Follow us on social

google cta
Trump Netanyahu

As expected, Netanyahu back demanding more war with Iran

Reports: Israeli PM coming to town and he wants the US, again, to do his bidding

Analysis | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

NBC News reports that Netanyahu’s key ask in his upcoming Dec 29 meeting with Trump is to convince the US to join Israel in restarting war with Iran.

As I wrote in August in FP, Israel was poised to resume the conflict since it didn’t achieve its key objectives during its first attack. The significant impact of Iran’s missile strikes compelled Israel to seek a ceasefire after only nine days—a stark contrast to the months and even years it previously took to pressure Israel into ceasefires with Hamas and Hezbollah.

The June war resulted in mutual deterrence, a situation Iran can accept, but one that is intolerable for Netanyahu and his legacy. Ultimately, the conflict was neither a victory for Israel nor for Iran.

It is precisely this balance of terror that prompts Israel to seek a new round - Israel’s military doctrine does not allow for any of its regional foes to deter it or challenge its military dominance. Iran’s missile program currently does exactly that.

According to NBC News, Israel’s messaging is no longer focused on the nuclear program but rather on Iran’s ballistic missile program.

And this is precisely why Trump must say no to Netanyahu. Because Israel’s objective is not security in the conventional sense, but rather absolute dominance. Israel insists on having total security and freedom to maneuver, while denying its neighbors any minimum level of certainty and forcing the region into a state of complete insecurity.

Consider the case of Lebanon. U.S. policy aims to build up the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) to a level where they can disarm Hezbollah, yet deliberately prevents the LAF from reaching a capacity that could allow Lebanon to defend itself or deter against Israeli aggression. This policy is maintained even as Israel engages in daily bombings of Lebanon.

Consequently, Israel’s demands on the US will be unending. After the nuclear program was bombed, the focus—and the demands on America—shifted to Iran’s missile program. If that program is destroyed, which is a major “if,” the attention will then shift to some other Iranian capability.

Don’t be surprised if the New York Times at some point runs an affirmative story on how kitchen knives in Iran are seen as an existential threat by the Israeli security establishment. Panic-stricken pundits on mainstream networks will then inevitably pose the question: “Will America tolerate Iran operating secret cutlery factories?”

Israel’s military doctrine demands endless war. Not to achieve security, but to exercise dominance.

Yet, Israel cannot sustain any of these wars without endless support from the US. American taxpayers covered $21.7bn of Israel’s military budget in 2024. In June of this year, the US consumed (wasted?) 25% of its THAAD missile interceptors to defend Israel in an unnecessary war that Netanyahu had chosen to start.

Israel is free to choose its own security doctrine. But the President of the United States, particularly one who professes America First, cannot sacrifice America’s national security and the well-being of the American people for the sake of megalomaniac Israeli dreams of a “Greater Israel” empire.

Particularly since Trump's National Security Strategy de-emphasized the importance of the Middle East, noting that “America’s historic reason for focusing on the Middle East will recede.”

Trump acquiesced to Israel’s demand to bomb the nuclear site, and now, six months later, Netanyahu is back with war plans against Iranian missiles. If Trump caves to Netanyahu once more, the Israeli Prime Minister will be back in another six months with another war plan for Americans to give their blood and tax dollars to.

This will go on endlessly until Trump decides to end it.

He should end it on December 29.

This was republished with permission from Trita Parsi's Substack newsletter


Top image credit: President Donald Trump hosts a bilateral dinner for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Monday, July 7, 2025, in the Blue Room. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)
The signs for US Middle East retrenchment are increasingly glaring
google cta
Analysis | QiOSK
Trump Hegseth Rubio
Top image credit: President Donald Trump, joined by Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Secretary of the Navy John Phelan, announces plans for a “Golden Fleet” of new U.S. Navy battleships, Monday, December 22, 2025, at the Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

Trump's realist defense strategy with interventionist asterisks

Washington Politics

The Trump administration has released its National Defense Strategy, a document that in many ways marks a sharp break from the interventionist orthodoxies of the past 35 years, but possesses clear militaristic impulses in its own right.

Rhetorically quite compatible with realism and restraint, the report envisages a more focused U.S. grand strategy, shedding force posture dominance in all major theaters for a more concentrated role in the Western Hemisphere and Indo-Pacific. At the same time however, it retains a rather status quo Republican view of the Middle East, painting Iran as an intransigent aggressor and Israel as a model ally. Its muscular approach to the Western Hemisphere also may lend itself to the very interventionism that the report ostensibly opposes.

keep readingShow less
Alternative vs. legacy media
Top photo credit: Gemini AI

Ding dong the legacy media and its slavish war reporting is dead

Media

In a major development that must be frustrating to an establishment trying to sell their policies to an increasingly skeptical public, the rising popularity of independent media has made it impossible to create broad consensus for corporate-compliant narratives, and to casually denigrate, or even censor, those who disagree.

It’s been a long road.

keep readingShow less
Ted Cruz
Top photo credit: Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas) (Shutterstock/lev radin)

Ted Cruz's anti-Tucker pose for 2028 is truly a Jurassic Park dud

Washington Politics

Ted Cruz is reportedly planning on running for president. But which version?

The Tea Party Republican senator who once called the Iraq war a mistake, tried to appeal to non-interventionist Ron Paul libertarians, questioned Barack Obama’s authority to strike Syria, warned against U.S. military adventurism, who was also once the favored alternative to Donald Trump in the 2016 GOP presidential primary only to eventually capitulate to MAGA even after Trump insulted his wife?

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.