Follow us on social

Hurricane response: This is ‘national defense’

Hurricane response: This is ‘national defense’

The federal government is missing sight of real US priorities


Analysis | QiOSK

When it comes to protecting the safety and wellbeing of actual American citizens, the most important branch of the U.S. armed forces is not the Air Force, or the Marines, or even the nuclear deterrent. It is the Army Corps of Engineers. It might almost be said that it is the only really valuable branch of the U.S. Army in this regard, unless one is seriously worried about an armed invasion from Mexico or Canada.

This is the lesson of Hurricane Helene, that at the latest count has killed 215 Americans (a number certain to rise), with hundreds still missing and feared dead. The cost of the damage is estimated at over $160 billion dollars, with some estimates rising to $250 billion. Just as New Orleans has never fully recovered from Hurricane Katrina in 2005, so it seems sadly probable that the southern Appalachians will never fully recover from Hurricane Helene.

When it comes to the priorities of the U.S. security establishment (and to a considerable degree the political and media establishments in general), it is necessary to ask: How many American citizens have the Russian or Chinese states killed over the past generation? Have they killed anybody in the United States itself? How much physical damage have they done to the United States? Indeed, how much physical damage could they do, short of nuclear war? How much do they even want to do?

On Friday October 4, with at least 600 Americans feared dead and not yet located, and many towns still cut off from the outside world, the crisis in the southern Appalachians — unlike the crisis in the Middle East, 6,000 miles from the U.S. — did not even make it onto the front page of the online editions of the New York Times, Washington Post or Wall Street Journal, though it would no doubt have been different if the hurricane had hit Washington or New York.

The official response to the disaster has been correspondingly limited (even compared to the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina). More than 6,700 state National Guard from all over the country have been deployed, but 27,000 are stationed abroad to compensate for an overstretched regular military. To date, the Federal Government has devoted just $20 million to Helene’s survivors - less than 0.25 percent of the $8.7 billion in only the latest U.S. military aid package to Israel. The U.S. institutions that are in the frontline of disaster response are grossly underfunded compared to the U.S. armed forces.

The most terrifying thing about the U.S. establishment’s inattention to Helene is that it is almost certainly not just a disaster in herself, but also a harbinger of worse to come. Of course, the direct and specific impact of climate change on this particular hurricane cannot be proved; but the science of the origins of hurricanes in warm seas is entirely clear; and so is the rise in ocean temperatures in recent decades.

On basic principles of risk assessment therefore, U.S. administrations must work on the assumption that hurricanes are going to get worse, and plan accordingly. The implications are frightening, in terms not just of the direct physical effects but the impact on the U.S. insurance industry, and people’s access to insurance. It is being suggested that because most of the damage done by Helene has been due to flooding, many of the people affected will find that their insurance policies will not cover their losses. The federal government will have to compensate them — or not. The results for the U.S. economy and the U.S. deficit should be obvious.

Meanwhile masses of people continue to move to Florida to buy property that in future is likely to be both doomed and uninsurable, and the system appears incapable of checking this lunatic process. One can only congratulate lemmings on their wisdom in not buying property before they throw themselves off cliffs.

Hurricane Helene has caused what may be the most widespread and destructive flooding since the Great Mississippi Flood of 1927. That disaster led to a massive state program of flood control led by the Army Corps of Engineers; one of the greatest engineering efforts in U.S. history, including the Tennessee Valley Authority. It is highly probable that similar efforts — but on an even larger scale -— will be needed in the generations to come. America’s capacity to meet this challenge will be a test of the continued cohesion and effectiveness of the state.

If the establishment continues to prioritize foreign wars over the lives of its own citizens, then it will fail that test.

Thanks to our readers and supporters, Responsible Statecraft has had a tremendous year. A complete website overhaul made possible in part by generous contributions to RS, along with amazing writing by staff and outside contributors, has helped to increase our monthly page views by 133%! In continuing to provide independent and sharp analysis on the major conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, as well as the tumult of Washington politics, RS has become a go-to for readers looking for alternatives and change in the foreign policy conversation. 

 

We hope you will consider a tax-exempt donation to RS for your end-of-the-year giving, as we plan for new ways to expand our coverage and reach in 2025. Please enjoy your holidays, and here is to a dynamic year ahead!

Members of the Indiana Task Force 1 Search and Rescue team search for a missing woman along the Buck Creek in Lake Tahoma, N.C. on Oct. 2, 2024. Her fiancee was also swept into the flood in the aftermath of Hurricane Helene, but was rescued. USA TODAY NETWORK via Reuters Connect

Analysis | QiOSK
Mike Waltz, Sebastian Gorka, Alex Wong
Top photo credit : Rep. Mike Waltz (Phil Pasquini/Shutterstock); Sebastian /Gorka (shutterstock/consolidated news photos) and Alex Wong (Arrange News/Screenshot/You Tube)

Meet Trump's new National Security Council

Washington Politics

On the campaign trail, Donald Trump promised a very different foreign policy from business as usual in Washington.

He said he would prioritize peace over “victory” in the escalating war in Ukraine, pull the United States back from foreign entanglements to focus on domestic problems, and generally oversee a period of prolonged peace, instead of the cycle of endless Great Power conflict we seem trapped in.

keep readingShow less
syria assad resignation
top photo credit: Men hold a Syrian opposition flag on the top of a vehicle as people celebrate after Syrian rebels announced that they have ousted President Bashar al-Assad, in Damascus, Syria December 8, 2024. REUTERS/Firas Makdesi

Assad falls, reportedly fleeing Syria. What's next?

QiOSK

(Updated Monday 12/9, 5:45 a.m.)

Embattled Syrian President Bashar al Assad, who had survived attempts to overthrow his government throughout a civil war that began in 2011, has reportedly been forced out and slipped away on a plane to parts unknown (later reports have said he is in Moscow).

keep readingShow less
Russia Putin
Russia's President Vladimir Putin speaks during a session of the Valdai Discussion Club in Sochi, Russia October 19, 2017. REUTERS/Alexander Zemlianichenko/Pool

Peace denied? Russian budget jacks up wartime economy

Europe

On December 1, Russian President Vladimir Putin signed the budget law for 2025-2027. The Duma had earlier approved the law on November 21, and the Federation Council rubber stamped it on November 27.

The main takeaway from the budget is that Russia is planning for the long haul in its war with NATO-backed Ukraine and makes clear that Russia intends to double down on defense spending no matter what the cost. While the increased budget does not shed light on expectations for a speedy resolution to the war, it is indicative that Moscow continues to prepare for conflict with both Ukraine and NATO.

keep readingShow less

Election 2024

Latest

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.