Follow us on social

Gaza

American doctors who worked in Gaza: No more bombs to Israel

In a letter to Biden, health care workers detail Israeli policy of deliberate starvation of Palestinians

Analysis | Middle East

Ahead of the first anniversary of the start of the war in Gaza, a group of 99 American health workers who served in Gaza has called on the Biden administration to halt arms transfers to Israel because of the devastating effects of Israel’s military campaign and siege on the civilian population.

The health workers attached a detailed appendix to their letter that documents the massive loss of life caused by the war, including the Israeli government’s policy of deliberate starvation. According to their conservative estimate, at least 118,908 people have been killed in Gaza through direct violence, starvation, and disease, and they say that the real death toll is almost certainly higher than that. This estimate represents a loss of life nearly three times greater than the current official count from Gaza’s Ministry of Health.

This letter is a wake-up call to our government to stop acting as an accomplice to the slaughter and starvation of civilians.

The letter’s signatories are witnesses to the human cost of one year of war and man-made famine, and they are imploring the president and vice president to end the policy of unconditional support that has led to this catastrophe. In the letter, first reported by HuffPost, they challenged President Biden and Vice President Harris to confront the horrors that their policy has unleashed: “We wish you could hear the cries and screams our consciences will not let us forget. We cannot fathom why you continue arming the country that is deliberately killing these children en masse.”

The war in Gaza has been extraordinarily dangerous for civilians. The Israeli government’s indiscriminate bombing has reduced the cities of Gaza to rubble and left the civilian infrastructure of the Strip in ruins. In addition to forcibly displacing almost the entire population, the Israeli government has been blocking the delivery of humanitarian aid for the duration of the conflict. According to a joint statement of humanitarian NGOs last month, Israel is still blocking the delivery of 83% of food aid.

The U.S. government has been aware of the blockage, but that has not led to any change in policy. As ProPublica confirmed in a new report last month, USAID and the State Department’s refugees bureau both concluded in the spring that Israel was deliberately blocking aid. Secretary of State Antony Blinken ignored their conclusions and certified the opposite.

The effects of this policy of starvation have been staggering. As the health workers say in the appendix, “The fact that Palestinians in Gaza are so hungry that many have died, or that this is the result of deliberate Israeli policy, is not in dispute. However, the scale of this starvation is not widely appreciated.”

They say that it is likely that 62,413 people have died of starvation and related complications between the start of the war and the end of September 2024. Nearly half a million people in Gaza are still in catastrophic food insecurity, and another 745,000 are experiencing emergency food insecurity, so the number of people killed by starvation is bound to increase if things remain as they are.

Oxfam also released its own report this week which found that the war in Gaza has been deadlier for women and children in its first year than any other conflict around the world in the last 20 years. According to Oxfam, “The record number of women and children killed in Gaza does not include those among nearly 20,000 people who are either unidentified, missing or entombed beneath rubble.” However bad we currently think the disaster in Gaza is, the reality is sure to be worse when there is a full accounting of the losses.

The Biden administration has sometimes paid lip service to Palestinian civilian casualties in Gaza, but it has never treated the humanitarian crisis there with the urgency or priority that it demands. When top U.S. officials won’t acknowledge that Israel is blocking the delivery of aid, they cannot address the real cause of mass starvation. Because the administration refuses to use any leverage to alleviate the crisis, the U.S. has effectively become an accomplice to Israel’s starvation crimes against the people of Gaza.

There must be a full accounting of the death and destruction that the U.S. has supported in Gaza so that the policymakers who are responsible can be held accountable for what they have done. It is also necessary for Americans to understand what our government’s policy has wrought. The letter from the health workers is an important contribution to counting the terrible human cost of a war that the Biden administration has enabled from the beginning.

The innocent victims of our policies are often invisible and forgotten in our foreign policy debates. That must change if we are ever going to rein in and then end our government’s destructive behavior. Americans have an obligation as citizens to learn about the true costs of what our government does abroad. We also have a responsibility to challenge monstrous policies when they inflict so much suffering and death on another nation as our government’s policy of supporting the war in Gaza has done.

The evidence that the health workers have collected in the appendix paints a clear picture of an Israeli government unbound by international law. Under U.S. law, the Biden administration is obligated to halt weapons transfers to that government because of the many violations it has committed. The very least that our government can do now is to follow the law and cease fueling the conflict.


Palestinians walk next to destroyed buildings and pools with stagnant water in Khan Yunis, in the southern Gaza Strip, on July 19, 2024. Editorial credit: Anas-Mohammed / Shutterstock.com

Analysis | Middle East
US Marines
Top image credit: U.S. Marines with Force Reconnaissance Platoon, Maritime Raid Force, 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, prepare to clear a room during a limited scale raid exercise at Sam Hill Airfield, Queensland, Australia, June 21, 2025. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. Alora Finigan)

Cartels are bad but they're not 'terrorists.' This is mission creep.

Military Industrial Complex

There is a dangerous pattern on display by the Trump administration. The president and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth seem to hold the threat and use of military force as their go-to method of solving America’s problems and asserting state power.

The president’s reported authorization for the Pentagon to use U.S. military warfighting capacity to combat drug cartels — a domain that should remain within the realm of law enforcement — represents a significant escalation. This presents a concerning evolution and has serious implications for civil liberties — especially given the administration’s parallel moves with the deployment of troops to the southern border, the use of federal forces to quell protests in California, and the recent deployment of armed National Guard to the streets of our nation’s capital.

keep readingShow less
Howard Lutnick
Top photo credit: Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on CNBC, 8/26/25 (CNBC screengrab)

Is nationalizing the defense industry such a bad idea?

Military Industrial Complex

The U.S. arms industry is highly consolidated, specialized, and dependent on government contracts. Indeed, the largest U.S. military contractors are already effectively extensions of the state — and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is right to point that out.

His suggestion in a recent media appearance to partially nationalize the likes of Lockheed Martin is hardly novel. The economist John Kenneth Galbraith argued for the nationalization of the largest military contractors in 1969. More recently, various academics and policy analysts have advocated for partial or full nationalization of military firms in publications including The Nation, The American Conservative, The Middle East Research and Information Project (MERIP), and The Seattle Journal for Social Justice.

keep readingShow less
Modi Trump
Top image credit: White House, February 2025

Trump's India problem could become a Global South crisis

Asia-Pacific

As President Trump’s second term kicked off, all signs pointed to a continued upswing in U.S.-India relations. At a White House press conference in February, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi spoke of his vision to “Make India Great Again” and how the United States under Trump would play a central role. “When it’s MAGA plus MIGA, it becomes a mega partnership for prosperity,” Modi said.

During Trump’s first term, the two populist leaders hosted rallies for each other in their respective countries and cultivated close personal ties. Aside from the Trump-Modi bromance, U.S.-Indian relations have been on a positive trajectory for over two decades, driven in part by mutual suspicion of China. But six months into his second term, Trump has taken several actions that have led to a dramatic downturn in U.S.-India relations, with India-China relations suddenly on the rise.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.