Follow us on social

Diplomacy Watch: Ukraine, Russia agree to restart grain shipments after Turkey-led talks

Diplomacy Watch: Ukraine, Russia agree to restart grain shipments after Turkey-led talks

If the deal holds, the world may dodge the worst of a food crisis that threatens to starve millions across the globe.

Analysis | Europe

Ukraine and Russia will sign a deal today to restart Ukrainian grain exports, according to Turkish officials. The move, which comes after two month of intensive negotiations, raises hopes that the world could be spared the worst of a food crisis that threatens to push millions into starvation, according to the World Food Programme.

News of the accord broke yesterday, just two days after Russian President Vladimir Putin met in Tehran with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who has spearheaded the United Nations-sponsored talks. The full details of the agreement are not currently available but should include measures in which Ukrainian vessels would guide ships through mined waters, and Turkish authorities would oversee inspections to allay Russian concerns of weapons smuggling, according to Al Jazeera.

As many experts note, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is just one cause of current food shortages, which have also been driven by the devastating effects of climate change and the Covid-19 pandemic. But there is wide agreement that reopening exports of Ukrainian grain will save lives across the globe.

The blockage revolves around two key issues: Russia has maintained a blockade of Ukraine’s Black Sea ports since the war began, and both Kyiv and Moscow have left mines in the water that would imperil any ships attempting to pass through the area. The new accord should take care of the first problem, but the second will be more complicated, as mine expert Herman Lammers told the New York Times. 

“It would take weeks to open up a route that would be safe for shipping to go in and out, for instance. Then it would take months to clear the whole area of mines so that it can be freely used again,” Lammers said. “But that’s mostly post-conflict that you clear the whole area.”

State Department spokesperson Ned Price commended the UN, Ukraine and Turkey for their role in the talks while making clear that the U.S. blames Russia for the grain blockage. “We welcome the announcement of this agreement in principle,” Price added, “but what we’re focusing on now is holding Russia accountable for implementing this agreement and for allowing Ukrainian grain to get to world markets.”

When asked if the U.S. played any part in the breakthrough, Price noted that Washington advised Turkish and UN officials but did not mention any direct role in negotiations. “We’ve been briefed by the UN at various stages. Our experts have compared notes, shared notes with their experts,” he said, adding that “the same goes with our Turkish allies and our Ukrainian partners.”

In other diplomatic news related to the war in Ukraine:

- The Los Angeles Timesreported that Putin blamed Ukraine for the lack of progress in talks to end the war, saying that “Kyiv’s authorities have no such desire.” The comment was likely made in reference to statements by Ukrainian negotiators that they would not entertain a new round of talks until Kyiv’s forces make progress on the battlefield. 

- Putin’s complaint is unlikely to garner much sympathy in light of recent remarks by  Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, who told state media Wednesday that Moscow’s war aims extend beyond the Donbas region, according to CNN. “It is far from being only DPR (Donetsk People’s Republic) and LPR (Luhansk People’s Republic), it is also Kherson Region, Zaporizhzhia Region and a number of other territories,” Lavrov said. 

- In the Atlantic, Former NATO chief Anders Fogh Rasmussen criticized French President Emmanuel Macron for his proposal that the West should offer Putin an “off-ramp” if it helps end the war. “It suggests that we are approaching a new world order where it’s not the rule of law that matters but the rule of the strongest,” Rasmussen said. “If Putin can get away with taking land from Ukraine, that’s horrendous—because what next?”

- Richard Gowan of the International Crisis Group argues in War on the Rocks that the UN  has been more effective on Ukraine than many think. “The organization has indeed acted as a platform for international public criticism of Russia, brought some aid to victims of the conflict, and helped keep a lid on some other crises that would otherwise be consuming the time of Western policymakers,” Gowan writes.

U.S. State Department news:
In a press briefing on Wednesday, Price responded to concerns that the West’s united front on Ukraine could be threatened by the political crisis in Italy, where Prime Minister Mario Draghi  has resigned over internal divisions in part related to the war. “This coalition of countries that defies any one geographic region has proven its resilience, and it has proven its strength time and again,” he said. “There have been many premature obituaries written for this incredible collection of countries in Europe and well beyond, dozens of countries that have come together to hold Russia to account, to support our Ukrainian partners, and to redouble our efforts to reinforce the rules-based international order.”


Analysis | Europe
ukraine war
Top Photo: Diplomacy Watch: Trump's 'gotta make a deal' on Ukraine
Diplomacy Watch: Trump's 'gotta make a deal' on Ukraine

Diplomacy Watch: Here comes Trump

Regions

Donald Trump’s nominee for U.S. secretary of state said this week that he wants the war between Ukraine and Russia to end.

“It is important for everyone to be realistic: there will have to be concessions made by the Russian Federation, but also by Ukrainians,” said Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) during his Senate confirmation hearing on Wednesday. “There is no way Russia takes all of Ukraine.”

keep readingShow less
Netanyahu , biden
Top photo credit: US President Joe Biden meets with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for a bilateral meeting in the Oval Office at the White House on July 25, 2024 in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Samuel Corum/Sipa USA)

Who should take credit for the ceasefire? Netanyahu.

QiOSK

It is an official: Israel and Hamas have agreed to a ceasefire.

It would appear to be based on the text already made available by the Associated Press, which is very much like the deal brokered by the Biden administration in May 2024. That agreement was never ratified by either side and was never implemented.

keep readingShow less
Joe Biden Gaza ceasefire
Top image credit: U.S. President Joe Biden, flanked by U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris and U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken, speaks after negotiators reached a phased deal for a ceasefire in Gaza between Israel and Hamas, during remarks at the White House in Washington, U.S., January 15, 2025. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein

Biden & Trump take credit for Gaza ceasefire

Middle East

The achievement of a Gaza hostage deal and temporary ceasefire ahead of Trump's inauguration demonstrates the power that the U.S. had all along. The Biden administration simply refused to use American leverage to push Netanyahu, despite U.S. officials’ assertions that they were “working tirelessly towards a ceasefire.”

In his remarks about the deal, and in his response to journalists afterwards, President Biden sought to take full credit. He pointed out that this was the deal he proposed in May, yet did not acknowledge that it was Trump’s willingness to pressure Israel to reach a ceasefire in time for his inauguration that actually achieved the deal, which Biden had failed to for months. "A diplomat briefed on the ceasefire negotiations between Israel and Hamas credited progress in the talks in part to the influence of President-elect Donald Trump, saying it was 'the first time there has been real pressure on the Israeli side to accept a deal’,” according to the Washington Post.

keep readingShow less

Trump transition

Latest

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.