Follow us on social

google cta
AI chips china USA

Bipartisan outrage after Trump greenlights Nvidia chips to China

Today’s announcement came as lawmakers were meeting to discuss how Beijing's AI progress was a threat to US national security


Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

With no little irony, the Trump administration announced late yesterday that it had approved Nvidia H200 chip exports to China, which are essential to China’s AI programs — just before the House Committee on Foreign Affairs held a hearing about the danger of China's AI advancements to U.S. national security.

The hearing discussed the necessity of winning the AI arms race against China and the imminent threats that would be sure to follow should this race be lost.

“The stakes could not be higher,” Rep. Andy Barr (R-Ky.) told the hearing. “Whoever wins the artificial intelligence race will gain an edge in economic power, military dominance, technological leadership and global influence. This is the defining competition of the century.”

When Trump announced the sales last month, he said they would be exported to China "under conditions that allow for continued strong National Security,” but many are wondering if that is truly the case.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, while announcing a new AI Acceleration Strategy earlier this month, said that AI will redefine the character of war over the next decade. Meanwhile, a former White House and Commerce Department official acknowledged to the Financial Times that access to this chip would allow China to take great strides in an already tight race.

“Unfettered access to the H200 would allow China to build frontier-scale AI supercomputers to develop the most powerful AI systems, just at a moderately higher cost relative to cutting-edge Blackwell chips,” the official told the Financial Times. “It would also arm Chinese cloud providers to compete globally with US hyperscalers.”

With today’s announcement, safety measures that had not been previously established were also released, including requirements that chips be reviewed by a third-party testing lab to confirm their technical AI capabilities before being shipped, and regulations that ensure China cannot receive more than 50% of the total amount of chips sold to American customers.

Chinese customers purchasing the chips will also need to demonstrate "sufficient security procedures" and will be barred from using the chips for military purposes.

Still, there are questions of whether these conditions will stop the so-called most consequential arms race in recent history.

“The outcome of this race directly affects military competitiveness of the United States of America versus China,” said Rep. Brian Mast (R-Fla), who chaired the hearing. “It is that black and white, and because AI works to improve other AI, this is a very unique race where the further you get ahead, the further you get ahead.”

Many lawmakers, including those in attendance at the hearing, expressed confusion and outrage about this move by Trump. Rep. Gabe Amo (D-R.I.) said at the hearing that the approval of sales will “empower China” and “handicap the United State’s AI superiority.”

“He's sabotaging our national security by auctioning off our most advanced technology to the highest bidder, and his aggression towards Venezuela and Greenland is creating a dangerous permission structure for Chinese and Russian aggression towards Taiwan and Ukraine,” Amo said.


Top photo credit: (William Potter/Shutterstock)
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
Trump Venezuela
Top image credit: President Donald Trump monitors U.S. military operations in Venezuela, from Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida, on Saturday, January 3, 2026. (Official White House Photo by Molly Riley)

Geo-kleptocracy and the rise of 'global mafia politics'

Global Crises

“As everyone knows, the oil business in Venezuela has been a bust, a total bust, for a long period of time. … We're going to have our very large United States oil companies, the biggest anywhere in the world, go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure, the oil infrastructure, and start making money for the country,” said President Donald Trump the morning after U.S. forces invaded Caracas and carried off the indicted autocrat Nicolàs Maduro.

The invasion of Venezuela on Jan. 3 did not result in regime change but rather a deal coerced at the barrel of a gun. Maduro’s underlings may stay in power as long as they open the country’s moribund petroleum industry to American oil majors. Government repression still rules the day, simply without Maduro.

keep readingShow less
Russian icebreakers
Top photo credit: Russian nuclear powered Icebreaker Yamal during removal of manned drifting station North Pole-36. August 2009. (Wikimedia Commmons)

Trump's Greenland, Canada threats reflect angst over Russia shipping

North America

Like it or not, Russia is the biggest polar bear in the arctic, which helps to explain President Trump’s moves on Greenland.

However, the Biden administration focused on it too. And it isn’t only about access to resources and military positioning, but also about shipping. And there, the Russians are some way ahead.

keep readingShow less
Iran nuclear
Top image credit: An Iranian cleric and a young girl stand next to scale models of Iran-made ballistic missiles and centrifuges after participating in an anti-U.S. and anti-Israeli rally marking the anniversary of the U.S. embassy occupation in downtown Tehran, Iran, on November 4, 2025.(Photo by Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto via REUTERS CONNECT)

Want Iran to get the bomb? Try regime change

Middle East

Washington is once again flirting with a familiar temptation: the belief that enough pressure, and if necessary, military force, can bend Iran to its will. The Trump administration appears ready to move beyond containment toward forcing collapse. Before treating Iran as the next candidate for forced transformation, policymakers should ask a question they have consistently failed to answer in the Middle East: “what follows regime change?”

The record is sobering. In the past two decades, regime change in the region has yielded state fragmentation, authoritarian restoration, or prolonged conflict. Iraq remains fractured despite two decades of U.S. investment. Egypt’s democratic opening collapsed within a year. Libya, Syria, and Yemen spiraled into civil wars whose spillover persists. In each case, removing a regime proved far easier than constructing a viable successor. Iran would not be the exception. It would be the rule — at a scale that dwarfs anything the region has experienced.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.