Follow us on social

google cta
Trump Netanyahu

As expected, Netanyahu back demanding more war with Iran

Reports: Israeli PM coming to town and he wants the US, again, to do his bidding

Analysis | QiOSK
google cta

NBC News reports that Netanyahu’s key ask in his upcoming Dec 29 meeting with Trump is to convince the US to join Israel in restarting war with Iran.

As I wrote in August in FP, Israel was poised to resume the conflict since it didn’t achieve its key objectives during its first attack. The significant impact of Iran’s missile strikes compelled Israel to seek a ceasefire after only nine days—a stark contrast to the months and even years it previously took to pressure Israel into ceasefires with Hamas and Hezbollah.

The June war resulted in mutual deterrence, a situation Iran can accept, but one that is intolerable for Netanyahu and his legacy. Ultimately, the conflict was neither a victory for Israel nor for Iran.

It is precisely this balance of terror that prompts Israel to seek a new round - Israel’s military doctrine does not allow for any of its regional foes to deter it or challenge its military dominance. Iran’s missile program currently does exactly that.

According to NBC News, Israel’s messaging is no longer focused on the nuclear program but rather on Iran’s ballistic missile program.

And this is precisely why Trump must say no to Netanyahu. Because Israel’s objective is not security in the conventional sense, but rather absolute dominance. Israel insists on having total security and freedom to maneuver, while denying its neighbors any minimum level of certainty and forcing the region into a state of complete insecurity.

Consider the case of Lebanon. U.S. policy aims to build up the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) to a level where they can disarm Hezbollah, yet deliberately prevents the LAF from reaching a capacity that could allow Lebanon to defend itself or deter against Israeli aggression. This policy is maintained even as Israel engages in daily bombings of Lebanon.

Consequently, Israel’s demands on the US will be unending. After the nuclear program was bombed, the focus—and the demands on America—shifted to Iran’s missile program. If that program is destroyed, which is a major “if,” the attention will then shift to some other Iranian capability.

Don’t be surprised if the New York Times at some point runs an affirmative story on how kitchen knives in Iran are seen as an existential threat by the Israeli security establishment. Panic-stricken pundits on mainstream networks will then inevitably pose the question: “Will America tolerate Iran operating secret cutlery factories?”

Israel’s military doctrine demands endless war. Not to achieve security, but to exercise dominance.

Yet, Israel cannot sustain any of these wars without endless support from the US. American taxpayers covered $21.7bn of Israel’s military budget in 2024. In June of this year, the US consumed (wasted?) 25% of its THAAD missile interceptors to defend Israel in an unnecessary war that Netanyahu had chosen to start.

Israel is free to choose its own security doctrine. But the President of the United States, particularly one who professes America First, cannot sacrifice America’s national security and the well-being of the American people for the sake of megalomaniac Israeli dreams of a “Greater Israel” empire.

Particularly since Trump's National Security Strategy de-emphasized the importance of the Middle East, noting that “America’s historic reason for focusing on the Middle East will recede.”

Trump acquiesced to Israel’s demand to bomb the nuclear site, and now, six months later, Netanyahu is back with war plans against Iranian missiles. If Trump caves to Netanyahu once more, the Israeli Prime Minister will be back in another six months with another war plan for Americans to give their blood and tax dollars to.

This will go on endlessly until Trump decides to end it.

He should end it on December 29.

This was republished with permission from Trita Parsi's Substack newsletter


Dear RS readers: It has been an extraordinary year and our editing team has been working overtime to make sure that we are covering the current conflicts with quality, fresh analysis that doesn’t cleave to the mainstream orthodoxy or take official Washington and the commentariat at face value. Our staff reporters, experts, and outside writers offer top-notch, independent work, daily. Please consider making a tax-exempt, year-end contribution to Responsible Statecraft so that we can continue this quality coverage — which you will find nowhere else — into 2026. Happy Holidays!

Top image credit: President Donald Trump hosts a bilateral dinner for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Monday, July 7, 2025, in the Blue Room. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)
The signs for US Middle East retrenchment are increasingly glaring
Analysis | QiOSK
Von Der Leyen Zelensky
Top image credit: paparazzza / Shutterstock.com
The collapse of Europe's Ukraine policy has sparked a blame game

They are calling fast-track Ukraine EU bid 'nonsense.' So why dangle it?

Europe

Trying to accelerate Ukraine’s entry into the European Union makes sense as part of the U.S.-sponsored efforts to end the war with Russia. But there are two big obstacles to this happening by 2027: Ukraine isn’t ready, and Europe can’t afford it.

As part of ongoing talks to end the war in Ukraine, the Trump administration had advanced the idea that Ukraine be admitted into the European Union by 2027. On the surface, this appears a practical compromise, given Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s concession that Ukraine will drop its aspiration to join NATO.

keep reading Show less
World War II Normandy
Top photo credit: American soldiers march a group of German prisoners along a beachhead in Northern France after which they will be sent to England. June 6, 1944. (U.S. Army Signal Corps Photographic Files/public domain)

Marines know we don't kill unarmed survivors for a reason

Military Industrial Complex

As the Trump Administration continues to kill so-called Venezuelan "narco terrorists" through "non-international armed conflict" (whatever that means), it is clear it is doing so without Congressional authorization and in defiance of international law.

Perhaps worse, through these actions, the administration is demonstrating wanton disregard for centuries of Western battlefield precedent, customs, and traditions that righteously seek to preserve as many lives during war as possible.

keep reading Show less
Amanda Sloat
Top photo credit: Amanda Sloat, with Department of State, in 2015. (VOA photo/Wikimedia Commons)

Pranked Biden official exposes lie that Ukraine war was inevitable

Europe

When it comes to the Ukraine war, there have long been two realities. One is propagated by former Biden administration officials in speeches and media interviews, in which Russian President Vladimir Putin’s illegal invasion had nothing to do with NATO’s U.S.-led expansion into the now shattered country, there was nothing that could have been done to prevent what was an inevitable imperialist land-grab, and that negotiations once the war started to try to end the killing were not only impossible, but morally wrong.

Then there is the other, polar opposite reality that occasionally slips through when officials think few people are listening, and which was recently summed up by former Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for Europe at the National Security Council Amanda Sloat, in an interview with Russian pranksters whom she believed were aides to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

keep reading Show less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.