Follow us on social

google cta
Plurality of Republicans say end US aid to Israel: poll

Plurality of Republicans say end US aid to Israel: poll

A new survey shows that the GOP base is tired of funding Israeli weapons

Reporting | Washington Politics
google cta
google cta

A plurality of Republicans oppose extending an agreement that would give $38 billion in U.S.-funded weapons to Israel over the next decade, according to a new poll from YouGov and the IMEU Policy Project.

While 35% of Republicans would renew the arrangement, 42% say they would rather see it lapse. Support for ripping up the deal is particularly high among Republicans between 18 and 44, with 53% of these respondents calling for an end to the aid packages.

The poll comes at a consequential moment. The Trump administration is deciding whether to extend America’s latest memorandum of understanding on military aid to Israel, which is due to expire in 2028. The results indicate that a clean extension of the deal could draw significant blowback on the right, particularly among younger Republicans.

YouGov and IMEU fielded the poll, which included a sample of 1,287 Republican voters, in mid-November.

Reports indicate that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu wants the next memorandum of understanding to last for 20 years rather than the typical 10. But the poll shows that this idea would be even less popular among Republicans, including older GOP members, with 40% of respondents over 45 saying that they would oppose such a deal.

This doesn’t necessarily mean the GOP base is suddenly turning against Israel on the whole. An increasing number of pro-Israel Republicans believe that continued U.S. aid is more trouble than it’s worth, in part because it gives powerful ammunition to Israel’s skeptics in Washington, who often rail against the use of American-funded weapons in alleged Israeli abuses.

The poll suggests that Republican voters are primarily concerned about who is paying for the weapons. Fifty-one percent of Republicans said they support selling arms to Israel, but that number drops to 38% when American taxpayers are footing the bill.

Support for providing weapons to Israel also correlated strongly with Fox News viewership. Among Fox viewers, 53% support sending more taxpayer-funded military aid to Israel. Among non-Fox viewers, only 23% favor sending additional taxpayer-funded aid, while 41% oppose it.

Despite the growing divisions on the right over Israel, Republicans broadly agreed on one thing: The U.S. should conduct independent investigations into the killings of American civilians by the Israeli military and Israeli settlers. Fifty-nine percent of respondents supported such an inquiry, which only 15% of respondents opposed, with minimal variation across age groups.


Top image credti: Runawayphill via shutterstock.com
google cta
Reporting | Washington Politics
Us-army-soldiers
Top photo credit: U.S. Army Soldiers, from the 173rd Airborne Brigade Combat Team depart for Afghanistan from Italy on Feb. 25, 2005. (U.S. Air Force Photo by Staff Sgt. Bethann Caporaletti)

Could the US win a war with a near-peer adversary today?

Military Industrial Complex

“One should never assert a power that he cannot exert,” said British statesman and wordsmith Winston Churchill. My hometown football coach expressed a similar thought: “The man with an alligator mouth and a hummingbird ass” would get more than his share of whippings.

The U.S. military today has a hummingbird’s ass. Despite decades of sky-high military spending, our force is incapable of defeating a peer or near-peer adversary in today’s complex, dangerous world. If we continue on our alligator-mouth-sized trajectory, the consequences will be catastrophic.

keep readingShow less
G7 Summit
Top photo credit: May 21, 2023, Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan: (From R to L) Comoros' President Azali Assoumani, World Trade Organization (WTO) Director-General Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the G7 summit in Hiroshima, Japan. (Credit Image: © POOL via ZUMA Press Wire)

Middle Powers are setting the table so they won't be 'on the menu'

Asia-Pacific

The global order was already fragmenting before Donald Trump returned to the White House. But the upended “rules” of global economic and foreign policies have now reached a point of no return.

What has changed is not direction, but speed. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney’s remarks in Davos last month — “Middle powers must act together, because if we’re not at the table, we’re on the menu” — captured the consequences of not acting quickly. And Carney is not alone in those fears.

keep readingShow less
Vice President JD Vance Azerbaijan Armenia
U.S. Vice President JD Vance gets out of a car before boarding Air Force Two upon departure for Azerbaijan, at Zvartnots International Airport in Yerevan, Armenia, February 10, 2026. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/Pool

VP Vance’s timely TRIPP to the South Caucasus

Washington Politics

Vice President JD Vance’s regional tour to Armenia and Azerbaijan this week — the highest level visit by an American official to the South Caucasus since Vice President Joe Biden went to Georgia in 2009 — demonstrates that Washington is not ignoring Yerevan and Baku and is taking an active role in their normalization process.

Vance’s stop in Armenia included an announcement that Yerevan has procured $11 million in U.S. defense systems — a first — in particular Shield AI’s V-BAT, an ISR unmanned aircraft system. It was also announced that the second stage of a groundbreaking AI supercomputer project led by Firebird, a U.S.-based AI cloud and infrastructure company, would commence after having secured American licensing for the sale and delivery of an additional 41,000 NVIDIA GB300 graphics processing units.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.