Follow us on social

North Gaza Gazans

Surprise: CIA link to sketchy Israeli aid scheme

Meanwhile, retired Marine tapped to run the project resigns saying it cannot be independent or meet humanitarian standards

Analysis | QiOSK

A former CIA officer who once headed American schemes to train right wing contras in Nicaragua in the 1980s has been working with the Israelis to hatch a new aid organization, call it "independent," and proceed to deploy it on the starving Gaza population with the assistance of foreign entities and U.S. security contractors, according to new reports.

To say something stinks here is an understatement. After the New York Times got a whiff and started writing about how the idea came together shortly after the Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas attacks on Israel, and that it was the brain child of IDF officials, Israeli tech entrepreneurs, and ex-COGAT (state aid coordinators) and one Israel-American venture capitalist, the CEO of the mysterious "Gaza Humanitarian Organization" quit last night.

CEO Jack Wood is a retired U.S. Marine who was on board to lead the fundraising for this effort. Upon his resignation he said in a statement: “It is clear that it is not possible to implement this plan while also strictly adhering to the humanitarian principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality, and independence, which I will not abandon.”

This sets back plans by ex-CIA officer Phillip F. Reilly, who the NYT describes:

As a young C.I.A. operative in the 1980s, Mr. Reilly had helped to train the Contras, right-wing militias fighting Nicaragua’s Marxist government, according to a 2022 podcast interview. Two decades later, he was one of the first U.S. agents to land in Afghanistan after the Sept. 11 attacks, according to the interview. He became the C.I.A. station chief in Kabul, then left to work as a private security expert for groups including Orbis, a Virginia-based consulting firm.

Reilly had engineered the procurement of Safe Reach Solutions, another mysterious U.S. private security firm that has been operating in the Gaza strip since early this year and my colleague Stavroula Pabst has written about for RS given the risks of having private American boots on the ground — for both the local population, and the "boots." The arrangement brings the U.S. closer than ever to the fighting there and in a split second could draw Washington into the conflict directly. It is not clear what Reilly's role is in UG Solutions, the other firm mentioned in past reports, but the New York Times mentions another U.S. based entity, G.H.F. under his purview.

What makes it even more suspicious is Wood told NYT (before his resignation) that these security companies work at "arms length" from the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (by the way there are two of the same name registered, one in the Delaware and the other in Switzerland). But an American lawyer, James Cundiff, registered both Safe Reach Solutions and the Delaware-based foundation and had been serving as a spokesperson for both. Confused yet?

All of this seeming skullduggery belies the fact that no real aid is getting to the civilians of Gaza, that the illegal siege of the population persists, and any idea that a new system will open up assistance this week is likely to be another gambit to force Gazans from their homes, particularly in the north (expulsion) under the auspices of humanitarianism.


Top photo credit: Displaced Gazans in North Gaza. January 2025. (Anes Mohammed/Shutterstock)
Analysis | QiOSK
Ukraine war
Top image credit: HC FOTOSTUDIO via shutterstock.com

Should a Russia-Ukraine peace leave territorial control for later?

Europe

Since the beginning of President Donald Trump’s second term, there have been ongoing diplomatic efforts to broker a peace settlement in the three-year-long war between Russia and Ukraine. So far, however, negotiations have failed to bridge the stark divide between the two sides.

Two of the key contentious issues have been post-war security guarantees for Ukraine and the political status of Ukrainian territory claimed or annexed by Russia. Specifically, regarding territorial sovereignty, Ukraine and Russia have rejected the United States' proposal to “freeze” the war along the current line of conflict as a de facto new border. Ukraine has refused to renounce its claims of sovereignty over territories occupied by Russia (including Crimea, which was annexed in 2014). Russia, in turn, has demanded Ukraine’s recognition of Russia’s territorial claim over the entirety of the four Ukrainian regions, which Russia annexed in 2022.

keep readingShow less
Submarine based cruise missiles
Top photo credit: An official USN rendering of an Ohio-class submarine VLS system firing Tomahawk missiles (Wikipedia/US Navy)

Navy pushing billions for sea-based nukes that nobody seems to want

Military Industrial Complex

Sea-launched, nuclear-armed cruise missiles, or SLCM-Ns, were considered unnecessary for U.S. national security for years. But now, the Navy’s pushing to bring SLCM-Ns back — even if doing so costs taxpayers billions.

Indeed, U.S. Navy Vice Admiral Johnny Wolfe told House Armed Services Committee members on May 7 that the Navy was fast tracking the development of the Sea-Launched Cruise Missile - Nuclear, known as the SLCM-N, along with the Trident II D5 Strategic Weapons System and hypersonic missiles.

keep readingShow less
lockheed martin
Top photo credit: The Lockheed Martin Corporation on display during the Seoul International Aerospace and Defense Exhibition(ADEX) 2023 at the Seoul Air Base on October 18, 2023 in Seongnam, south of Seoul. (Photo by Chris Jung/NurPhoto)

Bipartisan bill seeks to put arms sales lobbyists on ice for 3-years

Military Industrial Complex

President Donald Trump announced some $200 billion in potential arms sales to Saudi Arabia and Qatar a week ago — this is huge potential business for major U.S. defense contractors like RTX, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and General Atomics, all of which deploy armies of lobbyists in Washington each year to influence such contracts.

A new bipartisan bill dropping this week will impose some of the strictest bans to date to make sure former government officials aren’t lobbying on behalf of those big companies or foreign countries to get their share of this massive federal pie. In fact, the legislation will make it a crime to do so.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.