Follow us on social

google cta
Trump designates 3 branches of Muslim Brotherhood as terror groups

Trump designates 3 branches of Muslim Brotherhood as terror groups

The move will send shockwaves across the Middle East, where the organization has deep roots

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

The Trump administration designated several branches of the Muslim Brotherhood as terrorist organizations in a move that will send shockwaves across the Middle East.

“The United States will use all available tools to deprive these Muslim Brotherhood chapters of the resources to engage in or support terrorism,” said Secretary of State Marco Rubio in a statement.

The decision comes just a month after President Trump instructed the State Department to consider issuing designations against Muslim Brotherhood branches in Jordan, Egypt and Lebanon. The policy appears tailored to slow down calls on the right to designate the entire Muslim Brotherhood as a terror group — a move that national security experts say would fuel extremism among moderate members of the group while diverting resources away from dealing with more violent groups, like al-Qaida or ISIS.

The move drew praise from hawkish analysts on the right. Mariam Wahba of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies called Trump’s decision “the most robust and consequential effort to tackle the growing threat posed by the world's largest and most potent Islamist organization.” The Institute for the Study of Global Antisemitism and Policy lauded the move and promised to “continue to brief policymakers” on its research about the organization and “on policy options for addressing the Muslim Brotherhood's long-term strategy.”

FDD and ISGAP played a crucial role in advancing the push to designate the Muslim Brotherhood, alongside officials and lobbyists representing Israel and the UAE, as RS reported last month.

The policy shift draws distinctions between different branches of the organization. The U.S. now considers the Lebanese Muslim Brotherhood a foreign terrorist organization, meaning that its backers can be criminally prosecuted if they provide “material support” to the group. (The administration has accused Lebanon’s Muslim Brotherhood of firing rockets at Israel in recent years.) Trump used a slightly less restrictive designation for the Egyptian and Jordanian Muslim Brotherhood affiliates, naming them as “specially designated global terrorists,” a move that cuts off their members from the global banking system.

The impact of the designation will largely come down to how aggressively the Trump administration enforces the policy. The Muslim Brotherhood refers to a loose umbrella of Islamist groups inspired by the teachings of Islamic scholar Hassan al-Banna, who founded the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood in 1928. Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated groups have followed diverse paths in the ensuing century, with some forming moderate political parties, like in Tunisia, while others took up armed struggle, like Hamas. But many of them have maintained some form of contact with other Muslim Brotherhood groups — a fact that could now expose them to serious legal liability.

The decision will complicate U.S. relations with some of its allies in the Middle East, some of which are active supporters of the Muslim Brotherhood, including Qatar and Turkey. “For other governments where the brotherhood is tolerated, it would be a thorn in bilateral relations,” Nathan Brown, a professor of political science at George Washington University, told AP News.

Critics also say the move could bolster efforts by authoritarian governments to crack down on political opposition parties. Egypt banned its local Muslim Brotherhood branch after a military junta deposed the country’s democratically elected Islamist president in a bloody coup in 2013. Jordan, for its part, banned a Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated political party in 2025 after it won roughly a third of seats in the Jordanian House of Representatives in 2024. As Raed Jarrar of DAWN told RS last month, “it's a free gift that authoritarian regimes would use to stifle freedom of expression and political organizing in the Middle East and North Africa.”


Top photo credit: President Donald Trump signs two executive orders in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC on Thursday, January 30, 2025. The first order formally commissioned Christopher Rocheleau as deputy administrator of the FAA. The second ordered an immediate assessment of aviation safety. Photo by Bonnie Cash/Pool/Sipa USA
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
nuclear weapons
Top image credit: rawf8 via shutterstock.com

What will happen when there are no guardrails on nuclear weapons?

Global Crises

The New START Treaty — the last arms control agreement between the U.S. and Russia — is set to expire next week, unless President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin make a last minute decision to renew it. Letting the treaty expire would increase the risk of nuclear conflict and open the door to an accelerated nuclear arms race. A coalition of arms control and disarmament groups is pushing Congress and the president to pledge to continue to observe the New START limits on deployed, strategic nuclear weapons by the US and Russia.

New START matters. The treaty, which entered into force on February 5, 2011 after a successful effort by the Obama administration to win over enough Republican senators to achieve the required two-thirds majority to ratify the deal, capped deployed warheads to 1,550 for each side, and established verification procedures to ensure that both sides abided by the pact. New START was far from perfect, but it did put much needed guardrails on nuclear development that reduced the prospect of an all-out arms race.

keep readingShow less
Trump Hegseth Rubio
Top image credit: President Donald Trump, joined by Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Secretary of the Navy John Phelan, announces plans for a “Golden Fleet” of new U.S. Navy battleships, Monday, December 22, 2025, at the Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

Trump's realist defense strategy with interventionist asterisks

Washington Politics

The Trump administration has released its National Defense Strategy, a document that in many ways marks a sharp break from the interventionist orthodoxies of the past 35 years, but possesses clear militaristic impulses in its own right.

Rhetorically quite compatible with realism and restraint, the report envisages a more focused U.S. grand strategy, shedding force posture dominance in all major theaters for a more concentrated role in the Western Hemisphere and Indo-Pacific. At the same time however, it retains a rather status quo Republican view of the Middle East, painting Iran as an intransigent aggressor and Israel as a model ally. Its muscular approach to the Western Hemisphere also may lend itself to the very interventionism that the report ostensibly opposes.

keep readingShow less
Alternative vs. legacy media
Top photo credit: Gemini AI

Ding dong the legacy media and its slavish war reporting is dead

Media

In a major development that must be frustrating to an establishment trying to sell their policies to an increasingly skeptical public, the rising popularity of independent media has made it impossible to create broad consensus for corporate-compliant narratives, and to casually denigrate, or even censor, those who disagree.

It’s been a long road.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.