Follow us on social

google cta
Diplomacy Watch: Veteran diplomats question Blinken's 'do not engage' strategy

Diplomacy Watch: Veteran diplomats question Blinken's 'do not engage' strategy

Little was done to end the war in Ukraine at the G20, but talks to loosen Ukrainian grain exports from Russia’s blockade look promising.

Reporting | Europe
google cta
google cta

At the Group of 20 meetings in Bali last Friday, Retno Marsudi, the host nation’s foreign minister, urged the world’s leading economic powers to work towards ending the war in Ukraine, noting that “the ripple effects are being felt globally on food, on energy and physical space.”

“It is our responsibility to end the war sooner rather than later and settle our differences at the negotiating table, not at the battlefield,” she said.

But stark divisions between factions led by the United States and Europe on one side, and Russia and to some extent China on the other, meant that the proceedings concluded with no consensus on the matter. The G20 foreign ministers took no group photo as is customary and they issued no joint communique. Instead, the AP pointed out, “acrimony appeared pervasive, especially between Russia and Western participants.” 

Indeed, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken and his Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov did manage one accomplishment in hand before leaving Indonesia: Successfully avoiding each other. 

On that front, the Washington Post reported that, while some more junior U.S. officials have held talks with their Russian counterparts since the Russian invasion nearly five months ago, Blinken “has not held a single meeting or phone call with a senior Russian official throughout the conflict.” 

One reporter asked Blinken about this “do not engage” strategy on the sidelines of the G20 and wondered whether it’s “out of step with the international community,” which, the reporter added, “want[s] to see peace brokered in Ukraine.” 

Blinken said he’d be happy to talk but he sees no point. Based on meetings the Russians have had with intermediaries from other countries, he said, “we see no signs whatsoever that Russia at this moment in time is prepared to engage in meaningful diplomacy.”

But some veteran diplomats wondered whether such an approach is wise. “The first step is opening channels of communication where you can measure what your adversary is looking for,” former senior State Department official Tom Shannon told the Post. “You can’t know unless you try.” 

“If the United States isn’t present, it’s not a serious conversation in the mind of the Russians,” Jeremy Shapiro, another former Obama administration official, also told the Post. “That shouldn’t be a surprise: The United States provides the vast majority of assistance to Ukraine and is the leader of the Western coalition.”

In other diplomatic news relating to the Ukraine war this week: 

Russian and Ukrainian diplomats met in Istanbul this week to try to work out an agreement that would allow Ukrainian grain to pass the Russian blockaded sea ports in the Black Sea. While the negotiations ended with no concrete breakthrough, U.N. Secretary General Antonio Guterres called the talks an “important and substantive step …on the way to a comprehensive agreement.”

— In a separate push to get Ukrainian grain back on the market, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Russian President Vladimir Putin will meet in Tehran next week to discuss prospects for an agreement. Erdogan spoke on the phone this week on the grain export issue with both Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. A Turkish readout of the calls stated that “President Erdoğan noted that it was time for the United Nations to take action for the plan regarding the formation of secure corridors via the Black Sea for the grain export.”

— Negotiations are ongoing between U.S. officials at the State Department and their Russian and Ukrainian counterparts about the release of two American military veterans captured by Russian forces in northeast Ukraine. The Washington Post this week published audio of a recent phone call between one of the prisoners, U.S. Army veteran Alexander Drueke, and his mother. Drueke confirmed he is being held in solitary confinement and appeared “a little less strained” than in previous calls. 


google cta
Reporting | Europe
Did the US only attack Iran because of Israel?
Top image credit: President Donald J. Trump holds a joint news conference at the White House with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Feb. 4, 2025. (Shutterstock/ Joshua Sukoff)

Did the US only attack Iran because of Israel?

QiOSK

In the months that led up to the Iraq War, the Bush administration went to extraordinary lengths to convince the world of the need to oust Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. Leading officials laid out their case in public, sharing what they claimed was evidence that Iraq was moving rapidly toward the deployment of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. When U.S. tanks rolled across the border, everyone knew the justification: the U.S. was determined to thwart Iraq’s development of weapons of mass destruction, however fictitious that threat would later prove to be.

In the months that led up to the Iran War, the Trump administration took a different tack. President Trump spoke only occasionally of Iran, offering a smattering of justifications for growing U.S. tensions with the country. He claimed without evidence that Iran was rebuilding its nuclear program after the U.S.-Israeli attack last June and even developing missiles that could strike the United States. But he insisted that Tehran could make a deal with seven magic words: “we will never have a nuclear weapon.”

keep readingShow less
Iran says ‘no ship is allowed to pass’ Strait of Hormuz: Reports
Top image credit: A large oil tanker transits the Strait of Hormuz. (Shutterstock/ Clare Louise Jackson)

Iran says ‘no ship is allowed to pass’ Strait of Hormuz: Reports

QiOSK

Hours after the U.S. and Israel launched a campaign of airstrikes across Iran, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps is warning vessels in the Persian Gulf via radio that “no ship is allowed to pass the Strait of Hormuz,” according to a report from Reuters.

The news suggests that Iran is ready to pull out all the stops in its response to the U.S.-Israeli barrage, which President Donald Trump says is aimed at toppling the Iranian regime. A full shutdown of the Strait of Hormuz would cause an international crisis given that 20% of the world’s oil passes through the narrow channel. Financial analysts estimate that even one day of a full blockade could cause global oil prices to double from $66 per barrel to more than $120.

keep readingShow less
What Pakistan's 'open war' on Taliban in Afghanistan really means
Top image credit: FILE PHOTO: Afghan Taliban fighters patrol near the Afghanistan-Pakistan border in Spin Boldak, Kandahar Province, following exchanges of fire between Pakistani and Afghan forces in Afghanistan, October 15, 2025. REUTERS/Stringer

What Pakistan's 'open war' on Taliban in Afghanistan really means

QiOSK

Pakistan’s airstrikes on Kabul and Kandahar over the last 24 hours are nothing new. Islamabad has carried out strikes inside Afghanistan several times since the Taliban’s return to power. Pakistan claimed that the Afghan Taliban used drones to conduct strikes in Pakistan.

What distinguishes this latest episode is the rhetorical escalation, with Pakistani officials openly referring to the action as “open war.” While the language grabbed international headlines, it is best understood as part of a managed escalation designed to signal resolve without crossing red lines that would make de-escalation impossible.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.