Follow us on social

Shutterstock_1286297938-scaled

Now is not the time to withhold aid to Yemen

The Trump administration refused to release aid to Northern Yemen back in March, but it must be released now to prevent a looming famine.

Analysis | Middle East

Last week, top U.N. officials warned the Security Council that Yemen is facing an unprecedented humanitarian crisis on multiple fronts and that aid operations are on the “verge of collapse.”

Not only has the conflict escalated, but the coronavirus is spreading unabated, causing exceptionally high levels of fatalities. Widespread famine looms as outside sources of income are squeezed. Yet in the midst of these life-threatening challenges, the Trump administration is refusing to release $73 million in congressionally-approved USAID humanitarian assistance to northern Yemen, suspended in response to aid obstruction by Houthi forces controlling the area. In light of these dire conditions, such a suspension is morally unsustainable and will only intensify the human suffering.

Since March 2015, Yemen has been facing the world’s worst humanitarian crisis, with 24 million Yemenis in need of humanitarian assistance, 15 million facing severe food insecurity, and more than 3.6 million displaced due to the ongoing conflict. An ongoing air, land, and sea blockade as well as frequent airstrikes by the U.S. backed Saudi-led coalition have greatly impeded the flow of humanitarian assistance and helped destroy half of the country’s healthcare facilities. UNICEF warns that if nothing changes, 2.4 million children will face acute malnutrition by the end of 2020.

The COVID-19 pandemic is particularly devastating in Yemen because 80 percent of Yemenis are believed to be immunocompromised as a result of lack of access to sufficient food, clean water, and basic healthcare. A direct consequence of this is that Yemen has a 27 percent COVID-19 mortality rate, the highest in the world.

Making matters worse, pandemic containment efforts around the world have resulted in a global recession that is directly impacting Yemenis’ already strained purchasing power. Remittances are a significant source of revenues for Yemen, with estimates as high as $10 billion annually. As Yemeni expatriates in neighboring Gulf countries take wage cuts, or worse yet, lose their sources of income altogether, their relatives in Yemen are forced to make do with even less.  Food has been put even further out of reach as prices rise and incomes fall.

The administration’s decision to suspend aid to Yemen also comes as international humanitarian operations run low on funding. In June, the U.N. convened a virtual donor conference to raise funding for urgently needed relief efforts in Yemen, but fell more than $1 billion short of the amount needed to continue aid operations through the year.

As Dr. Aisha Jumaan, chair of Yemen Relief and Reconstruction Foundation, explained, “This is the time to come together and save the Yemeni people from yet another outbreak. Without international aid, COVID-19 will kill many people. We know that famine and other disease have compromised the immunity of the populations there and the war has destroyed their health system.”

The administration cites Houthi harassment of relief workers and diversion of humanitarian aid as justification for the aid suspension. While such activity does make it difficult for NGOs to distribute assistance in accordance with humanitarian principles, a blanket suspension of aid to northern Yemen is an overreaction that will adversely impact 80 percent of those who live in Houthi-held territory. Other international donors have worked diplomatically through the U.N. to successfully address obstruction issues without resorting to unilateral suspensions. The pain of this suspension is being felt by innocent civilians, and not by Houthi officials.

The U.S. House of Representatives has repeatedly demonstrated its concern about the situation in Yemen, most recently by passing measures to ban the sale of U.S. weapons to Saudi Arabia and the UAE, prohibit logistical support for Saudi and Emirati coalition airstrikes against the Houthis, and require a report on U.S. complicity in the coalition’s ongoing commercial and humanitarian blockade. Moreover, Congress passed a bipartisan resolution last year that would have ended U.S. participation in the Saudi-led war on Yemen, but Trump vetoed it.

As early as March, key congressional leaders warned USAID and the State Department about the potential consequences of aid suspension, and in July, more than 110 civil society organizations signed a letter to Congress calling for the resumption of humanitarian aid. Now, with aid operations on the verge of collapse, the administration must act.  With the simple stroke of a pen, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo can help stop a preventable famine and ease the suffering millions of innocent civilians.


Child waits for food aid in Taiz, Yemen (Photo: anasalhajj / Shutterstock.com)
Analysis | Middle East
USS Carl Vinson
Top image credit: 250410-N-FS097-1573 U.S. CENTRAL COMMAND AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY (April 10, 2025) An F-35C Lightning II, attached to Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 97, launches from the flight deck of the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson (CVN 70) during flight operations in the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility. (Official U.S. Navy photo)

Deterrence or creep? US forces quietly surge back to Middle East

Middle East

Since October 7, 2023, the United States has quietly but significantly expanded its military presence across the Middle East, reversing the drawdown that followed its withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021.

U.S. troop numbers in the region have risen from approximately 34,000 to nearly 50,000 as of late 2024, a level not seen since the height of the anti-ISIS campaign, in addition to a rapid increase in naval and aerial deployments. This shift reflects a strategic recalibration that appears driven less by long-term planning than by an improvised response to perceived Iranian threats, instability in the Red Sea, and domestic political pressure to “do something” without committing to a full-scale conflict.

keep readingShow less
Donald Trump
Top image credit: President Donald Trump speaks to the media following the White House Easter Egg Roll in Washington, D.C., on April 21, 2025. President Trump speaks about Secretary of Defense Hegseth, the Pope's death, and the situation in Ukraine and Iran. (Photo by Andrew Leyden/NurPhoto) VIA REUTERS

Ukraine and Europe can't afford to refuse Trump's peace plan

Europe

Most of the peace plan for Ukraine now sketched out by the Trump administration is not new, is based on common sense, and has indeed already been tacitly accepted by Kyiv.

Ukrainian officials have acknowledged that its army has no chance in the foreseeable future of reconquering the territories now occupied by Russia. Vice President J.D. Vance’s statement that the U.S. plan would “freeze the territorial lines…close to where they are today” simply acknowledges an obvious fact.

keep readingShow less
Michael O'Hanlon, Jack Keane, Michele Flournoy
Top photo credit: Michael O’Hanlon (DoD Photo by U.S. Army Sgt. James K. McCann), Ret. General Jack Keane (White House photo) and Michele Flournoy (CNAS/Flickr)

Could a Blobby enclave be sowing chaos at DoD?

Military Industrial Complex

UPDATE 4/24, 5:15 PM: The Defense Policy Board website has been scrubbed, as reported by The Intercept. The list of DPB members can still be viewed on an archived version of the website.


Discussing alleged Pentagon leaks with Tucker Carlson on Monday, recently ousted DoD official and Iraq war veteran Dan Caldwell charged that there are a number of career staff in the Pentagon who oppose the current administration’s policies. He then took particular aim at the the Defense Policy Board as a potential source of ongoing leaks to the press.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.