Follow us on social

Thomas Massie Ro Khanna Iran

House joins Senate in push against war with Iran

Bipartisan group tells Trump: no war without Congressional approval

Reporting | QiOSK

A bipartisan group of House lawmakers wants to limit President Trump’s ability to go to war with Iran.

Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky) introduced a war powers resolution on Tuesday, which, if passed, would prohibit U.S. involvement in the ongoing war between Iran and Israel.

“This is not our war. But if it were, Congress must decide such matters according to our Constitution,” Massie posted on social media on Monday, previewing his intention to introduce the measure. He added, “I invite all members of Congress to cosponsor this resolution.”

Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif) almost immediately signaled his intention to co-sponsor. “No war in Iran. It’s time for every member to go on record. Are you with the neocons who led us into Iraq, or do you stand with the American people?” Khanna replied.

Other House members have since expressed their support for the Massie-Khanna resolution. “I look forward to supporting this War Powers Resolution. The American people aren't falling for it again,” said Rep. Rashid Tlaib (D-Mich.).

The bill will be privileged, meaning that House leadership can’t torpedo it before it reaches the House floor for a vote, and must be voted on within 15 calendar days.

At least 14 other representatives have signed on as cosponsors so far.

This coincides with a war powers resolution from Sen. Kaine (D-Va.) and a bill to prohibit the funding of offensive military measures against Iran from Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), and Chris Van Hollen (D–Md.).

For his part, President Trump hasn’t presented a consistent message on the topic. Back in May, the president strongly indicated that he was ready to make a deal with Iran. Additionally, the United States and Iran were set to partake in another round of nuclear negotiations in Oman just before Israel began its bombardment of Iran.

However, Trump posted on Monday, “Simply stated, IRAN CANNOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON. I said it over and over again! Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran!”

This weekend, a meeting between U.S. and Iranian officials is under consideration, but Trump commented, “I’m not too much in the mood to negotiate.”

Iran and Israel are still trading missile fire five days into the conflict, both sides claiming hits on civilian and industrial targets. It seems as though the United States did not directly participate in the initial round of attacks, but has involved itself through blocking Iranian missiles, providing intelligence, and even helping Israel gain “complete and total control of the skies over Iran,” according to Trump.


Top photo credit: Rep. Tom Massie (R) (Gage Skidmore/Flickr); Rep. Ro Khanna (D) (Jewish Democratic Council of America/Creative Commons)
Reporting | QiOSK
Trump ASEAN
Top photo credit: U.S. President Donald Trump looks at Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., next to Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim when posing for a family photo with leaders at the ASEAN Summit in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, October 26, 2025. Vincent Thian/Pool via REUTERS

‘America First’ meets ‘ASEAN Way’ in Kuala Lumpur

Asia-Pacific

The 2025 ASEAN and East Asia Summits in Kuala Lumpur beginning today are set to be consequential multilateral gatherings — defining not only ASEAN’s internal cohesion but also the shape of U.S.–China relations in the Indo-Pacific.

President Donald Trump’s participation will be the first by a U.S. president in an ASEAN-led summit since 2022. President Biden skipped the last two such summits in 2023 and 2024, sending then-Vice President Harris instead.

keep readingShow less
iran, china, russia
Top photo credit: Top image credit: Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov and and Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi shake hands as Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Ma Zhaoxu looks on during their meet with reporters after their meeting at Diaoyutai State Guest House on March 14, 2025 in Beijing, China. Lintao Zhang/Pool via REUTERS

'Annulled'! Russia won't abide snapback sanctions on Iran

Middle East

“A raider attack on the U.N. Security Council.” This was the explosive accusation leveled by Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov this week. His target was the U.N. Secretariat and Western powers, whom he blamed for what Russia sees as an illegitimate attempt to restore the nuclear-related international sanctions on Iran.

Beyond the fiery rhetoric, Ryabkov’s statement contained a message: Russia, he said, now considers all pre-2015 U.N. sanctions on Iran, snapped back by the European signatories of the 2015 nuclear deal (JCPOA) — the United Kingdom, France, Germany — “annulled.” Moscow will deepen its military-technical cooperation with Tehran accordingly, according to Ryabkov.

This is more than a diplomatic spat; it is the formal announcement of a split in international legal reality. The world’s major powers are now operating under two irreconcilable interpretations of international law. On one side, the United States, the United Kingdom, France, and Germany assert that the sanctions snapback mechanism of the JCPOA was legitimately triggered for Iran’s alleged violations. On the other, Iran, Russia, and China reject this as an illegitimate procedural act.

This schism was not inevitable, and its origin reveals a profound incongruence. The Western powers that most frequently appeal to the sanctity of the "rules-based international order" and international law have, in this instance, taken an action whose effects fundamentally undermine it. By pushing through a legal maneuver that a significant part of the Security Council considers illegitimate, they have ushered the world into a new and more dangerous state. The predictable, if imperfect, framework of universally recognized Security Council decisions is being replaced by a system where legal facts are determined by political interests espoused by competing power blocs.

This rupture followed a deliberate Western choice to reject compromises in a stand-off with Iran. While Iran was in a technical violation of the provisions of the JCPOA — by, notably, amassing a stockpile of highly enriched uranium (up to 60% as opposed to the 3.67% for a civilian use permissible under the JCPOA), there was a chance to avert the crisis. In the critical weeks leading to the snapback, Iran had signaled concessions in talks with the International Atomic Energy Agency in Cairo, in terms of renewing cooperation with the U.N. nuclear watchdog’s inspectors.

keep readingShow less
On Ukraine and Venezuela, Trump needs to dump the sycophants
Top Photo Credit: (Official White House Photo by Molly Riley)

On Ukraine and Venezuela, Trump needs to dump the sycophants

Europe

While diplomats labored to produce the Dayton Accords in 1995, then-Secretary of Defense Bill Perry advised, “No agreement is better than a bad agreement.” Given that Washington’s allies in London, Paris, Berlin and Warsaw are opposed to any outcome that might end the war in Ukraine, no agreement may be preferable. But for President Trump, there is no point in equating the illusion of peace in Ukraine with a meaningless ceasefire that settles nothing.

Today, Ukraine is mired in corruption, starting at the very highest levels of the administration in Kyiv. Sending $175 billion of borrowed money there "for however long it takes" has turned out to be worse than reckless. The U.S. national sovereign debt is surging to nearly $38 trillion and rising by $425 billion with each passing month. President Trump needs to turn his attention away from funding Joe Biden’s wars and instead focus on the faltering American economy.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.