Follow us on social

google cta
AI chips china USA

Bipartisan outrage after Trump greenlights Nvidia chips to China

Today’s announcement came as lawmakers were meeting to discuss how Beijing's AI progress was a threat to US national security


Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

With no little irony, the Trump administration announced late yesterday that it had approved Nvidia H200 chip exports to China, which are essential to China’s AI programs — just before the House Committee on Foreign Affairs held a hearing about the danger of China's AI advancements to U.S. national security.

The hearing discussed the necessity of winning the AI arms race against China and the imminent threats that would be sure to follow should this race be lost.

“The stakes could not be higher,” Rep. Andy Barr (R-Ky.) told the hearing. “Whoever wins the artificial intelligence race will gain an edge in economic power, military dominance, technological leadership and global influence. This is the defining competition of the century.”

When Trump announced the sales last month, he said they would be exported to China "under conditions that allow for continued strong National Security,” but many are wondering if that is truly the case.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, while announcing a new AI Acceleration Strategy earlier this month, said that AI will redefine the character of war over the next decade. Meanwhile, a former White House and Commerce Department official acknowledged to the Financial Times that access to this chip would allow China to take great strides in an already tight race.

“Unfettered access to the H200 would allow China to build frontier-scale AI supercomputers to develop the most powerful AI systems, just at a moderately higher cost relative to cutting-edge Blackwell chips,” the official told the Financial Times. “It would also arm Chinese cloud providers to compete globally with US hyperscalers.”

With today’s announcement, safety measures that had not been previously established were also released, including requirements that chips be reviewed by a third-party testing lab to confirm their technical AI capabilities before being shipped, and regulations that ensure China cannot receive more than 50% of the total amount of chips sold to American customers.

Chinese customers purchasing the chips will also need to demonstrate "sufficient security procedures" and will be barred from using the chips for military purposes.

Still, there are questions of whether these conditions will stop the so-called most consequential arms race in recent history.

“The outcome of this race directly affects military competitiveness of the United States of America versus China,” said Rep. Brian Mast (R-Fla), who chaired the hearing. “It is that black and white, and because AI works to improve other AI, this is a very unique race where the further you get ahead, the further you get ahead.”

Many lawmakers, including those in attendance at the hearing, expressed confusion and outrage about this move by Trump. Rep. Gabe Amo (D-R.I.) said at the hearing that the approval of sales will “empower China” and “handicap the United State’s AI superiority.”

“He's sabotaging our national security by auctioning off our most advanced technology to the highest bidder, and his aggression towards Venezuela and Greenland is creating a dangerous permission structure for Chinese and Russian aggression towards Taiwan and Ukraine,” Amo said.


Top photo credit: (William Potter/Shutterstock)
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
Tech billionaires behind Greenland bid want to build 'freedom cities'
Top image credit: The White House Marcn 2025

Tech billionaires behind Greenland bid want to build 'freedom cities'

North America

This past week, President Trump removed any remaining ambiguity about his intentions toward Greenland. During a White House event, he declared he would take the Arctic territory “whether they like it or not.” Then he laid down what sounded like a mobster’s threat to Denmark: “If we don’t do it the easy way we’re going to do it the hard way.”

Trump also reportedly ordered special forces commanders to come up with an invasion plan, even though senior military officials warned him it would violate international law and NATO treaties. In an interview with the New York Times, Trump said, “I don’t need international law.”

keep readingShow less
Iran protests
Top photo credit: A member of the Iranian police attends a pro-government rally in Tehran, Iran, January 12, 2026. Stringer/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS ATTENTION EDITORS - THIS PICTURE WAS PROVIDED BY A THIRD PARTY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY

Iran regime is brittle, but don't count out killer instinct to survive

Middle East

Political and economic protests have long been woven into Iran’s political fabric. From the Tobacco Movement of the 1890s which ultimately created the first democratic constitution in the Middle East, to labor strikes under the Pahlavi monarchy, to student activism and localized economic unrest in the Islamic Republic, street mobilization has repeatedly served as a vehicle for political expression.

What is new, however, is the increase in frequency, geographic spread, and persistence of protests since 2019, an episode which took the lives of more than 300 Iranians. That year marked a turning point, with nationwide anti-government demonstrations erupting across Iran in response to fuel price hikes, followed by repeated waves of unrest over economic hardship, and political repression.

keep readingShow less
US trashed Somalia, can we really scold its people for coming here?
Top image credit: A woman walks past the wreckage of a car at the scene of an explosion on a bomb-rigged car that was parked on a road near the National Theatre in Hamarweyne district of Mogadishu, Somalia September 28, 2024. REUTERS/Feisal Omar

US trashed Somalia, can we really scold its people for coming here?

Africa

The relatively small Somali community in the U.S., estimated at 260,000, has lately been receiving national attention thanks to a massive fraud scandal in Minnesota and the resulting vitriol directed at them by President Trump.

Trump’s targeting of Somalis long preceded the current allegations of fraud, going back to his first presidential campaign in 2016. A central theme of Trump’s anti-Somali rancor is that they come from a war-torn country without an effective centralized state, which in Trump’s reasoning speaks to their quality as a people, and therefore, their ability to contribute to American society. It is worth reminding ourselves, however, that Somalia’s state collapse and political instability is as much a result of imperial interventions, including from the U.S., as anything else.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.