Follow us on social

google cta
Screen-shot-2021-08-05-at-1.20.17-pm

GOP Senate candidate promotes border security technology made by his boss

Billionaire Peter Thiel has poured millions into the campaign of Blake Masters, who in turn appears to be boosting Thiel’s financial interests.

Reporting | North America
google cta
google cta

Last month, billionaire Peter Thiel contributed $10 million to a super PAC supporting the Senate candidacy of his employee, Blake Masters, in Arizona. At the time, Masters, who serves as chief operating officer of Thiel Capital — Thiel’s investment firm — and president of the Thiel foundation, seemed to launch his Senate run with a number of policy prescriptions that would potentially steer federal funding to Thiel’s investments in border security technology and defense contractors who stand to profit from a militarized competition with China.

Since then, Masters, despite his populist rhetoric of pushing back against “corporations that have gotten so big, they think they’re bigger than America,” is doubling down on militarization of the border that closely tracks with his boss and top campaign supporter’s investments in surveillance technologies.

Masters, speaking at an event on August 3 at the Pima County Republican Club, describes “day one legislation to fix the [border] wall,” saying:

I think we need to double or triple the size of the Border Patrol. And I also think we need to arm those guys with the technology they need. Very often it's just like you know two guys with a pickup truck and — God bless them — they have a huge territory, and they just have like a radio and a sidearm or something like that. We should be using drones. We should be using, you know, infrared beams. We should be getting — we have the technology. We can get them pickup trucks with heads-up, night-vision displays, so they can actually do their job around the clock in a much safer way.

Anduril Technologies, in which Thiel is an early investor, signed its first federal government contracts with the border patrol to put up autonomous surveillance towers incorporating, among other technologies, infrared sensors. Anduril is also developing small drones and, at the company’s formation, outlined a vision for a high tech border wall using many of the technologies described by Masters.

Thiel also founded Palantir Technologies, a $20 billion data-analytics firm with ongoing contracts with Immigration and Customs Enforcement  for technology that includes software used to support the Trump administration’s controversial detention, deportation, and family separation policies on the southern border.

While Masters’ campaign noticeably promotes federal spending on technologies that, coincidentally or not, are developed by companies linked to Thiel, Masters denied that his boss and campaign funder would have undue influence over him if he succeeds in unseating Democratic Arizona Senator Mark Kelly, in an interview with the New York Post

In that same interview, Masters faced questions about whether his high tech border strategy would ultimately steer taxpayer money to Thiel’s companies. 

“I’m familiar with those companies and bullish on them,” he told the New York Post in reference to Palantir and Anduril. “I’m open to whatever works.”


Photos: mark reinstein via shutterstock & Benjamin Chambers/The RepublicCent02 via Reuters
google cta
Reporting | North America
nuclear weapons
Top image credit: rawf8 via shutterstock.com

What will happen when there are no guardrails on nuclear weapons?

Global Crises

The New START Treaty — the last arms control agreement between the U.S. and Russia — is set to expire next week, unless President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin make a last minute decision to renew it. Letting the treaty expire would increase the risk of nuclear conflict and open the door to an accelerated nuclear arms race. A coalition of arms control and disarmament groups is pushing Congress and the president to pledge to continue to observe the New START limits on deployed, strategic nuclear weapons by the US and Russia.

New START matters. The treaty, which entered into force on February 5, 2011 after a successful effort by the Obama administration to win over enough Republican senators to achieve the required two-thirds majority to ratify the deal, capped deployed warheads to 1,550 for each side, and established verification procedures to ensure that both sides abided by the pact. New START was far from perfect, but it did put much needed guardrails on nuclear development that reduced the prospect of an all-out arms race.

keep readingShow less
Trump Hegseth Rubio
Top image credit: President Donald Trump, joined by Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Secretary of the Navy John Phelan, announces plans for a “Golden Fleet” of new U.S. Navy battleships, Monday, December 22, 2025, at the Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

Trump's realist defense strategy with interventionist asterisks

Washington Politics

The Trump administration has released its National Defense Strategy, a document that in many ways marks a sharp break from the interventionist orthodoxies of the past 35 years, but possesses clear militaristic impulses in its own right.

Rhetorically quite compatible with realism and restraint, the report envisages a more focused U.S. grand strategy, shedding force posture dominance in all major theaters for a more concentrated role in the Western Hemisphere and Indo-Pacific. At the same time however, it retains a rather status quo Republican view of the Middle East, painting Iran as an intransigent aggressor and Israel as a model ally. Its muscular approach to the Western Hemisphere also may lend itself to the very interventionism that the report ostensibly opposes.

keep readingShow less
Alternative vs. legacy media
Top photo credit: Gemini AI

Ding dong the legacy media and its slavish war reporting is dead

Media

In a major development that must be frustrating to an establishment trying to sell their policies to an increasingly skeptical public, the rising popularity of independent media has made it impossible to create broad consensus for corporate-compliant narratives, and to casually denigrate, or even censor, those who disagree.

It’s been a long road.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.