Follow us on social

google cta
Kash Patel

He took Qatar’s money, now Kash Patel handling their FBI files?

Trump's top cop was working for Doha until the election. He just obtained a waiver to deal with a case that landed on his desk.

Reporting | Washington Politics
google cta
google cta

FBI Director Kash Patel promised that he wouldn’t touch any work related to the country of Qatar — until very recently, a lucrative client of his. Now, only a few months into the job, he’s had a change of heart and is already handling official FBI business related to the Gulf country.

After his confirmation hearing, Patel revealed that he worked as a consultant for the Embassy of Qatar until November. Dylan Hedtler-Gaudette, Acting Vice President of Policy & Government Affairs at Project on Government Oversight, explained to RS that federal regulations stipulate that executive branch employees should recuse themselves on issues related to their former employers for a period of one year.

However, employees can avoid this requirement by simply obtaining a waiver — or, as Hedtler-Gaudette put it, “activating the escape hatch.”

According to the new disclosure filing, Patel received this waiver from his agency’s ethics officer for a particular matter related to Qatar on March 4. The new disclosure does not specify what work or case Patel’s waiver is for — but if official FBI business involving Qatar is landing on the Director’s desk and it’s worth asking for a waiver over, it’s a good sign the work carries some weight.

In his ethics disclosure from before his confirmation hearing, Patel pledged to avoid actual and apparent conflicts of interests; “I will not participate personally and substantially in any particular matter involving specific parties in which I know a former client of mine is a party or represents a party for a period of one year after I last provided service to that client or until the client satisfies any outstanding bill, whichever is later, unless I am first authorized to participate.”

It turns out those last seven words did most of the heavylifting.

“This waiver should never have been granted,” Craig Holman, Government Affairs Lobbyist for Public Citizen, told RS. “There is no reason why Patel has to address whatever specific issue this is relating to Qatar when he can just delegate it to someone else in the FBI.”

Patel’s consulting business, Trishul LLC, earned a neat $2.1 million according to his financial disclosure. The Embassy of Qatar is listed as one of nine clients, though it does not provide a breakdown as to how much Patel received from each client. Other clients include a Kremlin-connected Russian filmmaker and the Chinese e-commerce platform Shein.

Patel first began working for Qatar shortly after leaving the Trump administration, where his last post was as chief of staff to the secretary of defense. A source with familiarity of his work explained to RS that Patel signed a contract to advise Qatar on security issues ahead of the World Cup. When the World Cup ended, Patel pivoted to advising the Qatar Embassy on counterterrorism issues and election monitoring, even identifying potential personnel in a future Trump administration.

Patel himself has not released a statement explaining the nature of his work for the Qatari Embassy, leaving some to wonder if he should have registered under the Foreign Agents Registration Act. “Based on everything I have seen, it seems like he probably should have registered as a foreign agent,” explained Hedtler-Gaudette. “If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it probably was a foreign agent,” he added.

In February, Attorney General Pam Bondi — herself a former lobbyist for Qatar — released a memo stating that FARA would only be enforced in cases of “traditional espionage.”

The FBI investigates everything from terrorism to public corruption, including a number of probes which involve foreign governments, leaving no shortage of possibilities of what the waiver could be for. Holman explained that if and when Qatar’s name does pop up in the FBI building again, Patel is likely to seek another waiver. “And, it’s likely to be granted.”

The FBI is also responsible for carrying out investigations into foreign influence; in January, Bob Menendez was sentenced to 11 years in prison for bribery and foreign agent charges. As part of that case, Menendez accepted gold and F1 tickets, among other gifts, in exchange for using his influence to help a New Jersey real estate developer obtain millions of dollars from a Qatari investment fund. On the other hand, Qatar has also been a key partner in negotiating the release of hostages and a ceasefire in Gaza in which security agencies were part of many of the sensitive talks they had — without the specifics of what the waiver for it's impossible to say.

But all of this begs the question — what did Patel seek a waiver for exactly?"


Top photo credit: FBI Director Kash Patel (Maxim Elramsisy/Shutterstock)
google cta
Reporting | Washington Politics
Tony Blair Gaza
Top photo credit: Britain's former Prime Minister Tony Blair attends a world leaders' summit on ending the Gaza war, amid a U.S.-brokered prisoner-hostage swap and ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas, in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, October 13, 2025. REUTERS/Suzanne Plunkett/Pool/File Photo

Phase farce: No way 'Board of Peace' replaces reality in Gaza

Middle East

The Trump administration’s announcements about the Gaza Strip would lead one to believe that implementation of President Trump’s 20-point peace plan, later largely incorporated into a United Nations Security Council resolution, is progressing quite smoothly.

As such, Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff announced this month on social media the “launch of Phase Two” of the plan, “moving from ceasefire to demilitarization, technocratic governance, and reconstruction.” But examination of even just a couple of Witkoff’s assertions in his announcement shows that "smooth" or even "implementation" are bitter overstatements.

keep readingShow less
Trump Polk
Top image credit: Samuele Wikipediano 1348 via wikimedia commons/lev radin via shutterstock.com

On Greenland, Trump wants to be like Polk

Washington Politics

Any hopes that Wednesday’s meeting of Greenland and Denmark’s foreign ministers with Vice President Vance and Secretary Rubio might point toward an end of the Trump administration’s attempts to annex the semiautonomous arctic territory were swiftly disappointed. “Fundamental disagreement” remains, according to Danish Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen.

That these talks would yield no hint of a resolution should not be surprising. Much of Trump’s stated rationale for seeking ownership of Greenland — the need for an increased U.S. military presence, the ability to access the island’s critical mineral deposits, or the alleged imperative to keep the Chinese and Russians at bay — is eminently negotiable and even achievable under the status quo. If these were the president’s real goals he likely could have reached an agreement with Denmark months ago. That this standoff persists is a testament to Trump’s true motive: ownership for its own sake.

keep readingShow less
Swedish military Greenland

Top photo credit: HAGSHULT, SWEDEN- 7 MAY 2024: Military guards during the US Army exercise Swift Response 24 at the Hagshult base, Småland county, Sweden, during Tuesday. (Shutterstock/Sunshine Seeds)

Trump digs in as Europe sends troops to Greenland

Europe

Wednesday’s talks between American, Danish, and Greenlandic officials exposed the unbridgeable gulf between President Trump’s territorial ambitions and respect for sovereignty.

Trump now claims the U.S. needs Greenland to support the Golden Dome missile defense initiative. Meanwhile, European leaders are sending a small number of troops to Greenland.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.