Follow us on social

google cta
Shutterstock_1708658488-scaled

SIPRI report: Global military spending increases for eighth year in a row

Not surprisingly, the biggest surge in spending came in Europe, in response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

Analysis | Military Industrial Complex
google cta
google cta

As the world continues to contend with the ongoing war in Ukraine and fears over potential conflict in East Asia, total military spending reached an all-time high of $2.24 trillion last year, according to data published by  the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) on Sunday. 

More spending was common across the world, with 12 of the top 15 countries — including India, Saudi Arabia, and the UK — spending more than they did in 2021. Every region of the world, with the exception of Africa, experienced an increase. 

The increases in spending were particularly notable in Europe. Ukraine’s 640 percent jump from 2021 marked the largest single-year increase in one country’s expenditure ever recorded in SIPRI data. Elsewhere, Central and Western European states returned to Cold War levels of spending, with these countries surpassing the totals from 1989 for the first time. However, as William Hartung, Senior Researcher at the Quincy Institute, told Responsible Statecraft, the majority of this increase came from frontline states such as Poland and countries hoping to join NATO like Finland and Sweden, while the major increases in spending pledged by major Western European powers have yet to materialize. Italy was one of the three countries in the top 15 who’s spending decreased in the last year. 

In addition, “many former Eastern bloc states have more than doubled their military spending since 2014, the year when Russia annexed Crimea,” said Lorenzo Scarazzato, a researcher with SIPRI’s Military Expenditure and Arms Production Program, in a press release. Russia’s spending also increased almost 10 percent. 

In Asia, China’s military expenditures increased for the 28th consecutive year, reaching an estimated $292 billion, and a number of other countries, notably Japan, increased their defense spending, likely in response to the perceived threat from China. 

“While China's spending increased significantly, by 4.2 percent, it was the second lowest rate of increase by Beijing since the end of the Cold War,” Hartung told RS. “And despite steady growth over the past three decades, China's military spending was still only about one-third of what the United States spent on its military in 2022.”

Confronted by high inflation, U.S. military spending rose by a relatively small 0.7 percent last year, but Washington remains by far the biggest spender in the world. The $877 billion accounts for almost 40 percent of worldwide military spending.  The Biden administration has already proposed a further increase in the Pentagon budget for next fiscal year. 

Continued massive military spending comes at the expense of pressing global issues, like the climate crisis, according to a statement released by the Global Campaign on Military Spending. 

“Political leadership has focused on hawkish politics and sabre-rattling, stoking tension and fear, instead of cultivating international relations based on mutual trust, diplomacy and cooperation – three components that are essential to tackle the global nature of the climate threat,” the statement reads. 

Last year marked the eighth successive one in which military expenditures have grown. The total represents a 3.7 percent increase in real terms. As the SIPRI press report notes, “the real-terms increase in world military spending in 2022 was slowed by the effects of inflation.” Without adjusting for inflation, the global total increased by 6.5 per cent. 

“The surge in spending does not bode well for global peace and stability, but the prospects for war and peace hinge on more than just money spent; the key question is whether diplomatic initiatives aimed at ending current conflicts and reducing mounting tensions among major powers can take precedence over war and preparations for war in government policies,” Hartung told RS. “Until that happens, global military spending is liable to continue its upward path.” 


Image: Pla2na via shutterstock.com
google cta
Analysis | Military Industrial Complex
Trump Venezuela
Top image credit: President Donald Trump monitors U.S. military operations in Venezuela, from Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida, on Saturday, January 3, 2026. (Official White House Photo by Molly Riley)

Geo-kleptocracy and the rise of 'global mafia politics'

Global Crises

“As everyone knows, the oil business in Venezuela has been a bust, a total bust, for a long period of time. … We're going to have our very large United States oil companies, the biggest anywhere in the world, go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure, the oil infrastructure, and start making money for the country,” said President Donald Trump the morning after U.S. forces invaded Caracas and carried off the indicted autocrat Nicolàs Maduro.

The invasion of Venezuela on Jan. 3 did not result in regime change but rather a deal coerced at the barrel of a gun. Maduro’s underlings may stay in power as long as they open the country’s moribund petroleum industry to American oil majors. Government repression still rules the day, simply without Maduro.

keep readingShow less
Russian icebreakers
Top photo credit: Russian nuclear powered Icebreaker Yamal during removal of manned drifting station North Pole-36. August 2009. (Wikimedia Commmons)

Trump's Greenland, Canada threats reflect angst over Russia shipping

North America

Like it or not, Russia is the biggest polar bear in the arctic, which helps to explain President Trump’s moves on Greenland.

However, the Biden administration focused on it too. And it isn’t only about access to resources and military positioning, but also about shipping. And there, the Russians are some way ahead.

keep readingShow less
Iran nuclear
Top image credit: An Iranian cleric and a young girl stand next to scale models of Iran-made ballistic missiles and centrifuges after participating in an anti-U.S. and anti-Israeli rally marking the anniversary of the U.S. embassy occupation in downtown Tehran, Iran, on November 4, 2025.(Photo by Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto via REUTERS CONNECT)

Want Iran to get the bomb? Try regime change

Middle East

Washington is once again flirting with a familiar temptation: the belief that enough pressure, and if necessary, military force, can bend Iran to its will. The Trump administration appears ready to move beyond containment toward forcing collapse. Before treating Iran as the next candidate for forced transformation, policymakers should ask a question they have consistently failed to answer in the Middle East: “what follows regime change?”

The record is sobering. In the past two decades, regime change in the region has yielded state fragmentation, authoritarian restoration, or prolonged conflict. Iraq remains fractured despite two decades of U.S. investment. Egypt’s democratic opening collapsed within a year. Libya, Syria, and Yemen spiraled into civil wars whose spillover persists. In each case, removing a regime proved far easier than constructing a viable successor. Iran would not be the exception. It would be the rule — at a scale that dwarfs anything the region has experienced.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.