Follow us on social

google cta
Shutterstock_1708658488-scaled

SIPRI report: Global military spending increases for eighth year in a row

Not surprisingly, the biggest surge in spending came in Europe, in response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

Analysis | Military Industrial Complex
google cta
google cta

As the world continues to contend with the ongoing war in Ukraine and fears over potential conflict in East Asia, total military spending reached an all-time high of $2.24 trillion last year, according to data published by  the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) on Sunday. 

More spending was common across the world, with 12 of the top 15 countries — including India, Saudi Arabia, and the UK — spending more than they did in 2021. Every region of the world, with the exception of Africa, experienced an increase. 

The increases in spending were particularly notable in Europe. Ukraine’s 640 percent jump from 2021 marked the largest single-year increase in one country’s expenditure ever recorded in SIPRI data. Elsewhere, Central and Western European states returned to Cold War levels of spending, with these countries surpassing the totals from 1989 for the first time. However, as William Hartung, Senior Researcher at the Quincy Institute, told Responsible Statecraft, the majority of this increase came from frontline states such as Poland and countries hoping to join NATO like Finland and Sweden, while the major increases in spending pledged by major Western European powers have yet to materialize. Italy was one of the three countries in the top 15 who’s spending decreased in the last year. 

In addition, “many former Eastern bloc states have more than doubled their military spending since 2014, the year when Russia annexed Crimea,” said Lorenzo Scarazzato, a researcher with SIPRI’s Military Expenditure and Arms Production Program, in a press release. Russia’s spending also increased almost 10 percent. 

In Asia, China’s military expenditures increased for the 28th consecutive year, reaching an estimated $292 billion, and a number of other countries, notably Japan, increased their defense spending, likely in response to the perceived threat from China. 

“While China's spending increased significantly, by 4.2 percent, it was the second lowest rate of increase by Beijing since the end of the Cold War,” Hartung told RS. “And despite steady growth over the past three decades, China's military spending was still only about one-third of what the United States spent on its military in 2022.”

Confronted by high inflation, U.S. military spending rose by a relatively small 0.7 percent last year, but Washington remains by far the biggest spender in the world. The $877 billion accounts for almost 40 percent of worldwide military spending.  The Biden administration has already proposed a further increase in the Pentagon budget for next fiscal year. 

Continued massive military spending comes at the expense of pressing global issues, like the climate crisis, according to a statement released by the Global Campaign on Military Spending. 

“Political leadership has focused on hawkish politics and sabre-rattling, stoking tension and fear, instead of cultivating international relations based on mutual trust, diplomacy and cooperation – three components that are essential to tackle the global nature of the climate threat,” the statement reads. 

Last year marked the eighth successive one in which military expenditures have grown. The total represents a 3.7 percent increase in real terms. As the SIPRI press report notes, “the real-terms increase in world military spending in 2022 was slowed by the effects of inflation.” Without adjusting for inflation, the global total increased by 6.5 per cent. 

“The surge in spending does not bode well for global peace and stability, but the prospects for war and peace hinge on more than just money spent; the key question is whether diplomatic initiatives aimed at ending current conflicts and reducing mounting tensions among major powers can take precedence over war and preparations for war in government policies,” Hartung told RS. “Until that happens, global military spending is liable to continue its upward path.” 


Image: Pla2na via shutterstock.com
google cta
Analysis | Military Industrial Complex
Why Israeli counterterrorism tactics are showing up in Minnesota
Top photo credit: Federal police tackle and detain a person as demonstrators protest outside the Whipple federal building in Minneapolis, Minnesota, on January 16, 2026. (Photo by Steven Garcia/NurPhoto)

Why Israeli counterterrorism tactics are showing up in Minnesota

Military Industrial Complex

In the past few weeks, thousands of federal law enforcement officials have descended on Minneapolis. Videos show immigration officers jumping out of unmarked vans, tackling and pepper-spraying protesters, and breaking windows in order to drag people from their cars.

Prominent figures in the Trump administration have defended this approach despite fierce local backlash. When federal agents killed a protester named Alex Pretti on Saturday, for example, Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem quickly accused him of “domestic terrorism.”

keep readingShow less
nuclear weapons
Top image credit: rawf8 via shutterstock.com

What will happen when there are no guardrails on nuclear weapons?

Global Crises

The New START Treaty — the last arms control agreement between the U.S. and Russia — is set to expire next week, unless President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin make a last minute decision to renew it. Letting the treaty expire would increase the risk of nuclear conflict and open the door to an accelerated nuclear arms race. A coalition of arms control and disarmament groups is pushing Congress and the president to pledge to continue to observe the New START limits on deployed, strategic nuclear weapons by the US and Russia.

New START matters. The treaty, which entered into force on February 5, 2011 after a successful effort by the Obama administration to win over enough Republican senators to achieve the required two-thirds majority to ratify the deal, capped deployed warheads to 1,550 for each side, and established verification procedures to ensure that both sides abided by the pact. New START was far from perfect, but it did put much needed guardrails on nuclear development that reduced the prospect of an all-out arms race.

keep readingShow less
Trump Hegseth Rubio
Top image credit: President Donald Trump, joined by Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Secretary of the Navy John Phelan, announces plans for a “Golden Fleet” of new U.S. Navy battleships, Monday, December 22, 2025, at the Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

Trump's realist defense strategy with interventionist asterisks

Washington Politics

The Trump administration has released its National Defense Strategy, a document that in many ways marks a sharp break from the interventionist orthodoxies of the past 35 years, but possesses clear militaristic impulses in its own right.

Rhetorically quite compatible with realism and restraint, the report envisages a more focused U.S. grand strategy, shedding force posture dominance in all major theaters for a more concentrated role in the Western Hemisphere and Indo-Pacific. At the same time however, it retains a rather status quo Republican view of the Middle East, painting Iran as an intransigent aggressor and Israel as a model ally. Its muscular approach to the Western Hemisphere also may lend itself to the very interventionism that the report ostensibly opposes.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.