Follow us on social

 Rep. Adam Smith  and Rep. Rob Wittman

Dem, GOP Reps: Putin is tooling Trump around

But they do think the president is going in the right direction on talks with Iran

Reporting | QiOSK

If you think all Republicans in Congress are confident in President Trump's approach on the Russia-Ukraine talks and the outcome, think again.

Talking to an audience at the POLITICO Security Summit Thursday morning, Rep. Rob Wittman (R-Va.), Vice Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, said Russian President Vladimir Putin was "not trustworthy, he is slow rolling this," referring to the talks. When asked if the Congress should pursue new sanctions against Russia if it does not move more concertedly to the table, Wittman said, "there has to be consequences I think for not working towards a negotiated peace, there has to be... it is clear to me that Putin is in no way, shape or form serious about this."

Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.), ranking member of the House Armed Services Committee, was more direct.

"That has been the problem ... Trump has put all the pressure on Zelensky and took the pressure of Putin. He gave Putin a massive green light to keep fighting in Ukraine...he's got to put the pressure on Putin and stop giving him all these opportunities," Smith said. "Yes, we need the peace talks in Turkey, but Putin is still playing with Ukraine, playing with Zelensky, and playing with Trump."

Their remarks came as the U.S., Russia and Ukraine began the first direct talks since the failed Istanbul talks of 2022. Putin rejected Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky's invitation to participate directly today, sending an envoy instead, leading critics to double down on the charge that he is not serious. Others said it was never likely for the two heads of state to meet directly without setting the diplomatic groundwork first.

On Iran, the congressmen were much more sanguine, if not supportive of the current talks between the U.S. and Iran to pursue a nuclear deal. Wittman said if there was a deal the terms for inspections must be tougher. But he did not criticize the attempt to get an agreement, despite Republicans being largely against the concept when President Obama forged the JCPOA in 2015.

"I think you have to put a lot of pressure on the Iranians to be able to do the right thing, to actually take away what is now continuing to be a building capability there. And by the way, I think it's a great time to do that, because I think internally in Iran, there's lots of pressures on Iran. They are at the weakest point right now historically," he noted.

"So I think now's the time to go in and say, these are things you need to do, and if not, there are consequences to not doing those things," Wittman added. When asked if Trump could get deals on Ukraine and Iran by Labor Day he said, "I do think that there's a better than 50/50 chance that we're able to get agreements there with both. Listen, I'm probably a little more skeptical on the Russia-Ukraine side, much more optimistic about Middle East."

Smith said he did not think Trump would ultimately get a deals in either arena by Labor Day, however, "I think you know, negotiating with Iran makes a ton of sense. They are at a weak point. We're in a position, potentially, to get a good agreement and avoid a conflict with Iran. I mean, look, we all know Israel is itching to attack Iran and just cut off their nuclear program, which could re-inflame the entire Middle East."


Top photo credit: Rep. Adam Smith (D) and Rep. Rob Wittman (R) (Reuters)
Reporting | QiOSK
JD Vance
Top image credit: U.S Vice President JD Vance arrives at the U.S. military's Pituffik Space Base in Greenland on March 28, 2025. Jim Watson/Pool via REUTERS

Why spying on Greenland isn't the problem

North America

According to a report in the Wall Street Journal last week, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has instructed U.S. intelligence agencies to increase collection of information on Greenland.

The topics of interest include independence sentiment among Greenlanders, attitudes regarding U.S. mining interests, and individuals in Greenland and Denmark who might be supportive of U.S. objectives in Greenland.

keep readingShow less
To Lam Xi Jinping
Top image credit: Vietnam's communist party general secretary To Lam (R) poses with Chinese President Xi Jinping (L) during a meeting at the office of the Party Central Committee in Hanoi on April 14, 2025. NHAC NGUYEN/Pool via REUTERS

An unexpected pawn: Vietnam's key role in Trump's trade war

Asia-Pacific

On April 2 — christened “Liberation Day” — President Donald Trump declared a national emergency in response to the “large and persistent U.S. trade deficit” and “unfair” economic practices by foreign countries that, according to Trump, hurt the American people by undermining the U.S. industry and employment.

In response, the president announced a minimum 10% tariff on all U.S. imports, plus higher tariffs, ranging from 11% to 50%, on imports from nearly 60 countries. These “reciprocal tariffs,” based on trade deficit calculations, targeted over 180 countries and territories. After a week of turmoil in the stock and bond markets, Trump announced a 90-day pause on reciprocal tariffs over 10 percent for most countries except China.

keep readingShow less
Woodrow Wilson World War I
President Woodrow Wilson (center) waves his top hat from the deck of USS George Washington (ID # 3018), as she steamed up New York Harbor upon the President's return to the U.S. from the World War I peace conference in France, 8 July 1919. (public domain)

'Victory Day for WW I' would be an embarrassment on global scale

Washington Politics

The United States looms large on the world stage, but it wasn’t always so important. President Donald Trump retrospectively applied America’s present role to yesterday’s world when he declared: “We won both [World] Wars, nobody was close to us in terms of strength, bravery, or military brilliance, but we never celebrate anything.” Henceforth, he wants to call Veteran’s Day “Victory Day for World War I.”

While the U.S. played a decisive role in that conflict, shifting the balance of power irreversibly against Imperial Germany after the other participants had exhausted themselves, Washington’s contribution remained much less than those of many allied belligerents. While U.S. soldiers were brave, their commanders were anything but brilliant, failing to learn from the allies and running up unnecessary casualties.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.