Follow us on social

google cta
Shutterstock_1623221884-scaled

Don’t let the Saudis use coronavirus concerns to hide their crimes

Saudi Arabia is already fomenting one of the world's worst humanitarian crises — why are we asking them to help solve another?

Analysis | Middle East
google cta
google cta

Saudi Arabia has just offered to host a “Virtual” G20 summit, bringing the world’s leaders together to address the coronavirus pandemic. While the world absolutely needs much better international coordination in response to this catastrophic pandemic, Saudi Arabia's ruling family is one of the last governments we should want convening a conversation on solving any humanitarian crisis, let alone a crisis of this magnitude.

Saudi Arabia's ruling family has repeatedly demonstrated its opposition to the very principles that enable a successful response to a global pandemic. To successfully address a public health crisis, governments must embrace information transparency and a willingness to listen to independent voices who might challenge their preconceived notions. The Saudi dictatorship has consistently done the opposite, deploying brutal campaigns of internal repression and censorship to silence dissent.

But that's not the only problem. To make matters worse, Saudi Arabia's ruling family has actually increased the risk that the coronavirus will spread across the Middle East through its devastating blockades and bombardment of Yemeni society.

First, there is the question of access to information. Addressing a public health crisis effectively requires information transparency and a posture of receptivity to dissent. Saudi Arabia's dictatorship often does the opposite, violently suppressing any dissenting voices.

The assassination of Jamal Khashoggi was one horrifying example of this. Another is the ongoing persecution of Loujain al-Hathloul, a leading voice in the Saudi women’s freedom to drive campaign. Right now, the Saudi monarchy is prosecuting al-Hathloul in a sham trial after already torturing her during some two years of imprisonment.

Against this backdrop of repression, some Saudi voices turned to Twitter as a platform for anonymous free speech. In response, the Saudi monarchy paid spies inside Twitter to find and share information on thousands of users of the social media platform. Human rights advocates outside Saudi Arabia have since received reports of the jailing and brutal torture of those who the Saudi dictatorship believed were using Twitter to criticize the government.

Allowing the Saudi monarchy to convene a conversation of world leaders on the coronavirus pandemic would provide a false sheen of legitimacy for a government that is actively fostering a climate of repression and censorship both inside and outside its borders.

But the problem isn't just Saudi repression and censorship, it’s that the Saudi monarchy has actually pursued strategies that now risk an expansion of the coronavirus pandemic in the Middle East.

In its war with Houthi rebels, Saudi Arabia has repeatedly bombed and blockaded Yemeni civilians and civilian infrastructure, creating a humanitarian and public health crisis. In the words of the International Committee of the Red Cross, Yemen's health care systems have been "decimated."

One result: According to the World Health Organization, there have been over 1.3 million suspected cases of cholera in the country, leading to what became the world's largest cholera outbreak in 2017.

As the coronavirus pandemic moves across the globe, Yemenis lack the basic public health defenses necessary to manage the threat. And as we now know all too well, this pandemic respects no borders. Wherever it can be incubated is a potential jumping off point for the next round of global infections. By creating a humanitarian crisis in Yemen, the Saudi monarchy has made all of us less safe.

Given this track-record, why is Saudi Arabia even being allowed to pitch itself as a convener for the international response to a public health crisis? The answer is, in short, the Saudi lobby.

Through the lobbying and public relations firms on their payroll, the Saudis have done an extraordinary job of white-washing their record of human rights atrocities. Their foreign agents have repeatedly touted Saudi efforts to reduce civilian casualties in Yemen, only to have their talking points tragically belied by horrendous attacks on funerals and markets just days later. Within days of Khashoggi’s murder they were spending millions on public relations and lobbying firms to thwart reprisals for the heinous murder of a Washington Post journalist on foreign soil. Just this month, their foreign agents distributed propaganda touting “representation and engagement of women” at the G20, conveniently ignoring that female activists pushing for women’s rights in Saudi Arabia, like Loujain al-Hathloul, are still imprisoned there.

Today, the Saudi’s are once again trying to get Americans and the world to turn a blind-eye to their ongoing transgressions. But, the stakes are far too high to let an instigator of humanitarian crises lead the charge against the greatest crisis of the 21st century so far. While it’s clear that the world needs much greater international coordination to address the coronavirus pandemic, it’s just as clear Saudi Arabia’s dictatorship should not be allowed to use this moment as a propaganda victory to obscure their many crimes.


Dear RS readers: It has been an extraordinary year and our editing team has been working overtime to make sure that we are covering the current conflicts with quality, fresh analysis that doesn’t cleave to the mainstream orthodoxy or take official Washington and the commentariat at face value. Our staff reporters, experts, and outside writers offer top-notch, independent work, daily. Please consider making a tax-exempt, year-end contribution to Responsible Statecraftso that we can continue this quality coverage — which you will find nowhere else — into 2026. Happy Holidays!

Saudi Arabia's war on Yemen is fomenting a humanitarian crisis there, including water shortages throughout the country (Photo credit: akramalrasny / Shutterstock.com)
google cta
Analysis | Middle East
Von Der Leyen Zelensky
Top image credit: paparazzza / Shutterstock.com
The collapse of Europe's Ukraine policy has sparked a blame game

They are calling fast-track Ukraine EU bid 'nonsense.' So why dangle it?

Europe

Trying to accelerate Ukraine’s entry into the European Union makes sense as part of the U.S.-sponsored efforts to end the war with Russia. But there are two big obstacles to this happening by 2027: Ukraine isn’t ready, and Europe can’t afford it.

As part of ongoing talks to end the war in Ukraine, the Trump administration had advanced the idea that Ukraine be admitted into the European Union by 2027. On the surface, this appears a practical compromise, given Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s concession that Ukraine will drop its aspiration to join NATO.

keep readingShow less
World War II Normandy
Top photo credit: American soldiers march a group of German prisoners along a beachhead in Northern France after which they will be sent to England. June 6, 1944. (U.S. Army Signal Corps Photographic Files/public domain)

Marines know we don't kill unarmed survivors for a reason

Military Industrial Complex

As the Trump Administration continues to kill so-called Venezuelan "narco terrorists" through "non-international armed conflict" (whatever that means), it is clear it is doing so without Congressional authorization and in defiance of international law.

Perhaps worse, through these actions, the administration is demonstrating wanton disregard for centuries of Western battlefield precedent, customs, and traditions that righteously seek to preserve as many lives during war as possible.

keep readingShow less
Amanda Sloat
Top photo credit: Amanda Sloat, with Department of State, in 2015. (VOA photo/Wikimedia Commons)

Pranked Biden official exposes lie that Ukraine war was inevitable

Europe

When it comes to the Ukraine war, there have long been two realities. One is propagated by former Biden administration officials in speeches and media interviews, in which Russian President Vladimir Putin’s illegal invasion had nothing to do with NATO’s U.S.-led expansion into the now shattered country, there was nothing that could have been done to prevent what was an inevitable imperialist land-grab, and that negotiations once the war started to try to end the killing were not only impossible, but morally wrong.

Then there is the other, polar opposite reality that occasionally slips through when officials think few people are listening, and which was recently summed up by former Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for Europe at the National Security Council Amanda Sloat, in an interview with Russian pranksters whom she believed were aides to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.