Follow us on social

google cta
 Rep. Adam Smith  and Rep. Rob Wittman

Reps. Smith, Wittman: Putin is tooling Trump around

But they do think the president is going in the right direction on talks with Iran

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

If you think all Republicans in Congress are confident in President Trump's approach on the Russia-Ukraine talks and the outcome, think again.

Talking to an audience at the POLITICO Security Summit Thursday morning, Rep. Rob Wittman (R-Va.), Vice Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, said Russian President Vladimir Putin was "not trustworthy, he is slow rolling this," referring to the talks. When asked if the Congress should pursue new sanctions against Russia if it does not move more concertedly to the table, Wittman said, "there has to be consequences I think for not working towards a negotiated peace, there has to be... it is clear to me that Putin is in no way, shape or form serious about this."

Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.), ranking member of the House Armed Services Committee, was more direct.

"That has been the problem ... Trump has put all the pressure on Zelensky and took the pressure of Putin. He gave Putin a massive green light to keep fighting in Ukraine...he's got to put the pressure on Putin and stop giving him all these opportunities," Smith said. "Yes, we need the peace talks in Turkey, but Putin is still playing with Ukraine, playing with Zelensky, and playing with Trump."

Their remarks came as the U.S., Russia and Ukraine began the first direct talks since the failed Istanbul talks of 2022. Putin rejected Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky's invitation to participate directly today, sending an envoy instead, leading critics to double down on the charge that he is not serious. Others said it was never likely for the two heads of state to meet directly without setting the diplomatic groundwork first.

On Iran, the congressmen were much more sanguine, if not supportive of the current talks between the U.S. and Iran to pursue a nuclear deal. Wittman said if there was a deal the terms for inspections must be tougher. But he did not criticize the attempt to get an agreement, despite Republicans being largely against the concept when President Obama forged the JCPOA in 2015.

"I think you have to put a lot of pressure on the Iranians to be able to do the right thing, to actually take away what is now continuing to be a building capability there. And by the way, I think it's a great time to do that, because I think internally in Iran, there's lots of pressures on Iran. They are at the weakest point right now historically," he noted.

"So I think now's the time to go in and say, these are things you need to do, and if not, there are consequences to not doing those things," Wittman added. When asked if Trump could get deals on Ukraine and Iran by Labor Day he said, "I do think that there's a better than 50/50 chance that we're able to get agreements there with both. Listen, I'm probably a little more skeptical on the Russia-Ukraine side, much more optimistic about Middle East."

Smith said he did not think Trump would ultimately get a deals in either arena by Labor Day, however, "I think you know, negotiating with Iran makes a ton of sense. They are at a weak point. We're in a position, potentially, to get a good agreement and avoid a conflict with Iran. I mean, look, we all know Israel is itching to attack Iran and just cut off their nuclear program, which could re-inflame the entire Middle East."


Top photo credit: Rep. Adam Smith (D) and Rep. Rob Wittman (R) (Reuters)
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
US missiles
Top photo credit: . DoD photo by Staff Sgt. Vince Parker, U.S. Air Force.

Trump: We have 'unlimited' weapons to fight 'forever' war

QiOSK

In a startling Truth Social post overnight on Monday, President Donald Trump defied reality and claimed that U.S. weapons were "unlimited" and the U.S. could fight "forever" with "these supplies."


keep readingShow less
Did the US only attack Iran because of Israel?
Top image credit: President Donald J. Trump holds a joint news conference at the White House with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Feb. 4, 2025. (Shutterstock/ Joshua Sukoff)

Did the US only attack Iran because of Israel?

QiOSK

In the months that led up to the Iraq War, the Bush administration went to extraordinary lengths to convince the world of the need to oust Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. Leading officials laid out their case in public, sharing what they claimed was evidence that Iraq was moving rapidly toward the deployment of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. When U.S. tanks rolled across the border, everyone knew the justification: the U.S. was determined to thwart Iraq’s development of weapons of mass destruction, however fictitious that threat would later prove to be.

In the months that led up to the Iran War, the Trump administration took a different tack. President Trump spoke only occasionally of Iran, offering a smattering of justifications for growing U.S. tensions with the country. He claimed without evidence that Iran was rebuilding its nuclear program after the U.S.-Israeli attack last June and even developing missiles that could strike the United States. But he insisted that Tehran could make a deal with seven magic words: “we will never have a nuclear weapon.”

keep readingShow less
Starmer Macron Merz
Top image credit: France's President Emmanuel Macron, Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz arrive at Kyiv railway station on May 10, 2025, ahead of a gathering of European leaders in the Ukrainian capital. LUDOVIC MARIN/Pool via REUTERS
Europe's snapback gamble risks killing diplomacy with Iran

Craven Europeans give US and Israel a blank check for illegal war

Middle East

In the aftermath of the new U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran, the transatlantic alliance has offered a response that confirmed what many both in the West and outside knew all along: that for London, Paris, Berlin, and Brussels, the "rules-based international order" has been reduced to a simple, brutal premise: might makes right, provided the might is Western.

The joint statement from the E3 — France, Germany, and the United Kingdom — is a master class in evasion. "We did not participate in these strikes, but are in close contact with our international partners, including the United States and Israel," they declared. The text also lists all the references and rationalizations used by Iran hawks — “nuclear program, ballistic missile program, regional destabilization and repression against its own people.”

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.