Follow us on social

Kash Patel

He took Qatar’s money, now Kash Patel handling their FBI files?

Trump's top cop was working for Doha until the election. He just obtained a waiver to deal with a case that landed on his desk.

Reporting | Washington Politics

FBI Director Kash Patel promised that he wouldn’t touch any work related to the country of Qatar — until very recently, a lucrative client of his. Now, only a few months into the job, he’s had a change of heart and is already handling official FBI business related to the Gulf country.

After his confirmation hearing, Patel revealed that he worked as a consultant for the Embassy of Qatar until November. Dylan Hedtler-Gaudette, Acting Vice President of Policy & Government Affairs at Project on Government Oversight, explained to RS that federal regulations stipulate that executive branch employees should recuse themselves on issues related to their former employers for a period of one year.

However, employees can avoid this requirement by simply obtaining a waiver — or, as Hedtler-Gaudette put it, “activating the escape hatch.”

According to the new disclosure filing, Patel received this waiver from his agency’s ethics officer for a particular matter related to Qatar on March 4. The new disclosure does not specify what work or case Patel’s waiver is for — but if official FBI business involving Qatar is landing on the Director’s desk and it’s worth asking for a waiver over, it’s a good sign the work carries some weight.

In his ethics disclosure from before his confirmation hearing, Patel pledged to avoid actual and apparent conflicts of interests; “I will not participate personally and substantially in any particular matter involving specific parties in which I know a former client of mine is a party or represents a party for a period of one year after I last provided service to that client or until the client satisfies any outstanding bill, whichever is later, unless I am first authorized to participate.”

It turns out those last seven words did most of the heavylifting.

“This waiver should never have been granted,” Craig Holman, Government Affairs Lobbyist for Public Citizen, told RS. “There is no reason why Patel has to address whatever specific issue this is relating to Qatar when he can just delegate it to someone else in the FBI.”

Patel’s consulting business, Trishul LLC, earned a neat $2.1 million according to his financial disclosure. The Embassy of Qatar is listed as one of nine clients, though it does not provide a breakdown as to how much Patel received from each client. Other clients include a Kremlin-connected Russian filmmaker and the Chinese e-commerce platform Shein.

Patel first began working for Qatar shortly after leaving the Trump administration, where his last post was as chief of staff to the secretary of defense. A source with familiarity of his work explained to RS that Patel signed a contract to advise Qatar on security issues ahead of the World Cup. When the World Cup ended, Patel pivoted to advising the Qatar Embassy on counterterrorism issues and election monitoring, even identifying potential personnel in a future Trump administration.

Patel himself has not released a statement explaining the nature of his work for the Qatari Embassy, leaving some to wonder if he should have registered under the Foreign Agents Registration Act. “Based on everything I have seen, it seems like he probably should have registered as a foreign agent,” explained Hedtler-Gaudette. “If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it probably was a foreign agent,” he added.

In February, Attorney General Pam Bondi — herself a former lobbyist for Qatar — released a memo stating that FARA would only be enforced in cases of “traditional espionage.”

The FBI investigates everything from terrorism to public corruption, including a number of probes which involve foreign governments, leaving no shortage of possibilities of what the waiver could be for. Holman explained that if and when Qatar’s name does pop up in the FBI building again, Patel is likely to seek another waiver. “And, it’s likely to be granted.”

The FBI is also responsible for carrying out investigations into foreign influence; in January, Bob Menendez was sentenced to 11 years in prison for bribery and foreign agent charges. As part of that case, Menendez accepted gold and F1 tickets, among other gifts, in exchange for using his influence to help a New Jersey real estate developer obtain millions of dollars from a Qatari investment fund. On the other hand, Qatar has also been a key partner in negotiating the release of hostages and a ceasefire in Gaza in which security agencies were part of many of the sensitive talks they had — without the specifics of what the waiver for it's impossible to say.

But all of this begs the question — what did Patel seek a waiver for exactly?"


Top photo credit: FBI Director Kash Patel (Maxim Elramsisy/Shutterstock)
Reporting | Washington Politics
US Marines
Top image credit: U.S. Marines with Force Reconnaissance Platoon, Maritime Raid Force, 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, prepare to clear a room during a limited scale raid exercise at Sam Hill Airfield, Queensland, Australia, June 21, 2025. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. Alora Finigan)

Cartels are bad but they're not 'terrorists.' This is mission creep.

Military Industrial Complex

There is a dangerous pattern on display by the Trump administration. The president and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth seem to hold the threat and use of military force as their go-to method of solving America’s problems and asserting state power.

The president’s reported authorization for the Pentagon to use U.S. military warfighting capacity to combat drug cartels — a domain that should remain within the realm of law enforcement — represents a significant escalation. This presents a concerning evolution and has serious implications for civil liberties — especially given the administration’s parallel moves with the deployment of troops to the southern border, the use of federal forces to quell protests in California, and the recent deployment of armed National Guard to the streets of our nation’s capital.

keep readingShow less
Howard Lutnick
Top photo credit: Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on CNBC, 8/26/25 (CNBC screengrab)

Is nationalizing the defense industry such a bad idea?

Military Industrial Complex

The U.S. arms industry is highly consolidated, specialized, and dependent on government contracts. Indeed, the largest U.S. military contractors are already effectively extensions of the state — and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is right to point that out.

His suggestion in a recent media appearance to partially nationalize the likes of Lockheed Martin is hardly novel. The economist John Kenneth Galbraith argued for the nationalization of the largest military contractors in 1969. More recently, various academics and policy analysts have advocated for partial or full nationalization of military firms in publications including The Nation, The American Conservative, The Middle East Research and Information Project (MERIP), and The Seattle Journal for Social Justice.

keep readingShow less
Modi Trump
Top image credit: White House, February 2025

Trump's India problem could become a Global South crisis

Asia-Pacific

As President Trump’s second term kicked off, all signs pointed to a continued upswing in U.S.-India relations. At a White House press conference in February, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi spoke of his vision to “Make India Great Again” and how the United States under Trump would play a central role. “When it’s MAGA plus MIGA, it becomes a mega partnership for prosperity,” Modi said.

During Trump’s first term, the two populist leaders hosted rallies for each other in their respective countries and cultivated close personal ties. Aside from the Trump-Modi bromance, U.S.-Indian relations have been on a positive trajectory for over two decades, driven in part by mutual suspicion of China. But six months into his second term, Trump has taken several actions that have led to a dramatic downturn in U.S.-India relations, with India-China relations suddenly on the rise.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.