Follow us on social

Ukrainian gas pipes

Could a Ukrainian pipeline attack thrust Europe into a gas war?

Energy insecurity in Europe is growing again as winter comes and as war sees no end

Analysis | QiOSK

UPDATE 1/11 9:45 AM: Ukraine has rejected allegations of involvement in the attempted attack since this article’s publication, but media reporting links Ukrainian agents to one. Russia has also subsequently accused the United States of involvement in the pipeline infrastructure attack.

As war in Ukraine intensifies, so is an increasingly tenuous fight over energy security in the region.

Russia has now accused Ukraine of attacking infrastructure belonging to the TurkStream natural gas pipeline, which runs from Russia to Turkey and is a critical energy source for central Europe, with drones. Ukraine has not responded to the allegation.

Critically, now that Ukraine has stopped transiting Russian gas this year, TurkStream, launched in 2020, is one of the only channels for Russian gas flow into Europe. Indeed, the TurkStream pipeline compressor station only suffered minor damage from a downed drone, but official responses to the incident showcase its high stakes.

Russian Spokesperson Dmitry Peskov described the alleged attack as “energy terrorism,” and Hungarian FM Péter Szijjártó wrote on Facebook that it should be deemed an assault on the sovereignty of countries receiving energy through the pipeline.

In November, Russia’s Federal Security Service (FSB) claimed that it stopped Ukrainian forces from sabotaging the unfinished South Stream gas pipeline. Previously, Europe suffered a energy security hit with the Nord Stream pipeline attack in summer 2022 severing a then-new and substantive link to Russian gas. European investigators have yet to officially determine who did it (though probes have led in Ukraine's direction); what is clear is that the U.S. has benefited from Europe's subsequent increased reliance on American liquified natural gas imports.

Ukrainian President Zelensky has described his recent gas transit halt as “one of Moscow’s greatest defeats.” But while the economic impacts of the Russian gas transit block remain to be seen, Russia’s economy has remained relatively unscathed by other wartime measures, including sanctions.

Instead, European nations that have already sacrificed much of their energy security appear positioned to suffer most from attacks and stoppages. The war’s onset almost three years ago complicated European energy access and jolted energy prices, with European civilians told in fall 2022 to prepare for an energy crisis, including possible electric and gas shortages, that winter.

Worst fears were averted then; Europe may not be so lucky now. As an example, Moldovans, previously heavily reliant on Russian gas access now rescinded by Kyiv, are now grappling with frequent electric outages, while Transnistria, a largely unrecognized breakaway state between Moldova and Ukraine, even says it may run out of energy in three weeks.

While the EU claims it’s prepared for the now-effective gas transit halt, some of its leaders have grown tired of the constant energy instability imposed by the war, and especially by Ukraine’s role in fostering it. Notably, Hungarian FM Szijjártó had threatened last week to block Ukrainian EU ascension over its recent gas transit halt; Slovakian President Robert Fico in turn threatened to stop exporting electricity to Ukraine.

Altogether, the alleged pipeline attack, in tandem with previous and ongoing energy debacles, signals not only prospects for further conflict escalation, but also the intensification of a possibly gruesome fight over energy resources on the extended European continent. As long as European leaders prioritize war over a negotiated settlement, their civilians seem likely to suffer for it.


Top image credit: Pipes and valves are pictured at a Ukrainian gas compressor station in the village of Boyarka (Reuters)
Analysis | QiOSK
The absolute wrong way to deploy US military on the border
Top photo credit: U.S. Marines with 7th Engineer Support Battalion, Special Purpose Marine Air-Ground Task Force 7, place concertina wire at the Otay Mesa Port of Entry in California on Nov. 11, 2018. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Staff Sgt. Rubin J. Tan)

The absolute wrong way to deploy US military on the border

North America

“Guys and gals of my generation have spent decades in foreign countries guarding other people's borders. It's about time we secure our own,” Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said during his first trip to the southern border earlier this month. “This needs to be and will be a focus of this department,” he reiterated at a Pentagon town hall days later.

Most servicemembers deploying to the southern border today never fought in the post-9/11 wars, but Hegseth is right that their commanders and civilian bosses have plenty of experience to draw on from two decades spent “securing” and “stabilizing” Iraq and Afghanistan.

keep readingShow less
Volodymyr Zelenskiy Donald Trump
Top image credit: Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump and Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskiy meet at Trump Tower in New York City, U.S., September 27, 2024. REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton/File Photo

The steep but worthy price of minerals for peace in Ukraine

Europe

Ukraine’s President Volodomyr Zelensky has agreed to hand over to the U.S. $500 billion worth of his country’s rare earth minerals. On the back of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s comments ruling out NATO membership for Ukraine, this looks like a dreadful deal on the surface. But it may be the best one available.

During his visit to Kyiv on February 12, Treasury Secretary Steve Bessent spoke to the press, beside Zelensky, about a proposed agreement on U.S. access to rare earths. It was a day, in fact, of geopolitical earthquakes in Europe. At a NATO Ukraine Contact Group meeting in Brussels, Hegseth was bluntly ruling out NATO membership for Ukraine or a return to its pre-2014 borders. The latter may be an elegant form of words suggesting scope to negotiate on border changes since 2022.

keep readingShow less
Munich Dispatch: Gaza issue banished to the sidelines this year
Top photo credit: Ursula von der Leyen speaks to the Munich Security Conference, 2/15/25 (MSC/Lennart Preiss)

Munich Dispatch: Gaza issue banished to the sidelines this year

Europe

MUNICH, GERMANY — Last year, the Munich Security Conference was dominated by the wars in Ukraine and Gaza. This time around, the Gaza War has remained a notable absence in Munich, at least on the confab’s main stage.

This was confirmed on Sunday, the last day of the conference, which was light on headlines amid the snowy Munich outside. The big news story Sunday didn't even originate from the conference, but in reports suggesting U.S. and Russian officials will meet in Saudi Arabia next week for talks to end the Ukraine War without the participation of Ukraine or other European countries.

keep readingShow less

Trump transition

Latest

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.