Follow us on social

google cta
2021-03-25t000000z_1095822690_rc2him95eu6w_rtrmadp_3_iran-usa-senators-scaled

Hawkish senators make moves to take over Biden's Iran policy

Nuclear deal spoilers Bob Menendez and Lindsey Graham are at it again, introducing a bill experts say will undermine negotiations.

Analysis | Middle East
google cta
google cta

In June, Sen. Bob Menendez (D-N.J.), chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, addressed donors at the AIPAC New Jersey Spring Leadership Dinner and declared that President Biden should halt efforts to revive the Iran nuclear deal and instead pursue a new approach. As Jewish Insider reported, Menendez declared “in the absence of hearing a plan in a classified setting, then I intend to create… legislation that will ultimately dictate what a plan should be.”

Despite the Biden administration going out of its way to cater to the whims of Menendez, including rhetoric calling for a “longer and stronger” nuclear deal that led to costly delays in negotiations during Biden’s first months in office, Menendez has continued to undermine the administration’s efforts to restore the Iran nuclear deal. This was most apparent in February, when Menendez responded to forward progress in nuclear negotiations by declaring his opposition to restoring the JCPOA in a long-winded speech on the Senate floor, exacerbating doubts in Tehran about whether Biden could deliver on sanctions relief. Now, Menendez has followed through on his threat to “dictate” the terms of Biden’s Iran policy by introducing a new bill.

His latest legislation with Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), another dyed-in-the-wool Iran hawk, mandates that Biden detail a full strategy on Iran and establish a “task force” with a primary function of relaying intelligence on Iran’s nuclear program to Congress and the public every 120 days.

At first glance, the legislation could appear just duplicative and unnecessary. Much of the data the task force would forward to Congress is already publicly reported by the International Atomic Energy Agency every 90 days, while the IAEA has also reported major developments on Iran’s nuclear program in real time. The bill itself cites the IAEA’s own reports on Iran’s stockpile of 60 percent enriched uranium while mandating the task force relay this exact same information later in the bill. Moreover, setting aside the invaluable information provided by the IAEA, Sens. Menendez and Graham can and do routinely request and receive both classified and unclassified briefings on Iran from the State Department, White House, and intelligence officials. There’s no lack of information on Iran’s nuclear program, particularly if you are a U.S. senator.

However, there are plenty of indications that the legislation would not be used to enhance congressional and public knowledge, but to sabotage diplomatic efforts that can avert threats from Iran’s nuclear program. One such indication is that the task force would be required to report on “clandestine nuclear facilities, including nuclear facilities and activities discovered or reported by Israel or other allies or partners of the United States.”

Thus, the task force would not just report out a careful interagency assessment of intelligence on Iran’s nuclear program, but it would also be required to include information — including potentially raw intelligence — from parties that may have a strong interest in stoking U.S.-Iran conflict. Particularly given that the report would need to be submitted at least partially in unclassified form and on the State Department’s website, this requirement could open the door to both members of Congress — like Menendez and Graham — and outside groups beating the drums for war on the basis of cherry-picked and false intelligence.

Moreover, the requirement could complicate the IAEA’s efforts to monitor Iran’s nuclear program in real time. Tariq Rauf, the IAEA’s former nonproliferation policy chief, recognized the risk of this approach, telling Bloomberg “[a]dding intelligence assessments to the findings of the IAEA would serve to undermine the integrity of the agency’s reports as well as its independence.” Rauf continued, “The legislation runs the risk of damaging the international nuclear verification system by second guessing the IAEA, whose inspectors are the only ones that can carry out on-site intrusive inspections.”

Perhaps these concerns don’t rank highly to Menendez and Graham, given all they’ve done to tear apart an accord that rolled back Iran’s nuclear program and created unprecedented access for the IAEA, but it should concern other legislators who think seriously about the risks of an unchecked Iranian nuclear program.

Outside observers have also provided plenty of confirmation that the effort is not a serious one, but an effort to jam Biden. Behnam Ben Taleblu of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, the hub of efforts to sabotage Iran diplomacy, said “The bill represents an understanding that Congress is going to have a bigger role in Iran policy and craft what Iran policy looks like.”

Despite the fact that the bill requires the administration to send a “diplomatic strategy” to Congress, it somehow still fails to support negotiations with the most relevant actor in Iran. Instead, the administration is directed to engage with “partners and allies of the United States regarding the nuclear weapons and missile activities” of Iran. Such direction strongly hints that what Menendez and Graham are looking for is not a successful negotiation with Iran like the one Obama directed, but a doubling down on Trump’s failed maximum pressure or a bombing campaign that would be nothing short of a disaster for the United States and region as whole.

Biden has ceded too much ground to Menendez and his hawkish fellow-travelers on Iran. Biden failed to move swiftly to restore the Iran nuclear deal, refused to implement any humanitarian sanctions relief, adopted “longer and stronger” rhetoric that wasn’t feasible, and ruled out lifting the Foreign Terrorist Organization designation of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps that was put in place to tie his hands on Iran diplomacy.

Menendez should be happy, as he already got what he asked for. The problem is that Iran’s nuclear program is more advanced than ever. Now, Menendez thinks he deserves the keys to the car even though he suggested that Biden drive it into a ditch. It’s time for Biden to take charge of Iran diplomacy and follow through on his commitments in restoring the Iran nuclear deal. If he fails, and Menendez and his allies get the chance to dictate, they’ll push us head over heels into war.


Dear RS readers: It has been an extraordinary year and our editing team has been working overtime to make sure that we are covering the current conflicts with quality, fresh analysis that doesn’t cleave to the mainstream orthodoxy or take official Washington and the commentariat at face value. Our staff reporters, experts, and outside writers offer top-notch, independent work, daily. Please consider making a tax-exempt, year-end contribution to Responsible Statecraftso that we can continue this quality coverage — which you will find nowhere else — into 2026. Happy Holidays!

FILE PHOTO: Senators Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Bob Menendez (D-NJ) hold a news conference on the death of Saudi dissident Jamal Khashoggi and the humanitarian crisis in Yemen on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., December 12, 2018. REUTERS/Yuri Gripas/File Photo
google cta
Analysis | Middle East
New weapons to Taiwan: 'Overdue correction' or poorly timed move?
Taiwan's flag is lowered during a daily ceremony as China conducts "Justice Mission 2025" military drills around Taiwan, in Taipei, Taiwan, December 30, 2025. REUTERS/Ann Wang TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY

New weapons to Taiwan: 'Overdue correction' or poorly timed move?

Asia-Pacific

On December 17, while much of the nation was watching President Donald Trump’s primetime “year-in-review” address to the nation, the State Department made a big reveal of its own: the approval of an $11 billion arms package for Taiwan.

According to the announcement, the sale will facilitate “[Taipei's] continuing efforts to modernize its armed forces and to maintain a credible defensive capability.”

keep readingShow less
Listening to what regular Ukrainians are saying about the war
Top photo credit: Kharkiv, Ukraine, September 30, 2024 Funeral and burial of Captain Maksym Kudrin, the company commander of the 123rd separate battalion. (Shutterstock/Jose Hernandez Camera 51)

Listening to what regular Ukrainians are saying about the war

Europe

As negotiations accelerate toward a compromise settlement to end the Ukraine war, the voices of the Ukrainians living through the daily horrors have in many ways been suppressed by unending maximalist rhetoric from those far from the frontlines.

The original 28-point working draft that set out an estimation of a compromise between Russian and Ukrainian positions met a harsh response by those who have demanded no less than a complete Ukrainian victory and a decisive Russian defeat throughout this almost four-year-long war.

keep readingShow less
herese Kayikwamba Wagner Congo Trump White House
Top photo credit: US President Donald Trump speaks during a meeting ahead of peace signing ceremony with Democratic Republic of the Congo Foreign Minister Therese Kayikwamba Wagner (R) and Rwandan Foreign Minister Olivier Nduhungirehe (2nd-L) in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, USA on June 27, 2025. (Reuters)
On a roll: Trump to host 5 African leaders this week

6 stories that defined Trump’s approach to Africa in 2025

Africa

President Trump’s policy towards the African continent in 2025 was loaded with personal disagreements, peace negotiations, and efforts to improve economic exchange.

Through the ups and downs of Trump’s Africa policy, it became increasingly clear as the year wore on that contrary to observers’ early expectations, Trump’s team is indeed prioritizing Africa.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.