Follow us on social

Mark Carney Canada elections liberal party

Trump catapulted Canada's liberals to victory - but maybe not enough

Thanks to the Conservatives' strong performance, Mark Carney's party will only form a minority government — the sixth in the past eight elections.

Analysis | QiOSK

Monday’s federal election in Canada has returned the Liberal Party, now led by former central bank governor Mark Carney after Justin Trudeau’s departure earlier this year, to power for a fourth consecutive term.

The result represents a stunning — and, by historical standards, shockingly rapid — turn of events. As recently as January, opinion polls were consistently showing a massive 25-point Conservative Party lead, driven by Trudeau’s deep and abiding unpopularity after more than nine years in office.

Carney replacing Trudeau as prime minister undoubtedly helped the Liberals to turn the page, although some may argue in style more than in substance. But this dramatic comeback would not have been possible without Donald Trump’s repeated threats to turn Canada into America’s 51st state. The Tories’ defeat owes itself in no small part to their inability to pivot quickly enough away from their longstanding “everything is broken” anti-Trudeau message and embrace the prevailing anti-Trump zeitgeist.

Canadians have long stopped treating Trump’s threats as a joke — and the president in a recent interview for TIMEmagazine admitted he was “not trolling.” While it remains unclear what tangible measures the administration will take to advance the president’s annexationist vision, Trump’s inability to put this obsessive rhetoric aside will no doubt complicate any post-election trade negotiations between Canada and the United States.

The results of the election present a further complicating factor. The Liberals will only form a minority government — Canada’s sixth in the past eight elections — thanks to a strong performance by the Conservatives in the country’s most populous province of Ontario. Despite the loss, Tory Leader Pierre Poilievre led his party to its highest share of the popular vote since 1988, rebuilding his party’s image with younger voters thanks to a message focused on housing and affordability.

A polarized electorate has made this the first federal election since 1958 in which the two leading parties combined for more than 80 percent of the vote, facilitated by the devastating collapse in support for the left-wing New Democratic Party (NDP). This is, in fact, the first federal election since 2000 in which any party has succeeded in passing the 40 percent threshold — something that both the Liberals and Conservatives achieved in Monday’s vote.

Yet despite their high popular vote share, the Liberals were only able to capture 169 seats (pending any recounts), three short of the threshold necessary for a majority in Parliament. The difference between a minority and majority government ultimately rested on just 611 votes in three ridings. Given this close margin, the election of the speaker of the House, possible floor crossings to the Liberals, and future by-elections in the event of a resignation will all take on added significance. But in the meantime, Carney’s government will have to rely on outside support to pass legislation.

Given Trump’s threats, the need for Canada to find more reliable export markets has gained renewed impetus. But moving forward with new east-west infrastructure to reduce Canada’s dependence on the United States may prove complicated as long as the Liberals rely on NDP or Bloc Québécois votes in the House of Commons.

Canadian politics have grown increasingly partisan over the past two decades. Yet with minority governments increasingly the norm, the ability of the Liberals and Tories to put their differences aside where the national interest is concerned will be a non-negligible factor shaping the extent of Canada’s leverage in its relationship with the U.S., both during the Trump presidency and beyond.


Top photo credit: Canada's Liberal Party leader, Mark Carney, attends a federal election campaign rally at Sheraton Vancouver Airport Hotel in Richmond, British Columbia, Canada, on April 7, 2025 (Harrison Ha/Shutterstock)
Analysis | QiOSK
Trump steve Bannon
Top photo credit: President Donald Trump (White House/Flickr) and Steve Bannon (Gage Skidmore/Flickr)

Don't read the funeral rites for MAGA restraint yet

Washington Politics

On the same night President Donald Trump ordered U.S. airstrikes against Iran, POLITICO reported, “MAGA largely falls in line on Trump’s Iran strikes.”

The report cited “Charlie Kirk, a conservative activist and critic of GOP war hawks,” who posted on X, “Iran gave President Trump no choice.” It noted that former Republican Congressman Matt Gaetz, a longtime Trump supporter, “said on X that the president’s strike didn’t necessarily portend a larger conflict.” Gaetz said. “Trump the Peacemaker!”

keep readingShow less
Antonio Guterres and Ursula von der Leyen
Top image credit: Alexandros Michailidis / Shutterstock.com

UN Charter turns 80: Why do Europeans mock it so?

Europe

Eighty years ago, on June 26, 1945, the United Nations Charter was signed in San Francisco. But you wouldn’t know it if you listened to European governments today.

After two devastating global military conflicts, the Charter explicitly aimed to “save succeeding generations from the scourge of war.” And it did so by famously outlawing the use of force in Article 2(4). The only exceptions were to be actions taken in self-defense against an actual or imminent attack and missions authorized by the U.N. Security Council to restore collective security.

keep readingShow less
IRGC
Top image credit: Tehran Iran - November 4, 2022, a line of Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps troops crossing the street (saeediex / Shutterstock.com)

If Iranian regime collapses or is toppled, 'what's next?'

Middle East

In a startling turn of events in the Israel-Iran war, six hours after Iran attacked the Al Udeid Air Base— the largest U.S. combat airfield outside of the U.S., and home of the CENTCOM Forward Headquarters — President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire in the 12-day war, quickly taking effect over the subsequent 18 hours. Defying predictions that the Iranian response to the U.S. attack on three nuclear facilities could start an escalatory cycle, the ceasefire appears to be holding. For now.

While the bombing may have ceased, calls for regime change have not. President Trump has backtracked on his comments, but other influential voices have not. John Bolton, Trump’s former national security adviser, said Tuesday that regime change must still happen, “…because this is about the regime itself… Until the regime itself is gone, there is no foundation for peace and security in the Middle East.” These sentiments are echoed by many others to include, as expected, Reza Pahlavi, exiled son of the deposed shah.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.