Follow us on social

google cta
Mark Carney Canada elections liberal party

Trump catapulted Canada's liberals to victory - but maybe not enough

Thanks to the Conservatives' strong performance, Mark Carney's party will only form a minority government — the sixth in the past eight elections.

Analysis | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

Monday’s federal election in Canada has returned the Liberal Party, now led by former central bank governor Mark Carney after Justin Trudeau’s departure earlier this year, to power for a fourth consecutive term.

The result represents a stunning — and, by historical standards, shockingly rapid — turn of events. As recently as January, opinion polls were consistently showing a massive 25-point Conservative Party lead, driven by Trudeau’s deep and abiding unpopularity after more than nine years in office.

Carney replacing Trudeau as prime minister undoubtedly helped the Liberals to turn the page, although some may argue in style more than in substance. But this dramatic comeback would not have been possible without Donald Trump’s repeated threats to turn Canada into America’s 51st state. The Tories’ defeat owes itself in no small part to their inability to pivot quickly enough away from their longstanding “everything is broken” anti-Trudeau message and embrace the prevailing anti-Trump zeitgeist.

Canadians have long stopped treating Trump’s threats as a joke — and the president in a recent interview for TIME magazine admitted he was “not trolling.” While it remains unclear what tangible measures the administration will take to advance the president’s annexationist vision, Trump’s inability to put this obsessive rhetoric aside will no doubt complicate any post-election trade negotiations between Canada and the United States.

The results of the election present a further complicating factor. The Liberals will only form a minority government — Canada’s sixth in the past eight elections — thanks to a strong performance by the Conservatives in the country’s most populous province of Ontario. Despite the loss, Tory Leader Pierre Poilievre led his party to its highest share of the popular vote since 1988, rebuilding his party’s image with younger voters thanks to a message focused on housing and affordability.

A polarized electorate has made this the first federal election since 1958 in which the two leading parties combined for more than 80 percent of the vote, facilitated by the devastating collapse in support for the left-wing New Democratic Party (NDP). This is, in fact, the first federal election since 2000 in which any party has succeeded in passing the 40 percent threshold — something that both the Liberals and Conservatives achieved in Monday’s vote.

Yet despite their high popular vote share, the Liberals were only able to capture 169 seats (pending any recounts), three short of the threshold necessary for a majority in Parliament. The difference between a minority and majority government ultimately rested on just 611 votes in three ridings. Given this close margin, the election of the speaker of the House, possible floor crossings to the Liberals, and future by-elections in the event of a resignation will all take on added significance. But in the meantime, Carney’s government will have to rely on outside support to pass legislation.

Given Trump’s threats, the need for Canada to find more reliable export markets has gained renewed impetus. But moving forward with new east-west infrastructure to reduce Canada’s dependence on the United States may prove complicated as long as the Liberals rely on NDP or Bloc Québécois votes in the House of Commons.

Canadian politics have grown increasingly partisan over the past two decades. Yet with minority governments increasingly the norm, the ability of the Liberals and Tories to put their differences aside where the national interest is concerned will be a non-negligible factor shaping the extent of Canada’s leverage in its relationship with the U.S., both during the Trump presidency and beyond.


Top photo credit: Canada's Liberal Party leader, Mark Carney, attends a federal election campaign rally at Sheraton Vancouver Airport Hotel in Richmond, British Columbia, Canada, on April 7, 2025 (Harrison Ha/Shutterstock)
google cta
Analysis | QiOSK
Nouri al Maliki Trump
Top photo credit: Nouri al-Maliki (Fars Media Corporation/Creative Commons) and Donald Trump (akatz/Shutterstock)

Trump's Iraq election threats could end up making Maliki more popular

Middle East
keep readingShow less
Why Israeli counterterrorism tactics are showing up in Minnesota
Top photo credit: Federal police tackle and detain a person as demonstrators protest outside the Whipple federal building in Minneapolis, Minnesota, on January 16, 2026. (Photo by Steven Garcia/NurPhoto)

Why Israeli counterterrorism tactics are showing up in Minnesota

Military Industrial Complex

In the past few weeks, thousands of federal law enforcement officials have descended on Minneapolis. Videos show immigration officers jumping out of unmarked vans, tackling and pepper-spraying protesters, and breaking windows in order to drag people from their cars.

Prominent figures in the Trump administration have defended this approach despite fierce local backlash. When federal agents killed a protester named Alex Pretti on Saturday, for example, Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem quickly accused him of “domestic terrorism.”

keep readingShow less
nuclear weapons
Top image credit: rawf8 via shutterstock.com

What will happen when there are no guardrails on nuclear weapons?

Global Crises

The New START Treaty — the last arms control agreement between the U.S. and Russia — is set to expire next week, unless President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin make a last minute decision to renew it. Letting the treaty expire would increase the risk of nuclear conflict and open the door to an accelerated nuclear arms race. A coalition of arms control and disarmament groups is pushing Congress and the president to pledge to continue to observe the New START limits on deployed, strategic nuclear weapons by the US and Russia.

New START matters. The treaty, which entered into force on February 5, 2011 after a successful effort by the Obama administration to win over enough Republican senators to achieve the required two-thirds majority to ratify the deal, capped deployed warheads to 1,550 for each side, and established verification procedures to ensure that both sides abided by the pact. New START was far from perfect, but it did put much needed guardrails on nuclear development that reduced the prospect of an all-out arms race.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.