Follow us on social

Gaza GHF food distribution

Charges of US contractor shootings in Gaza recall ugly Blackwater era

Reports indicate American mercenaries guarding aid sites are using live ammo and shooting into crowds of desperate Palestinians

Analysis | QiOSK

The U.S. is once again entangled in a contractor scandal in a combat zone — this time in Gaza.

During the Iraq War, the name Blackwater became shorthand for contractor abuse after the 2007 Nisour Square massacre, where 17 civilians were killed. Since then, Washington has leaned heavily on private contractors, primarily for logistics, but also for security roles that keep U.S. forces out of direct sight.

“Contractor” has at times become a sanitized term for “mercenary” in the United States, yet the world sees them much like Russia’s Wagner Group: extensions of state power. If the latest reports of abuse are true, the damage won’t be limited to Gaza — it will land squarely on America’s credibility. Washington can’t subcontract responsibility.

There were already serious concerns about the practices and effectiveness of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). But the current scandal broke when two U.S. contractors working at aid distribution sites under GHF told the Associated Press — on condition of anonymity — that some of their colleagues were using live ammunition, stun grenades, and pepper spray against Palestinians trying to get food.

The contractors provided disturbing video and photo evidence, claiming that poorly trained guards with little oversight were sometimes firing directly toward the crowd.

GHF and its subcontractor, Safe Reach Solutions, deny any serious injuries and insist that live fire was used only as a warning to control crowds. However, both the contractors’ accounts and the footage suggest otherwise. Launched in February 2025 to replace the U.N. aid system amid an Israeli blockade, the U.S.-backed GHF has already seen nearly one-third of its June distributions result in injuries, according to internal reports.

Moreover, this isn’t the first time the American contractors made headlines at the sites, including a meltdown when the aid centers were first launched.

Externally, the Gaza Health Ministry has reported more than 600 Palestinian deaths and 4,200 wounded at these aid centers since they opened. The Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported last week, based on IDF soldier interviews, that forces were ordered to deliberately shoot at unarmed Gazans at these sites, even when no threat was present.

The implications for the U.S. are severe — not only does it raise the possibility that American contractors are directly harming or even killing Palestinian civilians, but it also revives the controversial precedent of outsourcing combat-zone roles. There’s a reason the United Nations and not armed U.S. contractors was once tasked with aid distribution. The primary victims, of course, are Palestinians being hurt or terrorized while trying to feed their families. But the reputational and moral cost to the United States is real, as is the erosion of norms, like the basic one that you don’t shoot at starving people.

You can watch the AP’s full video here.

For its part the GHF has released a statement on the allegations in the AP story:

“GHF launched an immediate investigation when the Associated Press first brought these allegations to our attention. Based on time-stamped video footage and sworn witness statements, we have concluded that the claims in the AP’s story are categorically false. At no point were civilians under fire at a GHF distribution site. The gunfire heard in the video was confirmed to have originated from the IDF, who was outside the immediate vicinity of the GHF distribution site. It was not directed at individuals, and no one was shot or injured.


Top photo credit: Screengrab of AP report on shootings at Gaza Humanitarian Foundation distribution sites in Gaza
Analysis | QiOSK
syria damascus bombing
Top image credit: A man walks with a Syrian flag, after powerful airstrikes shook Damascus on Wednesday, targeting the defense ministry, as Israel vowed to destroy Syrian government forces attacking Druze communities in southern Syria and demanded their withdrawal, in Damascus July 16, 2025. REUTERS/Khalil Ashawi

Israel blindsides Trump in self-serving effort to break up Syria

Middle East

Just days before Israeli F-35s screamed over Damascus, the improbable seemed within reach. U.S. Special Envoy Tom Barrack, leveraging his dual role as Ambassador to Turkey and point man on Syria, was brokering painstaking back-channel talks between two historic enemies.

The Syrian government, led by interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa, the former Islamist militant turned statesman, signaled openness to a non-aggression pact with Israel. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar publicly welcomed Syria into “the peace and normalization circle in the Middle East.”

keep readingShow less
US Dollar
Top image credit: Yingko via shutterstock.com

Are Trump's aggressive policies weakening the dollar?

Global Crises

There has been an extraordinary flurry of announcements from the Trump administration about its preferred domestic and international policies since January 20.

Policies have been threatened, announced, postponed, canceled, and reinstated with greater or lesser severity. But underneath this hyperactivity, a clear pattern of economic policy preferences is emerging.

keep readingShow less
Masoud Pezeshkian
Top image credit: 6/22/2025 Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, center, attends a protest following U.S. attacks on nuclear sites, in a square in central Tehran on sunday, Jun 22, 2025. (Photo by Sobhan Farajvan/Pacific Press/Sipa USA VIA REUTERS)

What the West misunderstands about Iran

Middle East

When Iranian officials were preparing for the sixth round of negotiations with their U.S. counterparts over the country’s nuclear program, Israel launched a surprise military strike. Rather than condemning the attack, the United States and Europe stood by — or even applauded. The German Chancellor framed it as “the dirty work Israel is doing for all of us.” This moment only reinforced what Iranian leaders have long believed: that the world demands their surrender — and leaves them alone, at constant risk of betrayal and invasion.

Unless the West begins to understand Iranian history — and the mindset it has created among Iranian leaders — it will continue to misread Tehran’s actions. What often looks like aggression or stubbornness from the outside is, in the minds of Iranian decision-makers, an act of defense grounded in deep national memory.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.