Follow us on social

North Gaza Gazans

Surprise: CIA link to sketchy Israeli aid scheme

Meanwhile, retired Marine tapped to run the project resigns saying it cannot be independent or meet humanitarian standards

Analysis | QiOSK

A former CIA officer who once headed American schemes to train right wing contras in Nicaragua in the 1980s has been working with the Israelis to hatch a new aid organization, call it "independent," and proceed to deploy it on the starving Gaza population with the assistance of foreign entities and U.S. security contractors, according to new reports.

To say something stinks here is an understatement. After the New York Times got a whiff and started writing about how the idea came together shortly after the Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas attacks on Israel, and that it was the brain child of IDF officials, Israeli tech entrepreneurs, and ex-COGAT (state aid coordinators) and one Israel-American venture capitalist, the CEO of the mysterious "Gaza Humanitarian Organization" quit last night.

CEO Jack Wood is a retired U.S. Marine who was on board to lead the fundraising for this effort. Upon his resignation he said in a statement: “It is clear that it is not possible to implement this plan while also strictly adhering to the humanitarian principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality, and independence, which I will not abandon.”

This sets back plans by ex-CIA officer Phillip F. Reilly, who the NYT describes:

As a young C.I.A. operative in the 1980s, Mr. Reilly had helped to train the Contras, right-wing militias fighting Nicaragua’s Marxist government, according to a 2022 podcast interview. Two decades later, he was one of the first U.S. agents to land in Afghanistan after the Sept. 11 attacks, according to the interview. He became the C.I.A. station chief in Kabul, then left to work as a private security expert for groups including Orbis, a Virginia-based consulting firm.

Reilly had engineered the procurement of Safe Reach Solutions, another mysterious U.S. private security firm that has been operating in the Gaza strip since early this year and my colleague Stavroula Pabst has written about for RS given the risks of having private American boots on the ground — for both the local population, and the "boots." The arrangement brings the U.S. closer than ever to the fighting there and in a split second could draw Washington into the conflict directly. It is not clear what Reilly's role is in UG Solutions, the other firm mentioned in past reports, but the New York Times mentions another U.S. based entity, G.H.F. under his purview.

What makes it even more suspicious is Wood told NYT (before his resignation) that these security companies work at "arms length" from the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (by the way there are two of the same name registered, one in the Delaware and the other in Switzerland). But an American lawyer, James Cundiff, registered both Safe Reach Solutions and the Delaware-based foundation and had been serving as a spokesperson for both. Confused yet?

All of this seeming skullduggery belies the fact that no real aid is getting to the civilians of Gaza, that the illegal siege of the population persists, and any idea that a new system will open up assistance this week is likely to be another gambit to force Gazans from their homes, particularly in the north (expulsion) under the auspices of humanitarianism.


Top photo credit: Displaced Gazans in North Gaza. January 2025. (Anes Mohammed/Shutterstock)
Analysis | QiOSK
'Security guarantees' dominate talks but remain undefined
Top photo credit: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy speaks during a meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump, French President Emmanuel Macron, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, and Finland's President Alexander Stubb amid negotiations to end the Russian war in Ukraine, at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., August 18, 2025. REUTERS/Al Drago

'Security guarantees' dominate talks but remain undefined

Europe

President Donald Trump met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and a host of European leaders in the White House Monday to discuss a framework for a deal to end the war. The big takeaway: that all parties appear to agree that the U.S. and Europe would provide some sort of postwar security guarantees to deter another Russian invasion.

What that might look like is still undefined. Trump also suggested an agreement would require “possible exchanges of territory” and consider the “war lines” between Ukraine and Russia, though this issue did not appear to take center stage Monday. Furthermore, Trump said there could be a future “trilateral” meeting set for the leaders of the U.S., Ukraine, and Russia, and reportedly interrupted the afternoon meeting with the European leaders to speak with Russian President Vladimir Putin on the phone.

keep readingShow less
Zelensky White House Keith Kellogg
Top photo credit: Handout - Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, left, speaks with U.S. Special Presidential Envoy for Ukraine, Ret. General Keith Kellogg prior to their meeting, August 18, 2025 in Washington, D.C. Zelenskyy met with Kellogg before the planned meeting with President Donald Trump later in the day. Photo by Ukrainian Presidential Press Office via ABACAPRESS.COM

Zelensky White House meeting could spell end of the war

Europe

If Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky cannot agree in principle with the contours of a peace deal mapped out by President Trump, then the war will continue into 2026. I’d encourage him to take the deal, even if it may cause him to lose power.

The stakes couldn’t be higher ahead of the showdown in the Oval Office today between President Donald Trump and President Zelensky, supported by EU leaders and the Secretary General of NATO.

keep readingShow less
Congo Rwanda peace
Top image credit: FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a meeting with Democratic Republic of the Congo's Foreign Minister Therese Kayikwamba Wagner and Rwanda's Foreign Minister Olivier Nduhungirehe in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington D.C., June 27, 2025. REUTERS/Ken Cedeno/File Photo

US companies rush into Congo before ink is dry on peace deal

Africa

On June 27, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Rwanda signed a peace agreement in Washington, brokered by the United States. About a month later, on August 1, they agreed to a Regional Economic Integration Framework — another U.S.-brokered initiative linking the peace process to cross-border economic cooperation.

All of this has been heralded as a “historic turning point” that could end years of conflict in eastern Congo between the M23 rebel movement, backed by Rwanda, and the Congolese state.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.