Follow us on social

What's next for South Africa's foreign policy

What's next for South Africa's foreign policy

While there are ministers in the new government eager for change, the country’s system is likely to maintain the status quo

Analysis | Africa

South Africa’s new coalition government is likely to leave present foreign policy unchanged, despite awarding six cabinet seats to the center-right Democratic Alliance (DA), which is notably more pro-Western and pro-Israel.

However, new foreign policy initiatives may be more restrained as a result of a clause in the coalition’s declaration of intent that requires agreement between the major parties when new policies arise.

The country’s relationship with the United States will be on their minds next year as its status as a beneficiary of the African Growth and Opportunity Act comes up for review amid rising congressional criticism. The U.S. House of Representatives recently passed legislation requiring the Biden administration to conduct a full review of the U.S. relationship with South Africa.

Triggered by opposition to Pretoria’s relations with Russia, China, and Iran, it would require the administration to report on whether South Africa “has engaged in activities that undermine U.S. national security or foreign policy interests.” The legislation is unlikely to pass in the Senate.

President Joe Biden told his South African counterpart, President Cyril Ramaphosa, on Tuesday evening that should he win a second term he intends on coming to South Africa for next year’s G20 summit which Ramaphosa will host as G20 chair in 2025, and Ramaphosa invited Biden for a state visit.

Biden called to congratulate Ramaphosa on his re-election and successful formation of a multiparty coalition government after Ramaphosa’s African National Congress (ANC) suffered a severe setback, falling from 57% to 40% in the May 29 poll.

In coalition talks, Ramaphosa successfully prioritized retaining almost all ideologically sensitive ministries, including international relations, defense and intelligence, as well as finance and trade and industy, in the hands of his ANC. He conceded six domestic portfolios out of 32 to the DA, and another six to smaller, ideologically conservative parties for a total of 12.

The newly appointed minister of international relations and cooperation, Ronald Lamola, who is 40, has publicly endorsed the policies of his predecessor, Naledi Pandor, a Muslim and passionate supporter of Palestine, who did not make it back to parliament given the ANC’s election setback.

Unlike Pandor, who spent many years in exile, Lamola is part of a new generation of leaders who stayed in South Africa before liberation. He was 10 when Nelson Mandela was sworn in as the first democratic president.

He is likely to maintain Pandor’s policy positions, having worked on the case against Israel at the International Court of Justice in his previous role as justice minister, but he has less experience with international affairs.

The DA and some smaller parties with a seat in the cabinet are likely to moderate the rhetorical tone of South African anti-Western criticism and emphasize South Africa’s important Western export markets for high-value sale of South African cars, wine, and agricultural goods.

The DA and other coalition parties have expressed fear that South Africa’s criticism of Western policies and growing ties with Russia could jeopardize important trade ties.

DA leader John Steenhuisen, now minister of agriculture, travelled to Ukraine early in that war to voice strong support for Ukraine and criticized the government for appearing to be neutral while calling President Vladimir Putin long before it contacted his Ukrainian counterpart.

Steenhuisen’s party has also objected to South Africa downgrading its Israeli embassy, and its decision to withdraw all diplomats from Israel and suspend diplomatic ties in November last year. His party has been less enthusiastic about South Africa’s role in BRICS.

The new government includes two small parties, the pro-Palestinian Al Jamma-ah party, which is not represented in the new cabinet, and the strongly pro-Israel Patriotic Alliance, led by former gangster and bank robber Gayton McKenzie, who is the new minister of sport, arts and culture.

The ANC made foreign policy a significant campaign issue, criticizing opposition parties for failing to speak out against Israel’s incursion into Gaza, but polling indicated that it had little impact on voters, who were guided mostly by domestic concerns in an economy that has not grown through both the nine-year presidency of Jacob Zuma and Ramaphosa’s six years in office.

The coalition government, which the president describes as a government of national unity, was concluded surprisingly fast after the results showed this was the only way to keep out two radical parties which vowed to change the constitution.

Both the ANC and most of its opponents in the DA and other small parties who joined the coalition have a strong incentive to stay together despite seemingly large ideological differences.

While the ANC lost 17% of its support, the DA was not able to capitalize on the ANC’s unpopularity as a result of years of well-publicized corruption, gaining only a single percent to garner 21.81% of the vote.

Both major parties and analysts were stunned at the success of Zuma’s new Mkhonto we Sizwe Party (MKP), taking 14.58% in last month’s poll after being established only six months ago.

Combined with the radical Economic Freedom Fighters, with 9.52%, they pose a threat to both the ANC and DA. This was undoubtedly the main reason the DA reversed its historic opposition to working with the ANC, and swallowed its differences and joined the government.

The coalition talks took one month, and included several public spats. One provincial government, Gauteng, home of the country’s commercial capital, Johannesburg, remains in deadlock. The Gauteng ANC, if left to its own devices, would probably have chosen the MKP and EFF as partners over the DA, which has accused them of negotiating in bad faith.

So far the ANC national leadership have stepped in successfully to prevent a complete breakdown in those talks, but however they are resolved, the DA has confirmed that this conflict will not spill over into the national coalition agreement. If they cannot agree, the DA will return to opposition benches in this province. DA ministers were sworn in on Wednesday.


South African President Cyril Ramaphosa speaks after being re-elected as president of South Africa during the first sitting of the National Assembly following elections, at the Cape Town International Convention Center (CTICC) in Cape Town, South Africa June 14, 2024. REUTERS/Nic Bothma

Analysis | Africa
US Marines
Top image credit: U.S. Marines with Force Reconnaissance Platoon, Maritime Raid Force, 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, prepare to clear a room during a limited scale raid exercise at Sam Hill Airfield, Queensland, Australia, June 21, 2025. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. Alora Finigan)

Cartels are bad but they're not 'terrorists.' This is mission creep.

Military Industrial Complex

There is a dangerous pattern on display by the Trump administration. The president and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth seem to hold the threat and use of military force as their go-to method of solving America’s problems and asserting state power.

The president’s reported authorization for the Pentagon to use U.S. military warfighting capacity to combat drug cartels — a domain that should remain within the realm of law enforcement — represents a significant escalation. This presents a concerning evolution and has serious implications for civil liberties — especially given the administration’s parallel moves with the deployment of troops to the southern border, the use of federal forces to quell protests in California, and the recent deployment of armed National Guard to the streets of our nation’s capital.

keep readingShow less
Howard Lutnick
Top photo credit: Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on CNBC, 8/26/25 (CNBC screengrab)

Is nationalizing the defense industry such a bad idea?

Military Industrial Complex

The U.S. arms industry is highly consolidated, specialized, and dependent on government contracts. Indeed, the largest U.S. military contractors are already effectively extensions of the state — and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is right to point that out.

His suggestion in a recent media appearance to partially nationalize the likes of Lockheed Martin is hardly novel. The economist John Kenneth Galbraith argued for the nationalization of the largest military contractors in 1969. More recently, various academics and policy analysts have advocated for partial or full nationalization of military firms in publications including The Nation, The American Conservative, The Middle East Research and Information Project (MERIP), and The Seattle Journal for Social Justice.

keep readingShow less
Modi Trump
Top image credit: White House, February 2025

Trump's India problem could become a Global South crisis

Asia-Pacific

As President Trump’s second term kicked off, all signs pointed to a continued upswing in U.S.-India relations. At a White House press conference in February, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi spoke of his vision to “Make India Great Again” and how the United States under Trump would play a central role. “When it’s MAGA plus MIGA, it becomes a mega partnership for prosperity,” Modi said.

During Trump’s first term, the two populist leaders hosted rallies for each other in their respective countries and cultivated close personal ties. Aside from the Trump-Modi bromance, U.S.-Indian relations have been on a positive trajectory for over two decades, driven in part by mutual suspicion of China. But six months into his second term, Trump has taken several actions that have led to a dramatic downturn in U.S.-India relations, with India-China relations suddenly on the rise.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.