Follow us on social

google cta
Shutterstock_1708658488-scaled

SIPRI report: Global military spending increases for eighth year in a row

Not surprisingly, the biggest surge in spending came in Europe, in response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

Analysis | Military Industrial Complex
google cta
google cta

As the world continues to contend with the ongoing war in Ukraine and fears over potential conflict in East Asia, total military spending reached an all-time high of $2.24 trillion last year, according to data published by  the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) on Sunday. 

More spending was common across the world, with 12 of the top 15 countries — including India, Saudi Arabia, and the UK — spending more than they did in 2021. Every region of the world, with the exception of Africa, experienced an increase. 

The increases in spending were particularly notable in Europe. Ukraine’s 640 percent jump from 2021 marked the largest single-year increase in one country’s expenditure ever recorded in SIPRI data. Elsewhere, Central and Western European states returned to Cold War levels of spending, with these countries surpassing the totals from 1989 for the first time. However, as William Hartung, Senior Researcher at the Quincy Institute, told Responsible Statecraft, the majority of this increase came from frontline states such as Poland and countries hoping to join NATO like Finland and Sweden, while the major increases in spending pledged by major Western European powers have yet to materialize. Italy was one of the three countries in the top 15 who’s spending decreased in the last year. 

In addition, “many former Eastern bloc states have more than doubled their military spending since 2014, the year when Russia annexed Crimea,” said Lorenzo Scarazzato, a researcher with SIPRI’s Military Expenditure and Arms Production Program, in a press release. Russia’s spending also increased almost 10 percent. 

In Asia, China’s military expenditures increased for the 28th consecutive year, reaching an estimated $292 billion, and a number of other countries, notably Japan, increased their defense spending, likely in response to the perceived threat from China. 

“While China's spending increased significantly, by 4.2 percent, it was the second lowest rate of increase by Beijing since the end of the Cold War,” Hartung told RS. “And despite steady growth over the past three decades, China's military spending was still only about one-third of what the United States spent on its military in 2022.”

Confronted by high inflation, U.S. military spending rose by a relatively small 0.7 percent last year, but Washington remains by far the biggest spender in the world. The $877 billion accounts for almost 40 percent of worldwide military spending.  The Biden administration has already proposed a further increase in the Pentagon budget for next fiscal year. 

Continued massive military spending comes at the expense of pressing global issues, like the climate crisis, according to a statement released by the Global Campaign on Military Spending. 

“Political leadership has focused on hawkish politics and sabre-rattling, stoking tension and fear, instead of cultivating international relations based on mutual trust, diplomacy and cooperation – three components that are essential to tackle the global nature of the climate threat,” the statement reads. 

Last year marked the eighth successive one in which military expenditures have grown. The total represents a 3.7 percent increase in real terms. As the SIPRI press report notes, “the real-terms increase in world military spending in 2022 was slowed by the effects of inflation.” Without adjusting for inflation, the global total increased by 6.5 per cent. 

“The surge in spending does not bode well for global peace and stability, but the prospects for war and peace hinge on more than just money spent; the key question is whether diplomatic initiatives aimed at ending current conflicts and reducing mounting tensions among major powers can take precedence over war and preparations for war in government policies,” Hartung told RS. “Until that happens, global military spending is liable to continue its upward path.” 


Image: Pla2na via shutterstock.com
google cta
Analysis | Military Industrial Complex
Inside Israel's shadow campaign to win over American media
Top image credit: Noa Tishby poses for a photo in Jaffa in 2021 (Alon Shafransky/CC BY-SA 4.0)

Inside Israel's shadow campaign to win over American media

Washington Politics

Back in March 2011, the Israeli consulate in New York City had a problem. A group of soldiers from the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) were coming to the U.S. on a PR trip, and Israeli officials needed help persuading influential media outlets to interview the delegation.

Luckily for the consulate, a new organization called Act For Israel, led by Israeli-American actor Noa Tishby, was prepared to swing into action. “[I]n mid March 2011, the New York Consulate requested our assistance,” Tishby’s organization wrote in a document revealed in a recent trove of leaked emails.

keep readingShow less
Volodymyr Zelenskyy Bart De Wever
Top image credit: President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy (R) and Prime Minister of the Kingdom of Belgium Bart De Weve in Kyiv, Ukraine When: 08 Apr 2025. Hennadii Minchenko/Ukrinform/Cover Images via REUTERS CONNECT

Europe could be on the hook for $160 billion to keep Ukraine afloat

Europe

Even if war ended tomorrow, Europe could be on the hook for 135 billion euros (nearly $160 billion) over the next two years to keep Ukraine afloat. Brussels does not appear to have a plan B up its sleeve.

I first warned in September 2024 that using immobilized Russian assets to fund war fighting in Ukraine would disincentivize Russia from suing for peace. Nothing has changed since then. Russia maintains the battlefield advantage, has the financial reserves, extremely low levels of debt by Western standards, and can afford to keep fighting, despite the human cost. Putin is self-evidently waiting the Europeans out, knowing they will run out of money before he does.

keep readingShow less
Unlike Cheney, at least McNamara tried to atone for his crimes
Top photo credit: Robert MacNamra (The Lyndon Baines Johnson Library and Museum/public domain)

Unlike Cheney, at least McNamara tried to atone for his crimes

Washington Politics

“I know of no one in America better qualified to take over the post of Defense Secretary than Bob McNamara,” wrote Ford chief executive Henry Ford II in late 1960.

It had been only fifty-one days since the former Harvard Business School whiz had become the automaker’s president, but now he was off to Washington to join President-elect John F. Kennedy’s brain trust. At 44, about a year older than JFK, Robert S. McNamara had forged a reputation as a brilliant, if arrogant, manager and problem-solver with a computer-like mastery of facts and statistics. He seemed unstoppable.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.