Follow us on social

google cta
Shutterstock_1708658488-scaled

SIPRI report: Global military spending increases for eighth year in a row

Not surprisingly, the biggest surge in spending came in Europe, in response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

Analysis | Military Industrial Complex
google cta
google cta

As the world continues to contend with the ongoing war in Ukraine and fears over potential conflict in East Asia, total military spending reached an all-time high of $2.24 trillion last year, according to data published by  the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) on Sunday. 

More spending was common across the world, with 12 of the top 15 countries — including India, Saudi Arabia, and the UK — spending more than they did in 2021. Every region of the world, with the exception of Africa, experienced an increase. 

The increases in spending were particularly notable in Europe. Ukraine’s 640 percent jump from 2021 marked the largest single-year increase in one country’s expenditure ever recorded in SIPRI data. Elsewhere, Central and Western European states returned to Cold War levels of spending, with these countries surpassing the totals from 1989 for the first time. However, as William Hartung, Senior Researcher at the Quincy Institute, told Responsible Statecraft, the majority of this increase came from frontline states such as Poland and countries hoping to join NATO like Finland and Sweden, while the major increases in spending pledged by major Western European powers have yet to materialize. Italy was one of the three countries in the top 15 who’s spending decreased in the last year. 

In addition, “many former Eastern bloc states have more than doubled their military spending since 2014, the year when Russia annexed Crimea,” said Lorenzo Scarazzato, a researcher with SIPRI’s Military Expenditure and Arms Production Program, in a press release. Russia’s spending also increased almost 10 percent. 

In Asia, China’s military expenditures increased for the 28th consecutive year, reaching an estimated $292 billion, and a number of other countries, notably Japan, increased their defense spending, likely in response to the perceived threat from China. 

“While China's spending increased significantly, by 4.2 percent, it was the second lowest rate of increase by Beijing since the end of the Cold War,” Hartung told RS. “And despite steady growth over the past three decades, China's military spending was still only about one-third of what the United States spent on its military in 2022.”

Confronted by high inflation, U.S. military spending rose by a relatively small 0.7 percent last year, but Washington remains by far the biggest spender in the world. The $877 billion accounts for almost 40 percent of worldwide military spending.  The Biden administration has already proposed a further increase in the Pentagon budget for next fiscal year. 

Continued massive military spending comes at the expense of pressing global issues, like the climate crisis, according to a statement released by the Global Campaign on Military Spending. 

“Political leadership has focused on hawkish politics and sabre-rattling, stoking tension and fear, instead of cultivating international relations based on mutual trust, diplomacy and cooperation – three components that are essential to tackle the global nature of the climate threat,” the statement reads. 

Last year marked the eighth successive one in which military expenditures have grown. The total represents a 3.7 percent increase in real terms. As the SIPRI press report notes, “the real-terms increase in world military spending in 2022 was slowed by the effects of inflation.” Without adjusting for inflation, the global total increased by 6.5 per cent. 

“The surge in spending does not bode well for global peace and stability, but the prospects for war and peace hinge on more than just money spent; the key question is whether diplomatic initiatives aimed at ending current conflicts and reducing mounting tensions among major powers can take precedence over war and preparations for war in government policies,” Hartung told RS. “Until that happens, global military spending is liable to continue its upward path.” 


Image: Pla2na via shutterstock.com
google cta
Analysis | Military Industrial Complex
Dan Caine
Top photo credit: Secretary of War Pete Hegseth and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff U.S. Air Force Gen. Dan Caine conduct a press briefing on Operation Epic Fury at the Pentagon, Washington, D.C., March 4, 2026. (DoW photo by U.S. Navy Petty Officer 1st Class Alexander Kubitza)

Did Caine just announce the Morgenthau option for Iran?

QiOSK

Gen. Dan Caine’s formulation of American war aims in Iran is remarkable not because it is bellicose, but because it is strategically incoherent.

In a press conference Tuesday morning, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff did not describe a limited campaign to suppress missile fire, blunt Iran’s naval threat, or even impose a severe but bounded setback on Tehran’s coercive instruments. He described a campaign against Iran’s “military and industrial base” designed to prevent the regime from attacking Americans, U.S. interests, and regional partners “for years to come.” In an earlier briefing he put the objective similarly: to prevent Iran from projecting power outside its borders. Rather than the language of a discrete coercive operation, this describes a war against a state’s capacity to regenerate power.

keep readingShow less
Mbs-mbz-scaled
UAE President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan receives Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman at the Presidential Airport in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates November 27, 2019. WAM/Handout via REUTERS

Is the US goading Arab states to join war against Iran?

QiOSK

On Sunday, U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Mike Waltz told ABC News that Arab Gulf states may soon step up their involvement in the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran. “I expect that you'll see additional diplomatic and possibly military action from them in the coming days and weeks,” Waltz said.

Then, on Monday morning, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) slammed Saudi Arabia for staying out of the war even as “Americans are dying and the U.S. is spending billions” of dollars to conduct regime change in Iran. “If you are not willing to use your military now, when are you willing to use it?” Graham asked. “Hopefully this changes soon. If not, consequences will follow.”

keep readingShow less
Why Tehran may have time on its side
Top image credit: Iranian army military personnel stand at attention under a banner featuring an image of an Iranian-made unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) during a military parade commemorating the anniversary of Army Day outside the Shrine of Iran's late leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in the south of Tehran, Iran, on April 18, 2025. (Photo by Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto)

Why Tehran may have time on its side

QiOSK

A provocative calculus by Anusar Farrouqui (“policytensor”) has been circulating on X and in more exhaustive form on the author’s Substack. It purports to demonstrate a sobering reality: in a high-intensity U.S.-Iran conflict, the United States may be unable to suppress Iranian drone production quickly enough to prevent a strategically consequential period of regional devastation.

The argument is framed through a quantitative lens, carrying the seductive appeal of mathematical precision. It arranges variables—such as U.S. sortie rates and degradation efficiency against Iranian repair cycles and rebuild speeds—to suggest a "sustainable firing rate." The implication is that Iran could maintain a persistent strike capability long enough to exhaust American political patience, forcing Washington toward a premature declaration of success or an unfavorable ceasefire.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.