highly enriched uranium and their advanced centrifuges,” Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) said during an interview with conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt. “They don’t need those centrifuges or highly enriched uranium for civilian nuclear power. There are a couple dozen countries around the world that have civilian nuclear power that don’t enrich their own uranium.”

Focusing solely on “highly enriched uranium” — which is needed for building nuclear weapons — and not “low enriched uranium,” which is for civilian nuclear power, is a significant shift for the Arkansas Republican and a slight move away from many Iran hawks who say Trump should not accept an agreement that allows Iran to have a civilian nuclear program at all.

Cotton has made a career out of promoting maximalist demands on Iran, opposing negotiations and calling for war. In fact, just two weeks ago, Cotton said “the only solution is Iran completely dismantling its program, or we should do it for them.”

Indeed, pushing for Trump to only accept a deal that completely dismantles Iran’s nuclear program has been the top talking point among Iran hawks since negotiations began just weeks ago.

“Dismantle all the infrastructure of Iran’s nuclear program,” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said recently. “That is a deal we can live with.”

The Foundation for the Defense of Democracies — a Washington think tank that advocates for Israel, pushes war with Iran and was instrumental in Trump’s withdrawal from Obama’s Iran nuclear deal in 2018 — has been peddling this line as well.

“With Tehran at its weakest point in decades,” an FDD “policy alert” stated earlier this month, “the administration must avoid past mistakes and insist that no deal be made unless Iran completely and verifiably dismantles its nuclear program.”

Experts more supportive of Trump's outreach to Iran say Cotton's recent comments have potential to help the president get a good deal.

"Senator Tom Cotton’s recent remarks on Iran represent a notable shift in the debate that maintains a hardline stance while introducing a more strategic path forward," said Center for International Policy senior fellow Sina Toossi. "Cotton has always been one of the toughest voices on Iran, and he’s making it clear that Iran must never be allowed to have highly enriched uranium or advanced centrifuges. He’s right. These aren’t needed for a peaceful, civilian nuclear program. Drawing that line is common sense, rooted in U.S. security interests."

Toossi added that Trump is in a unique position to settle the nuclear dispute with Iran and avoid dragging the U.S. into another Middle East war. "Cotton appears to be moving away from that maximalist position, which could signal weakening domestic opposition to any deal Trump makes with Iran," he said.

A spokesperson for Cotton said the senator "has been very clear that the terrorist regime of Iran must dismantle its entire nuclear program."


Top image credit: Maxim Elramsisy / Shutterstock.com
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
Mbs-mbz-scaled
UAE President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan receives Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman at the Presidential Airport in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates November 27, 2019. WAM/Handout via REUTERS

Is the US goading Arab states to join war against Iran?

QiOSK

On Sunday, U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Mike Waltz told ABC News that Arab Gulf states may soon step up their involvement in the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran. “I expect that you'll see additional diplomatic and possibly military action from them in the coming days and weeks,” Waltz said.

Then, on Monday morning, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) slammed Saudi Arabia for staying out of the war even as “Americans are dying and the U.S. is spending billions” of dollars to conduct regime change in Iran. “If you are not willing to use your military now, when are you willing to use it?” Graham asked. “Hopefully this changes soon. If not, consequences will follow.”

keep readingShow less
Why Tehran may have time on its side
Top image credit: Iranian army military personnel stand at attention under a banner featuring an image of an Iranian-made unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) during a military parade commemorating the anniversary of Army Day outside the Shrine of Iran's late leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in the south of Tehran, Iran, on April 18, 2025. (Photo by Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto)

Why Tehran may have time on its side

QiOSK

A provocative calculus by Anusar Farrouqui (“policytensor”) has been circulating on X and in more exhaustive form on the author’s Substack. It purports to demonstrate a sobering reality: in a high-intensity U.S.-Iran conflict, the United States may be unable to suppress Iranian drone production quickly enough to prevent a strategically consequential period of regional devastation.

The argument is framed through a quantitative lens, carrying the seductive appeal of mathematical precision. It arranges variables—such as U.S. sortie rates and degradation efficiency against Iranian repair cycles and rebuild speeds—to suggest a "sustainable firing rate." The implication is that Iran could maintain a persistent strike capability long enough to exhaust American political patience, forcing Washington toward a premature declaration of success or an unfavorable ceasefire.

keep readingShow less
Will Democrats pop Trump's $50 billion trial balloon for war?
Top image credit: Sens. Andy Kim (D-N.J.), Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) and Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) sit look on during a congressional hearing in January, 2025. (Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call/Sipa USA)

Will Democrats pop Trump's $50 billion trial balloon for war?

Washington Politics

On Wednesday, Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) told CNN that he would support new funding for the U.S. war with Iran — but only if Israel and Arab Gulf states help pay for it.

“We’re using our taxpayer money to protect those countries,” Gallego said. “We’re using our men to protect these countries. They need to throw in and have skin in the game too.”

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.