Follow us on social

Texas floods disaster relief

America last: Trump demands states support Israel or risk disaster relief

FEMA money to be contingent on pledge against any boycotts or divestment of Israeli companies

Reporting | QiOSK

UPDATE 8/4 10:20 PM: The DHS removed language explicitly blocking federal disaster relief funding to states allowing boycotts of Israel in its FY2025 standard terms and conditions document, but clarified on X that it could still deny funding on these grounds.

The Trump administration announced today that American states and cities boycotting Israeli companies will not receive natural disaster funding from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

To be eligible for $1.9 billion available in federal grants from FEMA for disaster preparation essentials, including emergency management salaries and rescue gear, U.S. states and cities must agree that they will not cut off “commercial relations specifically with Israeli companies.”

In essence, signing a loyalty oath to another country.

“DHS will enforce all anti-discrimination laws and policies, including as it relates to the BDS movement, which is expressly grounded in antisemitism,” a spokesperson for Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem said.

Back in April, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which oversees FEMA, announced that states and cities receiving its funding cannot boycott Israel.

Today, 34 states have laws or policies against Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) already in place, making today’s development a largely symbolic one.

There are currently no states that actively “boycott” Israel, though a handful of cities have moved toward passing laws cutting off business with Israel or companies that do business with Israel over humanitarian concerns. For example, Portland, Maine voted in September 2024 to divest from companies doing business with Israel, citing the humanitarian crisis Israel has caused in the Gaza Strip. And the city of New Orleans passed, but rescinded soon after, similar legislation back in January 2018, years before the current war.

Observers contend today’s move by the White House, which makes critical disaster relief (paid for by American taxpayers) contingent on Israel support, showcases the extent to which the Trump administration backs Israel amid its longstanding war on the Gaza Strip, which has killed more than 60,000 people and created famine-like conditions there.

"Tying disaster assistance to a state or city's stance on Israel demonstrates that the Trump administration has abandoned ‘America First’ in favor of ‘Israel First,’” Quincy Institute Middle East Program Research Fellow Annelle Sheline told RS. “Yet it also highlights the desperation of the pro-Israel lobby: if American communities have to be forced to support Israel, such support is not viable for the long-term."

Josh Paul, the co-founder and Director of Washington-based think tank A New Policy, similarly told RS the move places Israel over Americans' well-being.

“When the next flood, or fire, or earthquake hits, the U.S. government will have to explain to Americans whose homes and lives have been devastated by disaster that the funding was not available to avert the catastrophe because the Trump Administration placed Israel's economic interests above the well-being of American citizens,” Paul said.

The move to block federal disaster preparation funding from states and cities divesting from Israel comes amid growing international outrage over the worsening humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip, and recently announced intentions by Western countries, including the UK, France and Canada, to recognize the state of Palestine.

Trump said last week at a meeting with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer that he did not mind if Starmer supported Palestinian statehood, but that he would not take a stance on that issue himself. However, Trump did say Canada moving to recognize Palestinian statehood could make a trade agreement between the two countries “very hard” to reach Thursday.


Top Image Credit: Over 100 killed in Texas flooding, officials report/ KREM 2 News, August 2, 2025 (YouTube/Screenshot)
Reporting | QiOSK
Congress
Top image credit: Bill Perry via shutterstock.com

Does the House have the grit to 'Block the Bombs' to Israel?

Washington Politics

Members of Congress are wrapping up August recess in their home districts and preparing to return to Capitol Hill. And if public polling is any indication, they’ve been facing constituents who want to know why their taxpayer dollars are enabling the carnage in Gaza, and what Congress is doing to put an end to it.

If they are smart, lawmakers can work to end U.S. complicity by supporting the “Block the Bombs” bill, a proposal to block sales of bombs and explosive shells to Israel.

keep readingShow less
Trump Khamenei
Top image credit: miss.cabul / Shutterstock.com

Four scenarios for war — and peace — with Iran

Middle East

The 12-day war between Israel and Iran in 2025 shattered long-held assumptions, thrusting U.S.–Iran relations into uncharted territory. The conflict, a dramatic escalation of decades-long tensions, has left the Middle East teetering on the edge of broader instability. As the dust settles, the United States faces a critical juncture in its approach to Iran — one that could redefine the region for decades.

Four plausible scenarios loom large, each carrying profound implications for global security, regional stability, and American foreign policy.

keep readingShow less
Benjamin Netanyahu
Top Image Credit: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attends the U.S. Independence Day reception, known as the annual "Fourth of July" celebration, hosted by Newsmax, in Jerusalem August 13, 2025. REUTERS/Ronen Zvulun/Pool (ReutersConnect)

Netanyahu’s ‘total victory’ rhetoric takes an extreme turn

Middle East

As Israel’s war on Gaza escalates with IDF troops now moving to take over Gaza City, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been deploying more extreme language than usual to describe his plans for “total” victory over Hamas. He has eschewed ceasefire talks, and is instead leaning into his expansive vision for a “Greater Israel,” which not only includes an Israeli takeover of Gaza but of neighboring territories too.

His public remarks and media appearances over the last week have caused some to observe that the prime minister may be taking his approach, which is already heavily influenced by the hardline right wing in his cabinet, to an even more maximalist level.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.