Follow us on social

google cta
Shutterstock_1641781519-2-scaled

What does GCC rapprochement mean for Jordan?

In addition to economic benefits, the incoming Biden administration might help boost Jordan’s regional status.

Analysis | Middle East
google cta
google cta

At the Gulf Corporation Council summit in AlUla, Saudi Arabia on January 5, several Persian Gulf states’ representatives signed an agreement to ease the rift with Qatar. The move came a day after Saudi Arabia agreed to reopen land, air, and sea links with Qatar after three-and-half years since the Gulf crisis began.

The Gulf Crisis has impacted the ties between the disputed countries on more than one level. Thus, relations between the Saudi-led bloc and Qatar are unlikely going back to the pre-2017 period overnight. But the recent rapprochement is undoubtedly a positive step in the direction of resolving the crisis. 

Keeping the same distance from all sides

Meanwhile, Jordan stands to benefit from the breakthrough. Amman downgraded its relations with Doha at the beginning of the Gulf Crisis due to pressure from the Riyadh-led bloc. Jordan also revoked the license of Al Jazeera TV channel.

Yet the Saudis were angry that Jordan has not severed ties to Qatar, which may have delayed Saudi investments and aid to the kingdom at a time when Jordan’s economy was in turmoil.

For instance, in 2017, the Saudi Jordanian Investment Fund (SJIF) was established by the Public Investment Fund of Saudi Arabia and 16 commercial and Islamic Jordanian banks. “SJIF seeks to invest in viable long-term projects, create a clear and sustainable socio-economic impact in Jordan, and align its objectives with the Public Investment Fund of Saudi Arabia’s strategic investment direction,” the fund’s website says.

However, billions of dollars in Saudi investments have been delayed since the SJIF was formed. Saudi Arabia also reportedly declined to renew a large aid package to the kingdom at the end of 2017.

In 2018, IMF-backed austerity measures led to widespread protests. The demonstrations resulted in the then-Prime Minister Hani Al Mulki resigning. Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and the UAE held a summit in Mecca and pledged $2.5 billion to Jordan. The package included a deposit in Jordan’s central bank, guarantees to the World Bank, annual budget support for five years, and development projects. While the Gulf states deposited over $1 billion in the Jordan’s central bank, little else materialized from the summit.

In contrast, just days after the Mecca summit, Qatar pledged to provide 10,000 jobs for Jordanians in Qatar, and invest $500 million in the kingdom.

The Jordanian government has been facing a budget deficit, youth unemployment, and poor economic growth. While these obstacles are not new, they have worsened in recent years due to, among many other factors, the influx of more refugees from war zones such as Syria. The Jordanian government estimates that nearly 1.4 million Syrians live in the kingdom. 

Although Jordan is keen to maintain its longstanding relations with the other GCC countries, that did not stop the kingdom from restoring ties with Qatar in 2019. Amman’s restoration of relations with Doha demonstrated Jordan's willingness to keep the same distance from all disputing sides. It also came as a reaffirmation that Amman would want to maintain an independent foreign policy. 

In February 2020, Qatar’s Emir, Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani visited Jordan and met King Abdullah II. According to a Royal Court statement, the two leaders examined economic and investment-related fields. They also discussed regional developments, mainly the Palestinian cause. The Emir issued directives to provide 10,000 jobs for Jordanians in Qatar, in addition to the 10,000 job opportunities that were announced in 2018.

Less pressure on Amman

The kingdom welcomed the AlUla summit outcome. Jordanian Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi said: “The ‘Al Ula Statement’ is a considerable achievement to heal the rift, end the Gulf crisis and resume brotherly ties to normal, which enhances Gulf solidarity and stability, for the best service of the ambitions of its peoples. The move also contributes to strengthening Arab solidarity and supporting efforts against common challenges.”

Curtis Ryan, professor of political science at Appalachian State University and author of “Jordan and the Arab Uprisings: Regime Survival and Politics Beyond the State,” told me that Jordan greeted the intra-GCC rapprochement with relief.

“The kingdom has tried to avoid picking a side, maintaining an awkward balancing act especially between Saudi Arabia and Qatar,” he said, adding, “but this rapprochement will put an end to that stress. Jordan saw all of this as an unfortunate distraction that prevented a united Arab front in the face of the various Trump and Kushner measures (such as moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem).”

Ryan also said that “for Jordan itself, a return to functional Saudi-Qatari relations and a stable GCC is more than welcome and offers a chance for increased Gulf aid and investment in the kingdom, as well as improved labor opportunities for Jordanians in the Gulf, at a time when the Jordanian economy is suffering mightily.”

Indeed, the Jordanian Ministry of Transport announced on January 12 the lifting of restrictions imposed on Jordanian trucks transiting to Saudi Arabia. In a press briefing, Transport Minister Marwan Khitan said that contacts are currently underway with Qatari authorities to grant Jordanian trucks and refrigerators visas to enter Qatar, according to Ammon news agency. Thus, the benefit appears to be both political and economic.

It’s also worth noting that the ambassadors of the GCC states to Jordan discussed advancing Jordanian-Gulf relations and boosting coordination and cooperation in various fields on January 20. The Saudi ambassador, Nayef Al Sudairy, said the GCC countries in general, and Saudi Arabia in particular, are “constantly” working to strengthen relations with Jordan.

The rapprochement also coincides with the inauguration of Joe Biden, with whom King Abdullah II appears to have strong personal ties which could benefit Jordan’s role as a regional player in at least the next four years.


Photo: Gevorg Ghazaryan via shutterstock.com
google cta
Analysis | Middle East
Haiti
Top photo credit: A man protests holding a Haitian flag while Haitian security forces guard the Prime Minister's office and the headquarters of the Transitional Presidential Council (CPT) in Port-au-Prince, Haiti, February 6, 2026. REUTERS/Egeder Pq Fildor

Further US intervention in Haiti would be worst Trump move of all

Global Crises

Early last week, U.S. warships and Coast Guard boats arrived off the coast of Port-au-Prince, as confirmed by the American Embassy in Haiti. On land in the nation’s capital, tensions were building as the mandate of Haiti’s Transitional Presidential Council neared expiration.

The mandate expired Feb. 7, leaving U.S.-backed Prime Minister Alix Didier Fils-Aimé in power. Experts believe the warships were a show of force from Washington to demonstrate that the U.S. was willing to impose its influence, encouraging the council to step down. It did.

keep readingShow less
US military Palau
Top photo credit: .S. Marines from 1st Marine Division attend Palau’s 25th annual boat race at the Japan-Palau Friendship Bridge, Sept. 29, 2019. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by 1st Lt Oscar R. Castro)

Palau (Shutterstock)

US working to expand control over Compact states in the Pacific

Washington Politics

The United States is quietly working to reassert its control over the compact states, three island states in the central Pacific Ocean.

Last month, witnesses at a congressional hearing revealed that the Trump administration is expanding military and intelligence operations in Palau, the Marshall Islands, and the Federated States of Micronesia. Witnesses told lawmakers that the three countries occupy an area critical to U.S. power projection and pivotal for geopolitical competition with China.

keep readingShow less
Ngo Dinh Diem vietnam coup assassination
Top photo credit: U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower and Secretary of State John Foster Dulles (from left) greet South Vietnamese President Ngo Dinh Diem at Washington National Airport. 05/08/1957 (US Air Force photo/public domain) and the cover of "Kennedy's Coup" by Jack Cheevers (Simon & Schuster)

'Kennedy's Coup' signaled regime change doom loop for US

Media

Reading a book in which you essentially follow bread crumbs to a seminal historical event, it’s easy to spot the neon signs signaling pending doom. There are plenty of “should have seen that coming!” and “what were they thinking?” moments as one glides through the months and years from a safe distance. That hindsight is absurdly comforting in a way, knowing there is an order to things, even failure.

But reading Jack Cheevers' brand new “Kennedy’s Coup: A White House Plot, a Saigon Murder, and America's Descent into Vietnam” just as the Trump administration is overthrowing President Nicolas Maduro in Venezuela is hardly comforting. Hindsight’s great if used correctly. But the zeal for regime change as a tool for advancing U.S. interests is a persistent little worm burrowed in the belly of American foreign policy, and no consequence — certainly not the Vietnam War, which killed more than 58,000 U.S. service members and millions of Vietnamese civilians before ending in failure for our side — is going to stop Washington from trying again, and again.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.