Follow us on social

Hurricane response: This is ‘national defense’

Hurricane response: This is ‘national defense’

The federal government is missing sight of real US priorities


Analysis | QiOSK

When it comes to protecting the safety and wellbeing of actual American citizens, the most important branch of the U.S. armed forces is not the Air Force, or the Marines, or even the nuclear deterrent. It is the Army Corps of Engineers. It might almost be said that it is the only really valuable branch of the U.S. Army in this regard, unless one is seriously worried about an armed invasion from Mexico or Canada.

This is the lesson of Hurricane Helene, that at the latest count has killed 215 Americans (a number certain to rise), with hundreds still missing and feared dead. The cost of the damage is estimated at over $160 billion dollars, with some estimates rising to $250 billion. Just as New Orleans has never fully recovered from Hurricane Katrina in 2005, so it seems sadly probable that the southern Appalachians will never fully recover from Hurricane Helene.

When it comes to the priorities of the U.S. security establishment (and to a considerable degree the political and media establishments in general), it is necessary to ask: How many American citizens have the Russian or Chinese states killed over the past generation? Have they killed anybody in the United States itself? How much physical damage have they done to the United States? Indeed, how much physical damage could they do, short of nuclear war? How much do they even want to do?

On Friday October 4, with at least 600 Americans feared dead and not yet located, and many towns still cut off from the outside world, the crisis in the southern Appalachians — unlike the crisis in the Middle East, 6,000 miles from the U.S. — did not even make it onto the front page of the online editions of the New York Times, Washington Post or Wall Street Journal, though it would no doubt have been different if the hurricane had hit Washington or New York.

The official response to the disaster has been correspondingly limited (even compared to the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina). More than 6,700 state National Guard from all over the country have been deployed, but 27,000 are stationed abroad to compensate for an overstretched regular military. To date, the Federal Government has devoted just $20 million to Helene’s survivors - less than 0.25 percent of the $8.7 billion in only the latest U.S. military aid package to Israel. The U.S. institutions that are in the frontline of disaster response are grossly underfunded compared to the U.S. armed forces.

The most terrifying thing about the U.S. establishment’s inattention to Helene is that it is almost certainly not just a disaster in herself, but also a harbinger of worse to come. Of course, the direct and specific impact of climate change on this particular hurricane cannot be proved; but the science of the origins of hurricanes in warm seas is entirely clear; and so is the rise in ocean temperatures in recent decades.

On basic principles of risk assessment therefore, U.S. administrations must work on the assumption that hurricanes are going to get worse, and plan accordingly. The implications are frightening, in terms not just of the direct physical effects but the impact on the U.S. insurance industry, and people’s access to insurance. It is being suggested that because most of the damage done by Helene has been due to flooding, many of the people affected will find that their insurance policies will not cover their losses. The federal government will have to compensate them — or not. The results for the U.S. economy and the U.S. deficit should be obvious.

Meanwhile masses of people continue to move to Florida to buy property that in future is likely to be both doomed and uninsurable, and the system appears incapable of checking this lunatic process. One can only congratulate lemmings on their wisdom in not buying property before they throw themselves off cliffs.

Hurricane Helene has caused what may be the most widespread and destructive flooding since the Great Mississippi Flood of 1927. That disaster led to a massive state program of flood control led by the Army Corps of Engineers; one of the greatest engineering efforts in U.S. history, including the Tennessee Valley Authority. It is highly probable that similar efforts — but on an even larger scale -— will be needed in the generations to come. America’s capacity to meet this challenge will be a test of the continued cohesion and effectiveness of the state.

If the establishment continues to prioritize foreign wars over the lives of its own citizens, then it will fail that test.


Members of the Indiana Task Force 1 Search and Rescue team search for a missing woman along the Buck Creek in Lake Tahoma, N.C. on Oct. 2, 2024. Her fiancee was also swept into the flood in the aftermath of Hurricane Helene, but was rescued. USA TODAY NETWORK via Reuters Connect

Analysis | QiOSK
US Marines
Top image credit: U.S. Marines with Force Reconnaissance Platoon, Maritime Raid Force, 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, prepare to clear a room during a limited scale raid exercise at Sam Hill Airfield, Queensland, Australia, June 21, 2025. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. Alora Finigan)

Cartels are bad but they're not 'terrorists.' This is mission creep.

Military Industrial Complex

There is a dangerous pattern on display by the Trump administration. The president and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth seem to hold the threat and use of military force as their go-to method of solving America’s problems and asserting state power.

The president’s reported authorization for the Pentagon to use U.S. military warfighting capacity to combat drug cartels — a domain that should remain within the realm of law enforcement — represents a significant escalation. This presents a concerning evolution and has serious implications for civil liberties — especially given the administration’s parallel moves with the deployment of troops to the southern border, the use of federal forces to quell protests in California, and the recent deployment of armed National Guard to the streets of our nation’s capital.

keep readingShow less
Howard Lutnick
Top photo credit: Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on CNBC, 8/26/25 (CNBC screengrab)

Is nationalizing the defense industry such a bad idea?

Military Industrial Complex

The U.S. arms industry is highly consolidated, specialized, and dependent on government contracts. Indeed, the largest U.S. military contractors are already effectively extensions of the state — and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is right to point that out.

His suggestion in a recent media appearance to partially nationalize the likes of Lockheed Martin is hardly novel. The economist John Kenneth Galbraith argued for the nationalization of the largest military contractors in 1969. More recently, various academics and policy analysts have advocated for partial or full nationalization of military firms in publications including The Nation, The American Conservative, The Middle East Research and Information Project (MERIP), and The Seattle Journal for Social Justice.

keep readingShow less
Modi Trump
Top image credit: White House, February 2025

Trump's India problem could become a Global South crisis

Asia-Pacific

As President Trump’s second term kicked off, all signs pointed to a continued upswing in U.S.-India relations. At a White House press conference in February, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi spoke of his vision to “Make India Great Again” and how the United States under Trump would play a central role. “When it’s MAGA plus MIGA, it becomes a mega partnership for prosperity,” Modi said.

During Trump’s first term, the two populist leaders hosted rallies for each other in their respective countries and cultivated close personal ties. Aside from the Trump-Modi bromance, U.S.-Indian relations have been on a positive trajectory for over two decades, driven in part by mutual suspicion of China. But six months into his second term, Trump has taken several actions that have led to a dramatic downturn in U.S.-India relations, with India-China relations suddenly on the rise.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.