Follow us on social

Screen-shot-2023-03-29-at-3.56.21-pm

Lawmakers ask Biden to investigate Israel's use of US arms

American weapons sales cannot be used to commit human rights abuses; increasing West Bank violence has caused some in Congress to act.

Reporting | Middle East

Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) are leading an effort to push the Biden administration to investigate whether U.S. arms sales to Israel are being used to commit human rights abuses in violation of U.S. law, Jewish Currents first reported

In a letter to President Biden and Secretary of State Antony Blinken, Bowman, Sanders and a handful of other House members — including Reps. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez (D-N.Y.), Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), and Betty McCollum (D-Minn.) — cited “the rapidly escalating violence in the occupied Palestinian West Bank and the alarming actions of the new extreme right-wing Israeli government” as a catalyst for the investigation “to prevent the further loss of Israeli and Palestinian lives.” 

The letter refers to many instances of violence over the past several weeks that have killed both Israelis and Palestinians and that their concern about the “Israeli government’s worsening systemic violations of Palestinian human rights … have only deepened and grown more urgent under the new Israeli government.”

The letter calls on the administration to ensure that the United States is not underwriting illegal settlements and to determine whether U.S. arms sales to Israel are being used to violate American law (i.e. the so-called “Leahy Laws”) or commit human rights abuses. 

“Furthermore,” the letter concludes, “we call on your administration to ensure that all future foreign assistance to Israel, including weapons and equipment, is not used in support of gross violations of human rights, including by strengthening end-use monitoring and financial tracking.” 

For FY2023, Congress appropriated $3.8 billion in aid to Israel for defense, and nearly another $100 million “in funding for other cooperative defense and non-defense programs.”

“It's long past time for the Biden administration to take a hard look at the use of U.S.-supplied weapons in ongoing human rights abuses committed by the Israeli military, and to impose consequences for those abuses,” said the Quincy Institute’s Bill Hartung. “More members of Congress need to join Rep. Bowman and Sen. Sanders in calling for accountability over the billions in annual U.S. military aid to Israel.”

Jewish Currents adds that nearly two dozen non-governmental organizations have offered support for the letter, but that prominent left-leaning pro-Israel group J Street has not yet to publicly support it. 

“This letter is a welcome step forward, reflecting not only a reaction to the naked extremism of Israel’s new government but also broadly the political space created by expanding support for Palestinian rights among American voters,” said Sarah Leah Whitson, executive director of Democracy for the Arab World Now, who charged that giving weapons to Israel “violates U.S. laws prohibiting arms transfers to human rights abusers and undermines our global interests as well.”


Photos: Sheila Fitzgerald and lev radin via shutterstock.com
Reporting | Middle East
ukraine war
Top Photo: Diplomacy Watch: Trump's 'gotta make a deal' on Ukraine
Diplomacy Watch: Trump's 'gotta make a deal' on Ukraine

Diplomacy Watch: Here comes Trump

Regions

Donald Trump’s nominee for U.S. secretary of state said this week that he wants the war between Ukraine and Russia to end.

“It is important for everyone to be realistic: there will have to be concessions made by the Russian Federation, but also by Ukrainians,” said Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) during his Senate confirmation hearing on Wednesday. “There is no way Russia takes all of Ukraine.”

keep readingShow less
Netanyahu , biden
Top photo credit: US President Joe Biden meets with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for a bilateral meeting in the Oval Office at the White House on July 25, 2024 in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Samuel Corum/Sipa USA)

Who should take credit for the ceasefire? Netanyahu.

QiOSK

It is an official: Israel and Hamas have agreed to a ceasefire.

It would appear to be based on the text already made available by the Associated Press, which is very much like the deal brokered by the Biden administration in May 2024. That agreement was never ratified by either side and was never implemented.

keep readingShow less
Joe Biden Gaza ceasefire
Top image credit: U.S. President Joe Biden, flanked by U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris and U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken, speaks after negotiators reached a phased deal for a ceasefire in Gaza between Israel and Hamas, during remarks at the White House in Washington, U.S., January 15, 2025. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein

Biden & Trump take credit for Gaza ceasefire

Middle East

The achievement of a Gaza hostage deal and temporary ceasefire ahead of Trump's inauguration demonstrates the power that the U.S. had all along. The Biden administration simply refused to use American leverage to push Netanyahu, despite U.S. officials’ assertions that they were “working tirelessly towards a ceasefire.”

In his remarks about the deal, and in his response to journalists afterwards, President Biden sought to take full credit. He pointed out that this was the deal he proposed in May, yet did not acknowledge that it was Trump’s willingness to pressure Israel to reach a ceasefire in time for his inauguration that actually achieved the deal, which Biden had failed to for months. "A diplomat briefed on the ceasefire negotiations between Israel and Hamas credited progress in the talks in part to the influence of President-elect Donald Trump, saying it was 'the first time there has been real pressure on the Israeli side to accept a deal’,” according to the Washington Post.

keep readingShow less

Trump transition

Latest

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.