Follow us on social

google cta
Murphy-usip

Murphy slams Biden’s ‘business as usual’ approach to Tunisia amid backslide

‘You have to walk the walk on democracy, not just talk the talk,’ the Democratic senator argued.

Reporting | Africa
google cta
google cta

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) called on the Biden administration to take a stand against Tunisian leader Kais Saied, who has dismantled much of the country’s progress toward liberal democracy since taking office in 2019.

“This administration has made it clear that they want to lead with American values, but at some point in the region of the Middle East and North Africa, you have to walk the walk on democracy, not just talk the talk,” Murphy said in a Tuesday morning talk at the United States Institute of Peace.

“People are noticing that we still stay in business with brutal dictators, we still fund regimes that move away from democratic norms,” Murphy, a prominent Biden ally in the Senate’s appropriations and foreign policy committees, added. “It becomes hard to claim that your priority is democracy and human rights and the rule of law if you don't change your policy when governments start to change their commitment to participatory democracy.”

The senator’s comments come as Saied continues his crusade against the democratic system that Tunisian civil society helped build after toppling long-serving dictator Zine El Abidine Ben Ali in 2011. Among other things, his administration has cracked down on political activism, pushed through a “sham referendum” on a new constitution, and recently arrested several opposition leaders over meetings with U.S. diplomats.

These actions have earned a “markedly milquetoast” response from the international community, as Erin Clare Brown recently noted in New Lines Magazine. The Biden administration has carefully avoided condemning Saied, and the White House’s latest budget request largely maintains regular levels of military and economic aid to Tunisia, which usually totals around $150 million per year.

“The Biden administration has, I think, made a bet on the Tunisian military,” Murphy said, noting later that the country’s military is “trying to integrate itself” into Saied’s new government. “I would argue that we should make a bet on civil society instead.”

For Murphy, that means cutting military support while increasing development aid to the country, which has struggled to get its economy on track since the Arab Spring. He stopped short of calling for a cutoff of all aid to the country, an increasingly popular idea among Tunisia watchers.

The question of how to pressure Saied has gotten increasingly complex as the leader tightens his grip on power. Just last week, Saied threatened to blow up negotiations over a $1.9 billion rescue deal from the International Monetary Fund and insisted that “Tunisians must count on themselves.” (The IMF, for its part, says it's still trying to salvage the agreement.)

Murphy added later in the conversation that the case of Tunisia “suggests that our democracy toolkit is fundamentally broken.”

“Our decision to have more employees of military grocery stores than we have diplomats in the State Department is a really, really bad bet for the United States going forward,” he concluded.


Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) speaks at an event hosted by the United States Institute for Peace. (Screengrab via usip.org)
google cta
Reporting | Africa
US foreign policy
Top photo credit: A political cartoon portrays the disagreement between President William McKinley and Joseph Pulitzer, who worried the U.S. was growing too large through foreign conquests and land acquisitions. (Puck magazine/Creative Commons)

What does US ‘national interest’ really mean?

Washington Politics

In foreign policy discourse, the phrase “the national interest” gets used with an almost ubiquitous frequency, which could lead one to assume it is a strongly defined and absolute term.

Most debates, particularly around changing course in diplomatic strategy or advocating for or against some kind of economic or military intervention, invoke the phrase as justification for their recommended path forward.

keep readingShow less
V-22 Osprey
Top Image Credit: VanderWolf Images/ Shutterstock
Osprey crash in Japan kills at least 1 US soldier

Military aircraft accidents are spiking

Military Industrial Complex

Military aviation accidents are spiking, driven by a perfect storm of flawed aircraft, inadequate pilot training, and over-involvement abroad.

As Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s (D- Mass.) office reported this week, the rate of severe accidents per 100,000 flight hours, was a staggering 55% higher than it was in 2020. Her office said mishaps cost the military $9.4 billion, killed 90 service members and DoD civilian employees, and destroyed 89 aircraft between 2020 to 2024. The Air Force lost 47 airmen to “preventable mishaps” in 2024 alone.

The U.S. continues to utilize aircraft with known safety issues or are otherwise prone to accidents, like the V-22 Osprey, whose gearbox and clutch failures can cause crashes. It is currently part of the ongoing military buildup near Venezuela.

Other mishap-prone aircraft include the Apache Helicopter (AH-64), which saw 4.5 times more accidents in 2024 than 2020, and the C-130 military transport aircraft, whose accident rate doubled in that same period. The MH-53E Sea Dragon helicopter was susceptible to crashes throughout its decades-long deployment, but was kept operational until early 2025.

Dan Grazier, director of the Stimson Center’s National Security Reform Program, told RS that the lack of flight crew experience is a problem. “The total number of flight hours U.S. military pilots receive has been abysmal for years. Pilots in all branches simply don't fly often enough to even maintain their flying skills, to say nothing of improving them,” he said.

To Grazier’s point, army pilots fly less these days: a September 2024 Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report found that the average manned aircraft crew flew 198 flight hours in 2023, down from 302 hours flown in 2011.

keep readingShow less
Majorie Taylor Greene
Top photo credit" Majorie Taylor Greene (Shutterstock/Consolidated News Service)

Marjorie Taylor Greene to resign: 'I refuse to be a battered wife'

Washington Politics

Republican Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia’s 14th district, who at one time was arguably the politician most associated with Donald Trump’s “MAGA” movement outside of the president himself, announced in a lengthy video Friday night that she would be retiring from Congress, with her last day being January 5.

Greene was an outspoken advocate for releasing the Epstein Files, which the Trump administration vehemently opposed until a quick reversal last week which led to the House and Senate quickly passing bills for the release which the president signed.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.