Follow us on social

Shutterstock_585901736-scaled

Private equity gobbling up defense firms at a frightening pace: Experts

And with no obligation to disclose financials, companies often ‘disappear into a black box’ after an acquisition.

Reporting | Military Industrial Complex

Private equity firms are rapidly acquiring a greater share of the U.S. defense sector, raising concerns about transparency as global demand for American weapons hits record highs, according to new research from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). 

In 2021 alone, private equity funds invested $15 billion in nearly 140 defense-related deals. Firms have acquired some of the world’s largest defense contractors, including Amentum, which claims that it is the second leading provider of services to the U.S. government. (Just last month, Amentum won a $4.7 billion contract with the Air Force.)

Since private funds are not required to share information about their portfolio companies, contractors often “disappear into a black box” after an acquisition, according to SIPRI researchers Lorenzo Scarazzato and Madison Lipson.

“We’re not able to publish data regarding those companies,” Scarazzato said, noting that the “rising trend” of private equity takeovers could make it difficult for SIPRI to maintain its widely-cited list of the world’s largest defense firms. “In a way, our database becomes crippled by the trend.”

And, experts argue, the problems don’t stop there. The risky approach favored by private equity firms increases the chance that contractors could default on their loans, as happened to Constellis Holdings — the successor to Erik Prince’s Blackwater — in 2020. Private equity acquisitions are also a key driver of defense industry consolidation, which could lead to increased costs for taxpayers, according to a recent Pentagon report.

President Joe Biden recently requested $842 billion for next year’s defense budget, over half of which will go to contractors.

Private equity interest in defense companies began in the 2000s, when simultaneous large-scale wars in Iraq and Afghanistan signaled to investors that weapons companies were a safe long-term bet. These deals dropped off briefly in the early 2010s before jumping to new peaks during President Donald Trump’s tenure in office. In 2019, private equity firms carried out 42 percent of total defense contractor takeovers.

Private equity firms now own a controlling stake in AM General, which produces military Humvees and Hummer cars, and Navistar Defense, a leading producer of MRAP armored vehicles.

With demand for arms at record highs, investor excitement has continued to grow. Consultancy firm KPMG argued in a 2021 report that, due to factors like “increased global insecurity” and the covid pandemic, “now is perhaps one of the best times” to invest in defense companies.

As KPMG noted, investors have so far shied away from weapons makers, largely because of ethical investment restrictions from major funders like university endowments. But those concerns don’t apply to contractors who work in “cyber defense and surveillance, which will help to remove such reputational barriers to investment.”

In a 2020 paper, researchers Charles Mahoney, Benjamin Tkach, and Craig Rethmeyer found that private equity takeovers “frequently result in credit downgrades to acquired defense contractors,” making it more likely that companies will default on loans.

They attribute this to the fact that private enterprises are not obligated to share key information about their financial status, shielding them from public scrutiny. By contrast, publicly owned contractors who take big risks “are likely to suffer repercussions including a decrease in share price, negative publicity, and potential management shake-ups.”

“[I]ncreasing the level of financial risk among defense contractors heightens the probability of disruptive credit events that could hinder US national security activities,” the scholars concluded.


(Shutterstock/ Dimj)
Reporting | Military Industrial Complex
POGO
Top image credit: Project on Government Oversight

The non-empires strike back

Military Industrial Complex

The Bunker appears originally at the Project on Government Oversight and is republished here with permission.

keep readingShow less
Trump Netanyahu
Top image credit: noamgalai / Shutterstock.com

Trump appears all in for Netanyahu's political survival

Middle East

On March 25, Israeli Prime Minster Benjamin Netanyahu’s government passed its long-delayed 2025 budget. Had the vote failed, it would have automatically triggered snap elections — an outcome Netanyahu appears politically incapable of surviving.

While Israel cited stalled hostage negotiations and ongoing security threats as reasons for ending the U.S.-backed ceasefire in Gaza, Netanyahu’s decision to resume large-scale military operations just days before the vote also appeared aimed at shoring up support from far-right coalition partners such as Itamar Ben Gvir. The budget, framed explicitly by Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich as a “war budget,” includes record levels of defense spending and a dramatic increase in funding for Israeli public diplomacy, a nod to the government’s attempt to counteract ongoing international condemnation of Israel’s military actions in Gaza.

keep readingShow less
JFK wanted to splinter CIA ‘into a thousand pieces.’ Why didn't he?
Top photo credit: Unredacted memo by Arthur Schlesinger (JFK files) and President John F. Kennedy, 1962 (public domain/Donald Cooksey)

JFK wanted to splinter CIA ‘into a thousand pieces.’ Why didn't he?

Washington Politics

When the final, declassified records from the John F. Kennedy assassination files were posted on the National Archives’ website last week, the first document researchers and reporters searched for was White House adviser Arthur Schlesinger Jr.’s June 1961 memorandum to the president titled “CIA Reorganization.”

ABC News led its initial coverage on the release of the JFK papers with that document, quoting Schlesinger’s now unredacted, dramatic, statistics that showed that the "CIA today has nearly as many people under official cover overseas as [the] State [Department].” The New York Times also featured that document with a headline “A Kennedy aide worried that the C.I.A. threatened the State Department’s power.”

keep readingShow less

Trump transition

Latest

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.