Follow us on social

Shutterstock_1623221884-scaled

Don’t let the Saudis use coronavirus concerns to hide their crimes

Saudi Arabia is already fomenting one of the world's worst humanitarian crises — why are we asking them to help solve another?

Analysis | Middle East

Saudi Arabia has just offered to host a “Virtual” G20 summit, bringing the world’s leaders together to address the coronavirus pandemic. While the world absolutely needs much better international coordination in response to this catastrophic pandemic, Saudi Arabia's ruling family is one of the last governments we should want convening a conversation on solving any humanitarian crisis, let alone a crisis of this magnitude.

Saudi Arabia's ruling family has repeatedly demonstrated its opposition to the very principles that enable a successful response to a global pandemic. To successfully address a public health crisis, governments must embrace information transparency and a willingness to listen to independent voices who might challenge their preconceived notions. The Saudi dictatorship has consistently done the opposite, deploying brutal campaigns of internal repression and censorship to silence dissent.

But that's not the only problem. To make matters worse, Saudi Arabia's ruling family has actually increased the risk that the coronavirus will spread across the Middle East through its devastating blockades and bombardment of Yemeni society.

First, there is the question of access to information. Addressing a public health crisis effectively requires information transparency and a posture of receptivity to dissent. Saudi Arabia's dictatorship often does the opposite, violently suppressing any dissenting voices.

The assassination of Jamal Khashoggi was one horrifying example of this. Another is the ongoing persecution of Loujain al-Hathloul, a leading voice in the Saudi women’s freedom to drive campaign. Right now, the Saudi monarchy is prosecuting al-Hathloul in a sham trial after already torturing her during some two years of imprisonment.

Against this backdrop of repression, some Saudi voices turned to Twitter as a platform for anonymous free speech. In response, the Saudi monarchy paid spies inside Twitter to find and share information on thousands of users of the social media platform. Human rights advocates outside Saudi Arabia have since received reports of the jailing and brutal torture of those who the Saudi dictatorship believed were using Twitter to criticize the government.

Allowing the Saudi monarchy to convene a conversation of world leaders on the coronavirus pandemic would provide a false sheen of legitimacy for a government that is actively fostering a climate of repression and censorship both inside and outside its borders.

But the problem isn't just Saudi repression and censorship, it’s that the Saudi monarchy has actually pursued strategies that now risk an expansion of the coronavirus pandemic in the Middle East.

In its war with Houthi rebels, Saudi Arabia has repeatedly bombed and blockaded Yemeni civilians and civilian infrastructure, creating a humanitarian and public health crisis. In the words of the International Committee of the Red Cross, Yemen's health care systems have been "decimated."

One result: According to the World Health Organization, there have been over 1.3 million suspected cases of cholera in the country, leading to what became the world's largest cholera outbreak in 2017.

As the coronavirus pandemic moves across the globe, Yemenis lack the basic public health defenses necessary to manage the threat. And as we now know all too well, this pandemic respects no borders. Wherever it can be incubated is a potential jumping off point for the next round of global infections. By creating a humanitarian crisis in Yemen, the Saudi monarchy has made all of us less safe.

Given this track-record, why is Saudi Arabia even being allowed to pitch itself as a convener for the international response to a public health crisis? The answer is, in short, the Saudi lobby.

Through the lobbying and public relations firms on their payroll, the Saudis have done an extraordinary job of white-washing their record of human rights atrocities. Their foreign agents have repeatedly touted Saudi efforts to reduce civilian casualties in Yemen, only to have their talking points tragically belied by horrendous attacks on funerals and markets just days later. Within days of Khashoggi’s murder they were spending millions on public relations and lobbying firms to thwart reprisals for the heinous murder of a Washington Post journalist on foreign soil. Just this month, their foreign agents distributed propaganda touting “representation and engagement of women” at the G20, conveniently ignoring that female activists pushing for women’s rights in Saudi Arabia, like Loujain al-Hathloul, are still imprisoned there.

Today, the Saudi’s are once again trying to get Americans and the world to turn a blind-eye to their ongoing transgressions. But, the stakes are far too high to let an instigator of humanitarian crises lead the charge against the greatest crisis of the 21st century so far. While it’s clear that the world needs much greater international coordination to address the coronavirus pandemic, it’s just as clear Saudi Arabia’s dictatorship should not be allowed to use this moment as a propaganda victory to obscure their many crimes.


Saudi Arabia's war on Yemen is fomenting a humanitarian crisis there, including water shortages throughout the country (Photo credit: akramalrasny / Shutterstock.com)
Analysis | Middle East
Mike Waltz: Drop Ukraine draft age to 18
Top Photo: Incoming National Security Advisor Mike Waltz on ABC News on January 12, 2025

Mike Waltz: Drop Ukraine draft age to 18

QiOSK

Following a reported push from the Biden administration in late 2024, Mike Waltz - President-elect Donald Trump’s NSA pick - is now advocating publicly that Ukraine lower its draft age to 18, “Their draft age right now is 26 years old, not 18 ... They could generate hundreds of thousands of new soldiers," he told ABC This Week on Sunday.

Ukraine needs to "be all in for democracy," said Waltz. However, any push to lower the draft age is unpopular in Ukraine. Al Jazeera interviewed Ukrainians to gauge the popularity of the war, and raised the question of lowering the draft age, which had been suggested by Biden officials in December. A 20-year-old service member named Vladislav said in an interview that lowering the draft age would be a “bad idea.”

keep readingShow less
Zelensky, Trump, Putin
Top photo credit: Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky (Office of Ukraine President/Creative Commons); US President Donald Trump (Gabe Skidmore/Creative Commons) and Russian President Vladimir Putin (World Economic Forum/Creative Commons)

Trump may get Russia and Ukraine to the table. Then what?

Europe

Russia’s dismissive response to possible provisions of a Trump settlement plan floated in Western media underscores how difficult the path to peace in Ukraine will be. It also highlights one of the perils of an approach to diplomacy that has become all too common in Washington: proposing settlement terms in advance of negotiations rather than first using discreet discussions with adversaries and allies to gauge what might be possible.

To achieve an accord that Ukraine will embrace, Russia will respect, and Europe will support, Trump will have to revive a tradition of American statesmanship — balancing power and interests among capable rivals — that has been largely dormant since the Cold War ended, and U.S. foreign policy shifted its focus toward democratizing other nations and countering terrorism.

keep readingShow less
Tulsi Gabbard
Top photo credit: Former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, President-elect Trump’s nominee to be Director of National Intelligence, is seen in Russell building on Thursday, December 12, 2024. (Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call/Sipa USA)

Tulsi Gabbard vs. the War Party

Washington Politics

Not long after Donald Trump nominated Tulsi Gabbard to serve as his director of national intelligence (DNI), close to 100 former national security officials signed a letter objecting to her appointment, accusing her of lacking experience and having “sympathy for dictators like Vladimir Putin and [Bashar al-]Assad.”

Trump has now made many controversial foreign policy nominations that stand at odds with his vows to end foreign wars and prioritize peace and domestic problems — including some who are significantly less experienced than Gabbard — yet only the former Hawaiian Congresswoman has received this level of pushback from the national security establishment so far.

keep readingShow less

Trump transition

Latest

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.