Follow us on social

google cta
Pete Hegseth Iran Bombings CNN Pentagon

Trump: Question the strikes = demeaning the troops

Admin officials say media should apologize to USAF pilots for questioning efficacy of the Iran bombing

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

President Trump and other White House officials are suggesting that questioning the decision and efficacy of bombing Iran shows a lack of patriotism and disparages American troops.

These claims harken back to the Iraq War when supporters of the policy insisted that critics or skeptics were simply anti-American or didn’t support the troops.

In a media press conference today, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth discussed the operation’s success and fielded questions from the press, while President Trump shared his opinion on social media.

“Secretary of Defense (War!) Pete Hegseth, together with Military Representatives, will be holding a Major News Conference tomorrow morning at 8 A.M. EST at The Pentagon, in order to fight for the Dignity of our Great American Pilots,” posted President Donald Trump.

“After 36 hours of dangerously flying through Enemy Territory, they landed, they knew the Success was LEGENDARY, and then, two days later, they started reading Fake News by CNN and The Failing New York Times. They felt terribly!”

Hegseth repeated the shopworn trope during the presser.

“What's really happening is you're undermining the success of incredible B-2 pilots and incredible F-35 pilots and incredible refuelers and incredible air defenders who accomplished their mission, set back a nuclear program in ways that other presidents would have dreamed,” Hegseth told reporters during the news conference.

“How about we celebrate that? How about we talk about how special America is, that we — only we have these capabilities? I think it's too much to ask, unfortunately, for the fake news.”

The CNN report, based on a preliminary Defense Intelligence Agency assessment, suggested the strikes did not hit all of their targets and likely only set Tehran’s nuclear program back months, rather than the originally claimed “obliteration.”

The report’s accuracy has been contested by members of Trump’s administration, including an alternative assessment, also covered by CNN, by CIA Director John Ratcliffe on Wednesday.

“Based on everything we have seen — and I’ve seen it all — our bombing campaign obliterated Iran’s ability to create nuclear weapons,” Hegseth said. “Our massive bombs hit exactly the right spot at each target and worked perfectly.”

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt also challenged the DIA report and intent of the reporters, saying on Wednesday, “the leaking of this alleged assessment is a clear attempt to demean President Trump, and discredit the brave fighter pilots who conducted a perfectly executed mission to obliterate Iran’s nuclear program.”

Trump demanded an apology.

“FAKE NEWS REPORTERS FROM CNN & THE NEW YORK TIMES SHOULD BE FIRED, IMMEDIATELY!!! BAD PEOPLE WITH EVIL INTENTIONS!!!” chided Trump, adding “the Fake News should fire everyone involved in this Witch Hunt, and apologize to our great warriors, and everyone else!”

As a strategy to rebuff challenges to its claims of “mission accomplished,” the Trump administration is sprinkling in suggestions that those who don’t trust the administration’s judgment are un-American or are somehow insulting the pilots who ran the mission themselves. But this isn’t new.

“Hegemonic discourse framed troop support as support for the mission of the (Iraq) War. The rhetorical phrase ‘support the troops’ is found on a variety of publicly available White House documents regarding the Iraq War, including budget requests that encouraged Congress to approve ad-hoc funding for the war,” claims Dr. Lisa A. Leitz, professor and chair of the Department of Peace Studies at Chapman University.

She adds, “This rhetoric intensified during the 2004 U.S. Presidential election. For example, a widely distributed Bush-Cheney 2004 campaign advertisement characterized Sen. Kerry’s vote against continued war funding as a vote “against funding our soldiers.”


Top photo credit: Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine (DoD photo by U.S. Navy Petty Officer 1st Class Alexander Kubitza)
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
Colby: Israel is fighting a different war in Iran
Top image credit: Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Elbridge Colby speaks at a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee. (Screengrab via armed-services.senate.gov)

Colby: Israel is fighting a different war in Iran

QiOSK

The U.S. is pursuing “scoped and reasonable objectives” in its military campaign against Iran and is not seeking regime change through force, argued Undersecretary of Defense Elbridge Colby in a Tuesday Senate hearing.

When pressed about why the campaign began with the killing of Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, Colby declined to comment directly. “I’m talking about the goals of the American military campaign,” he told the Senate Armed Services Committee. “Those are Israeli operations.”

keep readingShow less
US missiles
Top photo credit: . DoD photo by Staff Sgt. Vince Parker, U.S. Air Force.

Trump: We have 'unlimited' weapons to fight 'forever' war

QiOSK

In a startling Truth Social post overnight on Monday, President Donald Trump defied reality and claimed that U.S. weapons were "unlimited" and the U.S. could fight "forever" with "these supplies."


keep readingShow less
Did the US only attack Iran because of Israel?
Top image credit: President Donald J. Trump holds a joint news conference at the White House with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Feb. 4, 2025. (Shutterstock/ Joshua Sukoff)

Did the US only attack Iran because of Israel?

QiOSK

In the months that led up to the Iraq War, the Bush administration went to extraordinary lengths to convince the world of the need to oust Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. Leading officials laid out their case in public, sharing what they claimed was evidence that Iraq was moving rapidly toward the deployment of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. When U.S. tanks rolled across the border, everyone knew the justification: the U.S. was determined to thwart Iraq’s development of weapons of mass destruction, however fictitious that threat would later prove to be.

In the months that led up to the Iran War, the Trump administration took a different tack. President Trump spoke only occasionally of Iran, offering a smattering of justifications for growing U.S. tensions with the country. He claimed without evidence that Iran was rebuilding its nuclear program after the U.S.-Israeli attack last June and even developing missiles that could strike the United States. But he insisted that Tehran could make a deal with seven magic words: “we will never have a nuclear weapon.”

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.