Follow us on social

google cta
Experts: Massive military buildup points to new US strikes on Iran

Experts: Massive military buildup points to new US strikes on Iran

If, when and how is unclear. But the clock appears to be ticking.

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

Although many newly deployed assets appear to be defensive, the intensifying U.S. build-up around Iran raises the possibility of a limited U.S. strike against Tehran — if not a wider campaign — soon.

Yesterday, the USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier and warships supporting it entered the greater Middle East region. That carrier joins other U.S. assets sent there in recent weeks, including THAAD and Patriot missile systems, and F-15E Strike Eagles.

Israeli network Ynet reported the presence of P-8A Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft, MQ-9 Reaper drones, refueling aircraft, as well as C-17 cargo carriers. The USS Lincoln itself carries substantive military assets, including F/A-18E/F Super Hornets and F-35s, both attack aircraft, and EA-18G Growlers, which can jam adversarial tech.

Earlier this month, the U.S. established the Middle Eastern Air Defense — Combined Defense Operations Cell (MEAD-CDOC) at Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, bolstering its integrated air and missile defense in the region.

Jennifer Kavanagh, senior fellow and director of military analysis at Defense Priorities, told RS that, if the brief Israeli war on Iran this summer is any indication, many assets being moved to the region will help the U.S. protect what that it already has there, in case of attack.

“When the United States decided to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities in the Middle East in June, it did not rely much on military assets in the region for those attacks. It relied on bombers flown from the U.S. and fighter jets and aerial refuelers mostly from Europe,” Kavanagh told RS. “Military assets in the region were used mostly for defensive operations, to protect U.S. bases and forces and to help Israel defend itself against Iranian retaliation.”

“I would expect that any future campaign would be similar. Assets moved into the region seem to be those intended to defend U.S. forces, bases, and military hardware, more than what the U.S. might use for offensive strikes on Iran,” Kavanagh said.

Crisis Group’s Iran Project Director, Ali Vaez, wrote on X that the ongoing build-up could simply be deterrence: “Threat of retaliation and protection of assets/allies keeps Iranian govt from making a first move, while upping sanctions pressure and diplomatic isolation in the meantime,” he wrote.

Although, Vaez said that more offensive U.S. plans are possible, perhaps along the lines of a “high-value but limited strike,” or even a “substantial campaign” against Iran, which could target leaders or other strategic assets.

Placing the ongoing build-up in context, Sebastian Bruns, a fellow at the Royal Swedish Society for Naval Sciences, said the arrival of a carrier to the Middle East, which, while not novel, suggests Washington intends to act.

“Historically, at least since the creation of US CENTCOM…American military assets have been strong in the area, with some waxing and waning in between periods of high tension… Stretched for ready aircraft carriers, the US had [later] opted to give up on the permanent carrier presence in the region, with a renewed focus on China,” Bruns told RS. “So: a carrier isn't new to the region, but it is a sign of power projection and if Venezuela is any guidance the Trump administration means business by deploying it.”

“However, a host of assets is needed to guard the ship, for Iran sports a more capable defense than Venezuela ever did,” Bruns told RS. “Hence, the build-up…can be sustained for a while, but needs to be either withdrawn or used in some form eventually. This introduces the element of time.”

Other observers, meanwhile, see strikes as likely.

“The overall force posture suggests to be that the US intends to carry out an initial strike to neutralise key targets like air defences and airbases (possibly using a mix of B-2s, F-35Cs and EA-18Gs), followed by potential several days or even a couple of weeks worth of further strikes…using the F-15Es and other assets,” says Jon, a senior editor of the UK Defence Journal and open source military tracker at @DefenceGeek on X, told RS in an email. The refueling tankers and cargo aircraft present would support those operations.

“During any initial strikes, I foresee [F-15Es] being used…as air defence interceptors for the region — carrying a mix of traditional air-to-air missiles for defence against Iranian cruise missiles, and the [Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System] APKWS guided rockets for use against any [adversarial drones there],” he predicted.

A Gulf official told Middle East Eye that the U.S. is considering high-precision strikes in Iran, as early as this week. CENTCOM announced today, further, that Air Force Central will be conducting military readiness exercises in the coming days. Iran says it will consider any attack against it “all-out war.”


The aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72) approaches the fast combat support ship USNS Arctic (T-AOE 8) for a replenishment-at-sea. September 12, 2019. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Tristan Kyle Labuguen/Released)
The aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72) approaches the fast combat support ship USNS Arctic (T-AOE 8) for a replenishment-at-sea. September 12, 2019. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Tristan Kyle Labuguen/Released)
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
G7 Summit
Top photo credit: May 21, 2023, Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan: (From R to L) Comoros' President Azali Assoumani, World Trade Organization (WTO) Director-General Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the G7 summit in Hiroshima, Japan. (Credit Image: © POOL via ZUMA Press Wire)

Middle Powers are setting the table so they won't be 'on the menu'

Asia-Pacific

The global order was already fragmenting before Donald Trump returned to the White House. But the upended “rules” of global economic and foreign policies have now reached a point of no return.

What has changed is not direction, but speed. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney’s remarks in Davos last month — “Middle powers must act together, because if we’re not at the table, we’re on the menu” — captured the consequences of not acting quickly. And Carney is not alone in those fears.

keep readingShow less
Vice President JD Vance Azerbaijan Armenia
U.S. Vice President JD Vance gets out of a car before boarding Air Force Two upon departure for Azerbaijan, at Zvartnots International Airport in Yerevan, Armenia, February 10, 2026. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/Pool

VP Vance’s timely TRIPP to the South Caucasus

Washington Politics

Vice President JD Vance’s regional tour to Armenia and Azerbaijan this week — the highest level visit by an American official to the South Caucasus since Vice President Joe Biden went to Georgia in 2009 — demonstrates that Washington is not ignoring Yerevan and Baku and is taking an active role in their normalization process.

Vance’s stop in Armenia included an announcement that Yerevan has procured $11 million in U.S. defense systems — a first — in particular Shield AI’s V-BAT, an ISR unmanned aircraft system. It was also announced that the second stage of a groundbreaking AI supercomputer project led by Firebird, a U.S.-based AI cloud and infrastructure company, would commence after having secured American licensing for the sale and delivery of an additional 41,000 NVIDIA GB300 graphics processing units.

keep readingShow less
United Nations
Monitors at the United Nations General Assembly hall display the results of a vote on a resolution condemning the annexation of parts of Ukraine by Russia, amid Russia's invasion of Ukraine, at the United Nations Headquarters in New York City, New York, U.S., October 12, 2022. REUTERS/David 'Dee' Delgado||

We're burying the rules based order. But what's next?

Global Crises

In a Davos speech widely praised for its intellectual rigor and willingness to confront established truths, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney finally laid the fiction of the “rules-based international order” to rest.

The “rules-based order” — or RBIO — was never a neutral description of the post-World War II system of international law and multilateral institutions. Rather, it was a discourse born out of insecurity over the West’s decline and unwillingness to share power. Aimed at preserving the power structures of the past by shaping the norms and standards of the future, the RBIO was invariably something that needed to be “defended” against those who were accused of opposing it, rather than an inclusive system that governed relations between all states.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.