Follow us on social

Money

The Pentagon can’t keep track of spare parts, and we’re paying for it

Why it may have been a bad idea for the debt limit deal to spare defense spending from proposed budget cuts.

Military Industrial Complex

Just yesterday, the House passed a bill to lift the debt ceiling. The proposal went to the Senate today, where it’s expected to pass by early next week.

The plan will make cuts to a range of government services, including tax collection and food stamps. But one department appears to have gotten off easy. The Pentagon — which hoovers up roughly half of discretionary spending each year — locked in a 3.2 percent boost to its budget compared to last year.

Given the militarist mood in Washington, it’s not all that surprising that the defense budget was spared. But lawmakers may want to look more closely at what an agency that’s still never passed an audit does with its annual blank check. 

Take, for example, last week’s revelation that defense giant Boeing has refused to give the Department of Defense pricing data for nearly 11,000 items included in a single sole-source contract. In other words, Boeing is charging taxpayers for thousands of parts without actually telling us how much each one costs. As Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Rep. John Garamendi (D-Calif.) noted in an open letter to the Pentagon, this isn’t exactly a recipe for financial discipline.

“This is a deeply troubling finding that reveals these contractors’ contempt for the Department and the taxpayers,” Warren and Garamendi wrote. “These denials make it impossible for DoD officials to make sure the agency is not being ripped off.”

As the lawmakers note, accurate pricing data has made a significant difference in previous contracts. In one case involving helicopter parts, the Pentagon was able to reduce the value of a contract by 25 percent after it got accurate numbers from the contractor, saving taxpayers roughly $40 million.

With defense budgets continuing to soar each year, DoD has little incentive to start looking between the couch cushions. But, as a new Government Accountability Office report revealed, officials may be surprised by what they find.

According to GAO, Lockheed Martin has lost nearly 2 million F-35 spare parts — worth a collective $151 million — since 2018. So where did they end up? Don’t ask the Pentagon. As the report notes, the F-35’s program office has only looked into about 20,000 of these lost parts. It’s no wonder that the total cost of acquiring these shiny new planes has gone up by $20.5 billion since 2012.

So what happens when you give an agency seemingly infinite money and minimal oversight? Apparently, it just hands the cash over to massive defense contractors. No wonder their profits keep soaring to new highs.


(phanurak rubpol/shutterstock)
Military Industrial Complex
American Special Operations
Top image credit: (shutterstock/FabrikaSimf)

American cult: Why our special ops need a reset

Military Industrial Complex

This article is the latest installment in our Quincy Institute/Responsible Statecraft project series highlighting the writing and reporting of U.S. military veterans. Click here for more information.

America’s post-9/11 conflicts have left indelible imprints on our society and our military. In some cases, these changes were so gradual that few noticed the change, except as snapshots in time.

keep readingShow less
Recep Tayyip Erdogan Benjamin Netanyahu
Top photo credit: President of Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdogan (Shutterstock/ Mustafa Kirazli) and Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu (Salty View/Shutterstock)
Is Turkey's big break with Israel for real?

Why Israel is now turning its sights on Turkey

Middle East

As the distribution of power shifts in the region, with Iran losing relative power and Israel and Turkey emerging on top, an intensified rivalry between Tel Aviv and Ankara is not a question of if, but how. It is not a question of whether they choose the rivalry, but how they choose to react to it: through confrontation or peaceful management.

As I describe in Treacherous Alliance, a similar situation emerged after the end of the Cold War: The collapse of the Soviet Union dramatically changed the global distribution of power, and the defeat of Saddam's Iraq in the Persian Gulf War reshuffled the regional geopolitical deck. A nascent bipolar regional structure took shape with Iran and Israel emerging as the two main powers with no effective buffer between them (since Iraq had been defeated). The Israelis acted on this first, inverting the strategy that had guided them for the previous decades: The Doctrine of the Periphery. According to this doctrine, Israel would build alliances with the non-Arab states in its periphery (Iran, Turkey, and Ethiopia) to balance the Arab powers in its vicinity (Iraq, Syria, and Egypt, respectively).

keep readingShow less
Havana, Cuba
Top Image Credit: Havana, Cuba, 2019. (CLWphoto/Shutterstock)

Trump lifted sanctions on Syria. Now do Cuba.

North America

President Trump’s new National Security Presidential Memorandum (NSPM) on Cuba, announced on June 30, reaffirms the policy of sanctions and hostility he articulated at the start of his first term in office. In fact, the new NSPM is almost identical to the old one.

The policy’s stated purpose is to “improve human rights, encourage the rule of law, foster free markets and free enterprise, and promote democracy” by restricting financial flows to the Cuban government. It reaffirms Trump’s support for the 1996 Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity Act, which explicitly requires regime change — that Cuba become a multiparty democracy with a free market economy (among other conditions) before the U.S. embargo will be lifted.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.