Follow us on social

Diplomacy Watch: China’s peace plan draws mixed reactions

Diplomacy Watch: China’s peace plan draws mixed reactions

Kyiv said it will “carefully study” the document before drawing any conclusions about Beijing’s proposal.

Asia-Pacific

China released a peace plan for Ukraine today in a move that could dramatically expand Beijing’s role in the conflict.

The plan, which Chinese officials referred to as a “position paper,” calls for a ceasefire and the resumption of peace talks. It also includes provisions calling for countries to respect the sovereignty of other states while noting that the “legitimate security interests and concerns of all countries must be taken seriously and addressed properly.” 

Ukraine has approached the proposal with cautious optimism, calling it a “good sign” for China’s role in the conflict. “We hope they also urge Russia to stop the war and withdraw its troops,” said Ukraine’s chargé d’affaires in China.

Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba, who saw the plan’s key points during a meeting with China’s top diplomat, said Tuesday that Kyiv intends to “carefully study it and draw conclusions.” Kuleba also noted that Ukraine’s top priority is its own peace plan, which Kyiv released late last year.

Kuleba’s careful reaction — a far cry from Kyiv’s harsh rebuke of a peace proposal made by Mexico last year — signals that Ukraine could be willing to consider China as a credible mediator despite the country’s close relationship with Russia.

The proposal earned a lukewarm reaction from Western leaders. “If the position paper is a positive sign for Ukraine then it’s a positive sign for the [European Union], although we are studying the paper closely,” said the EU ambassador to China, who argued that the proposal should not be viewed as a full peace plan. The German foreign minister also welcomed the plan earlier this week, noting that China’s place on the UN Security Council means that it “has an obligation to use its influence to secure world peace.” 

For its part, the United States has largely dismissed the document. “My first reaction to it is that it could stop at point one, which is to respect the sovereignty of all nations,” said National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan.

As Patrick Wintour noted in the Guardian, the plan will likely earn plaudits from many in the Global South, which has suffered significantly from the war due to its impact on the price of food and other staples. “We cannot limit ourselves to talking about the war,” Brazilian Foreign Minister Mauro Vieira told Wintour. “I am not referring to immediate negotiations – we would have to go step by step, perhaps first create an environment that makes a negotiation possible.”

Meanwhile, there is growing evidence that China isn’t the only superpower pitching a path to peace. Two unnamed Ukrainian officials told Politico Tuesday that CIA Director William Burns did in fact float a peace plan during a meeting with his Russian counterpart last November, a claim that Washington has strenuously denied.

“[T]he officials also confirmed a report that in January, Burns had urged Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to make as much battlefield headway as quickly as he could, because the scale of military support could start falling off,” wrote Politico opinion editor Jamie Dettmer.

In other diplomatic news related to the war in Ukraine:

— On Monday, President Joe Biden made a surprise visit to Kyiv, where he praised Ukraine’s resistance against Russian aggression and pledged more weapons transfers, according to AP News. “I thought it was critical that there not be any doubt, none whatsoever, about U.S. support for Ukraine in the war,” Biden said. “[Russian President Vladimir Putin] thought he could outlast us. I don’t think he’s thinking that right now.”

— Putin announced Tuesday that Russia is suspending its participation in the New START Treaty, the only agreement that sets a cap on the number of nuclear weapons deployed by Washington and Moscow, according to Reuters. While Russia’s foreign ministry later clarified that the Kremlin does not intend to exceed the limits set out in the treaty, the news is a worrying sign that the agreement could collapse before its 2026 expiration date, leaving no binding limits on the world’s two largest nuclear arsenals.

— The UN General Assembly overwhelmingly approved a non-binding motion Thursday calling for an immediate withdrawal of Russian troops from Ukraine, according to Axios. The vote largely fell along the same lines as last year’s measure to condemn Russia’s invasion, with both earning 141 votes in favor; 32 countries abstained. Nicaragua and Mali, which had abstained on last year’s measure, opted to vote against Thursday’s motion.

— Russian weapons were on display alongside systems from Ukraine and the U.S. at a major arms expo in the United Arab Emirates this week, according to AP News. Moscow’s presence at the event — which has a reputation for hosting controversial potential buyers like Libyan General Khalifa Haftar — suggests that the Kremlin is still determined to sell weapons abroad despite severe Western sanctions on its defense sector.

— Calls for greater scrutiny of U.S. aid to Ukraine continue to grow as the war passes its one-year anniversary, according to NPR. “When you spend that much money that fast, there's bound to be problems, there's bound to be leakage,” said John Sopko, who led oversight of U.S. assistance to Afghanistan.

U.S. State Department News

In a Wednesday press conference, Beth Van Shaak — America’s ambassador at large for Global Criminal Justice — pledged to follow through on the recent announcement that Washington had formally found Russia responsible for crimes against humanity. “The United States, together with the international community, is committed to holding those responsible – both the direct perpetrators and the architects of violence – to account, no matter how long this might take,” Van Shaak said.


Asia-Pacific
Mark Levin
Top photo credit: Erick Stakelbeck on TBN/Screengrab

The great fade out: Neocon influencers rage as they diminish

Media

Mark Levin appears to be having a meltdown.

The veteran neoconservative talk host is repulsed by reports that President Donald Trump might be inching closer to an Iranian nuclear deal, reducing the likelihood of war. In addition to his rants on how this would hurt Israel, Levin has been howling to anyone who will listen that any deal with Iran needs approval from Congress (funny he doesn’t have the same attitude for waging war, only for making peace).

keep readingShow less
american military missiles
Top photo credit: Fogcatcher/Shutterstock

5 ways the military industrial complex is a killer

Latest

Congress is on track to finish work on the fiscal year 2025 Pentagon budget this week, and odds are that it will add $150 billion to its funding for the next few years beyond what the department even asked for. Meanwhile, President Trump has announced a goal of over $1 trillion for the Pentagon for fiscal year 2026.

With these immense sums flying out the door, it’s a good time to take a critical look at the Pentagon budget, from the rationales given to justify near record levels of spending to the impact of that spending in the real world. Here are five things you should know about the Pentagon budget and the military-industrial complex that keeps the churn going.

keep readingShow less
Sudan
Top image credit: A Sudanese army soldier stands next to a destroyed combat vehicle as Sudan's army retakes ground and some displaced residents return to ravaged capital in the state of Khartoum Sudan March 26, 2025. REUTERS/El Tayeb Siddig

Will Sudan attack the UAE?

Africa

Recent weeks events have dramatically cast the Sudanese civil war back into the international spotlight, drawing renewed scrutiny to the role of external actors, particularly the United Arab Emirates.

This shift has been driven by Sudan's accusations at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) against the UAE concerning violations of the Genocide Convention, alongside drone strikes on Port Sudan that Khartoum vociferously attributes to direct Emirati participation. Concurrently, Secretary of State Marco Rubio publicly reaffirmed the UAE's deep entanglement in the conflict at a Senate hearing last week.

From Washington, another significant and sudden development also surfaced last week: the imposition of U.S. sanctions on the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) for alleged chemical weapons use. This dramatic accusation was met by an immediate denial from Sudan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which vehemently dismissed the claims as "unfounded" and criticized the U.S. for bypassing the proper international mechanisms, specifically the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, despite Sudan's active membership on its Executive Council.

Despite the gravity of such an accusation, corroboration for the use of chemical agents in Sudan’s war remains conspicuously absent from public debate or reporting, save for a January 2025 New York Times article citing unnamed U.S. officials. That report itself contained a curious disclaimer: "Officials briefed on the intelligence said the information did not come from the United Arab Emirates, an American ally that is also a staunch supporter of the R.S.F."

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.