Follow us on social

Murphy-usip

Murphy slams Biden’s ‘business as usual’ approach to Tunisia amid backslide

‘You have to walk the walk on democracy, not just talk the talk,’ the Democratic senator argued.

Reporting | Africa

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) called on the Biden administration to take a stand against Tunisian leader Kais Saied, who has dismantled much of the country’s progress toward liberal democracy since taking office in 2019.

“This administration has made it clear that they want to lead with American values, but at some point in the region of the Middle East and North Africa, you have to walk the walk on democracy, not just talk the talk,” Murphy said in a Tuesday morning talk at the United States Institute of Peace.

“People are noticing that we still stay in business with brutal dictators, we still fund regimes that move away from democratic norms,” Murphy, a prominent Biden ally in the Senate’s appropriations and foreign policy committees, added. “It becomes hard to claim that your priority is democracy and human rights and the rule of law if you don't change your policy when governments start to change their commitment to participatory democracy.”

The senator’s comments come as Saied continues his crusade against the democratic system that Tunisian civil society helped build after toppling long-serving dictator Zine El Abidine Ben Ali in 2011. Among other things, his administration has cracked down on political activism, pushed through a “sham referendum” on a new constitution, and recently arrested several opposition leaders over meetings with U.S. diplomats.

These actions have earned a “markedly milquetoast” response from the international community, as Erin Clare Brown recently noted in New Lines Magazine. The Biden administration has carefully avoided condemning Saied, and the White House’s latest budget request largely maintains regular levels of military and economic aid to Tunisia, which usually totals around $150 million per year.

“The Biden administration has, I think, made a bet on the Tunisian military,” Murphy said, noting later that the country’s military is “trying to integrate itself” into Saied’s new government. “I would argue that we should make a bet on civil society instead.”

For Murphy, that means cutting military support while increasing development aid to the country, which has struggled to get its economy on track since the Arab Spring. He stopped short of calling for a cutoff of all aid to the country, an increasingly popular idea among Tunisia watchers.

The question of how to pressure Saied has gotten increasingly complex as the leader tightens his grip on power. Just last week, Saied threatened to blow up negotiations over a $1.9 billion rescue deal from the International Monetary Fund and insisted that “Tunisians must count on themselves.” (The IMF, for its part, says it's still trying to salvage the agreement.)

Murphy added later in the conversation that the case of Tunisia “suggests that our democracy toolkit is fundamentally broken.”

“Our decision to have more employees of military grocery stores than we have diplomats in the State Department is a really, really bad bet for the United States going forward,” he concluded.


Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) speaks at an event hosted by the United States Institute for Peace. (Screengrab via usip.org)
Reporting | Africa
Benjamin Netanyahu
Top Image Credit: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attends the U.S. Independence Day reception, known as the annual "Fourth of July" celebration, hosted by Newsmax, in Jerusalem August 13, 2025. REUTERS/Ronen Zvulun/Pool (ReutersConnect)

Netanyahu’s ‘total victory’ rhetoric takes an extreme turn

Middle East

As Israel’s war on Gaza escalates with IDF troops now moving to take over Gaza City, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been deploying more extreme language than usual to describe his plans for “total” victory over Hamas. He has eschewed ceasefire talks, and is instead leaning into his expansive vision for a “Greater Israel,” which not only includes an Israeli takeover of Gaza but of neighboring territories too.

His public remarks and media appearances over the last week have caused some to observe that the prime minister may be taking his approach, which is already heavily influenced by the hardline right wing in his cabinet, to an even more maximalist level.

keep readingShow less
Houthis Yemen
Top image credit: Houthi supporters shout slogans and hold up weapons during a protest against the US and Israel, in Sana a, Yemen, 15 August 2025. IMAGO/ Sanaa Yemen via REUTERS

Why Israel won't beat the Houthis

Middle East

Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz threatened to "cut the hands" of Israel's enemies, but his specific target — Yemen's Houthi movement (Ansarullah) — has not only survived months of IDF and U.S. military pressure, but has also grown stronger with each confrontation.

The latest Israeli strike on Heyzaz power plant near Sanaa, Yemen’s capital, exemplifies this strategic failure: a symbolic attack on civilian infrastructure that inflicts severe hardship on Yemen's civilian population while doing nothing to degrade Houthi military capabilities.

keep readingShow less
Putin Trump
Top image credit: President Donald Trump meets with Russian president Vladimir Putin in the Billy Mitchell Room at Joint Base Elmendorf Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska, Friday, August 15, 2025. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

Did the Alaska Summit usher in a new ice age?

Global Crises

The Trump-Putin Alaska summit was about far more than Ukraine. Since long before the meeting in Anchorage, the Arctic has been recognized as a setting for U.S.-Russia cooperation.

Now, with the historic presidential summit in the unexpected location of Alaska, the Arctic has been confirmed as one of the key areas for the normalization of the bilateral relationship.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.