Follow us on social

 Rep. Adam Smith  and Rep. Rob Wittman

Reps. Smith, Wittman: Putin is tooling Trump around

But they do think the president is going in the right direction on talks with Iran

Reporting | QiOSK

If you think all Republicans in Congress are confident in President Trump's approach on the Russia-Ukraine talks and the outcome, think again.

Talking to an audience at the POLITICO Security Summit Thursday morning, Rep. Rob Wittman (R-Va.), Vice Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, said Russian President Vladimir Putin was "not trustworthy, he is slow rolling this," referring to the talks. When asked if the Congress should pursue new sanctions against Russia if it does not move more concertedly to the table, Wittman said, "there has to be consequences I think for not working towards a negotiated peace, there has to be... it is clear to me that Putin is in no way, shape or form serious about this."

Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.), ranking member of the House Armed Services Committee, was more direct.

"That has been the problem ... Trump has put all the pressure on Zelensky and took the pressure of Putin. He gave Putin a massive green light to keep fighting in Ukraine...he's got to put the pressure on Putin and stop giving him all these opportunities," Smith said. "Yes, we need the peace talks in Turkey, but Putin is still playing with Ukraine, playing with Zelensky, and playing with Trump."

Their remarks came as the U.S., Russia and Ukraine began the first direct talks since the failed Istanbul talks of 2022. Putin rejected Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky's invitation to participate directly today, sending an envoy instead, leading critics to double down on the charge that he is not serious. Others said it was never likely for the two heads of state to meet directly without setting the diplomatic groundwork first.

On Iran, the congressmen were much more sanguine, if not supportive of the current talks between the U.S. and Iran to pursue a nuclear deal. Wittman said if there was a deal the terms for inspections must be tougher. But he did not criticize the attempt to get an agreement, despite Republicans being largely against the concept when President Obama forged the JCPOA in 2015.

"I think you have to put a lot of pressure on the Iranians to be able to do the right thing, to actually take away what is now continuing to be a building capability there. And by the way, I think it's a great time to do that, because I think internally in Iran, there's lots of pressures on Iran. They are at the weakest point right now historically," he noted.

"So I think now's the time to go in and say, these are things you need to do, and if not, there are consequences to not doing those things," Wittman added. When asked if Trump could get deals on Ukraine and Iran by Labor Day he said, "I do think that there's a better than 50/50 chance that we're able to get agreements there with both. Listen, I'm probably a little more skeptical on the Russia-Ukraine side, much more optimistic about Middle East."

Smith said he did not think Trump would ultimately get a deals in either arena by Labor Day, however, "I think you know, negotiating with Iran makes a ton of sense. They are at a weak point. We're in a position, potentially, to get a good agreement and avoid a conflict with Iran. I mean, look, we all know Israel is itching to attack Iran and just cut off their nuclear program, which could re-inflame the entire Middle East."


Top photo credit: Rep. Adam Smith (D) and Rep. Rob Wittman (R) (Reuters)
Reporting | QiOSK
Fort Bragg horrors expose dark underbelly of post-9/11 warfare
Top photo credit: Seth Harp book jacket (Viking press) US special operators/deviant art/creative commons

Fort Bragg horrors expose dark underbelly of post-9/11 warfare

Media

In 2020 and 2021, 109 U.S. soldiers died at Fort Bragg, the largest military base in the country and the central location for the key Special Operations Units in the American military.

Only four of them were on overseas deployments. The others died stateside, mostly of drug overdoses, violence, or suicide. The situation has hardly improved. It was recently revealed that another 51 soldiers died at Fort Bragg in 2023. According to U.S. government data, these represent more military fatalities than have occurred at the hands of enemy forces in any year since 2013.

keep readingShow less
Trump Netanyahu
Top image credit: President Donald Trump hosts a bilateral dinner for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Monday, July 7, 2025, in the Blue Room. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

The case for US Middle East retrenchment has never been clearer

Middle East

Is Israel becoming the new hegemon of the Middle East? The answer to this question is an important one.

Preventing the rise of a rival regional hegemon — a state with a preponderance of military and economic power — in Eurasia has long been a core goal of U.S. foreign policy. During the Cold War, Washington feared Soviet dominion over Europe. Today, U.S. policymakers worry that China’s increasingly capable military will crowd the United States out of Asia’s lucrative economic markets. The United States has also acted repeatedly to prevent close allies in Europe and Asia from becoming military competitors, using promises of U.S. military protection to keep them weak and dependent.

keep readingShow less
United Nations
Top image credit: lev radin / Shutterstock.com

Do we need a treaty on neutrality?

Global Crises

In an era of widespread use of economic sanctions, dual-use technology exports, and hybrid warfare, the boundary between peacetime and wartime has become increasingly blurry. Yet understandings of neutrality remain stuck in the time of trench warfare. An updated conception of neutrality, codified through an international treaty, is necessary for global security.

Neutrality in the 21st century is often whatever a country wants it to be. For some, such as the European neutrals like Switzerland and Ireland, it is compatible with non-U.N. sanctions (such as by the European Union) while for others it is not. Countries in the Global South are also more likely to take a case-by-case approach, such as choosing to not take a stance on a specific conflict and instead call for a peaceful resolution while others believe a moral position does not undermine neutrality.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.